Download Treating generalised anxiety disorder

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Political abuse of psychiatry wikipedia , lookup

Asperger syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Antipsychotic wikipedia , lookup

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders wikipedia , lookup

Depersonalization disorder wikipedia , lookup

Conduct disorder wikipedia , lookup

Moral treatment wikipedia , lookup

Dysthymia wikipedia , lookup

Bipolar II disorder wikipedia , lookup

History of psychiatric institutions wikipedia , lookup

Critical Psychiatry Network wikipedia , lookup

Spectrum disorder wikipedia , lookup

Child psychopathology wikipedia , lookup

Study 329 wikipedia , lookup

History of mental disorders wikipedia , lookup

Narcissistic personality disorder wikipedia , lookup

Dissociative identity disorder wikipedia , lookup

Pyotr Gannushkin wikipedia , lookup

Anxiety disorder wikipedia , lookup

Emergency psychiatry wikipedia , lookup

Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup

Panic disorder wikipedia , lookup

Conversion disorder wikipedia , lookup

Separation anxiety disorder wikipedia , lookup

History of psychiatry wikipedia , lookup

Controversy surrounding psychiatry wikipedia , lookup

Generalized anxiety disorder wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
LAPPfizersatellitekr2.qxd
27/7/09
16:09
Page 2
Satellite meeting
Latest Advances in Psychiatry: GAD
Treating generalised anxiety
disorder: room to improve
In a Pfizer-sponsored satellite meeting at the Latest Advances in Psychiatry Symposium
in London in March, Dr David Baldwin, Reader in Psychiatry and Honorary Consultant
Psychiatrist at University of Southampton, reviewed the drug treatment of generalised
anxiety disorder. Medical writer, Mark Greener, reports.
G
Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD)
is relatively common – one in every
20 people suffers from the condition
during their lifetime. GAD potentially causes significant morbidity,
increases the risk of concurrent disorders, and is associated with considerable economic costs. Indeed,
the distress associated with GAD
can be so marked as to induce suicide ideation and attempts.
Drugs are a mainstay of GAD
management. Unfortunately, current
pharmacological interventions leave
considerable room for improvement.
For example, many patients fail to
show an adequate response. Eight to
12 weeks’ treatment with SSRIs in
adults with GAD produces response
rates of 52-68 per cent, compared
with 37-63 per cent with placebo.
SNRIs produce response rates of
between 49 per cent and 81 per cent
during treatment that lasts 8 to 28
weeks. This compares with response
rates of 33 per cent to 48 per cent
with placebo. During treatment with
pregabalin lasting between four and
eight weeks, the response rates were
44 per cent to 61 per cent, compared
with 28 per cent to 48 per cent with
placebo. A recent systematic review
and meta-analysis indicated less risk
of discontinuation due to inefficacy
with benzodiazepines, compared
with placebo (relative risk [RR]
0.29), in patients with GAD. On the
other hand, benzodiazepines’ impact
on all-cause patient discontinuation
was inconclusive (RR 0.78).1
However, there is no consensus
about the definition of symptomatic
remission, which complicates evaluation of the evidence base. When
changes in Clinical Global
Impressions scale (CGI) and disorder-specific symptom scores in studies assessing escitalopram for major
depression, panic disorder, GAD
and social anxiety disorder have
been compared, the dif ferences
between placebo and escitalopram’s
effect ranged from 0.32 to 0.59 on
the CGI-S and CGI-I and from 0.32
to 0.50 on disease-specific rating
scales. A comparison of the two
scoring systems suggests that a 50
per cent reduction in scores on the
former (a typical measure of remission) might be too conservative.2
Predicting prognosis in GAD
Several factors influence prognosis
in GAD, which further complicates
the evidence base. A shorter duration of symptoms, co-morbid dysthymia, psychiatric co-morbidity
(such as a history of depression or
panic disorder), and severity of psychosocial impairment predict a better prognosis. Lower symptom
severity, a history of benzodiazepine
use and a longer duration of
untreated illness seem to predict a
worse outcome.
Furthermore, certain sideeffects can compromise outcomes.
For example, GPs and psychiatrists
do not routinely address sexual dysfunction in anxiety disorders, which
28 Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry
can adversely affect self-esteem,
mood and relationships. Sexual dysfunction in anxiety disorders can
arise from several possible causes,
including antidepressants. The
prevalence and severity of sexual
dysfunction varies between and
within psychopharmacological
classes. Pregabalin seems to be associated with a relatively low risk of
sexual dysfunction. For example, in
clinical studies, the rates of abnormal ejaculation and impotence in
GAD were 4 per cent and 3 per cent
respectively. This compared with
none and 1 per cent respectively in
the placebo arms. Sexual dysfunction associated with GAD tends to
persist and is hard to treat.
Therefore, prescribers should consider a treatment’s propensity to
cause sexual dysfunction when
selecting the most appropriate intervention for each patient.
Sleep disturbances both add to
the burden imposed by GAD and
complicate management. Between 7
per cent and 14 per cent of cases of
chronic insomnia are associated with
GAD and the presence of sleep disturbances supports the diagnosis.
Moreover, insomnia is often a prodromal symptom that heralds a full
relapse and is a common persistent
residual symptom. However, SSRIs
can be associated with sleep disturbances. In a study assessing escitalopram and paroxetine in GAD, the
rates of fatigue and insomnia were 2.9
per cent and 2.2 per cent respectively
with placebo. The rates for escitalopram 20mg were 16.5 per cent and
10.5 per cent respectively, and 8.6 per
cent and 10.8 per cent for paroxetine
20mg.3 In contrast, the PEACE study
suggests that pregabalin reduces
sleep problems and disturbances
compared with placebo.
Rethinking the time course
Psychiatrists generally regard GAD
as a chronic disease waxing and
waning in intensity. However, a
www.progressnp.com
LAPPfizersatellitekr2.qxd
27/7/09
16:09
Page 3
Satellite meeting
Latest Advances in Psychiatry: GAD
recent 22-year follow-up study that
enrolled 105 patients, found that 52
per cent were symptom free, while
29 per cent experienced sub-threshold symptoms. Sixteen per cent
endured symptoms daily over the
previous 12 months. Therefore,
rather than following a chronic
course, GAD symptoms tend to
resolve and reappear. Against this
background, many patients will
cease pharmacological treatment
during the course of the disease
and, therefore, potentially experience discontinuation symptoms.
Discontinuation symptoms are
typically mild and transitory, but are
occasionally severe and distressing.
As predicting which patients are
most likely to endure discontinuation symptoms is problematic, many
GPs and psychiatrists taper the dose.
However, studies have not established unequivocally the value of
tapering. On the other hand, it is
clear that antidepressants differ in
their propensity to cause discontinuation symptoms.4 The risk with pregabalin is dose-related. However,
doses of 150-400mg seem to be associated with rates that are not statistically significantly different from
placebo.
The longitudinal course of many
cases of GAD suggests that relapse
prevention is rational. Paroxetine,
escitalopram, duloxetine, quetiapine
and pregabalin reduce the risk of
relapse. For example, one study
enrolled GAD patients who previously responded to pregabalin.
Patients received pregabalin (450mg
daily) or placebo for 24 weeks. By the
end of the study, 65 per cent taking
placebo had relapsed compared with
42 per cent of pregabalin users. No
safety concerns emerged during
long-term treatment.5
There are several possible
options if patients do not show an
adequate response, including:
increasing the dose; switching to an
alternative, eg cognitive behavioural
www.progressnp.com
Study
Treatment
Pande et al, 2003
Pande et al, 2000
Pregabalin
Pregabalin
Lorazepam
Feltner et al, 2003
Pregabalin
Lorazepam
Rickels et al, 2005
Pregabalin
Alprazolam
Montgomery et al, 2006 Pregabalin
Venlafaxine
Pohl et al, 2005
Pregabalin
Montgomery et al, 2008 Pregabalin
Dose
(mg daily)
Length
(wks)
Active
response (%)
150, 600
150. 600
6
150, 600
6
300, 450, 600
1.5
400, 600
75
200, 400, 450
150-600 (mean 270)
4
4
NS, 47*
28
No significant difference in
efficacy for any treatment vs placebo
47.8, 49.2
42.4
56.3
61***, 44, 51**
31
45*
56*, 59*
42
61**
56**, 55**, 59**
34
CGI-I: 58.4
48.4 NS
4
4
6
6
8
Placebo
response (%)
Figure 1. Response rates with pregabalin in acute treatment: double-blind randomised placebo-controlled
studies. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.0001; NS, not significantly different; advantage over placebo
therapy (CBT), buspirone, agomelatine or quetiapine; augmentation with
olanzapine or risperidone; combinations of drug and psychological
treatment; and complementar y
approaches. For example, azapirones
are effective in the acute treatment of
GAD, especially if patients are benzodiazepine-naïve. However, azapirones
are less well tolerated than benzodiazepines.6 The role of CBT in GAD
is currently unclear. There is a need
for a large randomised controlled
trial of CBT versus SSRIs alone and
the two treatments in combination.7
Finally, several possible targets
could yield new treatments for GAD,
which could increase the options
available for patients who do not
respond adequately to first-line therapies. These include: melatonin
receptor agonists; nicotinic receptor
antagonists and partial agonists;
metabotropic glutamate receptor
and cholecystokinin antagonists;
neuropeptide Y and adenosine A1
and A2A receptor agonists.
Nevertheless, there is a need to
expand the evidence base in GAD to
help optimise the use of new and
existing treatments. For example,
studies need to characterise neuropsychological or genetic factors that
predict response and to ascertain
the impact of co-morbid depressive
disorders on outcomes. There is
also a need for dose escalation studies after initial non-response and
larger placebo-controlled augmentation trials of, for example, pregabalin, buspirone, agomelatine and
antipsychotics. Nevertheless, the
growing pharmacological armamentarium for GAD offers GPs and psychiatrists the prospect of better
managing this common and often
debilitating disease.
References
1. Martin JL, Sainz-Pardo M, et al. Benzodiazepines in
generalized anxiety disorder: heterogeneity of outcomes based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Psychopharmacol 2007;21:774-82.
2. Bandelow B, Baldwin DS, Dolberg OT, et al.What is
the threshold for symptomatic response and remission for major depressive disorder, panic disorder,
social anxiety disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder? J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67:1428-34.
3. Baldwin DS, Huusom AK, Maehlum E. Escitalopram
and paroxetine in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder: randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Br J Psychiatry 2006;189:264-72.
4. Baldwin DS, Montgomery SA, Nil R, et al.
Discontinuation symptoms in depression and anxiety
disorders. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2007;10:73-84.
5. Feltner D, Wittchen HU, Kavoussi R, et al. Longterm efficacy of pregabalin in generalized anxiety disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2008;23:18-28.
6. Chessick CA,Allen MH,Thase ME, et al.Azapirones
for generalized anxiety disorder. Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews 2006. DOI 10.1002/
14651858.CD006115.
7. Bandelow B, Baldwin DS, Dolberg OT, et al.What is
the threshold for symptomatic response and remission for major depressive disorder, panic disorder,
social anxiety disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder? J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67:1428-34.
Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry 29