Download Dangers Of Malpractice

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Psychedelic therapy wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Compounding wikipedia , lookup

Stimulant wikipedia , lookup

Specialty drugs in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Drug design wikipedia , lookup

Polysubstance dependence wikipedia , lookup

Pharmaceutical marketing wikipedia , lookup

Orphan drug wikipedia , lookup

Electronic prescribing wikipedia , lookup

Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacokinetics wikipedia , lookup

Neuropharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup

Psychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Pharmaceutical industry wikipedia , lookup

Bad Pharma wikipedia , lookup

Medication wikipedia , lookup

Drug interaction wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Prescription costs wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Dangers of Medical Practice
By: Ronald J. Aragona, D.C., Ph.D.
I have always read that main-stream chiropractic practice is the safest, most cost effective, and
most highly clinically effective and patient satisfying healing art system, and the practice of
medicine is the most dangerous major healing arts systems.
You may occasionally read a news column, written by an M.D., discrediting the chiropractic
profession. In my opinion, these medical authors are extremely jealous of the excellent clinical
results and safety of chiropractic, as a major non-drug alternative to address many of their health
problems, fewer people today are receiving medical care, therefore causing a medical financial
loss.
I deliver low-force-specific chiropractic spinal adjustments; and have never read adverse effects
of these adjustment procedures. Many years ago, I read a case, where a chiropractor put iodine
drops in a child’s eyes...certainly not chiropractic practice. I can understand the dangers of a nonproficient chiropractic adjuster vigorously twisting an older patient’s neck to the right and
thereafter to the left (which I never do), causing serious harm. That’s called at random, general
manipulation, not chiropractic. Wrestlers are expert in that field . . . why go to a chiropractic
university for many years to practice wrestling . . . (?), it’s beyond my comprehension. I have
also heard from patients who have twisted their own necks and caused harm. I can assure you
that’s an extremely dangerous practice.
My youngest patient was 3 hours old and my oldest patient was 96 years old. Certainly different
adjustment techniques are used in different patients. It has been my over 40 years clinical
experience, compliant patients usually experience a degree of relief and improved spinal ranges
of motion following their first chiropractic adjustment; and most patients experience significant
improvement following the first two to three weeks of chiropractic care; on a rare occasion, a
patient may feel slightly worse initially but usually in a few months improvement is noticed
(these are usually severe spinal deformities, usually with extensive degenerative disc disease).
Because of the sensitivity of this subject I prefer to use authoritative quotes to support my bold
but truthful opening statement.
“The Effectiveness of Chiropractic Care.”
“U.S. Government Agency Report.” In 1994, the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research
published Clinical Practice Guidelines 14 – Acute Low Back Problems in Adults (Bigos et al.
1994). The guidelines defined acute-low-back pain, evaluated various treatments, and made
recommendations concerning the efficacy of those treatments. According to the Guideline, spinal
manipulation is one of the most safe and effective treatments for most cases of acute low-back
pain.” (Studies on chiropractic 2000, National Board of Chiropractic Examiners).
“RAND, a prestigious non-profit research organization and ‘think tank,’ has conducted several
studies of chiropractic. Dr. Paul Shekelle, a medical doctor and a researcher for RAND, stated:
‘Instead of thinking of chiropractic as an alternative or some kind of therapy separate from other
health care, we really should consider it equivalent’ (Qtd. In Brin 1988), (NBOCE).”
“The Cost-Effectiveness of Chiropractic Care”
“Mosley, Cohen, and Arnold (1996) concluded that for patients who had back or neck pain,
chiropractic care was substantially more cost-effective than conventional care.
“An earlier cost comparison study by Stano (1993) involved 395,641 patients with
neuromusculoskeletal conditions. Results over a two-year period showed that patients who
received chiropractic care incurred significantly lower health care costs than did patients treated
solely by medical or osteopathic physicians (NBOCE).”
“Patient Satisfaction with Chiropractic Care”
“A study published in the Western Journal of Medicine comparing patients of chiropractors and
family physicians found that medical patients had a higher rate of disability days (mean 39.7)
than chiropractic patients (mean 10.8). The authors determined that the percentage of
chiropractic patients who were ‘Very satisfied’ with the care they received for low-back pain was
triple that for patients of family physicians (66% vs. 22%), (Cherkin and MacCornack
1989,353), (National Board of Chiropractic Examiners).”
The first quote regarding the dangers of medical practice concerns infants and children regarding
cough and cold medicines; Source: The Chiropractic Journal, October, 2008, Page 9.
“FDA experts want to ban OTC cold drugs for kids under six
“Last year, citing concerns over safety and effectiveness, several experts from the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration recommended that the agency ban all over-the-counter, multisymptom cough and cold medicines for children under six. Although their advice managed to
stay under the public radar, a few more progressive medical experts have praised the advice.
“Ken Haller, MD, associate professor of pediatrics at Saint Louis University, said
recently that the regulatory is long overdue.
“‘Cough and cold medicines were first approved many years ago under the assumption
that children’s bodies worked like adult ones, but on a smaller scale,’ Dr. Haller explained to
parents. ‘They were never tested for safety and effectiveness in children. There are a lot of side
effects associated with these medicines.’
“While infant cough and cold medications were pulled off shelves last year, nearly 800
over-the-counter cough and cold medications are still available for children over two years old –
a decision with which Haller disagrees.
“‘I feel strongly that they should all be taken off the market,’ he stated.
“‘Numerous studies have shown that these do not make children with colds and sore
throats feel better any quicker than doing nothing. And over the years, thousands of children
have been hospitalized and scores of children have died as a result of taking these drugs because
of their side effects and the fact that many of these drugs contain multiple active ingredients,
which add up to a harmful dose.’
“In the first two years of life, it’s normal for children to get an average of six significant
upper respiratory infections per year. ‘Parents often feel powerless when their kids are sick and
are desperate to help them feel better,’ Haller said. ‘But drugs are not the answer for every
illness. Not only will these over-the-counter medicines not help your child feel better, but they
can be very dangerous, too.’ “Source: Saint Louis University Medical Center, Sept. 8, 2009"
The remainder of this news-letter comprises direct quotes from a 690 page authoritative book,
entitled, “Worst Pills - Best Pills II, The Older Adult’s Guide to Avoiding Drug-Induced Death
or Illness”. I strongly recommend this book for people of all ages, although it emphasizes older
adult’s adverse drug reactions; these reactions affect people of all ages; perhaps to a slightly
lesser degree in younger adults. The authors are: Sidney M. Wolfe, M.D., Director, Public
Citizen’s Health Research Group and Rose-Ellen Hope, pharmacist, Veneta, Oregon.
The preface of the book is written by, Paul D. Stolley, M.D., Professor and Chairman,
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine. His first paragraph to the preface: “For
older Americans, nothing less than the closest attention to their health problems is adequate.
Although many older adults can benefit from drugs which lower blood pressure, reduce the pain
and discomfort of angina or arthritis, or treat other common ailments, they are extra ordinarily
sensitive to adverse effects of medicines, such as drug induced parkinsonism, confusion,
decreased coordination, falls and hip fractures, and mental deterioration. Thus, the best medicine
may be no medicine.”
The first section of this book is entitled, “Overview”. To me these facts are overwhelming...
“Each year there are approximately 61,000 older adults with drug-induced parkinsonism, 32,000
with hip fractures including 15,000 deaths attributable to drug-induced falls, 16,000 injurious car
crashes caused by adverse drug reactions, 163,000 with drug-induced or drug-worsened memory
loss, 659,000 who have to be hospitalized because of adverse drug reactions, including 41,000
hospitalizations – 3,300 deaths – from ulcers caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,
usually for arthritis, and hundreds of thousands with drug-induced dizziness or fainting. Over
half (50.5%) of the Food and Drug Administration adverse reaction reports of deaths and 39% of
hospitalizations related to adverse drug reactions are in older adults. All told, 9.6 million older
adults suffer an adverse drug reaction each year.”
“These are a number of reasons why older adults suffer more and more serious adverse drug
reactions than younger people....
“Recent studies have found that
“70% of doctors treating Medicare patients flunked an exam concerning their knowledge of
prescribing to older adults.
“Between 40% and 50% drugs prescribed for older adults outside the hospital were overused.
“Among older patients being given three or more prescriptions upon leaving the hospital, 88% of
them had prescriptions with one or more problems, 22% had prescription errors which were
potentially serious or life-threatening. The types of these frequent, often-serious prescribing
mistakes included:
“59% of patients prescribed a less-than-optimal drug or one not effective for their
disease;
“28% of patients were given doses which were too high;
“48% of patients were given drugs with one or more harmful interactions with other
drugs.
“But, according to the World Health Organization:
“‘Quite often, the history and clinical examination of patients with side effects reveal that
no valid interaction (purpose) for the drug has been present.’
“One of the most succinct explanations for why there is what is clearly an epidemic of
drug overuse and preventable damage to older adults is by British geriatric drug expert, Dr.
George Carruthers:
“ ‘Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, medications are often used to treat the physical,
psychological, social, and economic problems associated with aging, even when there is
scientific evidence that drugs are the least appropriate way of managing some of these problems.
Rather than having the quality of life improved, the elderly patient may actually suffer adverse
effects of drug intervention which was initiated, presumably, with the best intentions. Overuse of
medications in the elderly may result.’
“Dr. Carruthers attributes this serious problem to ignorance on the part of the doctor,
differences between younger and older people, and ignorance of the ‘limitations’ of drug
therapy. Patients too often see doctors as ‘drug givers’ and themselves as ‘drug receivers,’ also
because of their own ignorance of non-drug alternatives to many of these problems.
“Finally, he discusses the ‘illness-medication-spiral,’ in which adverse reactions to drugs
already being used may be incorrectly interpreted as a new illness, leading to the prescription of
yet another drug, instead of stopping or reducing the dose of the one actually causing the
‘illness’.”
“Thirty seven percent of older adults are using five or more different prescription drugs
and 19% are using seven or more. Older Americans fill 650 million prescriptions a year.”
“...serious problems with prescription drugs do not suddenly start at age 60. Beginning in
our 30s, the ability of the liver to metabolize drugs and even more importantly, of the kidney to
clear drugs out of the body, and the output of the heart begin to decrease. Since most people in
their 30s or 40s are not given many prescription drugs, these changes alone do not usually lead to
a large number of drug induced medical problems. Many of the adverse reactions discussed in
this book, however, can occur in anyone at any age.
“But as people enter their 50s, the amount of prescription drug use starts increasing
significantly, and the odds of getting an adverse drug reaction also increase. The risk of adverse
drug reaction is about 33% higher in people aged 50 to 59 than it is in people aged 40 to 49. It
becomes two to three times higher as people get even older.”
“119 of the 364 most commonly prescribed drugs for older adults – one out of every three
drugs – should not, according to published studies and/or Public Citizen’s Health Research
Group and its medical consultants, be sued by older adults because safer alternative drugs are
available.”
“This list of ‘Do Not Use’ drugs include widely used sleeping pills and tranquilizers such
as Valium, Dalmane, Halcion, Restoril, Ativan, and Xanax, and antidepressants such as Elavil;
pain killers or arthritis drugs such as Darvocet or Darvon, Indocin, and Feldene; heart drugs such
as Persantive, Lopid, Aldomet, Dyrenium, and Catapres; gastrointestinal drugs such as Bentyl,
Donnatal, Librax, Lomotil, and Tigan; and the widely used diabetes drug Diabenese.”
“When you look at the 119 ‘Do Not Use’ drugs you will find 97 other drugs in addition to
these 22. ‘Do Not Use’ drugs account for approximately one out of every four prescriptions filled
by older adults. In three of the major categories of drugs prescribed for older adults, a large
proportion are categorized as ‘Do Not Use’ by our medical experts. They include:
“18 of 36, or 50% of the mind drugs (tranquillizers, sleeping pills, etc.);
“24 of 73 or 33% of the heart/blood pressure drugs;
“17 or 50 of 34%, of the gastrointestinal drugs.
“Even for the 113 drugs which we categorize as ‘Limited Use’ or the other drugs
discussed in this book, the number of serious, life-threatening adverse reactions can be
significantly reduced even more by using lower doses and avoiding the harmful interactions with
other drugs of foods which we lists.
“What percentage of the drugs used by older adults are not necessary, too
dangerous or are prescribed at a dose that is too high?
“Answer: A conservative estimate is that two-thirds of the prescriptions filled by older
adults – more than 429 million prescriptions a year – fall into one of these three categories.
“That is, the drug is:
“Not needed at all because the problem of the older patient is not for which a drug is the
proper solution.
“Unnecessarily dangerous wherein a less dangerous drug would give the same benefit
with lower risk.
“The right drug but the dose is unnecessarily high, again causing extra risk without extra
benefits.”
“... All of the following medical problems have been found, in a significant number of
instances, to occur as adverse drug reactions.
“86 drugs which can cause depression
“105 drugs which can cause hallucinations or psychosis
“119 drugs which can cause sexual dysfunction
“65 drugs which can cause dementia
“46 drugs which can cause falls and hip fractures
“22 drugs which can cause injurious auto accidents
“18 drugs which can cause insomnia
“88 drugs which can cause constipation
“29 drugs which can cause Parkinsonism
“This list does not include those kinds of adverse reactions which are more difficult for
patients or their friends to detect, such as early evidence of liver or lung damage, nor does it
contain every drug, no matter how few prescriptions there are which can cause the adverse
effects listed here.”
“... For each drug you or your parents are using you will need to list the doses, how often
the drug is taken and for how long, the medical conditions for which the doctors says each drug
is being used, the adverse effects you are having from any of these drugs and other information
shown on the drug work-sheet. Then you, your parents and the doctor can begin the process of
reducing the number of drugs being taken by eliminating the ones which are not absolutely
necessary or which are unnecessarily dangerous. At the same time, the drugs which are thought
to be necessary can be reduced, if possible, to further decrease the risk of adverse drug reactions.
“Question: When I finally get down to the smallest number of drugs I really need to
be taken and the lowest dose of each, is there any way that I can further cut down on the
$1200 a year I am now spending on prescription drugs?
“Answer... each year a larger percentage of the drugs most commonly used by older
adults are available in usually much less expensive generic form as the brand name version. In
this chapter, we also discuss and rebut the myths that brand name companies are using to
frighten doctors and patients from using these much less expensive drugs.
“In addition, many times more expensive, but no safer or effective drugs, are prescribed,
because they are promoted more to doctors.
“A typical older adult might have arthritis and high blood pressure and get prescribed
Feldene for the arthritis and Calan SR for the high blood pressure at cost of $1,008 per year for
the Feldene and about $190 a year for Calan SR, the total would be $1,198. But Feldene is a ‘Do
Not Use’ drug and the preferred Worst Pills Best Pills II alternatives for arthritis, either generic
enteric-coated aspirin or ibuprofen, cost about $130 a year. Similarly, Calan SR cost about $190
a year but the first choice drug for hypertension, generic hydrochlorothiazine, can be obtained for
only $12 a year. Thus, the yearly drug bill for this typical person would be $142 a year instead of
$1,198, or less than one-third as much.”
“One last thought: when we hear the phrase Dug Abuse these days, the first thing that
comes to mind is heroin, cocaine, in the headlines. But what about drug abuse in older people?
Well, older people do not use those kinds of drugs. That problem mainly has to do with younger
people who ‘chooses’ to take drugs such as heroin, cocaine, etc. If instead, we broaden the
definition of drug abuse to include victims of the choices of others – such as patients of doctors –
then the greatest epidemic of drug abuse in American society is among our older people.
Like other epidemics, it is preventable.”
Well, there you are, these are most authoritative quotes regarding adverse drug reaction in the
older adults. As you have read they also adversely affect younger persons. The next time you
“pop-a-pill” think of the adverse consequences. Perhaps you can become seriously mind-infused
to think about your health and choose a safer alternative; good luck with you future health care
existence!
What Will Transpire?
In my over 40 year’s clinical experience; the mentally confused patients or the know-itall patients, will not properly follow through or comply with their treatment plan. They will self
dismiss the moment they feel better. Bad news – their spinal deformities usually become
protractivally worse with the passage of time; as well as their health disabilities. However, the
serious minded or mentally intact patient will understand the necessity to follow through with the
recommended treatment plan and comply, and most compliant patients improve decisively.
This is summed up by a statement I published in a pamphlet entitled “Why I Do What I Do and
Why You Should Do What You Should Do”, 1973:
“Our Complete Referral Service Information Bulletin
“Concerning nutrition, exercise, rest, emotional balance, we ask that you find someone
who is ‘an expert’ on these ‘natural’ activities. Concerning medicine and surgery – we are truly
fearful to recommend that you find someone who is an ‘EXPERT’ in these fields because of the
terribly deadly statistics that are being revealed every day in the news media. If I personally refer
you to any medical or surgical ‘expert’, I stand a good chance of sending you to your death.
Only you have the right to choose your own assassin.”
The choice is yours, take dangerous medical drugs with obvious injurious adverse
reactions, to cover-up your impairments; or choose safe and conservative chiropractic care to
correct the cause of your bodily disabilities. Think twice, the next time you pop pills!!
Chiropractically Yours,
Dr. R.J. Aragona