Download T-Vector Direction Differentiates Postpacing From Ischemic T

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia, lookup

Jatene procedure wikipedia, lookup

Coronary artery disease wikipedia, lookup

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia, lookup

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia, lookup

Electrocardiography wikipedia, lookup

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia, lookup

Ventricular fibrillation wikipedia, lookup

Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
T-Vector Direction Differentiates Postpacing From Ischemic
T-Wave Inversion in Precordial Leads
Alexei Shvilkin, MD; Kalon K.L. Ho, MD, MSc; Michael R. Rosen, MD; Mark E. Josephson, MD
Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 13, 2017
Background—Postpacing precordial T-wave inversion (TWI), known as cardiac memory (CM), mimics ischemic
precordial TWI, and there are no established ECG criteria that adequately distinguish between the two. On the basis of
CM properties (postpacing sinus rhythm T vector approaching the direction of the paced QRS vector), we hypothesized
that CM induced by right ventricular pacing would manifest a TWI pattern different from that of precordial ischemic
TWI, thereby discriminating between the two.
Methods and Results—T-wave axis, polarity, and amplitude on a 12-lead ECG during sinus rhythm were compared
between CM and ischemic patients. The CM group incorporated 13 patients who were paced in DDD mode with short
atrioventricular delay for 1 week after elective pacemaker implantation. The ischemic group consisted of 47 patients
with precordial TWI identified among 228 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for an
acute coronary syndrome. The combination of (1) positive TaVL, (2) positive or isoelectric TI, and (3) maximal precordial
TWI⬎TWIIII was 92% sensitive and 100% specific for CM, discriminating it from ischemic precordial TWI.
Conclusions—CM induced by right ventricular pacing results in a distinctive T-vector pattern that allows discrimination
from ischemic precordial T-wave inversions regardless of the coronary artery involved. (Circulation. 2005;111:969974.)
Key Words: electrocardiography 䡲 pacing 䡲 ischemia
T
he differential diagnosis of precordial T-wave inversion
(TWI) poses a significant clinical challenge. Precordial
TWI has a wide range of causes, from a normal ECG variant to
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, pericarditis, and myocardial ischemia.1,2 A syndrome of diffuse precordial TWI associated
with critical proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD)
disease (sometimes referred to as Wellens’ syndrome3) has been
shown to portend a poor prognosis unless the LAD obstruction
is definitively treated by percutaneous coronary intervention
(PCI) or bypass surgery.2,4 Because the anginal episode often has
resolved by the time of presentation,4 physicians confronted with
diffuse precordial TWI in an asymptomatic patient often feel
motivated to perform urgent catheterization unless a compelling
alternative explanation for TWI exists.
Cardiac memory (CM) refers to T-wave abnormalities
that manifest on resumption of a normal ventricular
activation pattern after a period of abnormal ventricular
activation, such as ventricular pacing,5 transient left
bundle-branch block, ventricular arrhythmias, or WolfParkinson-White syndrome.6,7 Pacing-induced TWI, the
most common clinical example of CM, is usually localized
to precordial and inferior leads.6,8 Postpacing CM often
produces striking precordial TWI that may persist for long
periods of time after the pacing is discontinued,5,6 thus
obscuring their causal relationship. As a result, TWI due to
CM represents an important confounder in the diagnosis of
myocardial infarction.6,9,10 No diagnostic features have
been described to differentiate pacing-induced CM from
TWI that results from ischemia and infarction. Asymptomatic patients with permanent pacemakers who present with
pacing-induced precordial TWI often undergo timeconsuming and costly evaluations to rule out ischemia,
including unnecessary cardiac catheterization.
On the basis of the key attribute of CM (T-wave vector
in sinus rhythm approaching the direction of the abnormally activated QRS complex),6 we hypothesized that
right ventricular endocardial pacing would result in a
precordial TWI with frontal-plane T-vector direction different from that of ischemic precordial TWI. If this were
the case, diagnostic criteria for differentiating between the
2 causes could be established.
Although precordial TWI was originally described with
proximal LAD lesions,2,4 ischemia in the territory of the left
circumflex (LCx) and occasionally right coronary artery
(RCA) can also cause precordial TWI. Therefore, the purpose
of the present study was to establish diagnostic criteria for
postpacing versus ischemic precordial TWI independent of
the coronary artery involved.
Received May 30, 2004; revision received November 17, 2004; accepted November 23, 2004.
From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (A.S., K.K.L.H., M.E.J.), Boston, Mass, and the Center for Molecular Therapeutics (M.R.R.),
Columbia University, New York, NY.
Correspondence to Mark E. Josephson, Baker4/Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 185 Pilgrim Rd, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail
mjoseph2@bidmc.harvard.edu
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Circulation is available at http://www.circulationaha.org
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000156463.51021.07
969
970
Circulation
March 1, 2005
TABLE 1. Distribution of TWI by Infarct-Related Artery in
ISC Group
Vessel Involved
Figure 1. Classification of T waves and calculation of T-wave
amplitudes. A through C, Negative T waves (⫺0.8, ⫺0.2, and
⫺0.1 mV, respectively); D, isoelectric T wave (0 mV); E, positive
T wave (0.2 mV).
LAD
TWI, n (%)
No TWI
Excluded
28 (47)*
31
20
79
Proximal
16 (57)
12
7
䡠䡠䡠
Mid, diagonal
12 (44)
15
10
䡠䡠䡠
0‡
4
3
12 (21)
44†
17
䡠䡠䡠
73
Distal
Methods
Total
LCx
Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 13, 2017
Groups of Patients
RCA
7 (11)
56
13
76
The CM group consisted of 13 patients followed up prospectively
after implantation of a permanent dual-chamber pacemaker who had
sinus rhythm with 1:1 AV conduction at physiological heart rates at
baseline. CM was induced by 1 week of DDD pacing with a short
AV delay to ensure ventricular activation from the endocardial
pacemaker electrode positioned in the right ventricular apex. At 1
week, a 12-lead ECG was recorded after the pacemaker was
reprogrammed in AAI mode. This ECG was used for analysis.
The ischemic TWI (ISC) group of patients was retrospectively
identified among the 228 consecutive patients who underwent PCI
for a non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction (as identified by
symptoms of ischemia and elevated cardiac markers, eg, troponin I,
troponin T, or creatine kinase-MB [CK-MB] in the absence of ST
elevations on the ECG) at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
from January to November 2003 as noted in the cardiac catheterization laboratory database. Precordial TWI was defined as TWI ⱖ0.1
mV in 2 or more adjacent precordial leads (V1 to V6) on a 12-lead
ECG recorded within 48 hours after admission. If TWI was present
on ⬎1 ECG, the earliest one was used for analysis. The ISC group
was further divided into 3 subgroups (LAD, LCx, and RCA)
according to the infarct-related artery. Patients with atrial fibrillation,
left bundle-branch block, presence of a pacemaker, multivessel PCI,
planned PCI for stable coronary disease, and frequent ventricular
ectopy were excluded from the ISC group.
Total
47 (26)
131
50
228
ECG Analysis
All ECGs were recorded on a Burdick Spacelabs Eclipse Plus ECG
(Burdick Spacelabs) at a paper speed of 25 mm/s. The tracings were
analyzed manually without magnification. T-wave amplitude was
measured by ruler in each lead from T-wave peak/nadir to the
baseline determined by T-P segment. In case of biphasic T waves,
the most negative deflection was measured, and the T wave was
classified as negative. T wave was classified as isoelectric (amplitude⫽0) if both positive and negative components were present with
amplitude ⬍0.05 mV (Figure 1). QT was measured manually over 3
consecutive RR intervals in lead II, and the results were averaged.
The corrected QT interval (QTc) was calculated according to
Bazett’s formula. Frontal-plane QRS and T-vector angles were
obtained from the automated standard ECG printouts and not
independently determined. All ECGs were analyzed by a single
investigator blinded to the patient group allocation.
Percentages represent the fraction of nonexcluded tracings with TWI.
*P⬍0.05 vs LCx and RCA groups.
†Includes 5 patients with isolated TWI in I and aVL.
‡P⬍0.05 vs other LAD locations.
pared with ␹2 test and Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. These
analyses were performed with SPSS 11.5 (SPSS Inc). Angular
variables were compared with Watson-Williams F test (Oriana 2.0,
KCS Inc). Probability values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Approval for the study was obtained in accordance with the
requirements of the Institutional Review Board of the Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center. All patients undergoing pacemaker
implantation signed informed consent for the study.
Results
ISC Patient Selection
A total of 228 patients underwent PCI for a non–ST-elevation
myocardial infarction. Fifty patients were excluded (9 with atrial
fibrillation, 18 with left bundle-branch block, 12 with ventricular
paced rhythm, 3 with multivessel PCI, 7 with planned PCI, and
1 with frequent ventricular ectopy). Forty-seven (26%) of the
remaining 178 patients had precordial TWI and made up the ISC
group.
Precordial TWI was present significantly more often in
patients with LAD lesions (47%) than in those with LCx
(21%) and RCA lesions (11%; P⬍0.05). TWI was observed
in 57% cases of proximal LAD disease and 44% of mid-LAD/
first diagonal branch disease (P⬎0.1) but in no patients with
distal LAD lesions (P⬍0.05 versus other LAD locations).
(See Table 1.)
Baseline ISC and CM group characteristics are presented
in Table 2. Age, gender distribution, prevalence of prior MI,
TABLE 2.
Baseline Patient Data
Biochemical Data
For LAD ISC patients, the highest level of CK-MB during admission
was used for analysis.
Group
ISC
(n⫽47)
CM
(n⫽13)
Male, n (%)
28 (60)
6 (46)
Angiographic Data
Age, y
65.3⫾2.0
72.5⫾3.0*
The culprit coronary artery lesion was determined by a high-volume
interventional cardiologist at the time of PCI on the basis of a
coronary artery occlusion or stenosis ⬎80% by visual estimation
corresponding to the clinical and ECG data. The location of the
culprit lesion was determined from angiographic reports and confirmed by visual analysis of digital angiographic images.
Prior history of MI, n (%)
12 (26%)
3 (23%)
8 (17)
2 (15)
Available
19/47
13/13*
Precordial TWI
4/19
0/13
Right bundle-branch block
1/19
3/13
Q waves
4/19
2/13
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables are expressed as mean⫾SEM and compared by
ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Categorical data were com-
History of CABG, n (%)
Prior ECG
*P⬍0.05.
Shvilkin et al
TABLE 4.
T-Wave Inversion
971
Lead Distribution of TWI in ISC and CM Groups
ISC
Lead
Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 13, 2017
Figure 2. A, Representative ECG of ISC patient with proximal
LAD lesion. This 68-year-old nondiabetic woman, an active
smoker with hypertension and strong family history of coronary
artery disease, developed progressive angina over the week
before admission and was found to have troponin T elevation
(1.5 ng/mL, upper limit of normal 0.10 ng/mL) with normal
CK-MB level and anterior wall hypokinesis on echocardiogram.
Cardiac catheterization revealed 90% proximal LAD stenosis
involving origin of first diagonal branch. Her prior ECG was normal. B, Representative ECG of CM patient. This 68-year-old
man with obstructive sleep apnea, Wenckebach-type seconddegree AV block, and pauses up to 4 seconds while awake
underwent a permanent pacemaker placement 1 week before
this recording. Pacemaker was turned off just before recording.
Patient has had no history of coronary artery disease and
recently had a normal exercise stress test. His preimplantation
ECG 1 week earlier showed isolated Q in lead III but otherwise
was normal.
and CABG did not differ between groups. Nineteen patients
in the ISC group (40%) and all patients in the CM group had
prior ECGs available. Within that subset of patients, the
prevalence of baseline ECG abnormalities (Q waves, right
bundle-branch block, TWI) was similar between groups
(P⬎0.1). None of the CM patients had symptoms suggestive
of ischemia during the study. Within the previous 2 years, 5
CM patients had negative stress test with imaging, and 6
underwent cardiac catheterization that demonstrated the absence of obstructive coronary disease in 3 patients, stable
single-vessel occlusion with collaterals in 1, and stable
revascularized 3-vessel disease in 2. The remaining 2 patients
had both a normal ECG and echocardiogram before pacemaker implantation. In 1 patient, the procedure was compliTABLE 3.
LAD (n⫽28) LCx (n⫽12) RCA (n⫽7) CM (n⫽13)
V1
8 (29)
1 (8)
V2
21 (75)
5 (42)
0*
8 (62)
22 (79)
5 (42)
1 (14)*
12 (92)
V4
24 (86)
7 (58)
6 (86)
12 (82)
V5
21 (75)
10 (83)
6 (86)
13 (100)
V6
16 (57)*
11 (92)
7 (100)
13 (100)
I
20 (71)*
11 (91)*
4 (57)*
0
II
8 (29)*
5 (42)*
6 (86)
13 (100)
III
3 (11)*
2 (17)*
4 (57)*
13 (100)
1 (8)
aVR
10 (36)*
0
1 (14)
aVL
23 (82)*
11 (92)*
2 (29)
0
aVF
6 (21)*
4 (33)*
5 (71)
13 (100)
(I⫹aVL)†
0*
0*
3 (43)*
13 (100)
(I⫹aVL)† and maximal
precordial TWI⬎TWIIII
䡠䡠䡠
䡠䡠䡠
0‡
12 (92)
Values are n (%).
*P⬍0.05 compared with CM group.
†(I⫹aVL) indicates positive T wave in lead aVL, positive or isoelectric T wave
in lead I.
‡P⬍0.05 for all ISC patients compared with CM patients.
cated by development of pericarditis with moderate pericardial effusion treated conservatively.
Representative ECG examples of ISC (LAD lesion) and
CM patients are depicted in Figure 2. Both CM and ISC
tracings demonstrate deep precordial TWI of similar magnitude and morphology. In addition, the CM patient demonstrates deep inferior TWI. A biphasic T wave in lead II in the
ISC tracing is also present. An important difference between
recordings appears in leads I and aVL, in which ISC shows
TWI, whereas CM manifests positive T waves.
ECG data are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. The heart rate
and QT and QTc intervals were not statistically different
between groups. Among those in the ISC group, LAD lesions
produced more pronounced precordial TWI than LCx and
RCA lesions both in terms of number of leads affected and
maximal amplitude of TWI in a single lead, similar to the
findings in CM group (Table 3).
Lead distribution of TWI in the CM group was consistent
with the T vector following the direction of the paced QRS
ISC
HR, min
⫺1
LAD (n⫽28)
LCx (n⫽12)
RCA (n⫽7)
CM (n⫽13)
69.4⫾2.1
74.2⫾3.1
66.9⫾3.6
71.7⫾3.7
QT, ms
440⫾10
415⫾11
438⫾10
417⫾10
QTc, ms
415⫾14
377⫾16
418⫾15
371⫾11
No. of precordial leads with TWI
Maximal precordial TWI, mV
4.0⫾0.3
⫺0.45⫾0.06
QRS frontal axis, degrees
T-wave frontal axis, degrees
20⫾7
128⫾10*
*P⬍0.05 compared with CM group.
5 (39)
V3
ECG Data
Group
0
3.25⫾0.5*
⫺0.21⫾0.10*
6⫾11
146⫾15*
2.9⫾0.3*
⫺0.26⫾0.11*
6⫾46
⫺98⫾30
4.8⫾0.3
⫺0.53⫾0.06
18⫾12
⫺70⫾5
972
Circulation
March 1, 2005
the magnitude of TWI between proximal and mid LAD
lesions or between patients with and without D1 territory
involvement (data not shown). No patients with distal LAD
lesion had precordial TWI.
Extent of Myocardial Necrosis
CK-MB levels were available in 27of 28 LAD patients. Ten
patients had CK-MB within the normal range (⬍10 ng/mL),
and 17 (61%) had CK-MB elevation ranging from 13 to 366
ng/mL (median 46 ng/mL, upper limit of normal 10 ng/mL).
The magnitude of precordial TWI in patients with normal
CK-MB was significantly greater than in those with elevated
enzyme levels (P⬍0.01).
Discrimination Criteria Between ISC and CM TWI
Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 13, 2017
Figure 3. Circular histogram of frontal-plane T-axes distribution
in LAD, LCx, and CM groups. Solid bars indicate LAD; hatched
bars, LCx; open bars, CM. Difference in T-vector axis between
CM and LAD/LCx is statistically significant (P⬍0.01).
complex. Right ventricular apex pacing produced QRS with
left superior frontal-plane axis that was negative in precordial
and inferior (II, III, aVF) leads and invariably positive in
leads I and aVL. As a result, the postpacing T-wave axis also
had a left superior direction (⫺70⫾5 degrees; Table 3). All
CM patients had positive TaVL, with diffuse TWI in the
precordial and inferior leads. Eleven patients had positive and
2 had isoelectric TI. With the exception of the patient with
postimplantation pericarditis, all CM patients demonstrated
maximal precordial TWI⬎TWIIII. Lead distribution of TWI
in the ISC group was consistent with a T vector directed away
from the area of ischemia, with a progressive increase in the
frequency of lateral precordial lead involvement from LAD to
LCx to RCA culprit vessels (Table 4).
The majority of LAD and LCx patients had negative T
waves in leads I and aVL. Only 3 LAD/LCx patients had
positive T waves in lead I, and 1 patient had a positive T wave
in lead aVL, but none had positive T waves in both leads. In
vectorcardiographic terms, this translated into a left-to-right
frontal-plane direction of the T vector, significantly different
from that of CM group (Table 3; Figure 3). Limb-lead TWI
pattern in the RCA group was variable, depending on the
relative involvement of lateral and inferior leads. Four patients with TWI in leads I or aVL and a left-to-right T-vector
direction similar to the LAD and LCx groups had predominantly lateral precordial TWI (maximal precordial TWI
⬎TWIIII). The remaining 3 patients with positive T waves in
leads I and aVL had a predominantly inferior-lead TWI
(maximal precordial TWI⬍TWIIII).
Location of Culprit Lesion in the LAD Group
Sixteen patients (57%) with a culprit lesion in the LAD had
a proximal LAD lesion with ischemic territory involving the
first diagonal (D1) branch. Twelve (44%) had a mid-LAD or
isolated D1 lesion. No significant differences were found in
CM Versus LAD/LCx
All CM patients had positive TaVL compared with only 1 ISC
patient (who had a negative T wave in lead I). A positive T
wave in lead I was observed in 11 of 13 CM patients; in the
remaining 2 (both of whom had prior inferior-wall MI), the T
wave was isoelectric. No CM patient had TWI in lead I. The
combination of a positive T wave in lead aVL and a positive
or isoelectric T wave in lead I was seen in all CM patients and
none of the LAD/LCx patients (Table 4).
CM Versus RCA
Four of 7 RCA patients conformed to the pattern of LAD/
LCx TWI. The remaining 3 RCA patients with positive T
wave in leads I and aVL had maximal precordial TWI⬍TWI
III, in contrast to all but 1 CM patient. Therefore, the
combination of (1) positive TaVL, (2) positive or isoelectric TI,
and (3) maximal precordial TWI⬎TWIIII was 92% sensitive
and 100% specific for CM, discriminating it from ISC
regardless of the coronary artery involved.
Discussion
We describe an approach to differentiate precordial ischemic
TWI from postpacing TWI on the basis of the unique
characteristics of the postpacing T-wave vector. The latter is
characterized by the left-superior frontal direction, with the
magnitude of precordial TWI exceeding that in the inferior
leads. We demonstrated that in most cases (LAD, LCx, and
the majority of RCA culprit lesions), ischemic precordial
TWI is characterized by a rightward frontal-plane T-wave
axis. In a small number of patients with inferolateral ischemia
with a left T-wave axis, the inferior/precordial TWI ratio still
allowed differentiation from CM. Bearing in mind these
vector concepts, we devised a simple rule for discriminating
CM and ISC precordial TWI using standard 12-lead ECG
criteria.
The small number of patients in our study (especially those
with precordial TWI due to RCA lesions) and the retrospective nature of the analysis make it necessary to confirm these
findings in a larger validation cohort. Nevertheless, our data
provide the proof of concept for using T vector direction in
differential diagnosis of precordial TWI.
The ISC group selection criteria served 2 purposes. First,
biochemical evidence of myocardial necrosis supported the
ischemic nature of the TWI in this group. Second, the presence
Shvilkin et al
Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 13, 2017
of a critical stenosis amenable to PCI minimized the potential
ambiguity in culprit lesion identification in cases without total
coronary occlusion. At the same time, this could create a bias
toward larger ischemic area in the ISC group in the present
study, and it is plausible that more localized ischemia could
produce different TWI patterns.
We found, however, no precordial TWI among 4 patients
with distal LAD lesions and presumably smaller areas of
ischemia (Table 1). LCx lesions were less likely to produce
precordial TWI, and the magnitude and number of leads
affected were significantly less than seen with LAD lesions.
Nevertheless, LCx ischemia produced a rightward T-wave
axis shift similar to that seen with LAD involvement. In fact,
among LCx lesions screened for precordial TWI, 5 patients
had isolated TWI in I and aVL, demonstrating rightward
T-axis direction even without precordial involvement. Therefore, it appears that anterolateral ischemia severe enough to
produce precordial TWI results in a rightward frontal-plane T
axis.
There were very few patients with RCA culprit lesions
with precordial TWI in the present study. Although the ratio
of inferior/precordial TWI allowed differentiation of inferolateral ischemic TWI and CM, a larger prospective patient
sample is required to confirm this observation.
Degree of ischemia is another factor potentially affecting
the expression of TWI. All ISC patients in the present study
had positive biochemical markers of myocardial injury.
Conceivably, a milder degree of ischemia could produce
smaller T-wave changes. To address this issue, we compared
patients with LAD culprit lesions with elevated versus normal
CK-MB levels and found the latter to have significantly
greater precordial TWI than those with elevated CK-MB.
This finding is in accord with observations in patients with
myocardial infarction who demonstrate an inverse relationship between TWI magnitude, enzymatic estimate of myocardial infarction size, and functional recovery,11 which
suggests that TWI indicates the presence of viable stunned
myocardium. Therefore, it appears unlikely that milder ischemia would alter the T-wave pattern in ISC.
All CM patients in the present study had endocardial right
ventricular apex lead implants. Other positions within the
right ventricle can produce different pacing QRS vectors that
result in different directions of memory T waves. Right
ventricular electrodes can be implanted in the mid septum or
right ventricular outflow tract.12,13 The QRS complex produced by pacing from these alternative sites can have variable
morphology in leads I and aVL, resulting in a left axis with
varying degrees of superior (closer to the right ventricular
apex) or inferior (right ventricular outflow tract) angulation.
Therefore, postpacing TWI will always assume a left axis, no
matter where in the right ventricle the pacing lead is situated.
With right ventricular outflow tract pacing, however, one
would not see deep TWIs in inferior leads, which are
considered typical for postpacing TWI.8 Additional studies
are needed to characterize the TWI pattern after pacing from
these alternative sites.
As demonstrated previously in animal studies, the early
stages of CM development can be accompanied by T-vector
rotation in the frontal plane before the T wave assumes the
T-Wave Inversion
973
direction of the paced QRS complex.14 Therefore, shorter (or
intermittent) pacing may result in an “intermediate” T-wave
axis. Molecular mechanisms of CM include changes in ion
channels such as Ito1,15 IKr,16 L-type Ca channel,17 and the
angiotensin II system,18 which result in a change of the
transmural repolarization gradient.14 Drugs that affect these
systems, such as ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers,17
and quinidine,16 influence the development of CM and
T-vector shape. It is unclear whether these drugs affect the
clinical utility of T-wave patterns in distinguishing ischemic
versus nonischemic TWIs.
Structural heart abnormalities and their ECG manifestations can alter the expression of CM. In the present study,
patients with secondary TWI, such as preexisting left bundlebranch block or left ventricular hypertrophy with repolarization abnormalities, were excluded. Our preliminary observations suggest that CM does not change the abnormal T vector
associated with these conditions. CM development might be
altered in patients with postinfarction scar. Most molecular
and cellular changes responsible for CM development are
believed to occur in the proximity of the pacing electrode,19
and therefore a prior inferior-wall myocardial infarction
could diminish CM development. Indeed, the only 2 CM
patients in the present series with isoelectric rather than
positive T waves in lead I had prior inferior-wall infarction.
Another example of a structural confounder in the present
series was a pericardial effusion blunting the postpacing
precordial TWI.
At present, we have no data to predict the effect of the
combination of ischemia and pacing on T-wave characteristics; therefore, extreme caution should be exercised in interpreting postpacing T-wave changes in patients with symptoms of ischemia. Three CM patients in the present series
with known coronary artery disease had angiographically
documented stable disease and were asymptomatic; therefore,
we felt confident that their T-wave changes were attributed to
CM rather than ischemia.
Conclusions
By applying vectorcardiographic principles to interpretation
of a standard 12-lead ECG, we demonstrated that right
ventricular apex pacing results in TWI with unique characteristics distinct from those induced by myocardial ischemia.
A simple algorithm can be used to differentiate these 2 ECG
patterns. The use of such vectorcardiographic information can
significantly improve the differential diagnosis of precordial
TWIs.
Acknowledgment
This work was performed during Dr Shvilkin’s Fellowship in
Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology from the North American
Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.
References
1. Okada M, Yotsukura M, Shimada T, et al. Clinical implications of
isolated T wave inversion in adults: electrocardiographic differentiation
of the underlying causes of this phenomenon. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;
24:739 –745.
2. de Zwaan C, Bar FW, Wellens HJ. Characteristic electrocardiographic
pattern indicating a critical stenosis high in left anterior descending
974
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Circulation
March 1, 2005
Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 13, 2017
coronary artery in patients admitted because of impending myocardial
infarction. Am Heart J. 1982;103:730 –736.
Rhinehardt J, Brady WJ, Perron AD, et al. Electrocardiographic manifestations of Wellens’ syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20:638 – 643.
de Zwaan C, Bar FW, Janssen JH, et al. Angiographic and clinical
characteristics of patients with unstable angina showing an ECG pattern
indicating critical narrowing of the proximal LAD coronary artery. Am
Heart J. 1989;117:657– 665.
Chatterjee K, Harris A, Davies G, et al. Electrocardiographic changes
subsequent to artificial ventricular depolarization. Br Heart J. 1969;31:
770 –779.
Rosenbaum MB, Blanco HH, Elizari MV, et al. Electrotonic modulation
of the T wave and cardiac memory. Am J Cardiol. 1982;50:213–222.
Herweg B, Fisher JD, Ilercil A, et al. Cardiac memory after radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways: the post-ablation T wave does not
forget the pre-excited QRS. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999;3:
263–272.
Chou T. Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia,
Pa: WB Saunders; 1996.
Gould L, Venkataraman K, Goswami MK, et al. Pacemaker-induced
electrocardiographic changes simulating myocardial infarction. Chest.
1973;63:829 – 832.
Gould L, Reddy CV, Singh B, et al. T-wave changes with intermittent left
bundle branch block. Angiology. 1980;31:66 – 68.
11. Nakajima T, Kagoshima T, Fujimoto S, et al. The deeper the negativity of
the T waves recorded, the greater is the effectiveness of reperfusion of the
myocardium. Cardiology. 1996;87:91–97.
12. Stambler BS, Ellenbogen K, Zhang X, et al. Right ventricular outflow
versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure
and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14:1180 –1186.
13. de Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk JW. Comparison of the haemodynamic
effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular
apex pacing: a quantitative review. Europace. 2003;5:275–278.
14. Shvilkin A, Danilo P Jr, Wang J, et al. Evolution and resolution of
long-term cardiac memory. Circulation. 1998;97:1810 –1817.
15. Yu H, McKinnon D, Dixon JE, et al. Transient outward current, Ito1, is
altered in cardiac memory. Circulation. 1999;99:1898 –1905.
16. Plotnikov AN, Shvilkin A, Xiong W, et al. Interactions between antiarrhythmic drugs and cardiac memory. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;50:335–344.
17. Plotnikov AN, Yu H, Geller JC, et al. Role of L-type calcium channels in
pacing-induced short-term and long-term cardiac memory in canine heart.
Circulation. 2003;107:2844 –2849.
18. Patberg KW, Plotnikov AN, Quamina A, et al. Cardiac memory is
associated with decreased levels of the transcriptional factor CREB modulated by angiotensin II and calcium. Circ Res. 2003;93:472– 478.
19. Patel PM, Plotnikov A, Kanagaratnam P, et al. Altering ventricular
activation remodels gap junction distribution in canine heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001;12:570 –577.
T-Vector Direction Differentiates Postpacing From Ischemic T-Wave Inversion in
Precordial Leads
Alexei Shvilkin, Kalon K.L. Ho, Michael R. Rosen and Mark E. Josephson
Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 13, 2017
Circulation. 2005;111:969-974; originally published online February 14, 2005;
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000156463.51021.07
Circulation is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231
Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
Print ISSN: 0009-7322. Online ISSN: 1524-4539
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the
World Wide Web at:
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/111/8/969
Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published
in Circulation can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial
Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located,
click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about
this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document.
Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at:
http://www.lww.com/reprints
Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Circulation is online at:
http://circ.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/