Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Economic democracy wikipedia , lookup
Economics of fascism wikipedia , lookup
Global financial system wikipedia , lookup
Economic calculation problem wikipedia , lookup
Uneven and combined development wikipedia , lookup
Post–World War II economic expansion wikipedia , lookup
Production for use wikipedia , lookup
Non-simultaneity wikipedia , lookup
1. When looking at the notion of globalization from a development perspective we begin to look at the global economy. The global economy points out the impacts that go beyond national borders and the international dimensions of economic activity. Four important factors to the fundamentals of global economy are international trade and finance, international institutions and agreements, foreign aid, and multi-national corporations (MNC). All four of the factors of the fundamentals of global economy have huge impacts on our lives not only on national levels but also in our local communities. These factors tend to be complicated to understand but are strong and effective nonetheless. In the twentieth century, the global economy has token some exceptional changes. The changes will open up opportunities for those who are able to take advantage of them and continue to foster greater insecurity, uncertainty, and a decline in economic prospects mostly in the less developed countries (LDC) of the Global South. The notion of globalization from a modern perspective is usually linked with the free movement of trade of goods and services. It is also linked with ideas, technology, and financial capital that is free by state control. We can link this to the strengthening of interconnections between numerous countries, institutions, and societies that exist around the world. To include political, social, cultural, and other dimensions in the notion of globalization goes well outside the economic world. However, the economic world forms perhaps its most vital single driving force. With the notion of globalization comes plenty of potential effects which can either be one of the two: negative or positive. In globalization we tend to see more negative effects than positive effects. Beginning with the negatives effects, we notice that they are more expressed in terms of the quality of life one lives, the distributional factor, and real economic issues. The first negative effect of the notion of globalization is the reduce role in national boundaries, more noticeable in the economic world which in turn becomes more difficult to control and regulate economic activity. This reduces the power of government as it does not allow them to make decisions on how resources are allocated or used. It also reduces the government’s ability to set independent distributive and stabilization policies as well as development strategies. This can cause for retaliation from those who are out of hand elsewhere due to the reduced roles having a bearing on the location of economic activity which occurs through the market. Some people believe that the notion of the nation state no longer have any relevance and that we are on our way to a borderless world. It is also believed that the market forces in the process of globalization are sabotaging the development prospects of the LDC’s. Economic progress on the basis of national resources and initiatives would be close to impossible. The second negative effect of the notion of globalization is due to the large flows of financial capital which allows for smaller and weaker markets to be weakened. Countries in the past such as Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina and countries presently such as Italy and Spain are places that have been ample proof of their markets being weakened. This is why LDC countries are predominantly vulnerable to this issue which the same issue is also existing in industrial countries as well, especially the relatively smaller ones. Instability is than presented due to the over-reliance on international trade on the part of the LDC’s. The third negative effect on the notion of globalization is the widening gap that is already large between rural and urban areas in LDC’s. Due to the widening of the gap we begin to see that globalization aims to promote uneven development where redistributive and allocative powers of the government are weak. Underprivileged peasant farmers, rural workers, and the urban poor will be the strongly affected by this process. We will begin to see migration to urban areas likely improve the amount of urban poverty while increasing the large urban informal sector or underground economy. The fourth negative effect on the notion of globalization is the wealthy being targeted by corporations at the global level which leaves consumers out in the more remote areas and countries. The targets of the corporations are called transnational consumers. Large amounts of the population in third world countries are becoming increasingly less vital both as consumers, producers, or markets. As a result of this, they are more powerless and marginalized. The fifth negative effect on the notion of globalization is that it increases the control of multinational corporations and transnational corporations (TNC). These corporations have advantages over local producers specifically small scale ones and new technologies that are emerging which they developed and control it. This helps the MNC and TNC become increasingly greater and enhance their power and influence. With the affects that MNCs have on the preferences and tastes of goods and service that they produce leads to problems where people would see it as disagreeable. An example of this would be in favor of McDonald’s hamburgers and coca cola which they would shift the consumption. A huge problem that they are beginning to see is that the mass production of consumer goods which is based solely on the drive of profit, would not encourage wellness and human welfare so that it represents a gross misallocation or misuse of scarce resources. The sixth negative effect on the notion of globalization is that it favors owners of financial capital or lenders at the expense of workers. The problem with this is that the owners of financial capital can send their capital across national boundaries that they do not have to move. This gives an advantage to the owners of financial capital by directing there money towards more profitable places. When the owners of financial capital get into trouble, governments and international institutions are expected to help them out. When this happens we end up with the socialization of costs and the privatization of profits. It than leaves unskilled labor to fight for themselves because of unemployment and economic crisis. The seventh negative effect of the notion of globalization is it promotes standardization, which makes sure that all products are similar. It than becomes easier to shift the production of goods and services that are not connected to a specific resource or geographical location. Furthermore, it also weakens local production. The eighth negative effect of the notion of globalization is it creates a rise in the mobility of production which causes a rise in risk and uncertainty. This occurs because of a small amount of employment security. Risk and security is not only damaging to workers but also other countries, communities, and regions. It can also cause for a break down between employers and employees based on the traditional agreements of interests. Globalization than allows for owners of production units to move their operations to another place where they can employ the same workers for lower wages. The ninth negative effect on the notion of globalization is the scare of globalization putting a downward pressure on wages in high wage countries moving in the direction of levels that exist in lower wages. MNC’s and the dependence on trade on behalf of LDC, will be inhibit any increase in LDC wages. This will cause problems in labor standards especially in the child labor side of things. These problems usually include the notion of “race to the bottom”. Restricting or getting rid of child labor will cause children to look at other ways of making an earning such as prostitution and petty crime. The tenth negative effect on the notion of globalization creates a scare that globalization will reduce problems with ecological issues and weaken local cultures and traditions. The environment is important because it is linked to our survival and also it is basically global in our nature. When there is a rise in the flow of goods internationally it creates more pollution and environmental degradation. The eleventh effect on the notion of globalization is by making everything similar causes globalization to have a contagion effect. Similar institutions and cultures believe that if something is to happen anywhere in the world it will manage to spread to them. The people who will suffer from the problems of something happening in the world and spreading over to them will be carried by the weaker countries. Large continents like North America would not be effected if something goes wrong somewhere else in the world. The twelfth effect on the notion of globalization is the concern with terrorism, international crime, and pandemics. We have seen a significant rise in criminal acts, for example, human and drug trafficking, organized fraud, and financial manipulation. We’ve also seen that diseases have begun to spread quickly and terrorism is changing the way we live our lives. The positive effects on the notion of globalization allows the division of labor to be carried out at the global level leading to greater productivity and output. Based on comparative advantage, trade specialization will begin to expand. Lower wage countries will be able to specialize in more-unskilled labor intensive areas of production. Income levels will begin to increase as a result of greater productivity. The second positive effect on the notion of globalization is it provides lower costs of production and increases efficiency by letting firms exploit economies of scale through larger production units and longer production runs. With lower production costs translates into lower prices, allowing things to be more open to people. Efficiency is significant because it is able to maximize the amount of output with the resources that are available which will allow for no wastage of resources. The third positive effect on the notion of globalization is it allows financial capital to be put in the best possible position due to greater mobility across national borders. Obstacles that arise from the shortage of capital from inhibiting moneymaking investment opportunities which include developing countries are prevented. The fourth positive effect on the notion of globalization is that it creates larger production for the international market that guarantees that products are at the highest quality and the specs of the products are at the highest standard. Consumers are than reassured in all countries due to a wide range of products to choose from. The fifth positive effect on the notion of globalization acknowledges that all countries should be integrated and gain from global economy which in turn guarantees higher standards of living and improvements in environmental and labor practices. LDC’s would benefit from the transfer of technology which speeds up their development process. The sixth positive effect on the notion of globalization takes into consideration against unacceptable social, economic and other practices through the rest of the world and the flows of ideas and information. In turn, we would see the elimination of practices such as discrimination and child labor. The seventh positive effect on the notion of globalization promotes better contact between people of different ethnicities which in the process promotes a better understanding and appreciation of differences. With the integration of ideas in local cultures we would see improved due to the contact between people of different ethnicities. Nevertheless, rather than weakening different cultures, it would be better to preserve them and make them more dynamic. The eighth positive effect on the notion of globalization improves the possibility of co-operation at a global scale that allows them to deal with global issues that are related to development and the environment. This would lead people to act as global citizens. The ninth positive effect on the notion of globalization helps better individual freedom. We than see that the globalization process is shaped by policies that involve the flow of trade, finance, ideas, and the whole institutional framework. In order for the globalization process to abide by these policies we need to build institutions that are consistent with the type of world we want to promote and support. This than allows the globalization process to be directed by policy actions. People, governments and institutions will all have their own roles that they will play in what type of world system we want in place. The most important thing is that in the decision making process we need to guarantee that legitimate interests and concerns of all three parties will not be ignored or sabotaged and the three parties having the opportunity and capacity to participate effectively. We need to understand though that implementing the right policies leads to issues of human action. Having good intentions could have its problems when its associated with ignorance and lack of understanding of the existing realities and circumstances. We need to overcome the differences in interests, objectives, and the like among people and nations. The importance of the notion of globalization of production is the trend that relates to the notion of national product that means any product or service associated with a certain area or country is less important. Components and parts of products are usually designed in one country, than made in another country, and then put together in another country and then sold in another. Due to this we see an increase in world trade through an intraproduct basis or through intra-industries that involve intermediate products or component parts rather than do trade in final products. An example of this, is in the automobile sector where we see a shift of the assembly in German, American, and Japanese cars to Mexico. As a result of this we see that the process of production is split up into different tasks which could be designated to different countries with different traits. What usually happens than is that the poorer countries get designated with the production of components due to the fact that involve fewer skills and are not paid that much money wise the wealthier countries are usually given jobs or products that require greater skills. We also see in the globalization process through the means of production that there can be a comparative advantage or a competitive advantage. A comparative advantage decides where production is to be taken place. A competitive advantage decides where the items will be produced by the company on its own and then are subcontracted or bought from other independent producers. We than move on to see that MNCs are the major beneficiaries of the global production process. These corporations are global and have plenty of advantages over local and national producers such as marketing channels, brand associations, and majority of up to date technology. MNC’s usually enter the markets through franchising, licensing, and other arrangements. We see this with our own eyes with businesses like Subway, KFC, and Tim Horton’s on James St., Antigonish. They also usually enter countries through subcontracting or networking. We can also notice that global production is driven by buyers usually through subcontracting. An example of this is Wal-Mart who are only sellers but outsource their production all over the globe. In the electronic and automobile industry in global production it strictly producer driven. In these industries, the main competition is amongst producers which is solely based on prices, production differentiation and the speed at which products are able to hit the market. The importance of the notion of globalization of consumption is that it is becoming more globalized due things we buy. We are starting to become more dependent on international standards, which MNCs set and cater to their interests. We are also affected by the marketing and advertising that happens on the global scale at the hands of MNCs. The effects of advertising that catch are taste and preferences makes substitute away from local goods and services and purchase products that usually are inferior and more expensive. The notion of globalization on from the third world countries is seen right now as a bit on the positive side as we are starting to see an advancement in technology which LDC countries are benefitting the most from at the moment LDCs able to access internet, cable, and even have mobile phones. This allows to be caught up on news around the world and even in their communities. It allows them to now interact with their friends near and far around the globe. 2. The effect of globalization on governments is seen in two separate views. One view believe that national governments are still relevant as regulars of economic activity which rests on the perception of nature and the extent of globalization but more importantly on the limits of markets. The other view believe that national governments will play an increasingly smaller role. In the view that national governments are still relevant as regulars of economic activity which rests on the perception of nature and the extent of globalization but more importantly on the limits of markets, believe that economic activities still need to take place somewhere in a geographical area and national boundary. As a result of this, governments will still be able to regulate activities that take place in their national boundaries. They also believe that enterprises can operate in certain locations that are profitable and superior to other locations. In order for these operations to be maintained and thrive they would follow local rules and regulations. We see an example of this in the case of Unisys, an Indian company with operations in the US that obey with American sexual harassment laws. Furthermore, they believe that despite trade and capital flows, the majority of economic activity takes place inside national boundaries. We see this in Canada where trade between provinces is greater than trade with the outside world including states and regions south of the border. In effect, mobility in the circumstance of physical capital is exaggerated. This is due to the existence of barriers to trade, transportation, historical facts such as Canada’s national policy, costs of trading due to different currencies and the risks that it entails, and a home bias by consumers linked to a wide range of things including ignorance and lack of information about goods and services of other countries, cultural factors, and differences in taste and preferences. In this view it is also noticeable that though they believe there has been a bit of shift in power to international institutions such as the IMF, World Bank, and GATT/WT). However, we need to consider that these institutions were created by national governments and therefore under their collective control. As a result, these institutions are mechanisms of national states, and promote and support their interests. We also need to consider that in order for the world economic system to be ran smoothly cooperation is needed especially in the powerful countries, mainly the US an G7 and G8 countries. Thus, larger countries are likely to have even more power. In this view we see liberalization and the expansion of trade and capital flows have pointed out the weaknesses of national governments in the economic world. Governments have also formed alliances which has helped them to pursue separate internal policies and resulted in greater policy harmonization, that leads to a larger amount of control over trade and reduces the impact of capital flows. While the movements being made are towards a capitalist market, different versions of it can co-exist. This means that globalization and the dependence of international financial flows do not limit or prevent countries from choosing policies that endorse greater equity, greater social protection and the establishment and maintenance of a generous welfare state. It also does not mean that it will lead to a merging between national policies, strategies and institutions. The role of the nation state cannot be replaced by any international institution because the whole notion of globalization rests on the existence of such entities. Some could argue that international trade and finance have moved hand in hand with the rise of strong and stable nation states. Some will argue that the enforcement of rules to guarantee that markets will work effectively cannot be achieved at the global level. As a result without a strong national government that are able to implement common sets of rules locally, it will be close to impossible to have efficient world markets. The notion that national governments can be eliminated and everything can be enforced at a distance by international institutions in combination with domestic interests is not a credible one. Cheating, collusion, and violation of rules and standards will get out of hand. Some will also argue that the nature of the market in promoting inequality and in generating both winners and losers, which are not the same around the world, need an effective redistributive mechanism which is necessary. This cannot be dealt with at the global level, even in the presence of a legitimate global government. International institutions and even if a world government that was established based solely on regulating market activities would not allow for the efficient supplying of non-market goods or services. Due to this we would see an increase in inefficiency and a reduction in welfare-enhancing economic activity. We would also see instability and strife due to the absence of effective entities that carry out fundamental stabilization functions that deal with growth, inflation and employment. On the other view that believes national governments will play an increasingly smaller role have numerous reasons why this will occur. They believe economic activities are beginning to gradually exceed the regulatory reach of national governments which in turn we would see a reduction in the role of government and would no longer regulate economic activity or implement policies that are designed to generate desired outcomes. They also believe that if given the mobility of capital, the abilities of countries to manage their economies will be reduced because in economic activity, a shift would occur which would be more in line with their interests. This result would include the adoption of policies that are similar to those adopted by other countries that are consistent with the needs and requirements of MNCs. Government involvement in the economy would be kept to a minimum. It would also include a transformation of national governments into nothing more than platform builders which would attract economic activity. Furthermore, they believe that governments would no longer be able to provide existing social welfare safety net programs. Thus, would allow us to see wages and other labor costs be reduced and would see an increase in profits. We would also see an increase in the competitiveness of cost in domestic businesses and foreign investment would be promoted. As well we would see more profit making opportunities created by for the private sector and profit driven enterprises would take over functions previously assumed by the private sector. An example of this is the privatization of specific medical procedures and functions.