Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
NOTES A rapid method of quantifying algal carbon ABSTRACT A rapid and inexpensive method of obtaining and assembling kinetic data from algal cultures is presented which allows evaluation of the interactions between limits imposed on algal carbon uptake kinetics by nutrient or physical factors and those imposed by carbon availability. Traditionally studies of algal growth kinetics are conducted in chemostats under steady-state conditions, IIowever maintenance of constant pH, alkalinity, and inorganic carbon supply while alga1 kinetic response is related to single nutrients or factors ignores interactions between these parameters and the variable under study. In natural waters algal fixation of carbon from the system results in a variety of changes including alterations in the relative ability of algae to compete (King 1970, 1972). Verduin ( 1951, 1957)) Beyers and Odum ( 1959)) Beyers et al. ( 1963)) Beyers (1963, 1965), Park et al. ( 1958), and many others have used measured changes in pH and the alkalinity system to calculate algal carbon fixation. Park ( 1969) reviewed the various calculation methods involved. These changes in the inorganic carbon budget associated with algal photosynthesis can be used to relate algal carbon fixation kinetics rapidly to any of several parameters, while allowing the alkalinity system of the culture to shift as it does in nature. Our method involves growing algal cultures in sterile inorganic growth media in l,OOO-ml erlenmeyer flasks designed to minimize atmospheric recarbonation but to permit atmospheric pressure equalization. Stoppers for each flask are drilled with two holes: a large median hole of 13-mm diameter, and a smaller one, 3.5 mm in diameter, about 15 mm from the stopper center. The small hole is fitted with a 50-mm length of 4-mm-OD glass tubing to provide pressure equalization during growth. The larger hole is fitted with a serum cap to permit LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY uptake kinetics sample removal with a syringe without exposing the flask contents to the atmosphere. Samples are removed for pH measurement by swirling the flask contents to obtain a homogeneous suspension and then penetrating the serum cap septum with a syringe and withdrawing the required volume. To accurately determine the pH of such samples without interference from atmospheric recarbonation, we use a 50-ml beaker fitted with a rubber stopper ( No. 9%) drilled with a 14- and a 7-mm-diameter hole. The larger hole is just large enough to permit insertion of a combination pH electrode and is capped with a No. 0 rubber stopper when not in use. The smaller hole is fitted with a 45-mm length of 6.35-mmOD glass tubing and capped with a small serum cap. Before sample injection, the apparatus is flushed completely of air and COn with nitrogen gas and rapidly sealed to preserve a nitrogen atmosphere. A 25-ml sample is then withdrawn from the culture flask with a syringe and injected into the nitrogen atmosphere, with care to limit turbulence and prohibit direct air contact. Finally, the pH probe is quickly inserted and pH determined. Culture pH as a function of time, from initial seeding until continued carbon uptake ceased, is illustrated in Fig. 1 for Anacystis nidulans. Calculated values of carbon fixed by the algae can be obtained at any point or over any interval of such curves by applying the following equation. where M = biomass in terms of organic carbon, M; At = t - to = time increment, hr; t, to = boundary parameters of time interval, hr; and &x3, = total molar sum of inorganic 978 NOVEMBER 1973, carbon V. 18(6) 979 NOTES o-280 -I - tux 0 " IO 0 PH me 9 8. I 100 200 300 ELAPSED 400 TIME 500 I 600 1 (HOURS) Fig. 1. Culture pH as a function of time during photosynthesis for several cultures of Anacystis niduhs grown under light intensities ranging from 280 to 915 lux (Sylvania Gro-Lux). species, M; a = carbonate-bicarbonate alkalinity, eq liter-l; H = hydrogen ion activity as determined by a pH meter, M; K1, K2 = first and second dissociation constants of carbonic acid. Values for K1 and K2 are from Buch (1951) as listed by Harvey ( 1957) for various water temperatures. Although it is difficult to evaluate the precision of this method, comparison of calculated biomass estimates with direct measures of organic carbon with a carbon analyzer (Beckman IR-315) yielded a coefficient of correlation between these estimates of 0.986. However, the standard error of 20.998 mg C liter-l incurred by estimating carbon fixed from calculated values appears to be more a function of the precision of the carbon analyzer than a reflection of the precision of the calculation method. After the curves representing pH as a function of time, as in Fig. 1, are transformed with equation 1 to curves of carbon fixed as a function of time, estimates of the specific growth rate, defined as follows, can be obtained. dM,‘dt p=M) (2) where ,u = specific growth rate, hr-r; M = carbon fixed as biomass, M; t = time, hr. Specific growth rate as used here is the instantaneous time rate of change of biomass (inorganic carbon fixed) per unit average biomass over the time interval in -4 -3 log I 0 -I -2 CO, (JI moles I I liter-‘) Fig. 2. Specific growth rate (P) of Anacystis niduhs as a function of the free CC& concentration under two light intensities. The curves represent calculations based on kinetic constants derived from the data, and photosynthetic minima indicate equilibrium CO, concentrations at which continued carbon uptake ceased. question, becomes t-b The specific AM/At = -= m (Mt growth - Mt,)/(t rate then - to), (3) (Mt + wow where pAt = specific growth rate during the time increment, hr-l; AM = biomass increment ( inorganic carbon fixed), M; t, to = boundary parameters of time increment, hr; At= t- to = time increment, hr; m = average standing crop biomass during the time increment; M. We chose to use the average standing crop biomass rather than the biomass at the beginning of the period to approximate more closely the integral rate over the period considered. This will yield a slightly lower specific growth rate than using the initial value, but we feel that it more nearly approximates the true rate over the changing conditions during a given interval. For the same reason we plot the resulting specific growth rate (p) against the mean substrate (free CO,) concentration over that period. Such specific growth rates for A. nidulans are plotted in Fig. 2 against the average free CO2 concentrations over the time intervals for which the specific growth rates were determined. Free CO2 concentrations 980 NOTES were calculated from pH and alkalinity data according to Park ( 1969). The two curves drawn through the data were calculated by the empirical Monod formulation (Monod 1949). Kinetic constants for these curves were calculated by a regression analysis of experimental data using V/S vs. V linear transform of the parent growth rate equation ( Dowd and Riggs 1965). The logarithmic axes used in this plot allow illustration of the different minimum attainable external free CO, concentrations and the change in specific growth rates at given free COa concentrations when other parameters, in this case light intensity, are varied. Figure 2 shows that a reduction in light intensity caused a large reduction in specific growth rate at all concentrations considered as well as a reduction in excess of an order of magnitude in the minimum attainable external free CO2 concentration. Although the curves based on empirical formulation drawn through the data in Fig. 2 would predict photosynthesis to continue to zero free CO2 concentration, this clearly is not the case, as is indicated by the points at which additional carbon fixation ceased. This indicates a marked interaction between light intensity, carbon availability, and both rate and extent of photosynthetic carbon fixation by A. nidulans. We have used this method successfully to evaluate algal carbon uptake kinetics as a function of available nitrogen and phosphorus over a range of free CO2 concentrations by withdrawing samples from the cultures at routine intervals for measurement of nitrogen or phosphorus uptake by the algae. Such additional measurements from a series of flask microcosms in which the amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, light, or temperature is varied sequentially allow evaluation of interactions between limits imposed by such parameters with those imposed by carbon availability, as well as determinations of C: P and C:N ratios of algae under various conditions of stress. This method allows rapid accumulation of carbon uptake kinetic data and can be used to illustrate interaction between various limiting factors, but there are some cautions. The carbon supply to the algae is comprised solely of carbonate-bicarbonate alkalinity since sterile inorganic media are used and the net flux of oxygen out of the flask through the small pressure equalization vent minimizes recarbonation from the atmosphere. Calculations are based on the assumptions that all carbon fixed by the algae comes from the alkalinity system and that all carbon removed from the alkalinity is fixed by the algae. Carbonate precipitates would be counted as algal carbon uptake and therefore the growth medium used must be dominated by monovalent cations. The sheer volume of measurement and calculation involved in estimating carbonate precipitation in media dominated by divalent cations limits the usefulness of this method in such waters. THOMAS C. YOUNG DARRELL L. KING Department of Civil Engineering University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia 65201 REFERENCES R. J. 1963. The metabolism of twelve aquatic laboratory microecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 33: 281-306. 1965. The pattern of photosynthesis -. and respiration in laboratory microecosystems, p. 61-74. In C. R. Goldman [ea.], Primary productivity in aquatic environments. Mem. 1st. Ital. Idrobiol. 18( suppl.), also Univ. Calif. 1966. J, LARIMER, H. T. ODUM, R. B. PARKER, N. E. AFLMSTRONG. 1963. Directions AA for the determination of changes in carbon dioxide concentration from changes in pH. Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. (Texas) 9: 454-489. AND H. T. ODUM. 1959. The use of caibon dioxide to construct pH curves for the measurement of productivity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 4 : 499-502. BUCH, K. 1951. Das Kohlensare Gleichgewichtssystem im Meerwasser. Havsforskningsinst. Skr. Helsingfors 151. 18 p. Down, J. E., AND D. S. RIGGS. 19fXL A comof estimates of Michaelis-Menten parison kinetic constants from various linear transformations. J. Biol. Chem. 240: 863-869. 1957. Chemistry and fertility HARVIZY, H. W. of sea water, 2nd ed. Cambridge. KING, D. L. 1970. The role of carbon in eutrophication. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 42: 2035-2051, BEYERS, 981 NOTES -. 1972. Carbon limitation in sewage lagoons, p. 9S-105. In G. E. Likens [ed.], Nutrients and eutrophication. Amer. Sot. Limnol. Oceanogr. Spec. Symp. 1. MONOD, J. 1949. The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu. Rev. Microbial. 3: 371-388. PARK, K. 1969. Oceanic COz system: An evaluation of ten methods of investigation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14: 179-186. 1958. -, D. W. HOOD, AND H. T. ODUM. Diurnal pH variation in Texas bays, and its application to primary production estimation. Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. (Texas) 5: 47-64. VERDUIN, J. 1951. Photosynthesis in naturally reared aquatic communities. Plant Physiol. 26: 45-49. 1957. Daytime variation in phyto-. plankton photosynthesis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2 : 333-336. Submitted: Accepted: 20 March 1973 17 August 1973 Trends in drogue design1v2 ABSTRACT Drogues in use today in the Lagrangian measurement of currents are in general inferior in behavior to those in use a century or more ago. This results from the historical tendency toward smaller drogues. For optimum measurements, one should select a drogue design that maximizes ease in handling and then scale it up to the largest size practicable. In conducting a general review of devices used in the Lagrangian measurement of current, we considered in particular that category of drogue, drag, or sea anchor whose motion is determined by tracking a surface buoy from which the submerged device is suspended at a selected depth. The various types of drogue are illustrated in Fig. I3 Each design is assigned to one of four classes based on geometrical considerations. Certain trends in drogue usage can be seen that limit the quality of the measurements obtained with the modern drogues. BASIC DROGUE MECHANICS A drogue-buoy pair undergoes only very slow changes in speed or direction of motion, i.e. very slight accelerations. It is 1 Study supported in part by the University of Michigan Sea Grant Program, maintained by NOAA, US. Dept. of Commerce. a Publication No. 213 from the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, The University of Michigan. a A copy of this figure, with a complete list of bibliographic citations, is available from the University of Michigan Sea Grant Program (Monahan and Monahan, in prep. ). thus appropriate to assume at any instant that a drogue-buoy system has no net external force acting on it. In the unique instance where the horizontal flows at the surface and at the depth of the drogue are the same, then the drogue-buoy system has no horizontal forces acting on it, and the drogue and the buoy, taken individually, have no horizontal external forces acting on them. (In this example, and in the one to follow, it is assumed that the force exerted by the wind on the exposed portions of the buoy can be neglected. This is a reasonable assumption if the buoy is almost awash and has only a thin radio antenna or a small radar transponder element protruding upward, but if the buoy has considerable freeboard, a flag, a radar reflector, or several such features, then for winds greater than a few meters per second, the wind force will be significant and must be included as an external force on the droguebuoy system. ) In the situation typically encountered, where the surface current is greater than the current at the depth of the drogue, the drogue-buoy system has several external forces acting on it which sum to zero. In those cases where the wire by which the drogue is suspended from the buoy is not of excessive length, these horizontal external forces are two in number and equal in magnitude: the drag force resulting from the motion of the surface water relative to the buoy and the drag force due to the motion of the drogue relative to the current at its depth. The drag force on the buoy is essentially proportional to the square of