* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download - Free Documents
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Extrachromosomal DNA wikipedia , lookup
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
DNA damage theory of aging wikipedia , lookup
ORIGINAL ARTICLE In vivo study on metal release from xed orthodontic appliances and DNA damage in oral mucosa cells Fiorenzo Faccioni, DDS, MD,a Paola Franceschetti, PhD,b Marzia Cerpelloni, TA,c and Maria E. Fracasso, MHPd Verona, Italy Interest in the amount of metal ion intake from dental alloys has grown. Fixed orthodontic appliances usually include brackets, bands, and archwires made of stainless steel, nickeltitanium, or nickelcobalt alloys, and these can release metal ions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biocompatibility in vivo of xed orthodontic appliances, evaluating the presence of metal ions in oral mucosa cells, their cytotoxicity, and their possible genotoxic effects. Mucosa samples were collected by gentle brushing of the internal part of the right and left cheeks of orthodontic patients and control subjects who were not receiving orthodontic treatment. The cells were immediately prepared for cell viability and the comet assay. Nickel and cobalt cellular content was quantied by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ICPMS. The results indicate that nickel and cobalt concentrations were .fold and .fold higher, respectively, in the patients than in the controls cellular viability was signicantly lower in the patients than in the controls, and there was a signicant negative correlation with metal levels. The biologic effects, evaluated by alkaline comet assay, indicated that both metals induced DNA damage more cells with comets and apoptotic cells. There were signicant positive correlations between cobalt levels and the number of comets and apoptotic cells, nickel levels and number of comet cells, and cobalt levels and comet tails. This study corroborates that nickel and cobalt released from xed orthodontic appliances can induce DNA damage in oral mucosa cells. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop everal studies have investigated whether orthodontic appliances release metal ions through emission of electrogalvanic currents, with saliva as the medium or through continuous erosion over time., The oral environment is particularly ideal for the biodegradation of metals because of its thermal, microbiologic, and enzymatic properties. Intraoral xed orthodontic appliances include brackets, bands, and archwires that are made of alloys containing nickel, cobalt, and chromium in different percentages. At present, the different types of orthodontic archwires From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona. a Professor of orthodontics, Department of Biomedical Morphological Sciences, Section of Dentistry. b Assistant research scientist, Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Pharmacology. c Technical assistant, Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Occupational Health. d Professor of toxicology, Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Pharmacology. Reprint requests to Prof Maria Enrica Fracasso, Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona. Policlinico Borgo Roma, P. le Scuro, , Verona, Italy email, mariaenrica.fracassounivr.it. Submitted, January revised and accepted, July . Copyright by the American Association of Orthodontists. //. doi./j.ajodo... S contain to nickel, to chromium, and to cobalt., Therefore, data on the biocompatibility of alloys are great interest. Nickel is a strong immunologic sensitizer, although nickel sensitivity has been reported to be lower in subjects who have received orthodontic treatment perhaps they develop immunological tolerance over the long period of treatment., On the other hand, chromium and cobalt ions can also cause hypersensivity, dermatitis, and asthma. These metals can induce other adverse biologic effects, such as cytotoxicity, and they are suspected genotoxic agents. Many metal compounds are carcinogenic to animals or humans their mechanisms are not overall known, but pathway might be the involvement of the metals with DNA interaction, either directly or indirectly. Several metals have been shown to have cogenotoxicity mechanisms seem to be predominant the generation of oxidative DNA damage and the interference with DNA repair and DNA replication processes., Recently, an electrophoretic technique capable of detecting DNA single strand breaks and alkali labile sites in individual cells has been developed by Singh et al. The importance of the singlecell gel electrophoresis or comet assay comes from its ability to evaluate Italy. .p. Previous studies have investigated. One milliliter of cell suspension cells from buccal mucosa cells of each patient was treated with nitric acid mL. Nickel and cobalt standard solutions of between . and aliquots of buccal mucosa cells of each patient were immediately used for comet assay. V/cm and mA at room temperature. This is not sufcient to assess the biocompatibility of orthodontic appliances that are in the mouth for several years. nickel. . stainless steel TruChrome SS. but less information exists about adverse biologic effects of these metals in vivo.. iron. . iron. One hundred randomly selected cells of each subject were analyzed cells for each of replicate slides. The rst group comprised orthodontic patients with xed appliances in both arches. and urine of patients with xed orthodontic appliances. The brushes were stirred in ml of phosphatebuffer saline solution PBS. both in vitro and in vivo. and possible DNA damage in the buccal cells by metal ion release. Haverhill. The metal content in the buccal mucosa cells was measured according to Forrer et al. Rocky Mountain Orthodontics. Glendora. nickel. measured from the center of the comet head and by tail moment. Milan. Hewlett Packard S. and then diluted with deionized distilled water. exposed to alkali pH for minutes. measurable but not toxic levels of metals in blood. These studies have reported in vitro. their viability was determined by using the trypan blue exclusion technique. molybdenum. or chromiumcobaltnickel alloy Elgiloy. chromium. such as nickel and chromium. the material was American Iron and Steel Institute AISI type for the bands and type for the brackets Ormco. Table I gives the general characteristics of patients and controls. cell suspensions were centrifuged. Suffolk. The alkaline version of the comet assay was performed as described previously. The slides were analyzed with a uorescent microscope Axioplan Zeiss LSM Carl Zeiss. Florence.l. Lysis was performed overnight at pH . The slides were neutralized. The results were presented as mean SD of medians of each subject. The archwires used in this study were nickeltitanium alloy Memoria Anat Arches. and the electrophoresis was performed for minutes at V . Cells were then placed in an electrophoresis chamber.. Italy. Faccioni et al American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics December Table I. Denver. All steps were performed under yellow light to prevent additional DNA damage. which was dened as the product of the comet length and the amount of DNA in the tail. titanium. Milan. and added to a slide precoated with L of agarose . Colo. Epithelial cells of buccal mucosa from each patient were collected. tail length m. Rocky Mountain Orthodontics. the release of these metals from orthodontic appliances. this is the rst study that examines directly in vivo on each patient the concentration of metal ions in oral mucosa cells. chromium. Leone S. To measure the amount of nickel and cobalt release. The purpose of this study was to measure the metal levels in the buccal mucosa cells and to evaluate their possible adverse biological effects.a. according to the method of Besarti Nia et al.. dried with ethanol. by gentle brushing of the internal part of the right and left cheeks with an interdental brush. The second group comprised subjects who were not undergoing orthodontic treatment and had no dental restorations. and ltered through polyamide gauze m mesh opening. suspended in PBS. General characteristics of subjects Controls / Patients / Parameters Number of subjects Fixed appliances y Male/female Age y Smokers Drinkers intercellular differences in DNA damage and repair in very small samples of proliferating or nonproliferating cells. Calif. with a Babington nebulizer. Sesto Fiorentino. cobalt. the biocompatibility of orthodontic appliances cellular viability and apoptosis. United Kingdom. nickel. evaluated with comet assay. Series .. . the cells were counted. . Perceptive Instruments..r. The xed appliances consisted of an average of to bands and bonded brackets. Briey. . pH . . Italy. after washing out the mouth many times with tepid water to remove exfoliated dead cells. Informed consent was obtained after the objective of the study was fully explained. saliva. Italy and image analysis Comet Assay II. the presence of metals.. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty ve subjects were included in this study. To our knowledge. and. Milan. in vivo. L of cell suspension about cells were mixed with L of lowmeltingpoint agarose . . we used inductively coupled plasmamass spectrometry IPCMS Hewlett Packard .. and stained with ethidium bromide g/ml. The ltrates were pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in RPMI Life Technology. . DNA damage was evaluated by percentage of DNA in the tail DNA. . . in simulated saliva medium. Correlations were evaluated with Spearman r tests. GraphPad Software. than those in the control subjects Table II. and the mean number of comets and apoptosis was assessed on random cells cells of replicate slides for each subject. The statistical analysis by nonparametric test MannWhitney Utest showed that the group of subjects with xed orthodontic appliances had mean values of tail moment and tail length significantly higher than the control subjects P . the mean levels of cobalt and nickel were . . and. which can show DNA damage strand breaks. Representative images of cells with an undetectable degree of DNA fragmentation A. ng/L were used. . for the measurements. in this case. . Number Faccioni et al Table II. between groups. the product of amount of DNA in the tail. Signicance determined by tailed MannWhitney U test. Patients . The potential genotoxic effects of metals on buccal mucosa cells were evaluated by comet assay. respectively. Nickel Table III.. incomplete excision repair sites. . . we observed a remarkable increase of both metals in the subjects with xed orthodontic appliances the cobalt and nickel concentrations were about . is equivalent to ng/ cells. San Diego.. and mean distance of the tail migration. and the sample concentrations were calculated from the standard curve. ng/mL . . The orthodontic patients had been wearing different types of metallic alloy xed appliances in both arches for to years. . respectively. smoking. respectively. Simple linear regression analysis was carried out among the comet parameters. The results showed a marked increase of these parameters in the oral mucosa cells of the patients compared with the controls P . The biologic compatibility of xed orthodontic appliances in buccal cells was evaluated by cytogenetic variables. The nonparametric MannWhitney Utest from the Prism . the general characteristics of the subjects in this study age. there was a signicant decrease in cellular viability P . cells per sample Viability . respectively. The assay is named for the characteristic shape when the DNA exits the nucleus and the cell body.fold higher. indicating a low variability in each group. . and by cellular viability. whereas the same metals were . Table III. ng/L and . a typical comet B. including the frequencies of cells with comets and apoptotic cells.American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Volume . . . When we examined the amount of nickel and cobalt ions in the buccal mucosa cells. the percentage of DNA in the tail or tail intensity and tail moment. Cytotoxicity and frequency of buccal cells with comet and apoptotic cells in controls n and patients n with xed orthodontic appliances for years Controls . The control group consisted of subjects who were not undergoing orthodontic treatment. P value . these differences were signicantly higher in the statistical analysis with the Student t test P . All P values were tailed. ng/mL and . Comets . . In this study. ng/mL. Calif statistics program was used to analyze the signicance of the differences between controls and the subjects with appliances. The frequencies of cells with a tail comet and of apoptotic cells were scored. ng/mL. and P .fold and . Values are mean SD of median of each subject. . Parameters Statistical analysis with Student t test. . viability. P . In the control group. parameters characterizing DNA strand breaks were evaluated tail length.. we used the isotopes Ni and Co with an internal standard of Rh . and an apoptotic cell C are shown in Figure . Table IV analyzes the data of comet parameters between groups the mean and the median values of each parameter were very similar. while the percentage of DNA in the tail was similar in both groups. . and alcohol drinking were similar in both groups. and the presence of different metals in the cells. . There were signicant positive correlations between cobalt levels in the buccal cells and tail . RESULTS As indicated in Table I. g/L. alkalilabile sites. ng/mL and . sex. Nickel and cobalt release from the xed orthodontic appliances was analyzed by ICPMS. The statistical difference between groups of metal levels cobalt and nickel was calculated with the Student t test. in the patient group. . P . the number of cells with comet or apoptotic cells. Results are given as ng/mL that. cells per sample Apoptosis . Mean SD values of cobalt and nickel levels ng/mL evaluated by ICPMS in buccal cells of controls n and patients n Cobalt Subjects Controls Patients . . Our aim was to evaluate possible damage of cellular DNA induced by these metals by analyzing the levels of nickel and cobalt. was signicantly below the average dietary intake and did not reach toxic concentrations. . EF. including saliva. released from orthodontic appliances in saliva or blood samples. they can be in the mouth for years or more. Several in vitro and in vivo methods have been used to study the release of metals and their content in biologic uids. . . median and range of comet assay in buccal cells of control subjects and patients with xed orthodontic appliances Group n subjects Controls Statistical data mean SD median range mean SD median range Tail moment DNA in tail Tail length m Patients . . apoptotic cell. Signicance determined by tailed MannWhitney U test. we chose to evaluate nickel and cobalt cellular levels as biomarkers of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity.. . . and a signicant negative correlation between nickel levels with cellular viability Fig . . . A. . . B. Fluorescence photomicrographs showing individual oral mucosa cells from comet assay. The most common alloy constituents are cobalt. The studies have shown that these metals were released during the rst or months of orthodontic therapy. Descriptive parameters mean SD. Cell without DNA damage. and urine. The alloys used in dentistry are exposed to several aggressive physicalchemical events. because these metals were the higher constituents with harmful characteristics of the appliances used during orthodontic therapy. A signicant positive correlation was found between nickel ions and number of cells with comet r . length. Faccioni et al American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics December Fig . it cannot be excluded that even nontoxic concentrations might be sufcient to induce important biologic effects in cells of oral mucosa.. brackets. blood.. NS P .... chromium.. followed by other metals in different amounts. . and number of comet and apoptotic cells. and nickel. . . . DISCUSSION We investigated the presence of metal ions in oral mucosa cells in orthodontic patients wearing xed appliances.. Corrosion events are very frequent in the oral cavity. and both stainless steel and nickeltitanium archwires. . C. . . and the metals were actually absorbed by patients with systemic distribution. Experimental and epidemiologic studies . A standard orthodontic appliance consists of bands.. P . . and to assess the cytogenetic damage by comet assay in the buccal mucosa cells.. . Not signicant. such as high concentrations of oxygen and chloride mixtures in saliva. and a signicant negative correlation with cell viability Fig . . and acid product deposit from microbiologic metabolism. NS. and plaque. P . . Although the orthodontic appliances had no effect on the general levels of metals. Table IV. which are the cells directly exposed. AD. . typical comet of damaged cell. tartar. The main conclusions indicate that the measurable amount of metal. and cellular viability F. cellular viability D. Correlations between cobalt levels in buccal cells and tail length A. cellular nickel levels with number of comets E. . Number Faccioni et al Fig . number of apoptosis C.American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Volume . number of comets B. Lyon. Biodegradation of orthodon This study corroborates the potential toxicologic effects of nickel and cobalt. Biometals . Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans chromium. the parameters characterizing DNA breaks tail moment. this might be expected for nickel. Scheper RJ. chlorination byproducts. emit metal ions in sufcient quantities to induce evident cytotoxic effects. J Dent Res . Bencko V. . We noted signicant positive correlations between metal concentration ie.. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . Franceschetti P. Yarat A. Our results. Lee HJ. In general. Nickel a review of its occupational and environmental toxicology. We thank Emma Orsolini. Exp Cell Res . Moreover. van Hoogstraten IMW. such as the interaction of metals with DNA crosslinks. Burrows D. Even if a genotoxic potential has been demonstrated in certain systems. Shin JS. nickel and welding. . Fisher JR.. CONCLUSIONS might be an initiating event of adverse biologic effects. Paik RS. Lee KH. Hartwing A. Agaoglu G. which are in the mouth for or years. Rosenblum GA. IARC. To our knowledge. Hong YC. .. In any case. Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans chlorinated drinking water. Cha JY. Verbeeck R. for her skillful technical assistance. are consistent with the evidence that both metals induce these adverse biologic effects we found high frequencies of cells with comets and apoptosis in the patient group.. Hwang CJ. Lyon. Bruynzeel DP. was signicantly lower in the patients than in the control group. . Induction of immunological tolerance by oral administration of nickel and chromium. Material Science Forum . von Blomberg BME. we found that cellular viability. considering the low levels of extraneous sources eg. vol.. Because of possible adverse biologic effects. France International Agency for Research on Cancer. Boden D. France International Agency for Research on Cancer. . Metal release from simulated xed orthodontic appliances. Mutat Res . Vandekerckhove R. only tail length was signicantly correlated with the cobalt cellular content. but also are safe for patients. student in the Department of Orthodontics. . We found that the oral mucosa cells from patients with xed appliances had nickel and cobalt concentrations signicantly higher than those obtained from the subjects without orthodontic appliances. Hypersensivity to mercury. Nitinol arch wire in a stimulated oral environment changes in mechanical properties. Quinn JK. Arun T. Newman SM. Talamini G. These data indicate that nickel and cobalt alloys of orthodontic appliances. Nicholson JA. Thomson BD. normal cells can repair these lesions. Vreeburg KJJ. McCoy LT.. Tice RR. . . Clin Exp Immunol . cobalt and cobalt compounds. although nickel and cobalt content was different in the archwires studied. there were signicant negative correlations between cobalt and nickel levels and cellular viability. Measurable metal values were also found in the control group. Electrochemical research on the corrosion of orthodontic nickeltitanium wires. Barrett RD. the generation of oxidative DNA damage. evaluated a few minutes after sampling. diet. Izgu B. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . Perbellini L. . but several possible pathways seem to be involved. Magnesium inhibits nickelinduced genotoxicity and formation of reactive oxygen.. .. REFERENCES . cobalt with the number of comets and apoptotic cells. this is the rst study that describes the effects of nickel and cobalt alloys in oral mucosa cells in subjects with xed orthodontic appliances by comet assay. . nickel and chromium in relation to dental materials. Environ Health Percept . Scheider EL. among these. Current aspects in metal genotoxicity. We noted that cells from patients with high levels of nickel or cobalt showed high DNA damage and low viability. and cobalt or cobalt compounds are possibly carcinogenic to humans. . IARC. Singh NP. von Blomberg M. Andersen KE. J Am Med Assoc . using the comet assay to evaluate DNA damage and cellular death by apoptosis. and between nickel concentrations with the number of comet cells. Angle Orthod . even if. . . the mechanisms underlying this feature are largely unknown. . Burrows D. . Solda S. Lead induced DNA strand breaks in lymphocytes of exposed workers role of reactive oxygen species and protein kinase C. Fracasso ME. . tail length. Harris EF. Asthma induced by nickel. but not for cobalt. of DNA in the tail were higher in the cells of the orthodontic patients than in the controls... Nickel and chromium levels in the saliva and serum of patients with xed orthodontic appliances. . drinking water of this metal compared with nickel. Jang SM. . vol. Int Dent J . some other halogenated compounds. or interference with DNA repair and replication processes. Faccioni et al American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics December suggest that exposure to nickel compounds is associated with lung and nasal cancer. but loss of repair capacity due to a reduction in damage detection or to an enzymatic deciency in repair processes . . scientic research should be directed toward dental materials that not only require mechanic resistance to wear and tear. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol . Bishara SE.. . Reduced frequency of nickel allergy upon oral nickel contact at an early age. Temmerman E. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. and shows that these metals can produce DNA breaks in cells of the oral mucosa. Thus. De Soet JJ. it provides an insight into the examined variables that is not available by applying conventional.. DNA Repair Protocols . Salivary nickel and chromium in subjects with different types of xed orthodontic appliances. because the signicance of the interaction term was not assessed. in most cases. Speit G. Zinelis S. which were eliminated by discontinuing treatment or replacing the responsible appliance without further consequences.. Kerosuo H. The effect of monthly application of chlorexidine varnish on the microora and dental caries incidence in a population of children in Surinam. and recycled stainless steel brackets. Moe G. Part I. Gautschi K. and.. Mutat Res . which might not be familiar to clinicians. materials have served our specialty in their current forms for over decades in many applications. Schlepegrell R. Exp Cell Res b. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . conclusions on the statistical difference between the metal levels of the populations require further verication. Immunoperoxidase detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonDNA adducts in mouth oor and buccal mucosa cells of smokers and nonsmokers. Nickel content of asreceived. Burgaz Y. readers unfamiliar with research techniques are often dazzled by the complexity of a procedure or a test. Biodegradation of nickel and chromium in vitro. Detection of crosslinks with the comet assay in relationship to genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. The results of these investigations indicated that. and it will take more than a report to seriously question their safety. although the value of the evidence reported in this study should not be underestimated. Moreover. Banath JP. Eliades G. Ozer D. Mutat Res . Athanasiou A. . Godschalk RWL. Atac PA. Van Amerongen WE. Hartwig A. et al. Angle Orthod . Environ Mol Mutagen . Beyersmann D. . Balm AJM. cobalt. no adverse effects on cell viability and function were found for the cells exposed COMMENTARY What makes this study important. . evidence of genotoxicity of ions derived from orthodontic alloys on human cells is presented. The use of the Student t test is inappropriate in this case. Gruythuysen RJ. Part II. Modulation by Co II of UVinduced DNA repair. Biodegradation of orthodontic appliances. Barrett RD. brackets and wires. Bosch JA. The importance of this effect in a journal of mainly clinical readership might be fold. Snyder RD. . Bishara SE. Van Zandwijk N. presents points which need further clarication and revision. Speit G. .. and nickel. . the effect of metallic ions might be exaggerated in cells with as high apoptotic rates as the oral mucosal epithelial cells. Lutz H. Direct determination of selenium and other trace elements in serum samples by ICPMS. Van Straaten HWM. Number Faccioni et al . Stroh A.. Factors inuencing DNA migration from individual cells subjected to gel electrophoresis. mainstream techniques. . HenstenPettersen A. Second. An additional body of literature pertains to the assessment of cytotoxicity of ions released from orthodontic alloys by using various cell types and alloy aging treatments. Contemporary orthodontics. the complexity of biological action of alloys coupled with the multiplicity of modes of application and patterns of intraoral aging should prevent the reader from extrapolating direct conclusions for the clinical performance of materials. These . accepting the conclusions and endorsing the claims without critically examining the integrity of the arguments. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . tic appliances. . . Changes in the blood level of nickel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . Olive PL. and the plastic components of facemasks. Kocadereli L. . Merk O. Burgaz S.. differentiating it from the pool of conventional cytotoxicity experiments. Assessment of cytogenetic damage in lymphocytes and in exfoliated nasal cells of dental laboratory technicians exposed to chromium.. The incidents reported were mostly hypersensitivity reactions. Proft WR. is the assessment of the DNA damage incurred by the ions in oral mucosa cells. the statistical analysis of cobalt and nickel cell contents is misleading. Ertas N. The state of knowledge on the adverse effects of orthodontic materials is restricted to a series of case reports showing an immune response to headgear bows and straps. . .. Salivary nickel and chromium in patients with xed orthodontic appliances. . Fields HW Jr. Demircigil GC. However.. The comet assay singlecell gel test a sensitive genotoxicity test for the detection of DNA damage and repair. Kale PS. for the rst time in the orthodontic literature. Durand RE. Kemaloglu Y. This study. Thus. The authors examined variables population control and patients and metal cobalt and nickel. and it is possible that more than type of epithelial cells with varying apoptotic potentials were grouped in the assays. . J Trace Elements Med Biol . Caries Res . Environ Mol Mutagen . Yilmazer M. adhesives. impressive as it may be.. retrieved.. . St Louis Mosby. Most importantly. Besarati Nia A.American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Volume . Kleinjans JCS.. First. Wlodek D. Hartmann A. . Forrer R. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . The study includes advanced analytical instrumentation and complex biological assays. Eliades T. further studies are required to unequivocally establish the critical importance of these ndings. mutagenesis and sisterchromatid exchanges in mammalian cells. The cell population harvested was not characterized. Selim MI.