Download issue statement - National Association of Social Workers

Workplace Discrimination
ISSUE STATEMENT
1
2
Employment serves as a major vehicle for the distribution of income and most other essential material social
3
benefits, such as health insurance, public and private retirement plans, and disability insurance, as well as many
4
nonmaterial benefits, such as status and prestige. Because of the inherent power associated with employment, it is
5
essential that NASW continues to work to end discrimination in the workplace and to enhance access to gainful
6
employment for all.
7
8
Discriminatory workplace policies and practices limit opportunities for job attainment, career mobility and equal
9
participation in organizational leadership. These forms of discrimination interact with wage discrimination to
10
negatively affect lifetime earnings, benefits, occupations, and personal and household income.
11
12
Discrimination—unequal treatment of persons, for a reason which has nothing to do with legal rights or ability
13
(Law.Com, n.d.)—continues to be pervasive in modern American life. The social work profession has long been
14
concerned with working to eliminate discrimination in all forms. This commitment is embodied in the Code of
15
Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers (NASW, 2008) and informs the major policies that NASW
16
supports. Discrimination based on age, race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion,
17
national origin, immigrant status, disability and other axes of difference, has a significant and pernicious impact
18
on the lives of the clients that the social work profession serves as well as on the members of the social work
19
profession themselves.
20
21
Discrimination unduly affects a variety of employable citizens in the workplace. Discrimination can occur at
22
every stage of the employment process, from interviewing, hiring, training, promotion and compensation to
23
retention and separation. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), created in 1964, enforces
24
statutes that make it illegal to discriminate against employees or applicants for employment on the basis of race,
25
color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, or age. It also provides federal protections from discrimination on
26
other bases, including status as a parent, marital status, political affiliation, and conduct that does not adversely
27
affect the performance of the employee.
28
29
Far too many people confront difficulty in their quests to realize their career goals and support themselves
30
financially. In the first decade of the new millennium, there were nearly 150,000 charges of sexual harassment
31
filed with the EEOC and the state and local Fair Employment Practices agencies across the country (EEOCa,
32
n.d.). In 2012, nearly 100,000 complaints of discrimination were filed with the U.S. Equal Employment
33
Opportunity Commission (EEOCb, n.d.) and complainants received more than $365 million in monetary benefits
34
(EEOCc, n.d.). In 2012, charges of discrimination based on race accounted for 33.7% of all complaints filed
35
with the EEOC, followed by charges of discrimination based on gender (30.5%), disability (26.5%) and age
36
(23%) (EEOCa, n.d.). Complaints were also filed on the basis of national origin (10.9%), religion (3.8%), color
37
(2.7%) and compensation (1.1%) (EEOCa, n.d.). In addition, 208 cases were filed with the EEOC charging
38
discrimination based on genetic information (EEOCa, n.d.) New manifestations of discriminatory behavior
39
based on body size (Judge & Cabel, 2011; Puhl, Andreyeva, & Brownell, 2008) and credit worthiness (NY Times,
40
2013; Traub, 2012) are also being reported in the workplace. In addition, verbal slurs, graffiti, bullying, sexual
41
harassment, and other forms of offensive conduct have become more pervasive in the workplace and are often
42
rooted in prejudices against people based on differences (Sallee & Diaz, 2012: Workplace Bullying Institute,
43
2010).
44
45
Despite federal and state civil rights legislation, affirmative action programs, and other legislative and policy
46
efforts to reduce these differences in the past several decades, workplace discrimination persists.
47
48
POLICY STATEMENT
49
Given the persistence and pervasiveness of workplace discrimination, NASW supports:
50
51
•
enforcement of all laws and regulations that forbid discrimination in the workplace, including adequate
52
funding for the federal and state agencies charged with the enforcement of civil rights and
53
antidiscrimination laws and regulations, such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
54
•
employment discrimination.
55
56
•
federal and state legislative measures that aim to eliminate discrimination in employment, training,
compensation, and job-related benefits.
57
58
workers’ efforts to organize as a means to promote progressive employment policies and address
•
public and private affirmative action programs that aim to ensure that people from historically oppressed
59
populations and women have access to employment, opportunities for advancement, nondiscriminatory
60
working conditions, and fair compensation.
61
•
undocumented workers.
62
63
•
•


equal opportunities for all people to access and complete their education in non-discriminatory and
non-hostile environments to further full participation in the workforce.
70
71
compliance with Americans With Disabilities (ADA) regulations to assure that persons with disabilities
have equal access to employment, promotion and job satisfaction.
68
69
adoption of federal and state measures that prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender
identity, marital and family status.
66
67
human and civil rights measures to protect all Americans, including lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender,
and intersex people from discrimination in the workplace.
64
65
federal and state measures that promote and protect legal employment opportunities for immigrants and

maintenance and expansion of the social safety net and work supports (e.g., child care subsidy, universal
72
health care, paid parental or caregiver leave, etc.), that support full access to and participation in the
73
workforce.
74

adoption of federal and state measures that prohibit discrimination based on reproductive choices.
75

adoption of the Equal Rights Amendment.
76
References
Judge, T.A. & Cable, D.M. (2011). When it comes to pay, do the thin win? The effect of weight on pay for
men and women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96 (1), 95-112 DOI: 10.1037/a0020860
Law.Com. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=532)
National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics for the National Association of Social Workers.
Washington, DC: NASW Press.
New York Times Editorial Board. (April 22, 2013). Credit history discrimination. Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/23/opinion/credit-history-discrimination.html?_r=0
Puhl, RM, Andreyeva, T., & Brownell, K.D. (2008). Perceptions of weight discrimination: Prevalence and
comparison to race and gender discrimination in America, International Journal of Obesity, 32, 992-1000.
Sallee, M.W. & Diaz, C.R. (2012). Sexual harassment, racist jokes, and homophobic slurs: When bullies target
identity groups. In Lester, J. (Ed.) Workplace bullying in higher education (41-59). New York: Routledge.
Traub, A. (February 7, 2012). Ending unjust employment credit checks. Retrieved from
http://www.demos.org/publication/ending-unjust-employment-credit-checks
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (a). (n.d.) Sexual Harassment Charges. EEOC & FEPAs
Combined: FY 1997 through FY 2011. Retrieved from
http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment.cfm
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (b). (n.d.) Charge statistics (National FY 1997 through FY
2012.) Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/charges.cfm
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (c). (n.d.) All statutes (FY 1997 through FY 2012.) Retrieved
from
http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/all.cfmhttp://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/all.cf
m
Workplace Bullying Institute. (2010). Race & workplace bullying: 2010 WBI survey. Retrieved from
http://www.workplacebullying.org/2010/09/06/race_2010_wbi/