* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Episodic Tremor and Slip Lab (doc)
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Mysterious motions along the California coast - Student Worksheet On April 25, 1992 an area of Northern California, called Cape Mendocino, moved. This movement was detected and recorded by Global Positioning System (GPS) stations installed throughout the area by scientists. Cape Mendocino (shown to the right) is located at a triple junction or a place where three tectonic boundaries all meet at a point. In this case, San Andreas Fault, Cascadia Subduction Zone and Mendocino Fracture (a transform plate boundary between the tiny Gorda Plate and the Pacific Plate) also join up. Below is a map that shows the location of several of the GPS stations that recorded the ground movement, and the amount and direction of the movement, which occurred over a very short time. 1 Use the map on the previous page to fill in the table below. Use a ruler and the information in the Map Legend to measure the distance the GPS station was displaced on April 25, 1992. Station Name Bear Ridge 2 Amount Displaced (cm) King Peak 2 Pierce Ecc Rhonerville Average for these 4 stations What was the greatest overall displacement that a station experienced? What do you think might have happened within the Earth to cause the ground to move in this region? How would you confirm your answer to the previous question? What other data would you need to support your hypothesis? If you suspected an earthquake occurred, use the IRIS Earthquake Browser at www.iris.edu/ieb/ to see if you are correct. Input the date 1992/4/25 for both the latest and earliest time to see where an earthquake occurred that day. Was your hypothesis confirmed, or do you need to formulate a new hypothesis for why the ground moved that day? 2 Part 2 Now let’s take a look at some more recent GPS data recorded near the Cascadia Subduction Zone. This data was recorded by station ALBH located on Victoria Island, British Columbia, which is north of Cape Mendocino, California. Here is a picture of the GPS station, along with a map of its location: What plate boundary is located near this GPS station? 3 The data for this station is displayed a little differently. Instead of vectors, as was shown previously, the position of the station is recorded and plotted for each day as a GPS Time Series Plot. While the position of the station is recorded in three dimensions (that is, the North-South, EastWest, and Vertical displacements are measured), we are only going to look at the data for the EastWest motion of the station. In this graph, if the station is displaced eastward, a dot is drawn above the previous measurement (e.g. sample data top). If the dot is drawn below the previous measurement the station has a ‘negative’ eastward motion, or is moving to the west (e.g. sample data middle). If the station were not moving East or West, we would expect the dot to be placed beside the previous dot (e.g. sample data bottom). What patterns do you see in the GPS Time Series Data for Station ALBH? Based on this graph, how far did the station move eastward between 2005 and 2010? 4 On average, how many mm a year does the Station ALBH move eastward? The overall eastward motion of the station is related to the general motion of the North American plate. If we take out this overall eastward motion and re-graph the data, the ‘zig-zag’ pattern is more pronounced: Describe what you think may be physically happening to the station (and the ground beneath it) to produce the ‘zig-zags’ pattern recorded by the GPS? 5 What is the average East-West displacement in mm during one of the episodes of abrupt change in direction? Over what sort of time period dies this appear to occur (e.g. years, months, weeks, etc)? What do you think is happening inside the Earth to produce these episodes of westward displacement of the Earth’s surface in this region? If you hypothesized that an earthquake may have caused these episodes of westward displacement, test your hypothesis by using the IRIS earthquake browser (www.iris.edu/ieb) to check to see if there might have been an earthquake during one of these episodes of westward displacement. What does this earthquake data tell you? Did you find any earthquakes the size of the one that occurred on April 25, 1992? If you did not find any earthquakes, then you need to reformulate your hypothesis for what is causing these periodic changes in the displacement of the GPS station. 6 In 2003 scientists were confused by the seeming conflict between the GPS and: They noticed that GPS stations in this region of Canada and Washington State were experiencing episodes of westward motion despite the fact that there were no earthquakes occurring to produce this motion on the surface of the Earth. To investigate this phenomena further, they sifted through lots and lots of seismic data, but instead of finding large earthquakes (sudden releases of stored seismic energy), they found that the there were episodes of gradual energy release (gradual, but equivalent to the total amount of energy released by a Magnitude 7 earthquake!) that corresponded to the westward motion. These low-level seismic signals, called tremors, are weak and slowly undulating. By studying these tremors, geologists realized that a portion of the major fault in this region of the US and Canada, the Cascadia Megathrust, was slipping to the westward displacement at the surface of the Earth. Examine this figure: 7 The figure above shows the GPS and seismic signals that are produced by different types of fault behavior along with the where they occur along the megathrust fault. Large, destructive earthquakes tend to occur in the ‘locked’ zone of the fault where the energy from the plate motions is stored elastically and then is suddenly released as an earthquake. In contrast, the deepest segment of the fault simply “creeps” without storing energy because this material behaves plastically rather than elastically. Between the “locked” and “creeping” segments of the fault is a zone where the fault stuck, but is weaker than the locked zone above it. In this zone, it is believed that Episodic Tremor and Slip or gradual release of seismic energy (the phenomena you just learned about) occurs because fluid pressure reduces the load of the overriding plate enough to overcome the locking friction but not enough to allow the rupture to occur suddenly. Episodic Tremor and Slip was not known to scientists before 2003, but since then there has been a lot of research to understand why it happens. It is important to understand how and why it happens, because a number of scientists think it might ‘load’ the locked zone, leading to a destructive earthquake in the future. 8