Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Study of Dynamical Cross Correlation function in a Black hole source XTE J1550-564 K. Sriram Osmania University Science with LAXPC/ASTROSAT 16 December 2014 Introduction • Emission modes cannot be wholly independent in BH/NS sources, so by comparing their interconnection, we can learn about the physical conditions from the main emission region: the inner disk around a BH/NS . • Cross-correlation function (CCF) provide us with information about the time lags between the different components of the emission (i.e., between the physical processes happening in the objects). • In general, soft and hard X-rays have different emission locations in the accretion disk (2-5 keV, from Keplerian disk portion & >15 keV, Compton cloud or jet), but associated locations for optical/IR and UV emission is still not clear. Probable wavelength emission and Locations Hard X-rays Soft X-rays Optical/IR Motivation • We know that BH sources show variations from milli sec to days • The picture of accretion disk is not clearly understood at smaller time scales. • Dynamical CCF provide clues of the behaviour and unviel interdependency of various mechanisms at smaller time scale. CCF at longer time scale • GRS 1915+105 GX 339-4 H1743-322 GX339-4, RXTE/soft and INTEGRAL/ hard CCF: Optical/IR vs X-ray at a shorter scale Based on this, Gandhi et al. (2008) ruled out reprocessing origin of optical photons 2-4 keV vs Optical red , Durant et al. 2011 Dynamic CCFs, upper left: SWIFT J1753, upper right: GX339, Bottom: Sco X-1, Durant et al. 2011 Dynamic CCF (2-5 keV vs 13-60 keV) of XTE J1550-564 Left: few CCFs Correlation length :50 s, Right: Dynamical CCF time resolution 1s Results • Found correlated positive and negative lags (>20 s) • Occasionally observed anti-correlated lags (<20 s) • Magnitude of lags are similar to the lags observed in CCF between optical/IR vs X-rays in other BH/NS sources. • Assuming accretion disk size ~106 km, 3-4 s could be due to LTT effect and remaining could be reprocessing or dissipation time scale, however clear picture is lacking Future study.. Is the Hard X-rays and optical/IR are correlated (Observational confirmation is required) Because in general emitting source of IR and hard X-ray is assumed to be Synchrotron in nature which is spanned from IR to few hundred keVs. Is there any connection between the structure of CCFs and the strength of QPO How the structure of CCFs varies in all the spectral states/similar state observations ASTROSAT: Energy domain, perfect for studying lags!!! Thanks!!!!