Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Verbal Communication Human Languages Language is the archives of history. (Ralph Waldo Emerson) By words the mind winged. (Aristophanes) Language has created the word ‘loneliness’ to express the pain of being alone and the word ‘solitude’ to express the joy of being alone. (Paul Tillich) We can receive, store, manipulate, and generate symbols to represent things, feelings and ideas. Common language evokes group identity; signals ingroup linkage and outgroup differentiation Major Topics Understanding human languages Understanding verbal communication Communication styles: comparisons Studying critical incidents Audience expectations: differences Human language: distinctive features A. Language: arbitrary symbolic system that names feelings, experiences, ideas, objects, events, groups, people, and other phenomena B. Arbitrariness: words have no innate meaning C. Abstractness: allows abstract hypothetical thinking: Experiential context and Cultural context D. Meaning-centeredness: five levels of meaning 1. Discourse meaning: denotative and connotative meanings a. Denotative: objective, dictionary meaning b. Connotative: subjective, informal meaning 2. Communicative meaning: intention or goal behind the utterance 3. Relational meaning: relational distance and intimacy 4. Situational meaning: physical and social context 5. Conventional meaning: coordinate the verbal message with cultural norms E. Creativity: using language to: 1. Talk about things far away in space and time (displacement feature) 2. Say things never said before (productivity feature) 3. Pass on heritage and wisdom (traditional transmission feature) Understanding multiple language rules A. Phonological rules (or phonology): combining of phonemes (basic sound units of a word) B. Morphological rules (or morphology): combining phonemes to make morphemes (smallest units of meaning, a word or part or a word) C. Syntactic rules (or syntactics): word sequence and grammar practices D. Semantic rules (semantics): features of meaning attached to words (including two levels: denotative and connotative meanings) E. Pragmatic rules (pragmatics): contextual rules that govern language use Understanding communication and verbal styles Communication personality: the manner in which you present yourself. Communication style: the way someone prefers to give and receive information; it develops from personality and cultural influences. Pragmatics of language usage: the cultural expectations of how, when, where, with whom, and under what situational conditions certain verbal expressions are preferred, prohibited, or prescribed Verbal style: the tone of voice, the speaker’s intention, and the verbal content reflect our way of speaking, and our verbal style in turn reflects our cultural and personal values and sentiments. Verbal communication Verbal communication enables children to learn: see handouts. Verbal communication: example Assumptions about communication styles Minor communication style differences can have a major negative impact on relationships. Communication style differences well-utilized can have a positive synergistic effect. Multiple communication styles exist in every culture. Every person can exhibit multiple styles, depending on the context. Communication styles are adaptive, not static. All communication styles have advantages and disadvantages. Components of Communication styles Orientation to interaction: individualistic Vs interpersonal (goal- or process-oriented) objective Vs subjective (sender- or receiver-oriented) Code preference: verbal Vs nonverbal Interaction format: persuasive Vs harmonizing quantitative Vs holistic pragmatic Vs process-oriented Differences in the Thinking Pattern Western Vs Oriental Straight line Vs a spiral Speaker/writer’s responsibility Vs Listener/ reader’s responsibility Explicit and plain Vs highly figurative, imagery Inductive (experiential) Vs deductive (didactic) Proof and evidence Vs assertion without proof Five Communication Contrasts Linear versus Circular = straight line discussion versus a more circular approach Direct versus Indirect = meaning conveyed by words versus through suggestion Detached versus Attached = objective presentation versus expressive style Intellectual Engagement versus Relational Engagement = Discussion is about the task versus discussion about the task and the person Concrete versus Abstract = example driven versus theory driven discussion Linear: Discussion is conducted in a straight line, almost like an outline, with the connections among the points stated as you move towards an end point, which is stated explicitly. There is a low reliance on context and a strong reliance on words. Cut to the chase, where the rubber meets the road! Circular (contextual) Discussion is conducted in a circular manner, telling stories and developing a context around the main point, which is often unstated because the listener will get the point after I give them all the information. There is a high reliance on context. Once you have the relevant information, you’ll know what I mean. Direct: Meaning is conveyed through explicit statements made directly to the people involved with little reliance on contextual factors such as situation and timing. What you see is what you get! Tell it like it is! Indirect: Meaning is conveyed by suggestion, implication, nonverbal behavior, and other contextual cues; for instance, statements intended for one person may be made within earshot of a different person. It is possible that messages will be sent through a third-party intermediary. Mostly, however, this style allows one to avoid confronting another person or cause them to lose face. What you get is what you manage to see! Attached: Issues are discussed with feeling and emotion, conveying the speaker's personal stake in the issue and the outcome. This shows the passion someone feels in a situation or for an issue. If it’s important, it’s worth getting worked up over! Detached: Issues are discussed with calmness and objectivity, conveying the speaker's ability to weigh all the factors impersonally. It is important to be objective. If it’s important, it shouldn’t be tainted by personal bias! Intellectual Engagement: Any disagreement with ideas is stated directly, with the assumption that only the idea, not the relationship, is being attacked. This is an intellectual style found in some European countries. We’re just arguing-don’t take it personally! Relational Engagement: Relational issues and problems are confronted directly, while intellectual disagreement is handled more subtly and indirectly. If you have a problem with someone, it helps to talk things over, albeit in an non-confrontational manner. In an intellectual debate, it is important to be tread softly. Be authentic about your feelings and respectful of other's ideas. Concrete: Issues are best understood through stories, metaphors, allegories, and examples, with emphasis on the specific rather than the general. What’s an example? Abstract: Issues are best understood through theories, principles, and data, with emphasis on the general rather than the specific. What’s the principle? Intercultural low-context and high-context communication framework A. Defining low-context and high-context communication 1. Low-context communication (LCC): intention or meaning is best expressed through explicit verbal messages a. Communication patterns of direct verbal mode b. Speaker is responsible for clear message decoded easily 2. High-context communication (HCC): intention or meaning is best conveyed through the context and nonverbal channels a. Communication patterns of indirect verbal mode b. Receiver assumes the responsibility to infer the hidden or contextual meanings of the message c. May be understated to emotionally animated in tone B. Low-context and high-context communication examples 1. LCC: speakers say everything on their minds with no restraints 2. HCC: indirect hints, nonverbal signals to preserve face and relationship Low-context and high-context verbal style comparisons A. Direct and indirect verbal styles 1. Direct: statement in forthright tone clearly reveals speakers intentions 2. Indirect: statement in softer tone camouflages speakers actual intentions (no need to hurt feelings) B. Complementary, animated, and understated verbal styles 1. Complementary: matter-of-fact tone in delivering verbal message 2. Animated: conveys emotional expressiveness and vitality 3. Understated: displays more emotional restraint or stoicism C. Informal and formal verbal styles 1. Informal: upholding informality, and casualness, and role suspension 2. Formal: status-based, formal interaction reflects large power distance D. Beliefs expressed in talk and silence 1. High-context cultures: silence can make understanding possible 2. Western rhetorical model: silence viewed as empty pauses Intercultural persuasion process A. Linear-logic versus spiral-logic persuasion 1. Linear persuasion style has two forms: a. Factual-inductive: present facts, then draw conclusion b. Axiomatic-deductive: present general principles then move to fill in specific details 2. Spiral persuasion style ranges from the dramatic to the subtle a. Dramatic style: effusive metaphors, adjectives, stories b. Subtle style: hints, implicit analogies, subtle nonverbal gestures B. Self-credentialing and self-humbling verbal modes 1. Self-credentialing: draw attention to ones abilities, accomplishments 2. Self-humbling: verbal restraints, hesitations, and use of self-deprecation concerning ones performance C. Face-negotiation and requesting strategies 1. Face: a claimed sense of social self-worth a person wants others to have of her or him 2. Two types of face concerns in conversations: a. Self-face concern: interest in upholding our own identities and favorable self-images b. Other-face concern: interest in providing identity respect and support for the other persons interests or needs 3. Facework: verbal and nonverbal behaviors to maintain or restore face loss and to uphold and honor face gain a. Face loss: treated in a way that challenges, threatens, or ignores our identity claims b. Face-saving issues: how to protect our own or others face from being embarrassed 4. Requesting strategies: a. U.S. managers: open invitation, promises, direct compliments b. Japanese managers: altruistic strategies or appeals to duty What’s your communication style? Test Your Communication Styles 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. I deal with problems in a systematic way. I may take the opposite view on a topic just for the sake of discussion. I like to give lots of information before stating my main point. I find the step-to-step approach very effective. It is necessary to give background for any topic that is discussed. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. It is easier to understand a topic if the speaker gives examples of what he or she is talking about. I use my hands a lot when expressing myself. I feel strongly about some topics and I say so. Debating is a good way to get things sorted out. I need proof to accept statements that are made. Types of communication styles Bennet and Paige (1993, 1996) Linear – circular Direct – indirect Low context – high context Detached – attached Intellectual – relational Task-centered – person-centered Procedural - personal Types of communication style Ting Toomey (1999) Direct – indirect Person-oriented – status-oriented Self-enhancement – self-effacement Talk - silence Types of communication style Gudykunst and Ting-Toomey (1988) Direct – indirect Elaborate – succinct Personal – contextual Instrumental - affective Studying the critical incidents Are you mad at me? A motivational speech? Audience expectations What makes a presentation successful? Summary Language permits us to remember the past, deal with the present, and anticipate and plan for the future. Language serves as a guide to how a culture perceives reality. Each of us learns and uses language as we do because of our cultural background. Communication style varies from culture to culture, but one’s communicative style is adaptive and can be developed.