* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Wroc*aw, 05
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup
Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Biogeography wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
Fauna of Africa wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Tropical Andes wikipedia , lookup
Operation Wallacea wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup
Landscape ecology wikipedia , lookup
Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
To the Dean of the Faculty of Science Masaryk University Prof. Dr. Jaromir Leichmann Kotlářská 3 611 37 Brno Wrocław 29.04.2016 REVIEW OF THE PHD THESIS Candidate: Topic: Mgr. Dana Michalcová Spatial distribution of small scale vegetation diversity in the landscape Mrs. Mgr. Dana Michalcová has submitted a dissertation thesis consisting of a series of four papers focused on grasslands diversity in a heterogonous landscape. Three papers have already been published in high impact factor international journals and one has also been submitted in a high good quality journal and I am convinced that this manuscript will be accepted for publication. In three papers Mgr. Dana Michalcová is the first author. The thesis is focused on the effect of landscape heterogeneity on species diversity in grassland communities. First, the PhD candidate made an attempt to critically assess the usability of vegetation-plot data gathered in phytosociological databases in the assessment of species richness and other important vegetation attributes. The PhD candidate also evaluated factors affecting the various levels of biodiversity, in particular, alpha diversity with respect to the proportion of grassland areas and heterogeneity of the landscape. The next stage of her research was to investigate the role of ecotones in influencing biological diversity in a diverse landscape. In the manuscript, six goals were introduced. The main goals of her study are well defined and concern many important ecological questions. The structure of the manuscript is clear and well-thought-out and consists of two parts. The first part includes an introduction to the problem, description of the methods, the results of the study and a comprehensive discussion with proper citations. The latter part consists of a set of papers. The first paper highlights the importance of methodological aspects concerning the use of data from electronic vegetation-plot databases in the assessment of species diversity in forest vegetation. Preferentially collected historical data has been confronted with a relatively complementary data set collected using stratified-random sampling. The results of this study showed differences in the representation of certain pre-defined plant groups and the tendency of phytosociologists to sample species-rich stands of vegetation. These results are not, however, unambiguous because species richness was biased by preferential sampling only in one of the two cases considered. The paper clearly pointed out that historical vegetation-plot data does not bias all of the estimates of vegetation parameters. Moreover, the subjective positioning of plots is important for the description of beta diversity patterns. The scope of this research is very important for the ecological studies and vegetation surveys carried out at different spatial scales. Mgr. Dana Michalcová clearly showed that the inference based on data from phytosociological databases must be treated with caution. This study stimulates discussion and reflection among vegetation scientists and raises many questions. How to treat data stored in databases, particularly in relation to changes in the concepts of species and methodological assumptions of data collection? Does phytosociological data collected over many years, in a rather conservative and mainly preferential way, require special treatment that would reduce bias? What are the possibilities to reduce bias in the results and subsequent interpretation? Does a direct comparison of historical and contemporary data, which was collected in different ways and by different authors, can create another bias? The two subsequent papers are devoted to the problem of the impact of various environmental factors and the structure of the landscape on different levels of diversity (particularly alpha diversity). The studies were carried out in the White Carpathians, several other neighbouring areas and in Slovakia. The papers present very interesting results explaining the relation between species diversity patterns and the landscape diversity. It has been shown that gamma diversity of the White Carpathians at a regional scale is not different from other areas studied. It has been proved, however, that extremely high alpha diversity of grasslands in the White Carpathians is, to some extent, due to the presence of a large mosaic of habitats with a relatively homogeneous geological structure. This creates a specific and complex combination of species. Another important result demonstrated that grassland vegetation found in a complex of semi-natural or natural vegetation is characterized by high alpha diversity. It has also been shown that alpha diversity depends on the vicinity and coverage of grasslands of a similar origin. Accordingly, species diversity of grassland decreases with the increasing share of non-natural habitats in the closest surroundings. The reverse pattern was found for beta and gamma diversity. Human-induced landscape alterations have a strong impact on the alpha diversity of sub-xerophilous and mesophilous grasslands, while xerophilous and wet grasslands are less affected. How to explain this relationship? It has been demonstrated that the structure of landscape seems to be one of the most important factors shaping a semi-natural vegetation, but not forest vegetation. The results of this study are very interesting and are an essential part of the research. What is the role of land use in this context, and abandonment in particular? My attention was drawn by the sample size of data sets used for the analysis. Could a different number of samples collected in each region affect the results? The last part of the research is devoted to the role of ecotones in maintaining biodiversity. This is a very well elaborated study with interesting information about ecotones. Transition zones between different plant communities and their importance for species persistence in the landscape have been poorly studied so far, or contradictory results have been published. Generally, it is recognized that they are usually species-rich and some species are considered to be specific to these ecosystems. According to the research of the PhD candidate, there are no significant differences in species richness between ecotones and adjacent homogenous ecosystems. Of particular interest is the result of questioning the role of ecotones in the spread of alien species, especially in relation to the intensively managed agricultural landscape. The results of this study did not confirm that ecotones may serve as refugia for rare species or archaeophytes, nor do they increase species pool in the landscape. Moreover, they are not a high diversity refugia and do not counteract the negative effect of fragmentation in the agricultural landscape. In the light of these results, we can learn more about these peculiar ecosystems. The submitted paper is of high scientific value and, in my opinion, should successfully be published in a good quality journal with a high impact factor. This topic is especially important for landscape ecology. Unclear, however, is why it was decided to use a quite subjectively defined plot area in the transect? Also, some other questions concerning sampling scheme arise. Did the authors consider dividing the basic plot area, especially within a single ecotone, into smaller plots (e.g. 1m 2) to determine the extent of ecotone community? How did the authors define ecotones between similar communities? Was the distribution of species from homogenous communities symmetric or asymmetric in ecotones? Can some of the ecotones in this study be distinct syntaxonomical units? The results of this study are of great practical importance because they show that landscape fragmentation and the disappearance of natural and semi-natural habitats from the landscape may result in the reduction of species diversity. It can therefore be argued that the ecotones do not compensate the loss of valuable habitats because the persistence of ecotones in the landscape is not enough to protect biodiversity and endangered species in particular. All papers included in the dissertation are kept in a single train of thought. They are well-planned and methodologically sound. The methods used in the analyses are appropriate and meet the standards of high-quality international journals. Of particular attention is the R script of sample-based rarefaction curves. The manuscript itself is well written and concise. The results are presented in a clear manner and references are appropriately cited in the comprehensive discussion. Most importantly, all the results from this research are essential for scientists working in the field of ecology, vegetation survey, and agriculture and ecosystem restoration. Mgr. Dana Michalcová is an ambitious young scientist contributing to the development of the Czech National Phytosociological Database. Additionally, she is involved in several projects, out of which Atlas of plants of the CZ for mobile devices is particularly interesting. Moreover, several posters and oral presentations were given by the applicant at international scientific conferences. In conclusion, Mgr. Dana Michalcová is a professional scientific researcher. The results of her study are of great importance for the international scientific community and also for nature conservation practitioners. I have no doubts that Mgr. Dana Michalcová deserves to be awarded a doctoral degree. dr hab. Zygmunt Kącki Department of Vegetation Ecology University of Wrocław