* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Whole Genome Sequencing and foodborne pathogens: a UK
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
ICMSF WGS Meeting, CCFH 47- Boston, USA – 12 November 2015 Whole Genome Sequencing and foodborne pathogens: a UK perspective Paul Cook Head of Microbiological Risk Assessment Science, Evidence and Research Division [email protected] Scope of presentation • WGS trends • Recommendations from expert workshops • Salmonella testing by Public health • • England Examples where WGS has contributed to outbreak investigations Other areas where WGS can have an impact Trends - rise of the genomes WGS –PubMed 3 Nov 15 1. Wetterstrand KA. DNA Sequencing Costs: Data from the NHGRI Large-Scale Genome Sequencing Program Available at: www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts. Accessed 18 April 2015. WGS technology is getting smaller Converging technologies – can we get closer to the sampling point? A reference bacterial genome dataset generated on the MinION™ portable single-molecule nanopore sequencer. Quick et al. GigaScience 2014, 3:22 http://www.gigasciencejournal.com/content/3/1/22 Expert workshop 2012 Workshop organised by Food Standards Agency (FSA), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Public Health England (PHE), UK Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety of Food (ACMSF) Looked at potential for this approach to support FSA objectives in tackling Foodborne illness Workshop report: http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/committee/acm-1092a.pdf Expert workshop 2012 • WGS capable of providing a significant benefit to outbreak investigations – timing, specificity • Technical, quality, logistical and training issues need to be addressed but should not delay roll-out of the technology • Need well-curated, inter-operable and quality controlled databases containing microbial sequences • Need to sequence historical isolates to help populate the databases – and the tools to interpret. EFSA Scientific Colloquium 20 Report Recommended a need for: • • • • • • International collaboration to co-ordinate and harmonise application of WGS Educational interdisciplinary programmes on WGS for epidemiologists, bioinformaticians, microbiologists etc Harmonization of terminology and data reporting in plain language Software and data analysis tools that are transparent and easy to use in WGS data processing The legal consequences of large-scale application of WGS should be reviewed WGS databases for public health - with appropriate curation standards June 2014 http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/743e Global Microbial Identifier (GMI) • • • Built from initial group of 25 participants to current involvement of around c200 experts from over 30 countries, including clinical-, food-, and public health microbiologists and virologists, bio-informaticians, epidemiologists, funding agencies, data hosting systems, and policy makers from academia, public health, industry, governments. Steering Committee involving Danish Technical Univ, US FDA, NCBI, WHO, FAO, FSA, PHE, RIVM, OIE, Thailand Ministry of Public Health, Chinese National Inst, for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention 5 active working groups: – Work group 1: Political challenges, outreach, building a global network and funding – Work group 2: Repository and storage of sequence and meta-data – Work group 3: Analytical approaches – Work group 4: Ring trials and quality assurance – Work group 5: Pilot projects – More information: www.globalmicrobialidentifier.org Whole Genome Sequencing at PHE Financial investment, machines, robotics, LIMS, data and bioinformatics workflows, data storage, staffing, training, methodological development – sample prep, library prep, validation of processes, accreditation ISO15189 2 HiSeq 2500 high-throughput machines 2 MiSeq machines + NextSeq machine Capacity < 3,000 genomes per week PHE Detection of Salmonella outbreaks • Use an ‘exceedance’ above what we would • • • expect to see as background, before an outbreak investigation is triggered – based on serotype and phage type MLVA, PFGE performed for greater strain discrimination – but not on every isolate The more common a serotype is, such as S. Enteritidis or Typhimurium, the harder it is to spot an outbreak Using SNP analysis to detect clusters and outbreaks PHE WGS Salmonella workflow Isolate received by reference lab undergoes automated DNA extraction WGS by Genomics Sequencing Unit GBRU receives FASTQs Bioinformatic pipelines for K-mer ID MLST used to assign serotype Based on serotype strain goes to automated SNP analysis (SNPDB) for genetic relatedness and cluster detection Triggers epidemiological investigation Report to referring lab SE PT14b outbreak 198 of 287 (69%) cases could be plausibly linked to eggs supplied by one company Two examples of recent outbreaks in the UK where WGS has been used Salmonella Enteritidis and eggs E.coli O157 and watercress WORKING OUT WHAT HAPPENED Microbiological Environmental/ Food Chain Epidemiological Source: Sarah O’Brien (Univ Liverpool) = Cause! Current challenges for incident risk assessment and management • Alignment - having the right evidence • • • from the right place and at the right time History - event has happened but environmental evidence cannot be found Interpretation – differing opinions seeking an independent view “Weight of evidence” to support decision making WGS can help with some of these but not all Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 14b: National outbreak MaySept 2014 International outbreak of Salmonella Enteritidis PT14b Summer 2014 • In England an outbreak of Salmonella Enteritidis PT 14b in a hospital in Birmingham with single MLVA profile • Also noticed small pockets of increase in PT14b around England with same MLVA or SLV – individual point source outbreaks? SE PT14b outbreak .198 of 287 (69%) cases could be plausibly linked to eggs supplied by one company Inns et al. EuroSurveill.2015;20(16):pii=21098 http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=21098 Company X Wholesaler Supplier Retailer # of cases Salmonella Enteritidis PT14b outbreak 198 of 287 (69%) cases could be plausibly linked to eggs supplied by one company Salmonella Enteritidis 14b National / International Orange – Austria Blue - France Red - Germany Black - U.K SE PT14b outbreak 198 of 287 (69%) cases could be plausibly linked to eggs supplied by one company Key Conclusions • • • • MLVA was used to identify this multi-country Salmonella outbreak The use of WGS provided confirmation and improved discrimination between isolates. WGS data provided a clear link between isolates from cases, eggs and environmental samples from premises associated with outbreaks. This, along with the egg supply network information and information from investigations in other European countries, provides compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that the outbreak was associated with eggs from one Company. . Inns et al.EuroSurveill.2015;20(16):pii=21098 http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=21098 E. coli O157 outbreak linked to bagged watercress • • • • • • • • In September 2013, a national increase in cases of VTEC O157 phage type 2 VT2 was observed 19 cases (14 in England, four in Wales and one in Scotland) Ten of thirteen cases contacted had consumed watercress purchased from a major retailer On 12 September 2013 – first Outbreak Control Team (OCT) held. The retailer recalled pre-packed salad products containing watercress on the same day. FSA issued a product recall notice to consumers Trace-back investigations, extensive microbiological testing of watercress and environmental sampling at farms. PT8 PT2 NonDomestic PT2 Domestic PT21/28 Maximum likelihood phylogeny of VTEC O157:H7 PT8 Outbreak 1 • We were unable to identify a PT2 NonDomestic OB1 PT2 Domestic OB2 local source for Outbreak 1 • Imported components of the process were implicated • These included watercress seeds from North America and mainland Europe and peat from mainland Europe Outbreak 2 Distinct cluster of cases and isolate from watercress irrigation water PT21/28 Outbreak 2 – Environmental investigation Presentation - edit in Header and Footer Thanks totitle Caroline Willis, PHE FW&E Robust SNP Phylogenies for National Surveillance Porton Summary of Outbreak • • • • The sequencing data identified two separate, concurrent outbreaks of E. coli O157 PT2 both linked to the consumption of watercress Strains from Outbreak 1 cluster were not closely related to any other UK strain in the Public Health England WGS database suggesting a possible imported source Epidemiologically unrelated isolates on the same branch as the Outbreak 2 cluster included those from human cases in England with domestically-acquired infection and UK domestic cattle. Environmental sampling resulted in the isolation of E. coli O157 PT2 from the irrigation water at one of the implicated watercress farms and WGS showed this isolate belonged to same phylogenetic cluster as Outbreak 2. WGS in outbreaks WGS is good at identifying outbreaks that are: • Small • Geographically dispersed • Spread over a long time and may not have triggered exceedance • • • • • Time to outbreak detection using WGS is faster than existing methods Time to outbreak resolution is faster using WGS. WGS provides a more accurate outbreak definition WGS is more robust at calling a case microbiologically linked or not linked to another case Provides information on phylogenetic relationships – ancestral history Application of WGS to outbreak investigation of gastrointestinal pathogens Other WGS applications • Attribution of pathogens to reservoir or • • • • source e.g. Campylobacter jejuni and poultry, cattle etc, Antimicrobial resistance genes Virulence gene profile e.g. STEC Burden of disease – metagenomics to reduce the diagnostic gap? Viruses and parasites Summary • Area is still developing and likely to see • • • further changes Valuable tool for routine surveillance, outbreak detection and investigation Still some significant hurdles to overcome - international collaboration essential Many other areas where WGS can have an impact in terms of food safety Acknowledgements Public Health England Kathie Grant, Tom Inns Food Standards Agency Jo Edge, Alisdair Wotherspoon University of Liverpool Sarah O’Brien Thank you