* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Thermal transport properties of halide solid solutions: Experiments
Survey
Document related concepts
Temperature wikipedia , lookup
Thermophotovoltaic wikipedia , lookup
Spinodal decomposition wikipedia , lookup
Ionic liquid wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Determination of equilibrium constants wikipedia , lookup
Heat transfer wikipedia , lookup
Copper in heat exchangers wikipedia , lookup
Glass transition wikipedia , lookup
Thermal expansion wikipedia , lookup
Thermal radiation wikipedia , lookup
Heat transfer physics wikipedia , lookup
Thermal conduction wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 142, 124109 (2015) Thermal transport properties of halide solid solutions: Experiments vs equilibrium molecular dynamics Aïmen E. Gheribi,1,a) Mathieu Salanne,2 and Patrice Chartrand1 1 CRCT—Centre for Research in Computational Thermochemistry, Department of Chemical Engineering, École Polytechnique, P.O. Box 6079, Station Downtown, Montréal, Québec H3C 3A7, Canada 2 Sorbonne Universits, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 8234, PHENIX, F-75005 Paris, France (Received 22 December 2014; accepted 9 March 2015; published online 31 March 2015) The composition dependence of thermal transport properties of the (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solution is investigated through equilibrium molecular dynamics (EMD) simulations in the entire range of composition and the results are compared with experiments published in recent work [Gheribi et al., J. Chem. phys. 141, 104508 (2014)]. The thermal di↵usivity of the (Na,K)Cl solid solution has been measured from 473 K to 823 K using the laser flash technique, and the thermal conductivity was deduced from critically assessed data of heat capacity and density. The thermal conductivity was also predicted at 900 K in the entire range of composition by a series of EMD simulations in both NPT and NVT statistical ensembles using the Green-Kubo theory. The aim of the present paper is to provide an objective analysis of the capability of EMD simulations in predicting the composition dependence of the thermal transport properties of halide solid solutions. According to the Klemens-Callaway [P. G. Klemens, Phys. Rev. 119, 507 (1960) and J. Callaway and H. C. von Bayer, Phys. Rev. 120, 1149 (1960)] theory, the thermal conductivity degradation of the solid solution is explained by mass and strain field fluctuations upon the phonon scattering cross section. A rigorous analysis of the consistency between the theoretical approach and the EMD simulations is discussed in detail. C 2015 AIP Publishing LLC. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4915524] I. INTRODUCTION In the last ten years, interest in renewable energy has increased due to environmental concerns and the increasing price of fossil fuel energy. The latent heat energy storage technology using Phase Change Materials (PCMs) is one of the most promising renewable energy sources for the near future. Thermal energy storage in salt PCM represents a serious option for solar energy applications. PCMs present many possibilities for halide mixtures:1 from simple systems with a single common anion, like NaCl-KCl, to complex reciprocal systems with several common anions and cations. The heat transfer mechanism is one of the most important issues in designing a new PCM. It is usually preferable to maximize the thermal conductivity of the substance in order to provide the minimum temperature gradients and facilitate the charge and discharge of heat. Consequently, a precise knowledge of the thermal transport properties in the halide system is required. Of course, other issues also have to be taken into consideration in the design of PCM. For example, halides of transitions metals are not suitable for a possible new PCM mixture because they are usually highly corrosive and an inert and expensive coating is necessary to protect the container. The thermal conductivities of pure stoichiometric halide compounds can be predicted in a rather large range of temperature with an appreciable precision either using a theoretical approach2 or equilibrium molecular dynamics (EMD) simua)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected] 0021-9606/2015/142(12)/124109/8/$30.00 lations.3 These two methods have the same order of precision2–4 less than about ±15%. This is generally the typical experimental range of error. Unlike pure compounds, the thermal transport properties of halides’ solid solutions (SS) are not well known. Although solid solutions are observed in many halide systems,5 almost no experimental data on their thermal conductivity are reported in the literature. This lack of experimental data is a significant barrier in the design of new PCM materials. In other systems, it has been shown experimentally6–9 that the thermal conductivity of solid solutions formed from oxides and semiconductors deviates considerably from a simple linear behaviour. An analogous behaviour can reasonably be expected for halide solid solutions. However, so far, EMD has been applied to predict, with good accuracy, only the thermal conductivity of halides’ liquid solutions.10–15 No study reporting EMD calculations of the thermal conductivity of halide solid solutions can be found in the literature. For solid stoichiometric compounds3 and liquid solutions, Ohtori et al.12,13 have presented a predictive approach for the determination of the thermal conductivity. Indeed, no experimental information has been used for the parametrization of the interionic potentials, only density functional theory calculations. A similar approach is applied in this work. The main purpose of this paper is to examine the predictive capability of EMD simulations for the composition dependence of the thermal conductivity of halide solid solutions. We perform a comparative study between EMD simulation experiments in the NaCl-KCl system, which can be considered a good prototype system because the interactions within the 142, 124109-1 © 2015 AIP Publishing LLC This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 134.157.146.58 On: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:31:12 124109-2 Gheribi, Salanne, and Chartrand system are purely ionic. Both (i) the method of calculation of the thermal conductivity from the phase trajectory generated with EMD simulation and (ii) the interionic potential used in the present work were already applied in predicting successfully the thermal conductivity of pure ionic compounds as a function of temperature, with an error of about 15% or less.3,16 The original contribution of the present work is the study of the predictive capability of EMD for the composition dependence of the thermal transport of halide solid solutions. II. EXPERIMENTS AND SIMULATION DETAILS A. Experimental determination of thermal conductivity of the (Na,K)Cl solid solution The pair temperature-composition for which the thermal di↵usivity has been measured17 with laser flash and the thermal conductivity, directly predicted by the present EMD simulations, is shown in Figure 1 inside the NaCl-KCl coherent phase diagram. As shown in Figure 1, there is no sample for which the thermal conductivity has been both measured and calculated. The reason is that during the experiments, it was necessary to keep the sample at a temperature of at least 100 K below the minimum liquidus temperature, i.e., below ⇠830 K. This temperature is the safest maximum temperature at which the flash apparatus can be used without damage by liquid formation. On the other hand, the prediction of the thermal conductivity by our EMD is limited to rather high temperatures for practical reasons discussed below. As also shown in Figure 1, all the studied samples are out side the coherent miscibility gap. Thus only the thermal conductivity of the single phase solid solution (with a rocksalt structure Fm3̄m) is studied in this work. The experimental thermal conductivity of the (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solution as a function of both temperature and composition has already been presented in a previous work.17 J. Chem. Phys. 142, 124109 (2015) The thermal conductivity, , was deduced from measurement of the thermal di↵usivity, a, using the laser flash method18 and the critically evaluated heat capacity CP and density ⇢, using the relation: = a· ⇢·CP . B. Simulations details The EMD simulations were carried out for (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solution at 900 K from pure KCl to pure NaCl by varying the molar fraction x KCl by steps of 0.1 mole fraction steps (the exact compositions are given in Table I together with the calculated physical properties). The total number of ions is 512 (256 cations and 256 anions). A first series of simulations were performed in the isobaric-isothermal statistical ensemble (NPT) at T = 900 K and P = 105 Pa in order to determine the equilibrium density, the heat capacity at constant pressure, CP , and the bulk modulus. It also generated thermally equilibrated configurations. The two cationic positions (Na+ and K+) were chosen randomly in the initial configuration of the NPT simulation. In a second step, starting with an initial configuration perfectly thermally equilibrated (obtained from previous NPT simulations), a new series of EMD simulations was performed and was done in the canonical statistical ensemble (NVT), in order to calculate the thermal conductivity of the (Na,K)Cl solid solution. The temperature and the pressure for the NPT simulations were controlled, respectively, with a weak NoséHoover thermostat19 and an extension of the Martyna barostat.20 The thermostat and barostat relaxation times were both 0.5 ps. The equations of motions were integrated using the velocity Verlet algorithm21 with a time step of 1 fs for the NPT and NVT simulations as well. The total simulation time for the NPT simulation is 2.5 ns while the total simulation time for the NVT simulation is 30 ns. All simulations were performed using periodic boundary conditions and the minimum image convention. The so-called Polarizable Ion Model (DPIM) potential was used to describe the ionic interaction; it has the form TABLE I. Thermal conductivity ( ), heat capacity (C P ), density (⇢), and thermal di↵usivity (a) of the (Na,K)Cl solid solution as a function of composition at 900 K calculated by the present EMD simulation. The rmse of each calculated property is given in parenthesis next to each property. The units of all the properties are in SI (i.e., in W m 1 K 1, C P in J kg 1 K 1, ⇢ in kg m 3, and a in m2 m 1). NVT X KCl FIG. 1. The coherent NaCl-KCl phase diagram along with the set of composition-temperature points for which the thermal di↵usivity has been measured by laser flash method17 (solid red square) and calculated by EMD simulations (solid blue circle). Outside the miscibility gap, the SS is stable and inside the miscibility gap, phase separation into two distinct solid solutions SS1 and SS2 occurs. All the studied compositions are below the minimum liquidus temperature of 927 K and above the consolute temperature of 453 K; thus they are in the stable solid solution region. 0.000 0.102 0.199 0.301 0.398 0.500 0.602 0.716 0.797 0.898 1.000 N PT 1017.62 991.46 971.52 960.83 944.31 929.99 903.69 880.17 863.54 835.10 807.65 107 ·a ⇢ CP 1.912 (0.009) 1.421 (0.007) 1.209 (0.008) 1.114 (0.0101) 0.949 (0.009) 0.934 (0.011) 0.982 (0.010) 0.968 (0.007) 1.031 (0.009) 1.107 (0.007) 1.185 (0.009) C al c (35.62) (41.64) (27.20) (29.78) (17.94) (33.47) (28.91) (23.76) (28.49) (26.72) (19.38) 1952.88 1943.47 1936.76 1934.45 1931.73 1930.29 1930.07 1933.02 1933.40 1935.84 1940.17 (13.67) (13.55) (17.41) (7.73) (11.22) (9.81) (17.91) (8.02) (11.07) (10.12) (15.67) 9.621 7.375 6.425 5.993 5.203 5.203 5.630 5.689 6.175 6.848 7.562 This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 134.157.146.58 On: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:31:12 124109-3 Gheribi, Salanne, and Chartrand disp pol Vi j (r i j ) = Vicj (r i j ) + Virep j (r i j ) + Vi j (r i j ) + Vi j (r i j ), J. Chem. Phys. 142, 124109 (2015) (1) where Vi j is the total interionic pair potential describing the total interaction between the i-th and j-th ions. In the DPIM, Vi j is formulated as a sum of four independent contributions. V c is the classical Coulomb potential describing the chargecharge interactions, V rep is the repulsive contribution to the total potential, V disp is a dispersion term, and V pol takes into account the charge-dipole, dipole-charge, and dipole-dipole interactions. Additional details can be found in the literature.12–14,22 The parameters describing the total pairwise potentials between Na+-Na+, K+-K+, Cl -Cl , Cl -Na+, and Cl -K+ ionic pairs were taken from the previous work of Ohtori et al.13 The potentials were parametrized on the basis of atomistic first principle electronic structure calculations. Specifically, they are determined by matching the dipoles and forces on the ions calculated from first-principles on condensed phase ionic configurations.23 In other words, no experimental information has been used in the parametrization of the potentials; thus, the present EMD calculations of all physical properties presented in this paper, in addition to the thermal conductivity, are purely predictive. It may be pointed out that the predictive capability of potentials has been already tested12 for many structural, thermodynamic, and transport properties in both liquid and solid phases. Thermal conductivity is a non-equilibrium property. The Green-Kubo formalism24 permits, via the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, its determination from the fluctuations of energy and eventually of the charge currents obtained from EMD. According to the Green-Kubo method, the thermal conductivity of stoichiometric ionic compounds and binary mixtures is written, respectively, as3 (⌧,T, X) = 1 (L ee (⌧,T, X) T2 and (⌧,T, X) = 1 (L ee (⌧,T, X) T2 L 2ez (⌧,T, X) ) L z z (⌧,T, X) (2) N(⌧,T, X) ) D(⌧,T, X) (3) comparison, the ionic conductivities in molten NaCl and KCl are, respectively, 3570 S m 1 and 2030 S m 1.26 Consequently, can be approximated as (⌧,T, X) ⌘ 1 · L ee (⌧, X,T) T2 (6) without any loss of precision. To calculate the thermal conductivity, for each composition, the total NVT run has been divided into 30 blocks of 1 ns and the di↵erent transport coefficients were calculated independently in each block. The correlation time, ⌧, was chosen to be large enough to ensure the convergence of the thermal conductivity. ⌧ was then set to 20 ps for all studied compositions. Finally, the thermal conductivity of a perfectly thermally equilibrated system is defined as an average value over all the di↵erent blocks and expressed as (T, X) = lim h (⌧,T, X)iall blocks. ⌧!1 (7) Normally, should reach a plateau when ⌧ is large enough (⌧ ! 1); nevertheless, we found that fluctuates slightly around its average value in the plateau region due to numerical uncertainties. Consequently, the value of thermal conductivity reported in Table I is in fact the average value of in the plateau region. The uncertainty associated in the thermal conductivity value is defined as the root mean square error (rmse) in the plateau region. In Figure 2, we show the calculated thermal conductivity of the (Na,K)Cl solid solution as a function of correlation time at 900 K and at equimolar composition. In this case, the plateau is reached at about 9 ps and the dispersion of the data in the plateau region is about 1%; this value is weak compared to the typical 10%–20 % of the experimental errors. with the numerator N, and the denominator, D, respectively, equal to N = L 2ez 1 L z 2z 2 + L 2ez 2 L z 1z 1 D = L z 1z 1 L z 2z 2 L 2z 1z 2. 2L ez 1 L ez 2 L z 1z 2v, (4a) (4b) L ↵ are the transport coefficients defined by the Green-Kubo formula,24 ⌅ ⌧ 1 L ↵ (⌧,T, X) = hJ↵ (t) · J (0)idt, (5) 3k BV 0 where ↵ and can take the value of either e or z i . k B and V are, respectively, the Boltzmann constant and the equilibrium volume of the system. The two vectors Je and Jz i are the energy and the charge flux of the i-th ion. Here, the ionic conduction in the materials is negligible, so that we can safely ignore the right end of Eqs. (2) and (3). Indeed, the electrical conduction in chloride crystals near their melting temperatures is small because it is due principally to the generation and movement of negative ion vacancies. The magnitude of the conductivity for NaCl and KCl is less than 10 3 S m 1.25 For FIG. 2. Thermal conductivity (open dotted circle) of (Na,K)Cl solid solution at 900 K at equimolar composition as a function of correlation time ⌧ averaged over 30 EMD simulation blocks of 1 ns each. The dashed line represents the average value of the thermal conductivity in the plateau region. The plateau is reached at about 9 ps. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 134.157.146.58 On: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:31:12 124109-4 Gheribi, Salanne, and Chartrand J. Chem. Phys. 142, 124109 (2015) III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The thermal transport properties within a material are characterized by the heat capacity and by either the thermal conductivity or the thermal di↵usivity. If CP is known, and a are in principle equivalent and the value of one can be deduced from the value of the other even though these two properties are conceptually di↵erent. describes the ability of a material to conduct heat and has physical significance in the context of conduction processes in the steady state; a quantifies the thermal inertia of the material and has physical significance in the context of transient conduction processes. Normally, a is the direct measured thermal transport property while can be predicted through EMD simulations. In Table I, we present the thermal properties and the density of the (Na,K)Cl solid solution as a function of composition at 900 K obtained by the present EMD simulations. The equilibrium density of the system is obtained simply by averaging the time of the instantaneous volume in the NPT ensemble while the equilibrium heat capacity is determined from the mean-squared enthalpy (H = E + PV ) variance, also in the NPT ensemble through the well known statistical relationship, CP = hH 2i⌧ hHi⌧2 . kB · T 2 (8) For the calculation of both ⇢ and CP , the time average was performed above 500 ps in order to let the system reach thermal equilibrium. For all compositions, we have observed that (⌧) reaches a plateau before 10 ps and the thermal conductivity values were calculated by averaging (⌧) for ⌧ 10 ps. Figure 3 shows both the experimental and the calculated thermal conductivities of the (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solu- tion as functions of temperature and composition. The EMD prediction of the thermal conductivity of pure NaCl at 900 K is in very good agreement with the critically assessed value reported by Gheribi et al.,17 with a di↵erence of about 5%. Unlike the NaCl case, the accuracy of about 25% obtained for KCl is relatively poor. This is surprising given that the thermal conductivity of molten KCl was predicted by Ohtori et al.13 with an error of less than 1%, even though they used the same interionic potentials and the Green-Kubo method. Both the experiment and EMD simulation show that is a quadratic function of composition, with a minimum in the vicinity of the equimolar composition. In Figure 4, we show the temperature dependence of both experimental and calculated in the vicinity of its minimum, i.e., for XKCl = {0.4, 0.5, 0.6}. Around the composition of the minimum, is found to decrease as 1/T and, at a constant temperature, is almost constant in the composition range 0.4 . XKCl . 0.6. As shown in Figure 4, the agreement between experiment and EMD prediction is excellent, as EMD data are very close (<5%) to the value obtained by linearly extrapolation of experimental data. For several types of properties (e.g., thermodynamic properties), the compositional dependence is often represented through the deviation from a linear behaviour by the so-called excess properties. For the thermal conductivity, the deviation from linearity is of the same order of magnitude as the thermal conductivity itself. The compositional dependence of cannot properly be represented by an excess term. It is rather more suitable to refer to the thermal conductivity degradation as proposed in a prior work.17 The thermal conductivity degradation, D , is a measure of the relative deviation from a linear dependence of with x and is defined as D (X,T) = [1 FIG. 3. Experimental and calculated thermal conductivity of the (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solution as a function of temperature and composition. The experimental data (open symbols) were measured in the range 473 K T 773 K and were presented in a recent publication.17 The EMD simulations (filled stars symbols) have been performed only at 900 K. The critically assessed values17 of the thermal conductivity of pure NaCl and KCl compounds at 900 K are also reported (filled square). Point interpolation were splined (dashed lines). XNaCl · sol(X,T) NaCl(T) + XKCl · KCl(T) ]. (9) FIG. 4. Experimental (open symbol) and calculated (filled symbol) thermal conductivities of the (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solution as a function of inverse temperature in the vicinity of the equimolar composition. The solid line represents the linear interpolation of the experimental data and the dashed line is the extrapolation up to 1/900 K 1. The experimental value at X KCl = 0.5 was obtained by the spline interpolation shown in Figure 3. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 134.157.146.58 On: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:31:12 124109-5 Gheribi, Salanne, and Chartrand J. Chem. Phys. 142, 124109 (2015) FIG. 5. Experimental and calculated thermal conductivity degradations of (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solution as a function of temperature and composition. The experimental data (open symbols) were deduced from the experimental thermal conductivity,17 while the EMD data (filled stars symbols) were deduced from the present calculations. The point were interpolated by splines. FIG. 6. Experimental and calculated maximum thermal conductivity degradations of the (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solution as a function of temperature. The solid line represents the linear interpolation of the experimental points (open squares), the dashed line is its extrapolation up to 900 K, and the solid star is the maximum thermal conductivity degradation obtained from the present EMD simulations. The thermal conductivity degradation is a proper way to define the composition-thermal conductivity relationship. Such a definition clearly points out the strong deviation from the linearity of the thermal transport properties relations. Figure 5 shows the thermal conductivity degradation deduced, respectively, from the experimental data of Gheribi et al.17 and from the present EMD simulations. Both experiment and EMD calculations show a quadratic shape of the thermal conductivity degradation versus composition. The experimental maximum D is observed around x KCl ⇠ 0.46 for all studied temperatures, which is very close to the value of x KCl ⇠ 0.43 for the maximum D obtained by EMD simulations T = 900 K. The temperature dependence of the maximum D is shown in Figure 6; the value deduced from experimental data shows a linear dependence with temperature. The linear extrapolation up to 900 K leads to a value of 63% which is very close to the value of 68% obtained by EMD simulation. However, the predicted thermal conductivity degradation is clearly overestimated in the NaCl rich side while it fits almost perfectly in the KCl rich side. The infinitesimal relative change of the thermal conductivity due to the addition of one N a+ in the pure K+ sublattice and vice versa can be defined by an expression analogous to that of enthalpy at infinite dilution as follows: K–Cl bond vibration at high temperature. The e↵ects on this limitation must also be observed for all thermal properties of the solid solution in the KCl rich side. Both the heat capacity and the excess heat capacity, CPx s , are shown in Figure 8. The di↵erence between the calculated and experimental heat capacity and the excess heat capacity is very similar to what was obtained for the thermal conductivity and thermal conductivity degradation. The prediction of CP is more accurate for NaCl with only about 1.5% di↵erence, while for KCl, the di↵erence is more than 5.5%. Like the thermal conductivity degradation (Figure 5), the excess heat capacity is also predicted with a poor accuracy on the NaCl rich side, in this case with the opposite sign, and with very good accuracy in the KCl rich side. This is also another hint of the limitation of the K+/Cl pair potential to predict accurately the thermal excitation of K–Cl bond vibration at high temperature. i in j sol = 1 lim ( jCl X jC l !0 @ sol ). @ X jCl (10) in K Both Ksolin Na and Na , derived from experimental sol data and EMD simulations, are shown in Figure 7. Ksolin Na deduced from experiment is found to be almost independent in K of temperature with a value of about 0.8 whereas Na sol decreases with temperature. Its magnitude doubles from 473 K to 773 K. Given both the experimental and the numerical errors, it can be assumed that the accuracy of EMD prediction in K of Na is satisfactory, unlike the prediction of Ksolin Na, sol which is clearly not acceptable. This reflects a limitation of the K+/Cl potential to predict accurately the thermal excitation of FIG. 7. Experimental (open symbols) and calculated (filled symbols) K in Na and K in Na. sol sol This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 134.157.146.58 On: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:31:12 124109-6 Gheribi, Salanne, and Chartrand J. Chem. Phys. 142, 124109 (2015) FIG. 8. Calculated versus critically assessed heat capacity bottom and excess heat capacity (top). The critical assessment of the heat capacity of NaCl-KCl roksalt solid solution is due to Sangster and Pelton.27 At the microscopic scale, for insulating materials, the thermal conductivity degradation is explained by a modification of the phonon-phonon relaxation time. In an isotropic lattice, and assuming only the nearest neighbour interactions, it has been shown by Klemens28,29 that the relaxation time due to the atomic disorder is given by ⌧ 1 = !4a3 , 4⇡vg3 (11) where !, a3, vg , and are, respectively, the phonon frequency, the atomic volume, the phonon group velocity, and the disorder parameter. The disorder parameter characterizes the phononphonon scattering cross section of the solute ion, i, in the cationic sublattice. According to the Klemens-Abeles7,29,43 approximation, is expressed in terms of the fluctuation of the mass and the elastic strain field induced by the alloying e↵ect and, for a binary solid solution, it is expressed as = X i X j {( M/M)2 + " anhar[( a/a)2]}, (12) where M = Mi M j and a = ai a j . The two terms inside the bracket are, respectively, the mass and the elastic strain field fluctuation terms of the disorder parameter. " anhar is an e↵ective parameter related to the average anharmonicity of the bond. The mass fluctuation term depends only on the mass of each cation constituting the solid solution. " is in general considered as an adjustable parameter. The value of " anhar is usually optimized to fit the experimental data by assuming that the volume of the solid solution is perfectly known, or by considering a mixing rule such as Vegard’s or Zen’s rule.30 Therefore, the two key parameters for the understanding of thermal conductivity behaviour of the (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solution with composition are the lattice constant and the anharmonicity of the interionic bond. The calculated lattice parameter of the (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solution, its absolute deviation from Vegard’s rule (i.e., linear behaviour of a with x), and its derivative versus the composition are shown in Figure 9 in comparison with experimental values after the recent critical assessment by Walker et al.31,32 As shown in Figure 9, the composition dependence FIG. 9. EMD calculations versus critically assessed values for lattice parameter, a (bottom), the absolute deviation of a from Vegard’s rule a (middle), and the first derivative of da/dx with composition (top). The critical assessment of the lattice constant of NaCl-KCl roksalt solid solution is from Walker et al.31,32 of the lattice parameter of the solid solution is reasonably well predicted. Both available experimental data and the present EMD simulations show that a deviates slightly from Vegard’s rule (with respective maximum deviations at the equimolar composition of 0.5% and 0.4%). Unlike CP , the compositional dependence of a is well predicted on both NaCl and KCl rich sides. The lattice parameters of pure NaCl are overestimated by 1% while for pure KCl, it is underestimated by 1.6%. The interaction potentials used in this work were constructed from atomistic first-principles calculations using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) according to the Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) scheme.33,34 Generally, for ionically bonded systems, the GGA-PBE method overestimates the lattice parameter.35,36 At 0 K, the di↵erences between the predicted lattice parameter with the GGA-PBE method36 and the experimental value37 are, respectively, 1.05% and 1.5% for NaCl and KCl. These di↵erences remain almost identical at 900 K for NaCl but are significantly di↵erent for KCl, the di↵erence decreases from 1.5% to 1.5% involving a sign change. The thermal expansion of NaCl is accurately predicted by EMD while it is underestimated for KCl by about 20%. One may note that this instance is similar to what was also observed for the thermal conductivity and heat capacity, except for the fact that the excess property, a, in this case, is predicted with satisfactory accuracy in the entire range of composition. Moreover, the di↵erence observed for the CP of KCl is much lower than what is observed for its thermal conductivity and This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 134.157.146.58 On: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:31:12 124109-7 Gheribi, Salanne, and Chartrand J. Chem. Phys. 142, 124109 (2015) lattice parameter. The main contribution to the heat capacity is the harmonic vibration of the lattice, contrary to the physical origin of the thermal expansion, which is due purely to the anharmonic vibration of the lattice.38 Consequently, it is clear that the majority of the discrepancy observed between EMD calculations and experimental values of the CP , , and a for KCl is mainly due to the failure of the pair potential to describe properly the anharmonic part of the K+–Cl bond vibration at high temperature. Finally, to end the discussion, we propose an objective synthesis of the overall quality of the predictive capacity of the EMD simulations. To be as rigorous as possible, the quality of the present EMD predictions should be determined uniquely by comparing the calculations to the experimental results. Unfortunately, the experimental device, namely, the laser flash, cannot be used at 900 K and EMD simulations failed to converge for a long enough time at 773 K. All attempts at MD simulations performed at 773 K failed before approximately 1 ns. This simulation time is too small to determine the thermal conductivity properly. A same situation was also observed by Salanne et al.3 in recent work. They managed to calculate the thermal conductivity of pure NaCl only above 900 K. In the range of temperature 473 K T 773 K, the experimental D can be fitted by a quadratic function of composition given by D ,exp(X,T) XKCl · (1 XKCl) = [2.4 · 10 3 ·T 0.25 · (2· XKCl 1)]. (13) This equation and the value of the critically assessed thermal conductivity of pure NaCl and KCl permit the extrapolation of the experimental thermal conductivity for the solid solution at 900 K. This equation is a linear relation that we assume to be valid up to 900 K, i.e., 127 K above the experimental temperature limit. This extrapolation is shown in Figure 10 along with the present EMD simulation results. The experi- mental and numerical errors are also reported in this figure for better visualization of the accuracy of the present EMD simulations. Except on the KCl rich side (x KCl & 0.9), EMD data and experimental data extrapolations are in good agreement. Therefore, the inability of the potential to describe properly the anharmonic part of the K+–Cl high temperature bond vibration has a negative impact on the thermal conductivity only on the KCl rich side of the solid solution. IV. CONCLUSION This work was motivated primarily by the lack of experimental data on thermal conductivity and/or di↵usivity in the literature for halide solid solutions, even though this information is critical for many industrial applications, such as thermal energy storage involved in solar energy plants. The aim of this work is to provide an objective analysis of the accuracy of equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations in predicting the thermal transport properties of halide solid solutions. The (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solution was presented as a prototype system. A series of equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations was performed in order to predict the thermal transport properties. The proposed approach is purely predictive since the interionic potentials used in this study were obtained from atomistic first principle calculation and thus no experimental information has been used. In conclusion, by using the theoretical method presented in this work, the thermal conductivity of binary and higher order halide solid solutions can be predicted with confidence. Similar to what has been done for metal systems,39–42 a further work will be proposed for a comprehensive study of the relations between equilibrium, structure, and thermal transport properties of ionic solid solutions. Generally, as shown in Figure 10, the accuracy of the predictions is within the margin of experimental error, up to the critical composition of XKCl . 0.9. The discrepancy between the calculated and experimental thermal conductivities is explained by the weakness of the pair potential to describe the anharmonic part of the K+–Cl high temperature bond vibration. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported by funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Rio-Tinto-Alcan. Stimulating discussions with Professor Laszlo Kiss are warmly acknowledged. We thank Eve Bélisle and Dr. James Sangster for their help in writing the manuscript. We are grateful to Calcul Québec (CQ) for computer resources. 1A. FIG. 10. Calculated thermal conductivity (filled stars) and extrapolation of the thermal conductivity using experimental data (solid line) of Gheribi et al.17 of the (Na,K)Cl rocksalt solid solution at 900 K. The two dashed lines represent the experimental error of ±11% reported by Gheribi et al.17 for the experimental thermal conductivity at 773 K. Sharma, V. Tyagi, C. Chen, and D. Buddhi, “Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 13, 318–345 (2009). 2A. E. Gheribi and P. Chartrand, “Application of the calphad method to predict the thermal conductivity in dielectric and semiconductor crystals,” Calphad 39, 70–79 (2012). 3M. Salanne, D. Marrocchelli, C. Merlet, N. Ohtori, and P. A. Madden, “Thermal conductivity of ionic systems from equilibrium molecular dynamics,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 102101 (2011). This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 134.157.146.58 On: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:31:12 124109-8 4G. Gheribi, Salanne, and Chartrand V. Paolini, P. J. D. Lindan, and J. H. Harding, “The thermal conductivity of defective crystals,” J. Chem. Phys. 106, 3681 (1997). 5See http://www.crct.polymtl.ca/fact/documentation/ftsalt/ for the description of halides system phases diagrams. 6M. Murabayashi, “Thermal conductivity of ceramic solid solutions,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 7, 559–563 (1970). 7B. Abeles, “Lattice thermal conductivity of disordered semiconductor alloys at high temperatures,” Phys. Rev. 131, 1906–1911 (1963). 8J. L. Wang, H. Wang, G. J. Snyder, X. Zhang, Z. H. Ni, and Y. F. Chen, “Characteristics of lattice thermal conductivity and carrier mobility of undoped pbse-pbs solid solutions,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46, 405301 (2013). 9M. R. Winter and D. R. Clarke, “Thermal conductivity of yttria-stabilized zirconiahafnia solid solutions,” Acta Mater. 54, 5051–5059 (2006). 10A. E. Gheribi, J. A. Torres, and P. Chartrand, “Recommended values for the thermal conductivity of molten salts between the melting and boiling points,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 126, 11–25 (2014). 11A. Gheribi, D. Corradini, L. Dewan, P. Chartrand, C. Simon, P. Madden, and M. Salanne, “Prediction of the thermophysical properties of molten salt fast reactor fuel from first-principles,” Mol. Phys. 112, 1305–1312 (2014). 12N. Ohtori, T. Oono, and K. Takase, “Thermal conductivity of molten alkali halides: Temperature and density dependence,” J. Chem. Phys. 130, 044505 (2009). 13N. Ohtori, M. Salanne, and P. A. Madden, “Calculations of the thermal conductivities of ionic materials by simulation with polarizable interaction potentials,” J. Chem. Phys. 130, 104507 (2009). 14Y. Ishii, K. Sato, M. Salanne, P. A. Madden, and N. Ohtori, “Thermal conductivity of molten alkali metal fluorides (lif, naf, kf) and their mixtures,” J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 3385–3391 (2014). 15M. Salanne, C. Simon, P. Turq, and P. A. Madden, “Heat-transport properties of molten fluorides: Determination from first-principles,” J. Fluorine Chem. 130, 38–44 (2009). 16V. Haigis, M. Salanne, S. Simon, M. Wilke, and S. Jahn, “Molecular dynamics simulations of y in silicate melts and implications for trace element partitioning,” Chem. Geol. 346, 14–21 (2013). 17A. E. Gheribi, S. Poncsk, R. St-Pierre, L. I. Kiss, and P. Chartrand, “Thermal conductivity of halide solid solutions: Measurement and prediction,” J. Chem. Phys. 141, 104508 (2014). 18W. J. Parker, R. J. Jenkins, C. P. Butler, and G. L. Abbott, “Flash method of determining thermal di↵usivity, heat capacity, and thermal conductivity,” J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1679 (1961). 19S. Nose, “A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods,” J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984). 20G. J. Martyna, D. J. Tobias, and M. L. Klein, “Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms,” J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4177–4189 (1994). 21D. C. Rapaport, The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulation (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1996). 22M. Salanne, B. Rotenberg, S. Jahn, R. Vuilleumier, C. Simon, and P. Madden, “Including many-body e↵ects in models for ionic liquids,” Theor. Chem. Acc. 131, 1143 (2012). 23P. A. Madden, R. Heaton, A. Aguado, and S. Jahn, “From first-principles to material properties,” J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 771, 9–18 (2006). J. Chem. Phys. 142, 124109 (2015) 24P. Sindzingre and M. J. Gillan, “A computer simulation study of transport coefficients in alkali halides,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 7033 (1990). 25C. E. Skov and E. A. Pearlstein, “Nonlinear ionic conductivity in alkalihalide crystals,” Phys. Rev. 137, A1483–A1495 (1965). 26S. Smedley, “Electrical conductivity in ionic liquids at high temperatures,” in The Interpretation of Ionic Conductivity in Liquids (Springer, US, 1980), pp. 101–132. 27J. Sangster and A. D. Pelton, “Phase diagrams and thermodynamic properties of the 70 binary alkali halide systems having common ions,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 16, 509 (1987). 28P. G. Klemens, “Thermal resistance due to point defects at high temperatures,” Phys. Rev. 119, 507–509 (1960). 29P. G. Klemens, “The scattering of low-frequency lattice waves by static imperfections,” Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. A 68, 1113 (1955). 30D. Sirdeshmukh and K. Srinivas, “Physical properties of mixed crystals of alkali halides,” J. Mater. Sci. 21, 4117–4130 (1986). 31D. Walker, P. K. Verma, L. M. D. Cranswick, R. L. Jones, S. M. Clark, and S. Buhre, “Halite-sylvite thermoelasticity,” Am. Mineral. 89, 204–210 (2004). 32D. Walker, P. K. Verma, L. M. D. Cranswick, S. M. Clark, R. L. Jones, and S. Buhre, “Halite-sylvite thermoconsolution,” Am. Mineral. 90, 229–239 (2005). 33J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996). 34J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple [Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)],” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997). 35P. Haas, F. Tran, and P. Blaha, “Calculation of the lattice constant of solids with semilocal functionals,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 085104 (2009). 36L. Liu, X. Wu, R. Wang, H. Feng, and S. Wu, “On the generalized stacking energy, core structure and peierls stress of the dislocations in alkali halide,” Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 58 (2012). 37P. D. Pathak and N. G. Vasavada, “Thermal expansion of NaCl, KCl and CsBr by x-ray di↵raction and the law of corresponding states,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 26, 655–658 (1970). 38N. Ashcroft and N. Mermin, Solid State Physics, HRW international editions (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976). 39J.-P. Harvey, A. E. Gheribi, and P. Chartrand, “Accurate determination of the Gibbs energy of cuzr melts using the thermodynamic integration method in Monte Carlo simulations,” J. Chem. Phys. 135, 084502 (2011). 40J.-P. Harvey, A. E. Gheribi, and P. Chartrand, “On the determination of the glass forming ability of alxzr1x alloys using molecular dynamics, Monte Carlo simulations, and classical thermodynamics,” J. Appl. Phys. 112, 073508 (2012). 41J.-P. Harvey, A. E. Gheribi, and P. Chartrand, “Thermodynamic integration based on classical atomistic simulations to determine the Gibbs energy of condensed phases: Calculation of the aluminum-zirconium system,” Phys. Rev. B 86, 224202 (2012). 42A. Gheribi, “Molecular dynamics study of stable and undercooled liquid zirconium based on {MEAM} interatomic potential,” Mater. Chem. Phys. 116, 489–496 (2009). 43J. Callaway and H. C. von Bayer, Phys. Rev. 120, 1149 (1960). This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 134.157.146.58 On: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:31:12