Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Aerosols and Cell Sorting: Characterizing the Risk and Evaluating Protection Kevin L. Holmes, Ph.D. Chief, Flow Cytometry Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH Background: What Prompted this Study 1. Clear that aerosols are a concern 2. Opening of new Biodefense/Emerging Infectious Disease building at NIH 1 The C.W. Bill Young Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases (Bldg 33) Op ed en Ma 0 y2 06 • Non-Select Agents – TB, HIV, SIV, West Nile Virus, Dengue • Select Agents – MonkeyPox, Anthrax, Avian Flu, 1918 Flu, JEV • FCS maintain two BSL3 cell sorter labs Background: What Prompted this Study 1. Clear that aerosols are major concern 2. Opening of new Biodefense/Emerging Infectious Disease building 3. Bridge the ‘gap’ between flow cytometry community and the Division of Safety 2 Aerosols and Cell Sorting: Characterizing the Risk and Evaluating Protection • Aerosols & Bioaerosols – Infectious bioaerosols • Measurement of aerosols produced by Cell Sorter • Protection from Aerosols – Cell Sorter specific – Personal protection Aerosols • Aerosol or bio-aerosols: definitions – Aerosol: a suspension of solid or liquid particles in a gas – Bio-Aerosol: an aerosol comprising particles of biological origin which may affect living things through infectivity, allergenicity, toxicity, pharmacological or other processes. • Aerodynamic particle size of 0.5 to 100 μm 3 Aerodynamic Diameter • For a given particle, the diameter of a water droplet having the same aerodynamic properties – Standardizes for shape and density Irregular Particle de = 5.0 μm pp = 4000kg/m3 χ=1.36 de = 8.6 μm pp = 1000kg/m3 VTS=2.2 mm/s Aerodynamic equivalent sphere VTS=2.2 mm/s Infectious Bio-Aerosols • An aerosol of bacterial, viral or fungal origin capable of initiating an infectious process in a susceptible host – Although infectious agents have discrete size ranges… • Bacterial cells/spores: ~0.3-10μm • Fungal spores: 2.0-5.0 μm • Viruses: 0.02-0.3 μm 4 Infectious Bio-Aerosols – Their size, in conjunction with the carrier matrix generated from a source, changes as they are aerosolized and exposed to environmental factors: • Relative Humidity and temperature may favor desiccation or hygroscopicity • Rapid desiccation results in smaller aerosols that can remain airborne longer (droplet nucleii); particles can increase in size due to hygroscopicity (condensation) Infectious Bio-Aerosols • Infectivity related to – particle size and shape, i.e. Aerodynamic diameter • lung deposition – Microbe survival – Microbe virulence – Host factors 5 Size and Infectivity • Lung Deposition – Size determines retention and deposition Hatch, T. 1961; Bacteriol Rev 25:237 Size and Infectivity • Size of infectious particles – Human volunteer experiments (1963-70): • Aerosolized rhinovirus, coxsackie virus and adenovirus: infection associated with aerosols of aerodynamic diameter of 1.0 to 2.0 μm – M. tuberculosis patients: • Fennelly, et al. (2004) characterized size distribution of infectious aerosols from TB patients: cough generated aerosols, mode size of 2.1 to 3.3 μm 6 Aerosols, Cell Sorters and Biosafety • BMBL, 5th Ed.: – “General agreement among biosafety professionals… that an aerosol generated by procedures…is the probable source of many LAI’s” • Observation: cell sorters produce aerosols – ~40-200 μm plus 3-7 μm satellite droplets – ‘secondary aerosols of various and undefined droplet sizes’ produced during failures (clogs) (ISAC biosafety guidelines) • What is the size and concentration of aerosols produced by a cell sorter during a failure? What is the Size and Concentration of Aerosols Produced by a Cell Sorter? • Aerodynamic Particle Sizer – TSI Model 3314 UV-APS – capable of measuring particles between 0.5μm to 20μm (aerodynamic diameter) – Principle of operation • Uses time of flight measurements to determine aerodynamic particle size • Incorporates UV laser for measurement of biologicals 7 TSI Instruments UV-APS 355nm Laser (diodepumped Nd:YAG freq tripled laser) TSI Instruments UV-APS Collection optics: 430-580nm 8 Using the APS to Measure Aerosols Produced by Cell Sorter – Need to know that particles detected are generated by sorter, not ambient air • Measure inside biological safety cabinet • Use UV-APS together with UV-excitable dye in sheath fluid or sample to unambiguously determine source of detected particles Characterization of Aerosols • FACS Aria in ‘fail mode’ – Deviate center stream to impact side of collection trough • Determine concentration and size distribution of aerosols from Aria in fail mode – Conducted in Baker BioProtect II class II BSC – Variables • Measurement location • Sheath pressure 9 Measurement Locations Position # Dist. From stream cm(in) 1 1.3 (0.5) 2 2.6 (1.0) 3 3.9 (1.5) 4 5.2 (2.0) 5 6.5 (2.5) 6 Position # Dist. From stream cm(in) 7 9.1 (3.5) 8 15.2 (6) 9 21.3 (8.4) 10 27.4 (10.8) 11 Hood grill 33.5 7.8 (3.0) Measurement Locations 10 Sheath: 70 psi Concentration (dw/dlogDp - Number) 10000 1000 Position 11 Position 10 Position 9 Position 8 Position 7 Position 6 Position 5 Position 4 Position 3 Position 2 Position 1 100 10 1 0.1 0 5 10 15 20 Mean Aerodynamic Particle Size Sheath: 35 psi Concentration (dw/dlogDp - Number) 10000 1000 Position 11 Position 10 Position 9 Position 8 Position 7 Position 6 Position 5 Position 4 Position 3 Position 2 Position 1 100 10 1 0.1 0 5 10 15 20 Mean Aerodynamic Particle Size 11 Sheath: 20 psi Concentration (dw/dlogDp - Number) 1000 100 Position 11 Position 10 Position 9 Position 8 Position 7 Position 6 Position 5 Position 4 Position 3 Position 2 Position 1 10 1 0.1 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 Mean Aerodynamic Particle Size Comparison of 20,35 & 70 psi 1.5in (3.9 cm) from chamber Concentration (dw/dlogDp - Number) 10000 70 psi 35 psi 20 psi 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 Range of alveolar infectivity Meandeposition Aerodynamicand Particle Size 12 Aerosol Protection in Cell Sorters • Biological Safety Cabinet • Flow Cytometer specific – Containment vs. Evacuation – FACS Aria • Aerosol management system (evacuation) • Sort Chamber – Is there aerosol evacuation from sort chamber? Aria Sort Chamber Sort Chamber Door Closed Collection Chamber: AMS evacuation Aspirator Drawer Closed Tube Holder w/rubber O-ring Aspirator Drawer Open Sort Chamber Door Gasket 13 Aria Sort Chamber Design • Sealed Sort chamber door • Tube holders sealed with o-ring below chamber • Fail mode (clog): – Stream turns off, sample unloads, aspirator door closes • What happens to aerosols in the sort chamber? • Does this design permit evacuation of aerosols after fail? UV-APS Measurements of Aria Sort Chamber containment & evacuation • Conditions: – Induce fail mode by deviating stream to hit side of waste trough – After fail mode induced, shut off stream; wait 15 sec, open Sort Chamber door & take measurement at sort chamber door opening – Variables: AMS on vs. off, Aspirator door open vs. closed, – UV tracer dye as sample at 1:25 dilution (also in Biological Safety Cabinet) 14 Risk Reactor Clear Blue Dye Risk Reactor’s IFWB-C0 is used in: Coatings. Water Tracing. Invisible fluorescent marking inks. Folder-gluers. Conformal Coatings. UV Sensor and automation markings. Non-destructive testing. Printing Inks. Leak detection. Man-made fibers. Special Effects. Color shifter. Household Articles. Coating Coverage. Public power utilities. Military facilities. Engineering firms. Testing companies and laboratories. Tank constructors and installers. Electrical equipment manufacturer. Assembly operations. Quality control during manufacturing. Product tracking. Technical Information: Shelf Life: Minimum 12 months. Emission Wave Length: 460-470 nm Excitation Wave Length: 350 nm Risk Reactor also carries EPA Approved, NSF Certified Water Based Tracers for drinking water applications. Aerosol Detection From Opened Sort Chamber Door Conditions: •UV tracer dye as sample •Fail mode (stream deflection) •Sort chamber door open •Measure 6.5cm from chamber •Performed in Biosafety Cabinet 15 UV-APS Measurements of Aria Sort Chamber Containment & Evacuation TEST 1: CLOSED CHAMBER 1. Tube holder in place 2. Sort chamber closed 3. Aspirator door closed 4. Fail mode – turn off stream-wait 15 sec 5. No AMS. 6. Open sort chamber and take measurement 18x10e3 UV-APS Measurements of Aria Sort Chamber Containment & Evacuation TEST 2: OPEN ASPIRATOR DOOR WITH AMS 1. Tube Holder in place. 2. Sort chamber closed 3. Aspirator door open 4. Fail mode – turn off stream-turn on AMS, wait 15 sec 5. Open sort chamber and take measurement 450 16 Problem With ‘Containment’ Design Even with aspirator door open, Tube holder o-ring and tubes in place prevent air flow from sort chamber Sort Chamber is sealed prevented air flow exchange for evacuation Inefficient evacuation of sort chamber: potential exposure when chamber is opened Modifications of Aria Tube Holder and Sort Chamber Door Threaded hole for Luer fitting Holes in tube holder 0.22 μm syringe filter 17 Modifications of Aria Tube Holder and Sort Chamber Door UV-APS Measurements of Aria Sort Chamber Containment & Evacuation TEST 3: MODIFICATION OF TUBE HOLDER AND SC DOOR; CLOSED ASPIRATOR DOOR WITH AMS 1. Tube Holder in place. 2. Sort chamber closed 3. Aspirator door closed 4. Fail mode – turn off stream-turn on AMS, wait 15 sec 5. Open sort chamber and take measurement 1.5 x 10e3 18 UV-APS Measurements of Aria Sort Chamber Containment & Evacuation TEST 3: MODIFICATION OF TUBE HOLDER AND SC DOOR; OPEN ASPIRATOR DOOR WITH AMS 1. Tube Holder in place. 2. Sort chamber closed 3. Aspirator door open 4. Fail mode – turn off stream-turn on AMS, wait 15 sec 5. Open sort chamber and take measurement 6. Conclusion: Simple modification permits evacuation of aerosols from Sort chamber 3 Published Methods of Containment Assessment in Cell Sorters • Bacteriophage T4 test • GloGerm bead test – Can we measure Glo-Germ beads with the UV-APS and… – What frequency of total aerosols produced in fail mode contain GloGerm beads? – Can we use the UV-APS to validate the GloGerm procedure for routine testing? 19 GloGerm: Can We Measure Them Using the UV-APS? GloGerm from spray bottle GloGerm stream fail mode 18% UV+ 0.3% UV+ Why So Few GloGerm Positive Particles? • Positive control for Glo-Germ tests routinely recover >50 beads/slide field • Aerotech collects 35L/min for 5 min – 175L total • UV-APS collects 1L/min for 20 sec – 0.333L total • • • • 175/0.33=525 Or 500 fold more air sampled with Aerotech 0.3%X65261=173UV+ (GloGerm) particles 173x500=8.65x104 in 5 minutes at increased rate 20 UV-APS and GloGerm • GloGerm are measurable by UV-APS • Differences in beads detected explained by collection rates and times • Possible to validate GloGerm procedure with the UV-APS Aerosol Protection • Biological Safety Cabinet • Flow Cytometer specific • PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) – Respirators, Surgical Masks & Helmets, PAPR’S 21 Filtration Theory of Fiber Filters – Misconception that aerosol filters are microscopic sieves – Mechanisms of deposition on fiber filters: • • • • • 1. Interception 2. Inertial impaction 3. Diffusion 4. Gravitational settling 5. Electrostatic attraction Filtration Theory of Fiber Filters 0.3 μm particles have highest penetration 22 Respirators (filtering facepiece) – Standards: US NIOSH 42 CFR Part 84:, European EN149: 2001 & Australian Standard AS1716. • Validation: NaCl particles used to test for filtration efficiency • NIOSH: N-95, -99, -100 respirators – % penetration of most penetrating particles, i.e. 5% penetration (95% efficiency) of 0.3μm NaCl particles for N-95 filters Does NaCl Particle Penetration Represent Equivalent Protection to Biologics? • Published experiments have demonstrated no difference in filtration of biological aerosols and non-biologics – Brosseau et al, 1997; Chen et al., 1994; McCullough et al., 1997; Qian et al., 1998; Willeke et al., 1996 – Conclusion: non-biological particles with the same size, shape, and density are appropriate surrogates for biological aerosols. 23 Respirator Fit Testing Requirements • For Respirators to work, they must fit your face! – In US, OSHA requires annual fit testing for all respirator wearers – In Europe, CEN standard includes a ‘total inward leakage’ test – In UK, Approved Code of Practices of COSHH requirement, but only 1st time for wearer • Fit testing does not guarantee proper fit every time it is used – Requires the wearer to confirm correct fit – Note: Respirators cannot be used with facial hair (beards) Other PPE • Surgical Masks – Not NIOSH certified as respirators – Numerous reports of poor filtration efficiency e.g.. Penetration of 20 – 100% for particles in the 0.1 to 4.0 μm aerodynamic diameter range have been observed 24 Other PPE Surgical Helmet Systems • Developed for orthopedic surgery, where aerosols and splatter is common. • Not certified as respirators; may have BFE or VFE >99.9% but use 3.0μm particles with bacteria or viruses (70% or < with 0.3 μm NaCl particles) – Some cite ASTM standard, but meant for clothing not a respirator Standard PAPR’s • Powered Air Purifying Respirators – HEPA filter – NIOSH certified – Equivalent to N-100 respirator rating – Can be helmet or half-face respirators – Do not require fit testing – Can be worn with facial hair 25 Conclusions • Using the UV-APS, Aerosols generated by cell sorters can be characterized & the range of aerosol size include the most potentially infectious • Modifications to the sort chamber in a FACS Aria reduces risk of aerosol exposure • The APS should help to validate current methods of containment testing • PPE is essential to operator safety, but must be aware of types and their limitations Acknowledgements • The Flow Cytometry Section, NIAID: – – – – – – – – Mehrnoosh Abshari Calvin Eigsti Bishop Hague Carol Henry Tom Moyer Michele Racine Dave Stephany Elina Stregevsky • The Division of Occupational Health and Safety, NIH – Jeff Potts – Gino Begluitti 26 THANK YOU! 27