Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Subfields of psychology wikipedia , lookup
Conservation psychology wikipedia , lookup
Developmental psychology wikipedia , lookup
Social psychology wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive science wikipedia , lookup
Cross-cultural psychology wikipedia , lookup
Cyberpsychology wikipedia , lookup
Music psychology wikipedia , lookup
History of psychology wikipedia , lookup
Observational methods in psychology wikipedia , lookup
Vladimir J. Konečni wikipedia , lookup
True or False http://www.gac.edu/~dick/classes/general/gensyl.html 1. It's a good idea to study in as many different locations (your bedroom or kitchen, the library, lounges around school, and so forth) as possible, so that studying becomes a habit. 2. If you have a professor who delivers chaotic, hard to follow lectures, there is little point in attending class. 3. Cramming the night before an exam is an effective method of study. 4. Students who are slow readers in college are generally poor students. 5. In taking lecture notes, you should try to be a "human tape recorder" (that is, write everything down your professor says). 6. You should never change your answers to multiple-choice questions, because your first hunch is your best hunch. The Mind/Body Problem Psychology (psych + logos), the study of the mind. Can the mind be studied? Can there be a science of the mind? Rene Descartes (1596-1650). • Determinism is the assumption that everything that happens has a cause or determinant in the observable world. Can humans be considered machines? – The human mind is capable of free will. Behavior is caused by an individual’s independent decision-making • Dualism, the mind is not part of the physical universe. The mind is metaphysical and therefore unknowable. – Problem: If the mind is immaterial how does it have a physical affect on the brain, how does it connect to the body? Study of mind stymied. Monism Monism--Psychology adopted monism because it assumed that if the brain is the mind, it can be explained by objective forces in the material world and there is nothing else. • The brain is the mind and can be known through empirical investigation of physical processes within it. The assumption of physical causality of mental events (contemporary scientific perspective). • What does it mean to be a monist? Monism Work of physiologists supported this assumption. • The mind is not immaterial or controlled by the soul but the result of biological processes occurring within the brain itself. The mind is really the workings of the brain. • Franz Joseph Gall 1758 to 1828, demonstrated that mental ability was correlated to brain size, and negatively correlated to damage to the brain • Paul Broca 1825 to 1880, discovered that the ability to speak was correlated with specific brain area • Herman von Helmholtz 1821 to 1894, demonstrated a communication of our minds with parts of our body was related the distance of the pathway by using the reaction time measures. The Study of the Conscious Mind Wilhem Wundt (1832-1920). The structure of the mind can be determined by the composition of its elementary parts . • Wundt important because he established psychology as a science and encouraged laboratory work. Educated Edward Tichener who emigrated to America. • Structuralism. The mind can be known by through the careful analysis of the elements of conscious experience (IntrospectionEdward Tichener). – lawn = Narrow, spiky, green, vertical protrusions of varying length, and width, amassed closely together on a 2 dimensional surface. Can we objectively observe our own experience? Can we trust the reports of others observing theirs? Failed because it could not be measured directly by outside observer, not conscious of all brain activities, too subjective. The Study of the Conscious Mind William James (1842-1910). • Functionalism, the study of the purpose metal processes serve enabling people to adapt to their environment. Psychology should study the purpose of conscious experience, not its structure. • The elements of thought are not important but how the conscious mind aids real world accomplishments, or survival. Typical questions from a functionalist perspective include: • How does a person recall the answer to a question? • How does a person inhibit an undesirable impulse? • Can a person attend to more than one task at a time? The Study of the Unconscious Mind Just when things were going so well…. Sigmund Freud(1856-1939). The main workings of the mind are unconscious and therefore unaware of itself. • Psychoanalysis. The mind cannot be known through conscious experience, alone. • The unconscious mind exerts great influence our actions, in fact it is more important in determining our actions than the conscious mind. The unconscious Mind can only be known indirectly by someone who is trained in psychoanalysis. Moved psychology toward study of mental testing of what the mind can do in the real world and not just in the laboratory. When Psychology lost its Mind John Watson(1878-1958). The mind is subjective and unverifiable and therefore unscientific. • Behaviorism. Contents of the mind cannot be verified by an independent observer. Proper role of science is to study only that which can be observed-BEHAVIOR. • Telephone switchboard. Mind is simply switching station putting together Stimuli with Responses as a consequence of reinforcement. Thinking = talking. • Great progress in human experimentation. Animal research. • Skinner, modern counterpart. Environmental contingencies explain behavior • Problems in handling complex thinking and language The Blackbox Problem Stimulusà Black Box à Response Jean Piaget and children s thinking Psychology - The Study of Mind (cont.) Modern Psychology--Cognitivism(1960-present). The mind can be studied objectively, and its covert actions are crucial in explaining behavior. • Complex mental behavior cannot be explained without reference to activity in the mind. It is possible to study mental processes empirically through inferring the action of mental processes in the mind (brain) to produce behavior. • We are moving now more toward explaining structure in the mind by reference to structure of the brain(neuroscience). The original goal for Wundt and his followers. Recap Dr. Martin's evil alter ego Psychology as a science has studied the mind. As a science it has assumed a determinism in the physical world and rejects a metaphysical explanations for the way the mind works. The history of psychology has involved different methods and assumptions about how the mind might be studied, especially as it involved covert processes in the mind. Imagine if you can, that I have an alter ego that is evil, whose goal is to confound college students in any way that we can. He especially likes to bring up studies that show strange results but which buttress his beliefs about the human condition. Would there be any way by which you could counteract his intention and come to more realistic understanding of psychology? Is there a way we can evaluate whether his experiments really mean what he says they mean? The scientific method Variables Correlated Variables Suggest Relationship Humans show variation in the traits they possess. Variables • Single dimensions of traits whose variation can be measured and assigned values are called variables. • Physical traits, e.g., height, weight, strength… – Easy to assign values to physical traits, using lbs, inches, etc.. • Psychological traits, e.g., intelligence, aggressiveness, empathy, … – Measuring psychological traits and assigning values more difficult (The Measurement Problem). Scientific thinking begins with the observation that some variables are related. Correlations Positive or negative correlation? • Hours of study and grades • Attending class and liking Dr. Martin • Alcohol use and good driving • Good looks and dates • Fraternity membership and boorish behavior • BO and number of friends • Watching reality TV and showing gender typed behavior • Being depressed and thinking positive thoughts • A psych major and being a fantastic person If events or variables are correlated it suggests the possibility of a causal relationship. • Example: People who smoke are more likely to develop lung cancer. Examples of variables psychologists have studied • IQ and level of occupation • Spanking and moral development Francis Galton s invented the Coefficient of Correlation (r) to measure the relationship between two variables. r ranges from -1.0 to +1.0. • Small +-.20 • Moderate +-.50 • Large +-.80 Positive Correlation - variables change in same direction. • Length of arms and legs, Money and Friends Negative Correlation - as one variable gets smaller the other becomes larger. • Percentage of people using seat belts and deaths on the highway Which correlation is stronger, -.89 or +.89? The Third Variable Problem Although variables that are correlated may be causally related it is by no means guaranteed. • Why is it that in elementary school children large feet are correlated with reading better (+ correlation.). There is a positive correlation between sexual satisfaction between husband and wife and marital satisfaction. How would you explain it? Third Variable Problem Compatible values Marital satisfaction Sexual satisfaction Figure 3.4 Three possible cause-effect relationships Myers: Psychology, Ninth Edition in Modules Copyright © 2010 by Worth Publishers Correlational Studies Correlational studies examine the relationship between variables in their natural state. In correlational studies relationships between variables are observed but not manipulated. 1. Naturalistic Observation. Careful observation of behavior in a natural setting with no intervention. Observation of Olympic athletes receiving medals. Why does the silver medalist smile less than the bronze? 2. Case Studies. In-depth investigation of an individual subject. The case of Genie, raised without language. 3. Surveys and Inventories. Questionnaires or interviews which gather specific information about behavior. Survey of American sexual attitudes. The Scientific Method Psychology attempts to provide scientific explanations by making valid interpretations of the observation of objective, empirical, and reliable phenomena found in the relationship between variables. • Objective and empirical means the phenomena are found in the real world and can be observed by all. • Reliable means that the phenomena are regularly observed in the same way. • Valid means it is the most parsimonious explanation for the relationship. Which Method Would You Use? Survey, Case Study, or Naturalistic Observation? What is the percentage of parents who believe spanking is a suitable method of disciplining children? What encourages bullying on the playground? Can feral children who are isolated from all human contact by their parents (extremely rare), recover to normality? Does marriage make you happy? Testing the Relationship Between Variables: The Scientific Explanation of the GAC 15 Each year the average incoming first year Gustie gains 15 pounds from September through May. My scientific explanation (theory): • Food often provided in infancy when we are under a state of need by a person who holds us close and loves us • Food calms us and makes us feel contented, leading us to associate food with feeling good about ourselves and being loved • First year in college is anxiety provoking • Students try to calm their anxiety by eating because of its past association with love and security. Therefore they put on weight. Will you accept my explanation that this is true? • I have a Ph.D. in psychology, and I have thought long and hard about this. No. However scientists are skeptics, not cynics. • Difference between relying on theories of how things work, versus relying on observations of phenomena in real world. How can we test this theory? How can my theory be tested? The Measurement Problem To test the theory we need to know if first term students become heavier and is this related to anxiety? • The variables, weight and anxiety need to be measured. • Variables are hypothetical constructs. We need to specify how they are to be measured by defining a procedure (operational definition). An operational definition describes how we measure a property of a variable. Operational definitions should be objective, reliable, and valid. Weight. • I have observed first term students for many years, they do become heavier. • Take a photograph of class in September in Fall and Spring and judge of heavy they are. • Ask Students their weight in September and then in May. • Use a weight scale. Measurement (cont.) Operational definition measuring hypothetical construct of anxiety more difficult. • Will you accept my clinical judgment that first term students are more anxious? • Ask students if they are anxious? • Sleeplessness, jitteriness, have them complete anxiety survey, GSR. Much more room for argument over whether the variable has been validly measured. Key Point in Measuring Variables Measurement of some variables (psychological constructs) more controversial than others. • Intelligence, autism, low self-esteem, ADHD…. To make progress, reliable, accurate measurement is essential. The ability to measure something well moves scientific study forward. Will Gingko Biloba make you smarter? Use of GB • • • Memory test score Use every day Occasional use Never 95 80 40 Is there a relationship between these variables, can we conclude: • • People who use GB have better memories? GB causes better memories? What are the presumed independent and dependent variables? Do we have control over the independent variable? Main problem with correlational studies is that they do not control the independent variables and allow extraneous variables to have their effects. Extraneous Variables • Any variables other than the independent variable that are likely to affect the dependent variable. Confounding of Variables • Occurs when two variables are linked together in a way that makes it difficult to sort out the specific effects of the relationship between variables. Self selection of subjects allows for confounded variables. Population vs. Sample Correlational Study Population Population is the complete set of people, events, or objects that we wish to measure. Sample is a subset of the population. The larger the sample the closer it approximates the population (Law of Large Numbers). How the sample is drawn determines whether or not it is representative of the population? If random sampling occurs it is only within each group Experimental group Control group Experimental Study of GB Two things we would like to do in an experiment: • control independent variable • get rid of effects of Extraneous Variables because of self selection Use of GB Experimental Study Population Memory test score • Use every day • Occasional use • Never 95 80 40 Experimental studies control the independent variable and the effects of extraneous variables through random assignment. This ensures groups are the same in characteristics, allowing only the independent variable to affect the dependent variable. Can we conclude: People who use GB have better memories? GB causes better memories? Random sampling Representative sample Random assignment Experimental group Correlational vs. Experimental Studies • Subjects in correlational studies are self-selected, and the independent variable is not controlled which may lead to confounding by extraneous variables. • Experimental studies control of extraneous variables through random assignment of subjects and ensure true control of the independent variables. • Experimental studies can show causal relationships. Why not always use experimental studies? • Correlational studies have better ecological validity. • Some phenomena cannot be studied experimentally. Correlational or Experimental • According to Dr. Jerry Attrick, keeping your mind active will help you ward of Alzheimers disease. Dr. Attrick studied groups of older individuals 65 and older starting in 1994, none of whom showed an indication of having Alzheimer s disease. He hypothesized that life style differences could have an effect on whether they maintained mental health. To test his hypothesis he surveyed his subjects repeatedly beginning in 1994 on whether they engaged in activities that would keep their minds active e.g.reading the newspaper each day, working crosswords, playing scrabble etc.. He found that those older people who engaged in regular vigorous mental activity were nearly 50 percent less likely to develop Alzheimer s disease. Dr. Attrick s advice is use it or lose it. Control group Correlational or Experimental • Dr. Harry Friend declares that a friendship with "man's best friend" makes the difference between life and death for some cardiac patients. In looking for social factors that distinguish between victims and survivors of coronary disease, Dr. Friend discovered that pet ownership makes an important difference. In a pilot study done on 92 cardiac patients one year after their release from a Baltimore hospital, Dr. Friend found that only three people out of a total of 53 who owned pets (including dogs, cats, birds gerbils, and even an iguana) had died during the year, compared with 11, or nearly 1/3 of the 39 who did not have pets. The apparently beneficial effect of pet ownership held true even taking into account a person's age, the severity of the illness, and the companionship of other human beings. Dr. Friend found that pets helped relieve the loneliness of illness even more than contact with other people does, and that the pets' dependence created a need that helped the owner survive. Correlational or Experimental • Sex differences have long been a source of controversy in psychological research, but a recent national study shows overwhelming evidence that at least one gender difference, the ability to deal with mathematical thinking, does exist. The study centered on the results of the SAT test taken by the nation's male and female students who plan to attend college. Approximately 50% of high school senior males and females take the exam each year. The results show that males in every part of the nation score above females on the math section of the test. It seems likely that females recognize their limited capacity for mathematical thinking since few females in the survey had chosen math as their college major, and surveys show that it is extremely unlikely that females will earn a Ph.D. in math although they are quite able to excel in other disciplines. I guess this will decide who should handle the family budget. Subtle Mistakes in Past Research Sampling Bias exists when a sample is not representative of the population that are making conclusions about. • Incidence of Alzheimer s in Nursing homes Experimenter bias occurs when a researcher s expectations or preferences about the outcome of a study influence the results obtained. • Facilitation with autistics? Running bright rats in a maze. Demand characteristics - Any cues in a study that suggests the purpose of the study or what the researcher hopes to find out. • Hawthorne effect also known as Rosenthall effect. Subtle Mistakes (cont.) Experimenter Bias and Demand Characteristics creates problems in Drug studies. • Classic Drug Study – Exp. Group receives Prozac. Depression lessens. – Control group receives nothing. No change. • Placebo effect - When Subject s expectations lead them to experience some change even though they receive empty, fake or ineffectual treatment. • Single Blind Control – All participants believe they are being treated, or participants do not know if they are being treated or not. • Double Blind Control – Both experimenters and participants are unaware of who is being treated Descriptive Statistics Research in Psychology and Common Sense Is psychology a restatement of the obvious? Why do psychololgists study what we already know? Research shows: • Men are more practical than women when choosing a mate and are less likely to fall in love at first sight than women. • Women are likely to become more emotionally upset during an argument with a spouse than are men. • CEOs of large companies are more likely to develop ulcers from stress than are the people who have lower status jobs without the responsibility. • Only children are more likely to be spoiled and have more difficulties getting along with other children and succeeding in school. • Receiving a large amount of money for a disagreeable task will make the task seem more positive than if you were paid a small amount of money. Making sense of Raw Data 4, 3, 2, 0, 3, 1, 3, 4, 0, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 2, 4, 5, 5, 3, 4, 6 Number • • • • • • • Frequency 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 4 5 5 3 2 2 Central Score • • • Mean =3.1 Mode = 3, 4 Median = 3 Dispersion • Measures of central tendency Mean, Mode, and Median Range = 0 to 6 Descriptive Statistics To describe a distribution we need a measure of central tendency: • Mode – Most common score. • Median – Score in the middle of the distribution. • Mean - The arithmetic average of the scores in a distribution. And a measure of variability • Range-highest and lowest score • Standard Deviation - An estimate of the variability of scores around the mean. – SD = Sqrt(Sum(Score - Mean)2/N) Populations of scores SD= 3 SD = 8 M = 15 Figure 3.10 The normal curve Myers: Psychology, Ninth Edition in Modules Copyright © 2010 by Worth Publishers 64.1% The intelligence test used by most psychologists has: 97.7% • a mean of 100 • a standard deviation of 15 99.8% The percentage of scores from the mean to +1 SD? To –1 SD? From –1 to +1? The percentage of scores from 1 to 2 SDs? Those with a score less than 2SDs? The percentage with a score greater than 2SDs. -1 SD or below? At the Mean? Saul has an IQ of 85. How many standard deviations is he away from the mean? Mary has an IQ of 130. How many standard deviations is she from the mean. Kirsten has an IQ which is -2 standard deviations from the mean. What is her IQ? Daniel s IQ is a +2/3 a standard deviation from the mean. What is his IQ. Statistics Statistics 1. On the first test in political science, John received a score of 75. The mean for the test was 45 and the sd was 15. What was his percentile? 2. On the first test in political science, John received a score of 75. The mean for the test was 45 and the sd was 15. On the second test the mean was 50 and the sd was 5. John's score was 65. On which test did he receive a better score? Solution: • Compute how many SDs away from mean. 75-45 = 30, 30/15 = +2 SDs • Sum percentages contained in normal curve From Bottom to Mean = 50.0% From Mean to +1SD = 34.1% From +1SD to +2SD = 13.6% Percentile = 97.7% Solution: • The greater the number of SDs from the mean the better the score. • Compute SDs for 1 and 2 Test 1, 75-45 = 30, 30/15 = +2SDs above Mean Test 2, 65-50 = 15, 15/5 = +3SDs above Mean John did better on test 2. Statistics 3. On the third test, his score ranked him in the 15th percentile. The mean was 48 and the sd was 7. What was his score? Solution: • On the curve the first point where the percentage of scores would equal 15 is at -1SDs. His score was 41. Statistics 4. On the fourth test John recovered and received a score 1 1/2 standard deviations above the mean. if his score was 83 and the sd was 9, what was the mean? Solution: John's score is 1 1/2 SDs from mean or 13 1/2 points (1.5 X 9 = 13.5). Mean equals John's score - 13.5 points. (83-13.5 = 69.5) Inferential Statistics For a psych test in which the mean was 63 and the SD was 3, what percentage of people had a score between 60 and 66? Inferential statistics are used to interpret data, and give us estimates of whether our samples predict populations, from which we can draw conclusions. Joe s score on the psych test was –1.33 standard deviations from the mean of 50. The standard deviation was 9. What was his score and approximately how well did Joe do on the test. Research question: Are there differences in American men and women in mental rotation OR are their abilities the same? How do we find this out? -1.33 X 9 = 12 50-12= 38 Approximate percentile rank = 10 percentile. One way is to use the sample of men and women who take the mental rotation test. Females Males One possibility: Separate Populations Abilities are different Males and females 510 560 Second possibility: Populations overlap Same Abilities We test representative samples to estimate pops. Inferential Statistics Usually randomization creates samples that are very similar in characteristics to populations, but sometimes your samples are quite different from populations simply because of chance. • Analogy to tossing a coin 20 times and counting numbers of heads and tails. In research we want to estimate what is the likelihood that when we observe samples that suggest that populations are different, it can be the result of sampling error. When the estimate of that likelihood is very low we say the samples are statistically significantly different from each other. The accepted level of significance is .05, which means that the differences we observe between our samples will occur by chance approximately five chances out of 100. This means that there are good odds that the differences ar real. Stroop Control Condition Mean = 0.35 SD = 0.17 Experimental Condition Mean = 0.71 SD = 0.55 The t test = -2.17. The t test is insignificant, p > .05. Drawing Conclusions From Experiments Drawing Conclusions (cont.) Conclusions about experiments depends on Internal and External Validity Internal Validity depends on how well the study was designed and carried out. External Validity is whether the experiment was representative of the real world phenomena you would like to explain. Problem: • The design allowed the experiment to effectively manipulate the independent variable • Participants were randomly assigned to the groups that differed in the levels of the independent variable • The measures of the variables were valid, powerful, and reliable. • Finally, the change in the dependent variable was correlated with the manipulation of the change in the independent variable. If internal validity strong can you conclude that the experiment explains a real world phenomena? Theories in Psychology Theories provide testable hypotheses that can be tested in research. • What if an experiment is done that tests the theory and the results are right in line with those predicted by the theory. Does that prove the theory? Science is tough. • Theories can only be supported, or disproved by experiments, they cannot be proved. Not all theories are scientific. To be scientific theories need to generate testable hypotheses in the real world. • This is the problem with intelligent design it doesn t generate hypotheses. • Freud s psychoanalysis has opposite problem it generates too many explanations. Parsimony. Theories that are simple are to be preferred over theories that are complex. • Do our operational definitions measure the properties of hypothetical variables accurately, in terms of how they work in real life situations? Does watching violent TV lead to serious violence in our society? • There is causality in our experiment but it may not necessarily be the same causality that works in the real world because of the different context of the experiment. Ethics in Behavioral Science 1. A subject's participation in research should be voluntary and based on informed consent. Subjects should never be coerced into participating in research. They should be informed in advance about any aspects of the study that might be expected to influence their willingness to cooperate. Furthermore, they should be permitted to withdraw from a study at any time if they so desire. 2. Subjects should not be exposed to harmful or dangerous research procedures. This guideline is intended to protect subjects from psychological as well a physical harm. Thus, even stressful procedures that might cause emotional discomfort are largely prohibited. However, procedures that carry a modest risk of moderate mental discomfort may be acceptable. Ethics in Behavioral Science 3. If an investigation requires some deception of subjects (about matters that do not involve risks), the researcher is required to explain and correct any misunderstandings as soon as possible. The deception must be disclosed to subjects in "debriefing" sessions as soon as it is practical to do so without compromising the goals of the study. 4. Subjects' rights to privacy should never be violated. Information about a subject that might be acquired during a study must be treated as highly confidential and should never be made available to others without the consent of the participant.