* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Fig. 4(a) Waveforms for positive and negative half cycles of supply
Electric motor wikipedia , lookup
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Power factor wikipedia , lookup
Electric power system wikipedia , lookup
Spark-gap transmitter wikipedia , lookup
Electrification wikipedia , lookup
Mercury-arc valve wikipedia , lookup
Electric machine wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Induction motor wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Brushed DC electric motor wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup
Stepper motor wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Power Quality Improved Bridgeless Buck-Boost Converter-Fed Vector Controlled PMSM Motor Drive Rintu Mathunni (1) Sreelekha V(2) Dept. of Electrical Engineering Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology Kottayam, India [email protected] Dept. of Electrical Engineering Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology Kottayam, India [email protected] Rajesh K(3) Dept. of Electrical Engineering Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology Kottayam, India [email protected] Abstract— This paper deals with the analysis, design and implementation of a power factor corrected (PFC) bridgeless (BL) Buck-Boost Converter in discontinuous current mode (DCM) of operation used for power quality improvement at AC mains in vector controlled permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drives. The designed converter feeds a vector controlled PMSM drive system. Modeling and simulation is carried out in MATLAB/Simulink environment. The results obtained demonstrate the effectiveness of the converter in improving power quality at AC mains in the PMSM drive system. Keywords—Bridgeless (BL) buck-boost Converter; permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM); vector controlled; power quality. I. INTRODUCTION Brushless Permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) are used nowadays, in a large scale owing to its simple structure, reliability, high power density, supreme efficiency, and high dynamic response. PMSM motors are used mostly in applications requiring fast torque response and high performance. A PMSM motor has a wound stator, a permanent magnet rotor assembly and internal or external devices to sense rotor position. The sensing devices provide position feedback for adjusting frequency and amplitude of stator voltage reference properly to maintain rotation of the magnet assembly. The combination of an inner permanent magnet rotor and outer windings offers the advantages of low rotor inertia, efficient heat dissipation, and reduction of the motor size. Moreover, the elimination of brushes reduces noise, EMI generation and suppresses the need of brushes maintenance. Ann Mary Joshua(4) Dept. of Electrical Engineering Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology Kottayam, India [email protected] Power quality have become one of the key issue to be considered due to recommended limits for harmonics for supply current set by various international power quality standards such as International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61000-3-2. For class A equipment (< 600 W, 16 A per phase), IEC 61000-3-2 restricts the harmonic current of different order such that the total harmonic distortion (THD) of the supply current should be below 19%. A PMSM motor when fed by a diode bridge rectifier (DBR) with a high value of dc link capacitor draws peaky current which can lead to a THD of supply current of the order of 65% and power factor as low as 0.8. In this paper a DBR followed by a power factor corrected (PFC) converter is utilized for improving the power quality at ac mains for a PMSM drive incorporating vector control. [1] The choice of mode of operation of a PFC converter is an important issue because it directly affects the cost and rating of the components used in the PFC converter. The continuous conduction mode (CCM) and discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) are the two modes of operation in which a PFC converter is designed to operate. In CCM, the current in the inductor or the voltage across the intermediate capacitor remains continuous, but it requires the sensing of two voltages (dc link voltage and supply voltage) and input side current for PFC operation, which is expensive. On the other hand, DCM requires a single voltage sensor for dc link voltage control, and inherent PFC is achieved at the ac mains, but at the cost of higher stresses on the PFC converter switch; hence, DCM is utilized for converter operation. [2] Fig. 1. Discussed PMSM motor drive with front end BL buck-boost converter. II. PROPOSED PFC BL BUCK-BOOST CONVERTER-FED PMSM MOTOR DRIVE Fig. 1 shows the discussed BL buck–boost converter-based VSI-fed PMSM motor drive. The parameters of the BL buck– boost converter are designed such that it operates in discontinuous current mode (DCM) to achieve an inherent power factor correction at ac mains. Vector Control is applied for the speed control of PMSM motor drive. Fig. 1. Discussed PMSM motor drive with front end BL buck-boost converter. Fig. 2.(a) Positive half cycle of supply voltage. Switch Sw1 conducts to charge the inductor Li1;hence an inductor current iLi1 increases. Dc link capacitor Cd is discharged. (Mode I) The discussed configuration of the BL buck–boost converter has the minimum number of components and least number of conduction devices during each half cycle of supply voltage which governs the choice of the BL buck–boost converter for this application. III. OPERATING PRINCIPLE OF PFC BL BUCK-BOOST CONVERTER The operation of the PFC BL buck–boost converter is classified into two parts which include the operation during the positive and negative half cycles of supply voltage and during the complete switching cycle. A. Operation during positive and negative halfcycles of supply voltage In the discussed scheme of the BL buck–boost converter, switches Sw1 and Sw2 operate for the positive and negative half cycles of the supply voltage, respectively. During the positive half cycle of the supply voltage, switch Sw1, inductor Li1, and diodes D1 and Dp are operated to transfer energy to dc link capacitor Cd as shown in Fig. 2(a)–(c). Fig.2. (b) Positive half cycle of supply voltage. Switch Sw1 is turned off, and the stored energy in inductor Li1 is transferred to dc link capacitor Cd until the inductor is completely discharged. The current in inductor Li1 reduces and reaches zero.(Mode II) Fig.2.(c) Positive half cycle of supply voltage. Inductor Li1 enters discontinuous conduction, i.e., no energy is left in the inductor; hence, current iLi1 becomes zero for the rest of the switching period. None of the switch or diode is conducting, and dc link capacitor Cd supplies energy to the load. (Mode III) Similarly, for the negative half cycle of the supply voltage, switch Sw2, inductor Li2, and diodes D2 and Dn conduct as shown in Fig. 3(a)–(c). In the DCM operation of the BL buck– boost converter, the current in inductor Li becomes discontinuous for certain duration of switching period. Fig. 4(a) Waveforms for positive and negative half cycles of supply voltage Fig. 4(b) shows the waveforms during complete switching cycle. Fig.3. (a) Negative half cycle of supply voltage. Switch Sw2 conducts to charge the inductor Li2; hence, an inductor current iLi2 increases. Dc link capacitor Cd is discharged. (Mode I) Fig. 4(b) Waveforms during complete switching cycle IV. Fig.3. (b) Negative half cycle of supply voltage. Switch Sw2 is turned off, and the stored energy in inductor Li2 is transferred to dc link capacitor Cd until the inductor is completely discharged. The current in inductor Li2 reduces and reaches zero.(Mode II) A PFC BL buck–boost converter is designed to operate in DCM such that the current in inductors Li1 and Li2 becomes discontinuous in a switching period. For a PMSM of power rating 400 W (complete specifications of the PMSM motor are given in the Appendix), a power converter of 550 W (Po) is designed. For a supply voltage with an rms value of 220 V, the average voltage appearing at the input side is given as 𝑉𝑖𝑛 = Fig.3. (c) Negative half cycle of supply voltage. Inductor Li2 enters discontinuous conduction, i.e., no energy is left in the inductor; hence, current iLi2 becomes zero for the rest of the switching period. None of the switch or diode is conducting, and dc link capacitor Cd supplies energy to the load. (Mode III) Fig. 4(a) shows the waveforms of different parameters during the positive and negative half cycles of supply voltage. DESIGN OF PFC BL BUCK-BOOST CONVERTER 2√2𝑉𝑠 2√2 × 220 = = 198 𝑉 𝜋 𝜋 (1) The relation governing the voltage conversion ratio for a buck–boost converter is given as 𝑑= 𝑉𝑑𝑐 𝑉𝑑𝑐 + 𝑉𝑖𝑛 (2) The discussed converter is designed for dc link voltage control from 50 V (Vdc min) to 200 V (Vdcmax) with a nominal value (Vdc des) of 100 V; hence, the minimum and the maximum duty ratio (dmin and dmax) corresponding to Vdc min and Vdcmax are calculated as 0.2016 and 0.5025, respectively. A. Design of input inductors (Li1 and Li2) . The value of inductance Lic1, to operate in critical conduction mode in the buck–boost converter, is given as 𝐿𝑖𝑐1 = 𝑅(1 − 𝑑)2 2𝑓𝑠 (3) where R is the equivalent load resistance, d is the duty ratio, and fs is the switching frequency. Now, the value of Lic1 is calculated at the worst duty ratio of dmin such that the converter operates in DCM even at very low duty ratio. At minimum duty ratio, i.e., the PMSM motor operating at 50 V (Vdc min), the power (Pmin) is given as 110 W (i.e., for constant torque, the load power is proportional to speed). Hence, from (4), the value of inductance Lic min corresponding to Vdcmin is calculated as 𝐿𝑖𝑐𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 2 (1 𝑉𝑑𝑐𝑚𝑖𝑛 − 𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑃𝑚𝑖𝑛 2𝑓𝑠 )2 = 2 (1 2 50 − 0.2016) 110 × 2 × 20000 = 362.18 µ𝐻 (4) The values of inductances Li1 and Li2 are taken less than1/10th of the minimum critical value of inductance to ensure a deep DCM condition. Hence, the values of inductors Li1 and Li2 are selected around 1/10th of the critical inductance and are taken as 35 μH. It reduces the size, cost, and weight of the PFC converter. B. Design of input capacitor (Cd) The design of the dc link capacitor is governed by the amount of the second-order harmonic (lowest) current flowing in the capacitor and is derived as follows. For the PFC operation, the supply current (is) is in phase with the supply voltage (vs). Hence, the input power Pin is given as 𝑃𝑖𝑛 = √2𝑉𝑆 sin ω𝑡 ∗ √2𝐼𝑆 sin ω𝑡 = 𝑉𝑆 𝐼𝑆 (1 − cos 2ω𝑡) (5) where the latter term corresponds to the second-order harmonic, which is reflected in the dc link capacitor as 𝑉𝑆 𝐼𝑆 𝑖𝐶 (𝑡) = − cos 2ω𝑡. 𝑉𝑑𝑐 (6) The dc link voltage ripple corresponding to this capacitor current is given as 𝛥𝑉𝑑𝑐 = 1 ∫ 𝑖𝐶 (𝑡)𝑑𝑡 𝐶𝑑 𝐼𝑑 =− sin 2ω𝑡. 2𝜔𝐶𝑑 (7) For a maximum value of voltage ripple at the dc link capacitor, Sin(ωt) is taken as 1. Hence, (7) is rewritten as 𝐶𝑑 = 𝐼𝑑 2ω𝛥𝑉𝑑𝑐 (8) Now, the value of the dc link capacitor is calculated for the designed value Vdc des with permitted ripple in the dc link voltage (ΔVdc) taken as 4% as 𝐶𝑑 = 𝐼𝑑 𝑃𝑜 ⁄𝑉𝑑𝑐 𝑑𝑒𝑠 550⁄100 = = 2ω𝛥𝑉𝑑𝑐 2ω𝛥𝑉𝑑𝑐 2 × 314 × 0.04 × 100 = 2189.4 µ𝐹 (9) Hence, the nearest possible value of dc link capacitor Cd is selected as 2200 μF. C. Design of input filter (Lf and Cf) A second-order low-pass LC filter is used at the input side to absorb the higher order harmonics such that it is not reflected in the supply current. The maximum value of filter capacitance is given as 𝐶𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝐼𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 550 1 tan θ = tan(1°) 𝜔𝐿 𝑉𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 220 314 × 220√2 = 446.67 𝑛𝐹 (10) where Ipeak, Vpeak, ωL, and θ represent the peak value of supply current, peak value of supply voltage, line frequency in radians per second, and displacement angle between the supply voltage and supply current, respectively. Hence, a value of Cf is taken as 330 nF. Now, the value of inductor Lf is calculated as follows. The value of the filter inductor is designed by considering the source impedance (Ls) of 4%–5% of the base impedance. Hence, the additional value of inductance required is given as 𝐿𝑓 = 𝐿𝑟𝑒𝑞 + 𝐿𝑠 ⇒ 𝐿𝑟𝑒𝑞 = 1 1 Vs2 = 𝐿 + 0.04 ( ) ( ) 𝑟𝑒𝑞 4π2 fc2 Cf ωL Po 1 1 2202 − 0.04 ( ) ( ) 4π2 × 20002 × 330 × 10−9 314 550 = 7.97 mH (11) where fc is the cutoff frequency of the designed filter which is selected as fL < fc < fsw. Hence, a value of fc is taken as fsw/10. Finally, a low-pass filter with inductor and capacitor of 8 mH and 330 nF is selected for this particular application. V. CONTROL OF PFC BL BUCK-BOOST CONVERTER FED PMSM MOTOR DRIVE The control of the PFC BL buck–boost converter-fed PMSM motor drive is classified into two parts as follows. A. Control of Front-End PFC Converter: Voltage follower approach The control of the front-end PFC converter generates the PWM pulses for the PFC converter switches (Sw1 and Sw2) for dc link voltage control with PFC operation at ac mains. A single voltage control loop (voltage follower approach) is utilized for the PFC BL buck–boost converter operating in ∗ DCM. A reference dc link voltage ( 𝑉𝑑𝑐 ) is generated as[3] ∗ 𝑉𝑑𝑐 = 𝑘𝑣 ω∗ (12) Where 𝑘𝑣 and ω∗ are the motor’s voltage constant and the reference speed, respectively. The voltage error signal (𝑉𝑒 ) is generated by comparing the ∗ reference dc link voltage (𝑉𝑑𝑐 ) with the sensed dc link voltage (𝑉𝑑𝑐 ) as ∗ (𝑘) 𝑉𝑒 (𝑘) = 𝑉𝑑𝑐 − 𝑉𝑑𝑐 (𝑘) (13) where 𝑘 represents the 𝑘th sampling instant. This error voltage signal (𝑉𝑒 ) is given to the voltage proportional–integral (PI) controller to generate a controlled output voltage (𝑉𝑐𝑐 ) as 𝑉𝑐𝑐 (𝑘) = 𝑉𝑐𝑐 (𝑘 − 1) + 𝑘𝑝 {𝑉𝑒 (𝑘) − 𝑉𝑒 (𝑘 − 1)} + 𝑘𝑖 𝑉𝑒 (𝑘) (14) where 𝑘𝑝 and 𝑘𝑖 are the proportional and integral gains of the voltage PI controller. Finally, the output of the voltage controller is compared with a high frequency saw tooth signal (md ) to generate the PWM pulses as For 𝑉𝑠 > 0; { For 𝑉𝑠 < 0;{ Fig. 5. Basic Scheme of Vector Control if md < 𝑉𝑐𝑐 then Sw1 = ‘ON’ } if md ≥ 𝑉𝑐𝑐 then Sw1 = ‘OFF′ 𝑖𝑓 𝑚𝑑 < 𝑉𝑐𝑐 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑆𝑤2 = ‘𝑂𝑁’ } 𝑖𝑓 𝑚𝑑 ≥ 𝑉𝑐𝑐 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑆𝑤2 = ‘𝑂𝐹𝐹′ (15) where Sw1 and Sw2 represent the switching signals to the switches of the PFC converter. B. Vector Control of PMSM motor Vector control use mathematical transformations in order to decouple the torque generation and the magnetization functions in PM motors to separately control the torque producing and magnetizing flux components.[4] Fig. 5 summarizes the basic scheme of torque control with Vector Control: Two motor phase currents are measured. These measurements feed the Clarke transformation module. The outputs of this projection are designated isα and isβ. These two components of the current are the inputs of the Park transformation that gives the current in the d,q rotating reference frame. The isd and isq components are compared to the references isdref (the flux reference) and isqref (the torque reference). As in synchronous permanent magnet motor, the rotor flux is fixed determined by the magnets; there is no need to create one. Hence, when controlling a PMSM, i sdref should be set to zero. The torque command isqref is the output of the speed regulator. The outputs of the current regulators are Vsdref and Vsqref; they are applied to the inverse Park transformation. The outputs of this projection are Vsαref and Vsβref which are the components of the stator vector voltage in the (α, β) stationary orthogonal reference frame. These are the inputs of the Space Vector PWM. The outputs of this block are the signals that drive the inverter. Both Park and inverse Park transformations need the rotor flux position. Knowledge of the rotor flux position is the core of the vector control. In the synchronous machine the rotor speed is equal to the rotor flux speed. Therefore θ (rotor flux position) is directly measured by position sensor. VI. SIMULATED PERFORMANCE OF PROPOSED PMSM MOTOR DRIVE The performance of the discussed PMSM motor drive is simulated in MATLAB/Simulink environment using the Sim Power-System toolbox. The performance evaluation of the discussed drive is categorized in terms of the performance of the PMSM motor and BL buck–boost converter and the achieved power quality indices obtained at ac mains. The parameters associated with the PMSM motor such as speed (N), electromagnetic torque (Te), and stator current (Is) are analyzed for the proper functioning of the PMSM motor. Parameters such as supply voltage (Vs), dc link voltage (Vdc), of the PFC BL buck–boost converter are evaluated to demonstrate its proper functioning. The different parameters of the drive are given in Table I TABLE I Parameters of the Proposed PMSM Drive Sl. No. Parameter Value 1 Back emf constant 31.63 V/Kr/min 2 Phase Resistance 4.7 Ω 3 Phase Inductance 25.71 mH 4 Moment of Inertia 3.1x10^-5 kg/m2 5 Proportional gain 0.4 6 Integral gain 0.001 The steady-state behavior of the proposed PMSM motor drive for three cycles of supply voltage at rated condition (rated dc link voltage of 200 V) is shown in Fig. 6 Fig. 8. Speed waveform of the PMSM drive during vector control VIII. Fig. 6. Steady state performance of the proposed PMSM drive at rated conditions The harmonic spectra of the supply current at rated and light load conditions, i.e., dc link voltage of 200 V, is also shown in Fig. 7, which shows that the THD of supply current obtained is under the acceptable limits of IEC 61000-3-2. CONCLUSION A PFC BL buck–boost converter-based Vector controlled PMSM motor drive has been proposed targeting low-power applications. The front-end BL buck–boost converter has been operated in DCM for achieving an inherent power factor correction at ac mains. A satisfactory performance has been achieved for speed control with power quality indices within the acceptable limits of IEC 61000-3-2. ACKNOWLEDGMENT I extend my sincere gratitude towards Prof. Vijayakumari C. K. Head of the Department of Electrical Engineering, for giving us her invaluable knowledge and excellent technical guidance. I express my thanks to P.G Coordinator Mrs. Shanifa Beevi S. and Mrs. Sreelekha V. for their kind co-operation and guidance during the work. I also thank all other faculty members of Electrical Department and my friends for their help and support. Fig. 7. Harmonic spectra of the supply current with rated dc voltage of 200 V and supply voltage of 230 V Last but not the least I thank the God Almighty for having made my endeavor successful. VII. HARDWARE VALIDATION OF PROPOSED PMSM MOTOR DRIVE Vector control of the PMSM was done using DSP 320F 28035. Obtained Speed waveform of the drive is shown in Fig.8 REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] [4] V.Bist and B.Singh, ”An Adjustable-Speed PFC Bridgeless Buck–Boost Converter-Fed BLDC Motor Drive ,IEEE Trans. Ind Electron., vol. 61, no. 6, Jun 2014. S.Singh and B.Singh, “A voltage-controlled PFC Cuk converter based PMBLDCM drive for air-conditioners,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 832–838, Mar./Apr. 2012. B. Singh, S. Singh, A. Chandra, and K. Al-Haddad, “Comprehensive study of single-phase ac-dc power factor corrected converters with highfrequency isolation,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 7, no. 4,pp. 540– 556, Nov. 2011. B Singh, B.P.Singh and Sanjeet Dwivedi, “AC-DC Zeta Converter for Power Quality Improvement in Direct Torque Controlled PMSM Drive.”Journal of Power Electron.Vol 6,No 2, April 2006.