* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Consider two point particles of mass m1 and m2 with position
Uncertainty principle wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Consider two point particles of mass m1 and m2 with position vectors ~r1 and ~r2 and momenta p~1 and p~2 respectively interacting via a central potential. The energy is given by H = p~1 · p~1 p~2 · p~2 + + V (|~r1 − ~r2 |) . 2m1 2m2 We will consider this problem classically and then quantize. ~ ≡ [ m1~r1 + m2~r2 ]/M where M = m1 + m2 We define the center-of-mass coordinate R is the total mass and the relative coordinate is given by ~r = ~r1 − ~r2 . The so-called reduced mass is defined by µ = m1 m2 /M . We will show the key identity p~1 · p~1 p~2 · p~2 P~ · P~ p~ · p~ + = + . 2m1 2m2 2M 2µ The center of mass velocity and the relative velocity are obtained by differentiating the corresponding coordinates: ~˙ ≡ V ~ = m1~v1 + m2~v2 R m1 + m2 and ~r˙ ≡ ~v = ~v1 − ~v2 . The velocities can be solve to obtain ~ + ~v1 = V m2 ~ + µ ~v and ~v2 = V ~ − µ ~v . ~v = V m1 + m2 m1 m2 Therefore, the kinetic energy is given by KE ≡ 1 1 1 m1~v1 · ~v1 + m2~v2 · ~v2 = m1 2 2 2 µ ~ + µ ~v V m1 µ ¶2 + 1 ~ − µ ~v m2 V 2 m2 ¶2 . Simplifying we note that the cross terms vanish1 1 ~ ·V ~ + 1 KE = (m1 + m2 )V 2 2 Ã µ2 µ2 + m1 m2 ! ~v · ~v = M~ ~ µ V · V + ~v · ~v . 2 2 where the last equality follows since µ = m1 m2 1 1 1 ⇒ = + . m1 + m2 µ m1 m2 ~ and is given by P~ = m1~v1 + m2~v2 and the The center of mass momentum is (m1 + m2 )V relative momentum is defined to be p~ = µ (~v1 − ~v2 ) . The expression for the kinetic energy in terms of the momenta is 1 ~ ~ 1 KE = P ·P + p~ · p~ . 2M 2µ 1 m1 µ ~ m2 µ ~ 2 V · ~v − 2 V · ~v = 0 . 2 m1 2 m2 1 For doing quantum mechanics it is useful to write the center-of-mass and relative momenta in terms of the individual momenta: µ µ P~ = p~1 + p~2 and p~ = p~1 − p~2 . m1 m2 How does one go over to quantum mechanics? We know that the components of p~1 , p~2 , ~r1 , and ~r2 are now operators and obey the standard commutation relations. The momenta and coordinates of different particles commute: for example, [x1 , p2x ] = 0. Now we have to convince ourselves that the the components of ~r and p~ obey the correct commutation relations. Calculate [x, px ]: · ¸ x1 − x2 , µ µ µ µ p1x − p2x = [x1 , p1x ] + [x2 , p2x ] = ih̄ µ m1 m2 m1 m2 µ 1 1 + m1 m2 ¶ = ih̄ where we have neglected all commutators that involve different particles since they vanish. Note that center of mass momentum and the relative coordinates commute: we compute [x1 − x2 , Px ]: [x1 − x2 , p1x + p2x ] = [x1 , p1x ] − [x2 , p2x ] = ih̄ − ih̄ = 0 . All the other relations can be similarly verified. Thus we can focus only on the relative coordinates and the Hamiltonian is H = 1 p~ · p~ + V (r) . 2µ Now we can write the kinetic energy as a radial and angular part just as we did before. The m2 only difference is that we use the reduced mass µ = mm11+m . 2 Thus for the hydrogen atom the energy levels are given by (Equation 4.70 in the text) En = − 2 m m µq 4 1 2h̄2 n2 e where q 2 = 4π² and µ = mee+mpp using obvious notation for the electron and proton masses. 0 If we had a muonic hydrogen atom with a µ− in a bound state with a proton we will use the corresponding masses. 2