* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Souces and scenarios for tsunami hazard assessment in the
Survey
Document related concepts
2009–18 Oklahoma earthquake swarms wikipedia , lookup
1570 Ferrara earthquake wikipedia , lookup
Seismic retrofit wikipedia , lookup
1988 Armenian earthquake wikipedia , lookup
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant wikipedia , lookup
Earthquake engineering wikipedia , lookup
2010 Pichilemu earthquake wikipedia , lookup
1908 Messina earthquake wikipedia , lookup
1960 Valdivia earthquake wikipedia , lookup
2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami wikipedia , lookup
2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Sources and scenarios for tsunami hazard assessment in the Mediterranean A very preliminary view Tsunami Hazard Assessment • 1. Deterministic (usually“credible” worst tsunami, Tinti and Armigliato, 2003) • 2. Scenario-based assessment • 3. Probabilistic (P for the exceedance of height H in T years, e.g. Sørensen et al., 2012) /statistics (sizefrequency relations) All (!) approaches suffer due to • 1. Poor knowledge of mechanisms • 2. Are realistic (?) • 3. Very small ts. catalogs (simulations/synthetic catalogs is an alternative) Geotectonic setting (Mascle & Mascle, 2012) Tsunamigenic zones (Papadopoulos et al., Mar. Geol., 2014) Rupture zones of tsunamigenic earthquakes (Papadopoulos & Papageorgiou, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014) Rupture zones of tsunamigenic earthquakes (Papadopoulos & Papageorgiou, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014) Seismic criterion for the source: slowness factor (Newman and Okal , 1998) Seismic moment Earthquake Nicaragua 1992 Java 1994 Peru 1996 Flores Sea 1992 PNG 1998 Messina 1908 Amorgos 1956 7.66 7.87 7.18 8.07 6.80 7.10 7.50 Mo x 1027 (dyn.cm) Slowness factor, θ 3.40 5.30 2.20 5.10 0.37 0.56 3.90 -6.51 -5.76 -6.22 -4.58 -5.50 -5.39 -4.68 E log10 0 M Western Mediterranean: Álvarez-Gómez et al. (2011a) selected various worst case seismogenic faults Western Mediterranean: Álvarez-Gómez et al. (2011a) selected various worst case seismogenic faults and calculated maximum wave elevation maps and tsunami travel times Western Mediterranean: Iglesias et al. (2012) presented a reasonable present-day, sea-level highstand numerical simulation and scenario for a tsunami excited by a hypothetical landslide with the characteristics of the pre-historic BIG’95 debris flow occurring on the Ebro margin about 11500 cal yr BP Strategies for developing database of pre-simulated tsunami scenarios 1. Discretization of a given “tsunamigenic domain” with sources distributed on a regular grid of cells, independently on the tsunami history. Tsunami scenarios are computed for each grid cell and for different EQ magnitudes starting from “standard” tsunami initial conditions (practice by Global Disasters Alerts & Coordination System, JRC, Ulutas et al., 2012). 1. The second approach applies when sound hypotheses on tectonic lineaments and/or specific active and potentially tsunamigenic faults can be made: “source-based” approach: the fault areas are tessellated with elementary faults of suitable extension and with focal mechanism coinciding with that of the parent source area. (e.g adopted by the NOAA Tsunami Research Center “Short-Term Inundation Forecast” (SIFT) operational tool). NEARTOWARN Project: “source-based” approach applied by UNIBO Cyprus Rhodes