Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
LEGENDS TO SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES Suppl. Fig. 1. (A) Quantification of p53 and p21 protein levels determined by western blot in Fig.1A using the ImageJ software, normalized to γ-tubulin and presented as fold change relative to the level of p53 and p21 in RPE1 and HCT116 at the last day of irradiation (IR) and after 120h of recovery (REC). Results are presented as mean±SD (n=3, ANOVA, *P<0.05 vs T0). (B) Quantification of mitochondrial protein levels determined by western blot in Fig.1C using the ImageJ software, normalized to γ-tubulin and presented as fold change. Results are presented as means ± SD (n=3, ANOVA, *P<0.05 vs T0). Suppl. Fig. 2. Relative mRNA quantification of PGC-1β target genes POLG, MFN1, MFN2, COX5B, UQCRQ and NDUFB5 in RPE1 and HCT116 upon IR. Data are mean±SD (n=3, Paired ttest, *P<0.05 vs T0). Suppl. Fig. 3. FACS analysis showing the fluorescence shift of MitoTracker Red (MTR) upon irradiation of RPE1 (A), HCT116 (B) and HPS11 (C) cells. For each panel, the left hand side bar graph displays the quantification of MTR fluorescence as mean±SD (n=3, t-test, *P<0.001 vs T0), whereas the right hand side bar graph displays quantification of MTR fluorescence normalized on Calcein-AM fluorescence as mean±SD (n=3, t-test, *P<0.001 vs T0). Suppl. Fig. 4. Relative expression of p21 in HCT116p53 before (T0) and after irradiation (IR) was evaluated as a control for p53 activation. Data are mean±SD (n=3, t-test, *P<0.05 vs T0). Suppl. Fig. 5. Viability of (A) RPE1, (B) HCT116, (C) HPS11 and (D) HCT116TP53KO cells at the last day of radiation treatment (IR) and after 120h of recovery (REC). Data are mean±SD (n=4, ttest, *P <0.05 vs T0; #P<0.05 vs IR). Suppl. Fig. 6. Quantification of mitochondrial protein levels determined by western blot in Fig.3F using the ImageJ software, normalized to γ-tubulin and presented as fold change relative to the levels of mitochondrial protein in RPE1 and HCT116 at the last day of irradiation (IR) and after 120h of recovery (REC). Results are presented as means±SD (n=3, t-test, *P<0.05 vs T0). Suppl. Fig. 7. (A) Quantification of HIF1α levels determined by western blot in Fig.4A using the ImageJ software, normalized to γ-tubulin and presented as fold change relative to the level HIF1α in HCT116 at the last day of irradiation (IR) and after 120h of recovery (REC). Results are presented as means±SD (n=3, t-test, *P<0.05 vs T0). (B) Quantification of MDM2 levels determined by western blot in Fig.4C using the ImageJ software, normalized to γ-tubulin and presented as fold change relative to the level MDM2 in HCT116 at the last day of irradiation (IR) and after 120h of recovery (REC). Results are presented as means±SD (n=3, t-test, *P<0.05 vs T0). Suppl. Fig. 8. (A) Quantification of HIF1α levels determined by western blot in Fig.4D using the ImageJ software, normalized to γ-tubulin, in HCT116 cells over-expressing HIF1α (HCT116HIF1α) upon over-expression of MDM2 (+) compared to clones not over-expressing MDM2 (-). (B) Quantification of degradation of HIF1 mutated on the three residues subjected to hydroxylation (HIF1αTM), in presence and absence of over-expressed MDM2, determined by western blot in Fig. 4E using the ImageJ software, normalized to γ-tubulin. (C) Quantification of HIF1α levels determined by western blot in Fig.4F using the ImageJ software, normalized to γ-tubulin, in presence and absence of over-expressed MDM2, upon forced pharmacological HIF1 stabilization by 1M DMOG. Suppl. Fig. 9. (A) Western blot analysis of HIF1 in HCT116 cells before (T0) and after irradiation (IR) in absence and in presence of 1µM DMOG. Gamma-tubulin was used as a loading control. One representative experiment of three is shown. (B) Relative expression of BNIP3L and LDHA in RPE1 cells before (T0) and after irradiation (IR) in absence and in presence of 1µM DMOG. Data are mean±SD (n=3, t-test, *P<0.05). Suppl. Fig. 10. Relative mtDNA copy number after γ-rays treatment in HCT116 cells with HIF1α stabilized by 250nM DFO treatment. Data are mean±SD (n=3). Suppl. Fig. 11. Relative mRNA quantification of PGC-1β target genes POLG, MFN1, MFN2, COX5B, UQCRQ and NDUFB5 after irradiation in HCT116 cells with stabilized HIF1 after 1M DMOG treatment. Data are mean±SD (n=3, Paired t-test, *P<0.05 vs T0). Suppl. Fig. 12. Quantification of mitochondrial protein levels determined by western blot in Fig.4I using the ImageJ software, normalized to γ-tubulin, in HCT116 cells with stabilized HIF1 after 1M DMOG treatment and irradiated (n=3, t-test, *P<0.05 vs T0). Suppl. Fig. 13. (A) Relative mtDNA copy number in RPE1 cells before (T0) and after irradiation (IR) in absence and in presence of 1µM DMOG. Data are mean±SD (n=3). (B) Western blot analysis of mitochondrial proteins. One representative experiment of 3 is shown. (C) Relative PGC1β expression after γ-rays treatment in RPE1 cells before (T0) and after irradiation (IR) in absence and in presence of 1µM DMOG. Data are mean±SD (n=3). Suppl. Fig. 14. Quantification of p53, p21, MDM2 and p16 protein levels determined by western blot in Fig.5A using the ImageJ software and normalized to γ-tubulin, in RPE1 and HCT116 cells with stabilized HIF1 after 1M DMOG treatment at recovery after irradiation (REC). Results are presented as mean±SD (n=3, ANOVA, *P<0.05 vs T0). Suppl. Fig. 15. β-galactosidase staining of RPE1 and HCT116 cells irradiated and treated with 250nM DFO. One representative experiment of 3 is shown. Magnification: 10X. Suppl. Fig. 16. Western blot analysis of MDM2 in HCT116TP53KO and HPS11 cells after irradiation. Gamma-tubulin was used as a loading control. One representative experiment of 3 is shown.