Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Analysis of Various Thicknesses of Shear Wall with Opening and without Opening and their Percentage Reinforcement S.H.Jagadale*, Post Graduate Student Civil Engineering Department, Dr.D.Y.Patil School of Engg and Tech, Charholi(Bk) Pune-412105,India. [email protected] N.L. Shelke Asst. Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Dr.D.Y.Patil School of Engg and Tech, Charholi(Bk) Pune-412105,India. Abstract: Due to increase in population spacing in India is needed, especially in urban areas. Structural engineers in the seismic regions across the world often face the pre ssure to de sign high ri se buildings with stiffne ss irregularities, even though they know the se buildings are vulnerable under seismic loading. Today’s tall buildings are becoming more and more slender, leading to the possibility of more sway in comparison with earlier high rise buildings. Improving the structural system s of tall buildings can control their dynamic re sponse. With more appropriate structural forms such as shear walls and improved material properties. Lateral force s of wind and earthquake are usually resisted by shear walls which are parallel to the direction of lateral load. These shear walls, by their shearing resistance and resi stance to overturning, transfer the lateral loads to the foundation. In the seismic design of buildings, reinforced concrete structural walls, or shear walls, act as major earthquake resi sting members. The properties of the se seismic shear walls dominate the response of the buildings, and therefore, it is important to evaluate the seismic re sponse of the walls appropriately. A shear wall may contain many openings due to the functional requirements such as doors and windows, which may largely affect the overall seismic re sponse of the structure . An earthquake load is applied to a building of ten stories located in zone V. In this pre sent study, main focus i s to determine effectiveness of shear wall with various thickne sse s, and al so vertical opening, staggered opening and without opening has been studied with the help of different models and also analysi s and observe the behaviour of shear wall with and without openings in shear wall under seismic loads. Keywords: Shear Wall, Response spectrum Method, Base, Shear, Time Period. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1. General Information I n modern high rise buildings, shear walls are generally used as a vertical structural element for resisting the lateral loads that is induced by the effect of wind and earthquakes, they will have the strength and stiffness to resist the horizontal forces. Lateral forces caused by wind, earthquake, and uneven settlement loads, in addition to the weight of structure and occupants; create powerful t wisting (t orsion) forces. These forces can literally tear (shear) a building apart. Reinforcing a frame by attaching or placing a rigid wall inside it maintains the shape of the frame and * Corresponding Author prevents rotation at the joints. Shear walls not only help to prevent catastrophic collapse, but they also help to prevent small-scale damage like c racked drywall and fractured tile. Shear walls play the same role in houses in high-wind zones. No matter the source of the force exerted on a house — atmospheric or tectonic—shear walls are simply designed to prot ect the home and its occupants. Finite Element modeling now days is an essential approach in analyzing and simulating civil engineering problem numerically. Shear walls are generally located at the sides of buildings or arranged in the fo rm of core that houses stairs and lifts. Shear walls in a building is a structurally efficient solution to stiffen the building because they provide t he necessary lateral strengt h and stiffness to resist horizontal forces.. They are generally provided alon g bot h length and width of the building and are locat ed at the exterior, interior sides of the buildings. Shear walls are vertical structural elements for resisting the lateral loads that may be induced by the effect of wind and earthquakes acting on tall structure. To reduce the effect of earthquake reinforced concrete shear walls are used in the building. These can be used for improving seismic response of buildings. The provision of shear wall in building t o achieve rigidity has been found effective and economical. Shear walls are usually used in tall building to avoid collapse of buildings. When shear wall are situated in advantageous positions, they can form an efficient lateral force resisting system. Shear walls may have one or more openings for functional reasons such as doors, windows, and other types of openings in shear wall. The size and location of openings may vary depending on purpos es of the openings. The size and location of shear walls is extremely critical. Properly designed and detailed buildings with shear walls have shown good performance in past earthquakes. effectiveness in minimizing earthquake damage in structural and nonstructural elements (like glass windows and building contents). For this study residential type of structure, with G+10 building are considered which one of the frame, with or without opening in shear wall and also find out their percentage reinforcement by using finite element software (E TABS) under earthquake loads. 1.2 Aim & Objectives of Study Analysis shear wall, wit h or without opening and staggered opening of various thicknesses. Objectives of study:1. To study the Performance of the building with opening or without opening in shear wall having varying thickness. 2. To study the behaviour of vertical opening or staggered opening in shear wall having varying thickness. 3. To study, which thickness of shear walls is give best result under the action of lateral loads. 4. To determine the percentage of reinforcement in shear wall under the action of lateral loads in buildings with help of comparison. Shear walls also provide lateral stiffness to prevent the roof or floor above from excessive side-sway. When shear walls are stiff enough, they will prevent floor and roof framing members from moving off their supports. Also, buildings that are s ufficiently stiff will usually suffer less non-structural damage. When shear walls are strong enough, then capable of transferring lateral forces from walls to next element as a path- floors, roofs to the ground foundation in a direction parallel to their planes a shear walls, floors, foundation walls, footings. Shear walls in high seismic regions require special detailing. However, in past earthquakes, even buildings with sufficient amount of walls that were not specially detailed for seismic performance (but had enough well distributed reinforcement) were saved from collapse. Shear wall buildings are a popular choice in many earthquake prone countries, like Chile, New Zealand and USA. Shear walls are easy to construct, because reinforcement detailing of walls is relatively straightforward and therefore easily implemented at site. Shear walls are efficient, both in terms of construction cost and Fig.1: Concept of with and without opening in shear wall 2.0 MODELLING AND ANALYSIS In this Project, the model was meshed in order to obtain results with higher accuracy. The earthquake load and load combinations were applied as per IS 1893 – 2002 and the seismic analysis was done by response spectrum method. In this study, zone given V because in that area eart hquake occure more time and also their frequency is more. The results obtained are compared for the displacement and base shear at different storey levels 2.1 Location of Shear Wall When shear wall are situated in advantageous positions, they can form an efficient lateral force resisting system. They are generally provided along both length and width of the building and are located at the exterior, interior sides of the buildings. Shear wall located as a symmetrically to reduce effects of twist. Symmetry can be along one or bot h the direction. Shear walls in both directions, which is a more realistic situation because both wind and earthquake forces need to be resisted in both directions. Model 3 – Staggered opening in shear wall structure 300 mm thicknesses:Model 4 – Without opening in shear wall structure Model 5 – Vertical opening in shear wall structure Model 6 – Staggered opening in shear wall structure Figure 2 and Figure 3 show Grid -Plan of RCC building and elevation of building respectively. Some shear wall are used for Lift wall and they are situated in interior of structure. These shear walls are not providing a opening. 2.2. Preliminary data required for analysis Fig.3: Elevational Plan for RCC structure Fig.2: Grid Plan for RCC layout 2.2.1 Plan of the building model are given below 2.2.2 Code of Practice 200 mm thicknesses:- Number of codes are us ed for design and analysis of RCC structure, but in that study, refer a following IS codes- Model 1 – Without opening in shear wall structure IS 456 - 2000-Plain and Reinforced Concrete. Model 2 – Vertical opening in shear wall structure IS 875 Parts-I -Code of Practice for Design Dead Loads Shear3 Wall 3 For Buildings and Structures IS 875 Parts-I I-Code of Practice for Design Live Loads 4 For Buildings and Structures. IS 875 Parts-III -Code of Practice for Design Wind Loads 5 Thickness 200mm, 300mm 4 Size of column 300 mm x 600 5 Size of beam 300mm x 600 6 Depth of slab 150mm mm mm For Buildings and Structures IS-1893-2002-(Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design Of Structures) 6 IS 13920:1993 – Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete structures Preliminary data are required foe seismic analysis are as follows in a tabular form. 1.8m X 2.4m, Opening 7 of 7 Shear Wall 0.9m X 1.2m Table 1: Preliminary geometrical data required for analysis Sr.No. Parameter Typical Floor Plan 1 Dimension 2 Number of Story Values 22.7m X 18.2 1.2m X 1.2m Table 3: Preliminary load consideration data required for analysis Sr. No. G+10 1 Parameter Values 1 Dead Load As per structure 2 Impoed Load 2KN/m3 Floor height 3 4 Ground Floor 3.5m Typical Floor 3.0m Infill wall 150 mm thick Table 2: Preliminary structural data required for analysis Sr. No. 1 Parameter 1 Type of structure 2 Ty pical 3 KN/m3 Special RC moment 4 4 Water Proofing Specific5 weight of 5 M25 Reinforcement Fe 500 Grade 25 KN/m3 concrete Specific6 weight of 6 Balcony-3KN/m3, Toilet- 4 KN/m3 resisting frame Concrete 2 Grade Floor-1KN/m3, Terrace Floor- 3 Values Materials 2 3 Floor Finish Infill Wall 20 KN/m3 Table 4: Seismic data required for analysis [As pe IS 1893:2002 (part-I)] Sr. No 1 2 3 4 5 Parameter Values 1 Seismic zone V 2 Zone factor (Z) 0.36 3 Type of soil Medium 4 Damping 5% 5 Response 5 6 0.8 reduction factor (R) 6 Importance factor (I) lateral forces at all levels above the story under consideration. The base shear is found to be much lesser for shear wall with staggered openings when compared to shear wall with vertical openings. As the base shear is reduced, the shear wall with staggered openings will be less susceptible to damage. However, the base shear depends upon the existing soil condition at the site. 1.0 ( For Residential Building) 0.7 0.6 0.5 Series 1 0.4 Series 2 0.3 Series 3 Time Period 0.2 0.1 0 1 3 5 7 9 3.0 OBSERVATION AND RESULT 3.1.1Time Period Mode Fig.4: Mode versus Time Period of 200mm thk shear wall For seismic analysis, the first mode or the fundamental time period is the most significant, which is the inherent property of the building. The 0.9 time period obtained from the analysis for all three 0.8 models is shown in figure. It can be seen that the staggered openings exhibited a higher value of 0.7 time period when compared to vertical openings, and without opening in shear wall time period is 0.6 less as compare to with opening in wall, which Time 0.5 indicates that the shear wall with staggered Period openings can perform better during seismic action 0.4 than the vertical openings and without opening in 0.3 wall. 0.2 These results are comparatively same for 0.1 thickness of 200mm and 300mm s hear wall. These results are shown as a graphical form 0 Notation:Series 1 = Staggered Opening in shear wall Series 2 = Vertical Opening in Shear Wall Series 3 =Without opening in shear wall 3.1.2 Base Shear Story shear is defined as the sum of design 11 Series 1 Series 2 Series 3 1 3 5 7 9 11 Mode Fig.5: Mode versus Time Period of 300mm thk shear wall Figure shows, without opening in shear wall base shear is more as compared to with opening in shear wall in all storey level. Acknowledgements 6000 5000 4000 Base Shear 3000 Series 1 2000 Series 2 1000 Series 3 Storey12 Storey10 Storey8 Storey6 Storey4 I would like to thank Principal, Dr. Ashok S. Kasnale and H.O.D, Dr. Sanjay K. Kulkarni of Civil Department, who were the source of inspiration throughout the making of this project stage I and helped us to accomplish our goals in a much easier and healthy Story No. References Fig.6: Storey versus Ba se Shear in X Direction of 200mm thk. Shear Wall [1] Mosoarc a Marius, ―Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete s hear walls with regular and staggered openings after strong earthquakes between 2009 and 2011‖, Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 34, pp. 537–565, 2013. 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Series 1 Series 2 Series 3 Base Storey 2 Storey 4 Storey 6 Storey 8 Storey 10 Storey 12 Base Shear Storey2 Base 0 I express my profound gratitude to our project guide Dr. Nagesh L. Shelke for their inspiring guidance due to which our difficulties and questions were shaped into the development of this project and complete support, co-operation and valuable suggestions. Story No. Fig.7: Storey versus Ba se Shear in X Direction of 200mm thk. Shear Wall Notations: Series 1 = Without Opening in shear wall Series 2 = Vertical Opening in Shear Wall Series 3 = Staggered opening in shear wall 4.0 CONCLUSION Performance of staggered opening is a best in a seismic zone as compared to vertical opening and without opening in shear wall. Shear base is less for a staggered opening in shear wall. The base shear of without opening is more as compare to opening in shear wall and also observe that the time period is more with comparision of vertical opening and without opening in shear wall [2] Mazen A. Musmar-Analysis of Shear Wall with Openings Using S olid65 Element, Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume 7, No. 2, 2013 [3] Sharmin Rez a Chowdhury, M.A. Rahman, M.J. Islam and A.K. Das, ―Effects of openings in shear wall on seismic response of structures‖, IJCA, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 10–13, Dec. 2012. [4] Anshuman S, Dipendu B hunia, Bhavin Ramjiyani, ―solution of shear wall location in multi storied building,‖ international journal of civil and structural engineering, 2011. [5] O. Esmaili et al. ‗Study of Structural RC Shear Wall System in a 56-Story RC Tall Building‘, The 14t h World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China [6] H-S. Kim, D.-G. Lee ―Analysis of shear wall with openings using super elements‖ Engineering Structuers 25(2003) 981 991. [7] Yanez F.V., R. Park and T. Paulay, ―Seismic behavior of walls with irregular openings‖, in Proc. Tenth world conferenc e on Earthquake Engineering, Rotterdam, 1992. [8] Aejaz Ali and James K. Wight, ―R.C. structural walls with staggered door openings ‖, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 5, pp. 1514–1531, May. 1991. [9] Husain, MA, 2011. Analysis of Shear Wall with Openings using B rick Element, European Journal of Scientific Research, ISS N 1450-216X, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 359-371. [8] Kim HS. and Lee DG. 2003. Analysis of shear wall with openings using super elements, Engineering Structures, 25:981-991. [10] Lin C.Y. and C.L. Kuo, ―Behavior of shear wall with openings‖, in Proc. Ninth world conference on Earthquake Engineering, Japan, 1988, paper, p. 535–540. [11] Anuj Chandiwala, ―Earthquake Analysis of Building Configuration with Different Position of Shear Wall‖, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering ISS N 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 2, Issue 12, December 2012, A dhoc Lecturer in Sarvajanik College of Engineering & Technology, Athvalines, Surat, Gujarat, India. [12] Balkaya C. and Kalkan E. ‗Estimation of fundamental periods of shear-wall dominant building structures‘, Earthquake E ngineering and Structural. Dynamics. 2003; 32:985–998. [13] Pankaj Agarwal and Manish Shrikhande ―Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures ‖ PHI Learning Private Limited, New Delhi.