* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download full-wave vlf modes in a cylindrically symmetric enhancement of
Survey
Document related concepts
Nordström's theory of gravitation wikipedia , lookup
Plasma (physics) wikipedia , lookup
First observation of gravitational waves wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Young (scientist) wikipedia , lookup
Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Diffraction wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup
Density of states wikipedia , lookup
Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup
Time in physics wikipedia , lookup
Wave packet wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Planet. S~~nct? .ScL. Vol. 23. pp. 1649 to 1657. Pergamon Press, 1975. Printed in Northern Ireland FULL-WAVE VLF MODES IN A CYLINDRICALLY SYMMETRIC ENHANCEMENT OF PLASMA DENSITY M. J. LAIRD and D. NUNN* Dept. of Mathematics, Ring’s College, London WC2, England (Receiued 21 April 1975) Abstract-VLF field. It is required to account for the good transmission properties of these ducts as some leakage of energy is expected, with consequent attenuation. We consider a cylindrical duct, whose axis is parallel to a uniform magnetic field. The electron density of a cold plasma is a function only of radial distance r from the axis, taking constant values in inner and outer regions r < a and r > b, and varying smoothly in the duct wall a < r < b. We compute full-wave ‘trapped’ VLF modes. Results are presented for a range of values of the parameters of the model. In general we find that attenuation of leading modes is very low, agreeing with observation. Specific features are that leakage (arising from mode conversion in the duct wall) increases as the wall is made thinner, that leakage for the leading modes is less for weaker ducts, that many modes may propagate, and that, because of interference effects, some higher order modes also suffer little attenuation. _ 1.INTRODUCTION It has long been known that VLF waves in the magnetosphere may be channelled along magnetic field lines by means of ducts consisting of field aligned enhancements of plasma density of a few percent. The refractive index for waves propagating in the whistler mode varies with plasma density, and in consequence the ducts act in a similar way to dielectric waveguides. Their transmission properties are known to be good, since VLF radiation from lightning strikes can travel to the conjugate point without difficulty-a path of about 60,000 km for a field line with an L parameter of four. The ducts are believed to be generally of circular or elliptical cross-section, and about 10-20 km in diameter at ionospheric heights implying dimensions of a few times this deep in the magnetosphere. Evidence for ducting, together with full details of and reference to work done prior to 1965 is given in Helliwell’s book (Helliwell, 1965). More recently, Angerami (1970) has discussed observations from the OGO 3 satellite. On the theoretical side, Walker (1971, 1972) and Scarabucci and Smith (1971) have treated in considerable detail models with planar geometry, using both phase-integral techniques and full wave methods. These studies showed that indeed duct walls are extremely good reflectors of wave energy for small angles of incidence. Cylindrical geometries have been studied by * Now at the Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough. Klozenberg et al. (1965) and Boswell (1970), with metal or vacuum as an outer boundary. In this paper we present results of full wave calculations for a model with cylindrical geometry, the plasma being unbounded. A major aim has been to find the amount of attenuation arising from mode conversion in the duct walls. 2. THE MODEL We take a cold electron plasma, all ions being assumed to be immobile. At the frequencies we shall be considering, the magnetospheric plasma may be considered collisionless (lossless). However, it is often convenient to have a damping term, so provision is made for its incIusion. Our model duct is then as follows. The duct axis is taken as the z-axis in a cylindrical coordinate system (r, 4, z). Parallel to this axis is a uniform magnetic induction B,. The electron density is a function, N(r), only of distance r from the axis. It is a constant, N,, in an inner core r < a, a constant, Nr,, in an outer region r > b, and varies smoothly from iV, to IVYwithin the duct wall a < r < b. (Note : in the rest of this paper subscripts a and b will be used to denote quantities in the inner core and outer region respectively.) As the equations of the problem have to be integrated numerically for r between a and b, virtually any variation for N(r) may be used. In our computations we chose a sinusoidal variation with half-period (b - a), giving a maximum density gradient half way through the duct wall. 1649 M. J. LAIRDand D. NUNN 1650 3. MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE FIELD EQUATIONS Hence A comprehensive development of the field equations for a general cylindrical geometry is given by Allis et al. (1963). Accordingly here we restrict our treatment to what is necessary for the problem in hand. We suppose that all components of the wave electric field E and magnetic induction B are given by the real parts of complex quantities of the form F(r) exp (i5), where 5 = kz + m# - wt, (1) m is an integer, and k and w are constants. In our analysis we shall take w to be real and k complex, the imaginary part of k being of particular interest. The linearised equation of motion of the plasma electrons gives, in SI units, iwm&j = -N(r)& -I- ej x B,, (2) where e and m, are the electronic charge magnitude and mass, and j is the current density. In the absence of collisions E = 1; otherwise E = 1 + iZ, where Z is the ratio of the frequency of collision of electrons with ions to the angular wave frequency w. Now curl B = pc,j - iwE/c2. (3) r a(rm,) ;iF ~;i;+ (q2 - ka)r2Be - m2B, = 0, (10) and so B, = V,(2r)erc, where R = q2 - k2, (I 1) and Fm(llr) denotes a cylindrical function of order m, i.e. a linear combination of the Hankel functions H’1*2’(lr). The remaining components of B and E rn:y then be calculated from equations (9) and (5) respectively. In the duct wall, N is varying, the above analysis cannot be used, and numerical integration must be resorted to. We return to equations (5) and (6), and note that B, and E, are nowhere differentiated with respect to r. These may then be eliminated, and there remain four coupled first order ordinary diffe~ntial equations which may be integrated numerically: dFa/dr = TirF3, i, j = 1, 2, 3, 4, (12) where the repeated subscript is summed over, and (ES, cB,, E+, cB+) = (F,, F2, Fe, FJeSi. The elements of the matrix (r,,) are functions alone, and are given here for reference: (13) of r Putting X = Ne2]e,m,w2, Y = eB,lm,w, .(lr) comparison of equations (2) and (3) indicates that we may omit the displacement current term in (3) if X > 1, i.e. if the wave frequency is we11 below the electron plasma frequency. With this omission on substituting for j, equation (2) becomes 5cs curl B = ioxE + iYc22 x curl 3, (5) where E is the unit vector B&Z,. To develop solutions for the regions where N is constant, we note, following, e.g. Klozenberg et al. (1965) and Boswell (1970), that equation (5), together with curl E = iwB, (6) curl B = qB (7) is satisfied by provided q is a root of T,, = T,, = Td2 = 0, T,, = -T,, = -km/Arc, A = iwXjc2(1 - Y2) T13 = Tza = -k Y, T,, = (ka - iwA)/Ac, T,, = -Td3 = ikmclwr, T,, = -T, -z--l (14) = my/r, T,, = -(k2c2 -I- Xw2)i/wc, T,, = (ioAr - ~)[Ar2~, Tdl = (m2c2 + w2r2X)z/wr2c, Tu = --l/r. Note: the above matrix elements are given for the case of no collisional damping. If collisions are inchrded, X and Y shouId be replaced by X/g and Y/E, respectively. 4. TRAPPED MODES {q* - kYq + w2X/c2 = 0. (8) Equation (7) occurs in a number of contexts, and solutions are well known. With the assumed dependence on 4 and z, qrB, = imB, - ikrB+, ‘I”B+ = -kmB,/r - q aS,l ar. (9) We now look for ‘trapped’ modes of the system; i.e. we try to find solutions of the field equations satisfying appropriate boundary conditions for which the fields do not extend appreciably outside the duct. Before giving a detailed presentation of the results it is useful to have a general picture of what to expect. VLF modes in cylindrical duct If we put k = q cos 8, equation (8) yields the familiar dispersion relation for a whistler propagating at an angle 0 to B,, namely (assuming no collisions) qa = dX/c2( Ycos 8 - 1). Equation (15) (8) may then be rewritten as q8 - kYq + kp2( Y - 1) = 0, (16) where k, is the wave number appropriate to a whistler propagating parallel to B,, i.e., Y > 1, and kDa = 02X/C2(Y - 1). (17) Figure 1 gives a plot of q/k against (k,/k)2 for given real k: a parabola with axis q/k = Y/2. When k, = k, the two roots of equation (16) are ql = k, and q2 = k(Y - 1). For Y > 2, we identify q1 as the smaller of the two roots, and note that t, (= (VI2 - k2)li2) is real for k, > k and imaginary for k, < k. On the other hand, for 1 < Y < 2, we identify q1 as the greater root and the conditions for A, to be real or imaginary are reversed. In an ordinary dielectric cylinder, for the guided modes the argument of the Hankel functions occurring in the solution is real in the dielectric itself and imaginary outside, so that the field amplitudes decay exponentially with distance from the axis (see, e.g. Collin, 1960). Similarly here we look for a solution for which 1, is real in the core and imaginary in the 1651 outer region. The analysis in the previous paragraph shows that, for small changes in density, this may occur near q = k = k,. Specifically, for Y > 2, we need k,, > k > kpb, so that the density must be enhanced in the duct, whereas for 1 < Y < 2 we need kgb B k > k,,, that is, the density within the duct must be diminished. (k, a W2.) Ray theory (Helliwell, 1965) leads to a similar conclusion. Thus we expect a wave, which we shall refer to as the principal wave, for which propagation in the core is nearly parallel to the duct axis and reflection occurs in the duct wall. There is, however, a complication in that another wave exists for which the associated root q2 is near to k( Y - l), so that As2is approximately given by k2 Y( Y - 2). For Y > 2, A, may be real everywhere, and so the wave, the escaping wave, may carry energy away from the duct. Now in the duct wall, the varying of the refractive index leads to mode conversion. Part of the principal wave is converted into the escaping wave so that attenuation may be expected, giving complex values for k. But from the work of Scarabucci and Smith (1971) only a small amount of conversion is likely, so that Im(k) < Re(k), and the above discussion in which k is taken to be real corresponds closely to the actual situation. When Y < 2, 1, may be imaginary everywhere, and so solutions may be expected for which no energy is carried away from the duct and hence there is no attenuation in the direction of the axis. Klozenberg et al. (1965) noted that the modes for positive and negative values of m were different. This \ I (I,Y-1: ik Y (191) e b I t1,1: Y ? 1 (I,Y-II 0 I< Y>2 - Y<2 (/$/Xl* FIG. 1. WAVE NUMBER AS A FUNCTION OFk,%FORGIVENk. k,,”is proportional to the electron number density. Real values for I corresnond to a/k > 1. lack of symmetry can be seen from expressions (9) for B, and B+. In an isotropic medium, q is plus or minus the angular wave number, the signs corresponding to right- and left-handed polarization respectively, so that symmetry may be maintained by changing the sign of both m and q. In our situation, this is not possible: the two roots of equation (16) have the same sign. This corresponds to the fact that the polarization of whistler mode waves is determined by the uniform magnetic field. For an observer looking in the direction of this field, the electric and magnetic vectors for the wave rotate in a clockwise, or right-handed, sense. When examining our results, we noticed a considerable similarity for modes with m = 1 & M, i.e. near symmetry about m = 1 rather than m = 0. Using recurrence relations for Bessel functions, equations (9) and (11) give, for m = 1 i M, B, = $ +?&r) Bb = - % if,(h) i(M f 1) WmdW, r(k + q) Wf i 1) + VxdW, r(k + q) + ~ B. = f %?x*~&). (18) (The factor exp (it) is understood.) For trapped modes, solutions have to be matched at the duct walls, M. J. LAW 1652 and D. NUNN and here the ratio of the second term to the first in the expressions for both BP and B+ is of order A/ak5. For the principai wave, this ratio may be expected to be very small, as t <k, and for typical whistler wave lengths of a few kilometres a duct diameter of order 100 km means that ku is quite large. B, is small compared with the transverse field. For the escaping wave, il and k are of the same order, so the first term in the expressions for B, and B+ is still dominant, while i(a is quite large, and VX+&Aa) and %?,,&&z) are approximately 180” out of phase. Thus, except for the centre of the inner core, the fields (apart from the angular dependence) for m = 1 f M may be expected to be much the same. In fact, the difference in angular dependence is largely geometrical. The principal wave propagates nearly parallel to the z-axis, and is close to being circularly polarized. (B+ $ iB?.) Transformation to a Cartesian coordinate system is thus almost equivalent to muhiplication by exp (-i#), changing the angular dependence to exp (iiM+). The fundamental mode may be. associated with m = 1 rather than with m = 0, the magnetic induction of the principal wave being given approximately by B, = -iB,. = (ik/il)g,,,(tr) exp i(kz - of). inner boundary condition to be satisfied is that of finite fields at r = 0. In the core, the above expression for B, must reduce to a sum of Bessel functions of the first kind, so that a,, = a,$ them. If damping is inserted in the outer zone, the outer boundary condition is simply that all fields go to zero as r -, to. An alternative procedure is to put zero damping in the outer region and select two waves only-the principal wave (here non-propagating that goes to zero as r -+ co, and the escaping wave whose Poynting vector is directed outwards. The procedures are almost equivalent provided that the degree of damping in the outer zone is neither too large nor too small, and give that two of the four coefficients at5 must vanish in the outer region. We now consider two solutions in the inner core of the form Trapped modes may also exist when Y > 2 for a dim~ution in density in the duct (a trough). As can be seen from Fig. 1, as kp2, which is proportional to electron density, is increased, the two roots for q become equal, when q/k = set 0 ==,X/2, and then complex. Suppose that B, = H’2’(A2r) + Rg2HE’(A2r) + R&‘2’(Q) vn 9n k2 < kpa2 < k2 P/4( Y - 1) < kpb2. (1% Then R, and rZ, are real in the core and complex in the outer zone, so that waveguidelike modes should exist, with solutions decaying exponentially with r outside the duct. One can no longer distinguish between principal and escaping waves. Both waves propagate in the core; for one wave t?is greater than COS-~(2/Y), and for the other it is less. (If the inequalities (19) hold, for some value of r in the duct wall the density is such that 0 = co@ (2/Y), and here the associated ray direction is parallel to the duct axis (Helliwell, 1965).) For propagation at an angle to the magnetic fieId, Landau damping is expected to be important. (We return to this point in our concluding remarks.) Accordingly, though these modes have interesting properties, we shall for the most part discuss propagation in densityenhancements. 5. APPLICATION OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS In regions where the electron number density is constant, for given m, o and k the general solution for B, is, from equations (8) and (1 l), 6~2 3=2 (20) the factor exp (i4) again being understood. The B, = H”‘(Q) m + R,H’2’(~r) m + &H”‘(12r) m ’ (21) ’ (22) where the complex coefficients Rll, Rle, Rzl, Rzz, are calculated by integrating equations (12) through the duct wall and imposing the outer boundary conditions. The two solutions correspond to outgoing principal and escaping waves respectively, together with the reflected waves, (R,& forming a reflection matrix at the inner core boundary r = a. Taking a linear combination of these two solutions that satisfies the condition of finite fields at the origin gives the condition for trapped modes in the form C = 1 - R,, - R12R&1 - R2,)-l = 0. (23) The problem thus becomes one of finding zeros of C regarded as a function of k. As we were interested in finding propagating modes with low attenuation, the procedure we followed was to take k = k,,(l - nA), (0 < A < l), and compute C for successive values of n (= 0, 1, 2 **, for Y > 2, = 0, -1, -2, . . . , for 1 < Y < 2)‘: On finding a minimum of [Cl, the nearby zero of C was then computed. The procedure was checked to see that the attenuation factor Im(k) so obtained was independent of the number of steps used in integrating numerically the equations (12) from r i= a to r = b, and was also independent of E when 5 + 1. Another check made was that the radial components of the Poynting vector added up correctly when k was real. Typically, we found that for propagation well away from half the eiectron gyrofrequency (corresponding to Y = 2) IRlll would be very close to unity for k > k,$, and modes existed. As soon as k VLF modes in cylindrical duct reached kpb, i.e. the principal wave became propagating in the outer region, 1&J would fall rapidly, and modes ceased to exist. For propagation at frequencies just below the half gyrofrequency, that is, with Y slightly greater than 2, the situation is more complicated. As k is decreased in the search procedure, it is evident from Fig. 1 that the two roots of equation (16) get very close. It was found that modes can exist for which l&l is not close to unity, indicating a considerable amount of coupling in the duct walls between the principal and the escaping waves. For troughs with Y > 2, &a and Rsl are essentially of unit magnitude, i.e. as one follows a wave through a number of reflections, the propagation angle 0 alternates between its two possible values in the core. 6. RESULTS The principal difficulty encountered in presenting the results is that even for our simple model there are a number of parameters and to give full results for even a few values of each would take up much space. In addition, the density profile for a < r < b is arbitrary. For all our computations, unless stated otherwise, we took a sinusoidal profile, with 2N(r) = N, -t ND + (N, - NJ sin [n(a + b - 2r)/ 2(b - 41 (24) 1653 within the duct wall. Accordingly, we first present some results appropriate to conditions at the equator in the region of L = 3, and then vary one or two parameters at a time to indicate what happens, for example, as the duct wall is made thinner, or the density enhancement reduced. Initially we take a = 40 km, b = 60 km, w/27r = f = 12 kHz, and electron plasma frequencies in the inner core and outer region of 1Of and 9.75f respectively. This corresponds to a plasma density enhancement of about 5 ‘A over a cylinder about 100 km in diameter. We suppose that propagation is at a little below half the electron gyrofrequency, with Y = 2.2. Table 1 lists modes for different values of m, giving for each mode the decay length l/Im(k) in megametres, and the real parts of a& and a&. For comparison, &LX = 91.8. The near symmetry about m = 1 shows up very clearly. The results for m = 0 and m = 2 were found to be almost identical, while even for m = -18 and m = 20 the values for L are very similar, though there are differences in decay length. There is a close correspondence between the values of Re(a&) (the imaginary part is very small) and the zeros of J&x), where m = 1 f M, the latter being about 10 % greater than the former. This compares with the asymptotic results of Snyder (1969) for a guide consisting of a dielectric cylinder embedded in a medium with slightly differing dielectric TABLE 1. RESULTS FOR A 5% ENHANCEMENT OF PLASMA DENSITY OVER A CYLINDER ABOUT 1OOkm IN DIAMETER. PROPAGATION ISATJUSTBELOWHALPTHEELECTRONGYROFREQUENCY(Y= 2.2) ID-O,Zl-2 l/Idk) ow (6)2:0 2.18 m.aj (5)1.3 (4)l.Y 5.00 1.84 60.62 60.25 (3)5.4 (3)3.1 0)l.O (3)8.4 (2)6.9 (JD.6 (2)3.8 (2)3.0 cu7.3 w2.9 (2)j.O 10.60 13.51 16.33 19.14 21.94 24.73 27.49 30,28 33.01 35&n %.I7 59.71 59.01 58.15 57.12 55.93 54.57 53.04 51.32 49.45 47.32 44.82 l/Idk) 0-M (3)l.J (2)4.8 (2)1.3 Rebh& R&$J 22.14 26.20 29.76 55.84 53.18 51.66 (3)6.1 (2)l.O 33.14 36.50 49.36 46.76 R4a “l&J (4)5.5 (4)Z.l (4)Z.l (6)l.C 3.41 6.36 9.22 12.06 (3)6.3 c3n.4 (3)z.l (3)3.3 (2)3.0 (4)6.2 w.3 (2)1.8 14.89 17.71 20.52 (2)9.7 R4ai\*J 60.75 60.46 60.01 59.39 58.61 51.66 23.32 26.10 28.87 56.55 55.28 53.83 52.21 31.65 34.37 37.26 50.41 48.44 46.13 22.10 26.15 29.71 33.09 36.44 55.05 53.6 51.69 49.39 46.81 m-_18 ow (3D.8 (2)3.7 (2b.5 (5D.3 (06.9 1654 M. J. LAIRD and D. NLEW constant. Another feature is that for given m the attenuation does not always increase with mode number as one might expect. One may think of an outgoing principal wave in the core as being reflected by the duct wall, with a small part being converted in the wall to outgoing and incoming escaping waves. This incoming wave is then reflected at the origin and propagates straight out through the wall (R,, is very small). The two escaping waves in the outer region may destructively interfere if the phasing is right, and this may prevent energy from escaping from the duct. Some high order modes may then be virtually unattenuated. A sketch of the situation is shown in Fig, 2. Figure 3 shows a pfot of Im(E+) (for 5 = 0) for the first two modes associated with m i= 0. The effect of a small amount of escaping wave added to the principal wave is clearly seen in the short period oscillations. The results indicate generaIly very low attenuation rates. For many modes, decay distances are very long compared with a typical magnetospheric distance of order 50 Mm. Thus a large number of modes might be involved in ducted propagation. For given m, the modes cease as the values of aA,, and u#& approach each other so that modes may be expected up to about m = 130. (The lowest zero of Xx w M -i- I.856 &P/3‘) We now examine what happens as the amount of enhancement, the duct size, and the wave frequency are changed. We consider propagation at below no. 3. AZIMUTHAL COMPONENT OF BLECTRIC FIELD FOR m = 0. In the core (r < 40 km) the field component varies approximately as .&(&J; the small oscillations show the presence of the escaping wave. haIf the electron gyrofrequency, i.e. Y > 2. As ic is decreased in the search procedure, the values of A,, and $, approach each other, becoming equal when q = ICY/~, i.e. when k2 = 4k,,a2( Y - I)/ F, (25) giving aI,” = d,,s = kp,2( Y - l)( P - 4)/ y2. (26) For lower values of k, A, and A, are complex conjugates, the waves in the core are i~omogeneous, and one would not expect trapped modes to exist even if there were no mode conversion. Expression (26) increases with Y (note that kpa2(Y - I) depends only on NJ so that initially as the frequency is decreased from half the electron gyrof~quency the number of modes for given m wiil rise. For large enough Y, the value for k given by equation (25) will be less than kDa, so that modes will now cease when k = &,,a, as the principal wave then becomes propagating in the outer region. The associated vaiue of iii, may be found from equation (16), putting k9 = kpQ, k = kpb, and q2 = k2 i- ii2, and may be shown to decrease with Y increasing. The maximum number of modes may then be expected to occur when ks = kpb2 = 4kss2(Y - I)/ y2, WI Y = 2/(1 - @‘a), (28) giving where 6 = (k,,2 - k,,,2)jk,,2 = (N, - N&/N,. (2% Substituting for Y in equation (26) gives as the maximum value of AI, for which trapped modes may be expected to exist - ey, A~, = a,, = k,,(Y Destructive interference in the outer zone may reduce the which varies as the square root of N, and as approximately the fourth root of 6, which measures the OF THE PRINCXPA?~ WAVE (1) AND CONVEXSXON TO THE ESCAPlNG WAVE (2) IN THE DUCT WALL. amplitude of the escaping wave and the energy loss. - 1yw4(2 FIG, 2. IWLECTION (30) 1655 VLF modes in cylindrical duct TABLE 2. VARIATIONOPTHENUMBEROFMODESWITHFREQUENCY m_lu f9)Y.O (6)E.l (6)l.l (514.4 (514.3 (5j7.2 (SE.% (5)Z.B (5)6.% (6)Z.O f5I2.4 (4)5.% (412.2 (413.8 w3.7 OI4.6 OD.6 (414.4 (2f3.1 121-l.% {l&l Oh5 fl16.5 &a% 7.64 IO.38 13.11 15.79 18.43 21.02 23.36 26.00 28.42 jo.aX 33.17 35.50 37.81 40.11 42.39 44.68 46.97 49.27 51.62 53.99 56.45 59.16 95.23 94.90 94.44 93.84 93.12 92.29 91.35 90.33 89.22 Bs.03 ij9)z.o 2.02 (m.5 4.63 (7)6.% 7.22 t7)l.S (614.3 9.76 12.21 (5I5.5 (4j6.5 (3I6.8 14.53 16.70 18.72 (214.3 20.53 177.09 176.74 176.13 175.27 174.21 172.99 171.6% 170.31 168.97 yL ==_& 86.17 05.43 84.02 l/b(k) b) =&.‘y,) Reb?-2a) 82.54 81.00 (7j4.1 (G4.4 1.93 4.40 278.22 277.20 79.3% 77.69 75.93 74.07 72.12 7o.Ob (5)6.1 (4X.5 w4.5 6.81 9.10 11.14 275.64 273.47 271.02 67.05 65.31 amount of enhancement. For a given duct structure, the values of aA&,for modes depend on the frequency (i.e. on Y). However, in our computations the dependence was rather weak, and the maximum number of modes did occur for Yin the region of the value given by equation (28). The effects of changing the wave frequency, keeping a, 6, the electron plasma frequencies and the electron gyrofrequency unchanged, are shown in Table 2. S = 79/1600, and equations (28) and (30) give for maximum modes values of 2.57 and 63.2 for Y and a& respectively. Note that for Y = 254 the number of modes has increased to 24 (compared with 14 for Y = 2*2), while it has dropped to 5 for Y = 8.8. (m = I in each case). Table 3 gives results for a smaller duct, with a and The reduced number of modes is immediately apparent, though the attenuation for the leading modes is still low. Vatues for m = -1 and m = 3 are given to show the sy~et~ about m = 1. In Table 4, the effect is shown of weakening the duct. We now take electron plasma frequencies of 120 kHz in the core and 119.4 kHz in the outer region, corresponding to an enhancement of 1%. Equation (28) gives Y = 2.22 for the maximum mnnber of modes, so the results shown (Y = 2.2) are close to this maximum. One point to notice here is that the attenuation is less than for the stronger duct, presumably because the density gradients in b equal to 5 and 25 km, respectively. TABLE 3. RESULTSFOR ASMALLDUCT (Y= 2.2) & l/-(k) Rebhla) Rdahza) (5b.8 (411.9 1.31 1.47 2.92 4.41 6.91 5.97 oa il)M lb(k) NJ (3j6.3 (lJ3.4 4.37 6.~0 lb(k) bw Re(ahlJ R&h&J (412.3 (114.3 2.76 4.35 6.96 6.01 16.56 M. J. LAIRD and D. NUNN TABLE4. RESULTS roa A WEAKDUCT(Y = 2.2) m_l l/h(k) (K-n) Reb?-la) Re(a\a) J&(k) w WayJ R~b~,f (Bj7.Q 2.09 a.03 j4D.5 22.80 55.53 (7h.3 A.79 60.64 (412.5 25.16 54.34 (6)Z.l. 7.49 60.30 (4&.3 27.51 53.04 WI.4 29.83 51.61 (5jA.l 10.17 59.82 (S)LY 1".02 59.20 W5.6 32.17 5w?? (:)I.‘! :..A1 5fGi (3h.7 34.51 48.33 (4J5.2 i4ir.e 17.94 2,,.AO 57.58 %.M m.4 36.36 46.36 TABLE 5. RESULTSFORATHIN-WALLED (5% ENHANCEMENT, Y= 2.2) DUCT m.l l/-k> bsn) (3j2.5 (2)3.3 (2j1.4 w-3 (2)&O (2k.5 (lj2.0 (20.3 Reb$,) ah&a) %‘I&) WJ) Reb%Ia) R&bza) 2.32 5.33 8.38 74.53 74.34 73.99 (04.5 W3.7 (04.1 26.47 29.81 11.44 73.48 14.47 17.43 20.50 23.63 71.06 w2.2 HALFTHEELECTRONGYROEREQUENCY (Y = 1.91) 67.10 (2)1.4 32.50 35.87 63.65 72.83 (2f1.4 41.59 59.73 72.04 w1.9 44.89 48.15 57.13 54.32 65.55 69.90 the wall are smaller and there is less conversion to the escaping wave. However, for a duct with curvature in the presence of inhomogeneity the guiding properties would not be as good as for stronger ducts. An important result of Scarabucci and Smith (1971) was that the leakage was much greater for thin-walled ducts. This is confirmed by calculations made for a and b equal to 49 and 51 km, respectively, with the results shown in Table 5. Comparison with Table 1 shows that, for 112= 1, the decay length of the leading modes is of the order of a hundred times less than for the thicker-walled duct. Finally, in this section, we give results for a trough (Table 6). a and b are again 40 and 60 km respectively and the electron plasma frequency in TABLE 6. Rxsu~rs FOR A TROUGH. PROPAGATION IS AT JUST ABOVE 68.69 the core is 120 kHz. But now we take the electron plasma frequency in the outer region to be 120.6 kHz, so that the density there is about 1% greater than in the core, and we consider propagation at just above the half-gyrofrequency, with f = 13.8 kHz, corresponding to Y = l-91. As can be seen, the modes are unattenuated. 7. CONCLUSION The main result of this paper is that plasma density enhancements can convey VLF wave energy almost without loss, in agreement with observed behaviour. However, we have not considered the effects of curvature and inhomogeneity, and there is much scope for further work in this direction. One question we shall comment on briefly is that of interaction between waves and energetic particles. Interpreting q as the wave number, one may regard the waves making up a guided mode as propagating at an angle 3 to the uniform magnetic field, where cos f? = k/q. For non-zero values of 6 one might expect Landau damping to occur. Away from Y = 2 we have seen that modes cease when k = kpb. For Y large, equation (16) gives that for the principal wave in the core, kq is approximately equal to ksa2. Hence the limiting value for 0 is given by: cos 6 = kgb2/k,” = 1 - 6. (311 1657 VLF modes in cylindrical duct Thus for a 5 % enhancement the angle of propagation of the principai wave in the core wouid be iess than about 18’. Near Y = 2, the modes cease when, in the core, line. Hence if Y > 1 at the equator, as it must be for the whistier mode to propagate there, then in general it will greatly exceed one as the top of the ionosphere is approached. Thus the angle 0 for possible trapped modes in a trough will approach 90’. Acknowle&ement-This work was carried out with the aid of a grant from the Science Research Council. REFERENCES Allis, W. P., Buchsbaum, S. J. and Bers, A. (1963). Waves in Anisotropic Plasmas, p. 134. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA. Angerami, J. J. (1970). Whistler duct properties deduced from VLF observations made with the OGO 3 satellite near the magnetic equator. J. geophys. Res. 75,6115. B,. Kennel (1966) studied low frequency (Y > 2) whistlers, and showed that a positive growth rate could exist for a significant cone of wave propagation angles to the magnetic field direction, with maximum growth occurring for propagation parallel to the field. Values depend on the pitch angle anisotropy and the hardness of the energy spectrum. For variation as the inverse square or cube of the energy, he concluded that growth for angles of propagation of at least 10’ is possible. Studies of higher frequency whistlers by Brinca (1972) and Cuperman and Stemlieb (1974) show that as Y approaches 2 the growth may in fact maximise for a non-zero angle of propagation. Thus a significant number of modes may be involved at any one time. One may certainly conclude that the attenuations we have computed are likely to be negligible compared with amplification or damping via interaction with energetic particles. These remarks have been made with especial reference to propagation in density enhancements. In the magnetosphere, the electron gyrofrequency increases away from the equator along a given field Boswell, R. W. (1970). A Study of Waves in Gaseous Plasmas, Ph.D. Thesis. The Flinders University of South Australia. Brinca, A. L. (1972). On the stability of obliquely propagating whistlers. J. geophys. Res. 77, 3495. Collin, R. E. (1960). Field Theory of Guided Waves, p. 480. McGraw-Hill, NY. Cuwrman, S. and Sternlieb, A. (1974). Obliquely iropagaiing unstable whistler waves: a cornl;utir simulation. J. Plasma Phvs. 11. 175. Helliwell, R. A. (1965). ‘Whikers and Related lonospheric Phenomena. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. Kennel, C. (1966). Low-frequency whistler mode. Phvs. Fluids 9, 2190. Klozknberg, J. P., McNamara, B. and Thonemann, P. C. (1965). The dispersion and attenuation of helicon waves‘in a-uniform cylindrical plasma. J. Fluid Mech. 21, 545. Scarabucci, R. R. and Smith, R. L. (1971). Study of magnetospheric field oriented irregularities-the mode theory of bell-shaped ducts. Radio Sci. 6, 65. Snyder, A. W. (1969). Asymptotic expressions for eicenfunctions and eigenvalues of a dielectric or o$cal waveguide. IEkE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniaues MTT-17. 1130. Walker, A. D’. M. (1971). $he propagation of very lowfrequency radio waves in ducis ii &e magnetosphere. Proc. R. Sot. London. (A) 321.69. Walker: A. D. M. (19i2j. The propagation of very low-frequency waves in ducts in the magnetosphere II. Proc. R. Sot. London. (A) 329,219.