Download Logic of Natural Language Semantics: Presuppositions and

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Analytic–synthetic distinction wikipedia , lookup

Donald Davidson (philosopher) wikipedia , lookup

Argument wikipedia , lookup

Grammaticality wikipedia , lookup

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus wikipedia , lookup

Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Fuzzy logic wikipedia , lookup

Willard Van Orman Quine wikipedia , lookup

Modal logic wikipedia , lookup

Curry–Howard correspondence wikipedia , lookup

Propositional calculus wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical logic wikipedia , lookup

Syllogism wikipedia , lookup

Catuṣkoṭi wikipedia , lookup

History of logic wikipedia , lookup

Jesús Mosterín wikipedia , lookup

Natural deduction wikipedia , lookup

Quantum logic wikipedia , lookup

Semantic holism wikipedia , lookup

Meaning (philosophy of language) wikipedia , lookup

Cognitive semantics wikipedia , lookup

Interpretation (logic) wikipedia , lookup

Intuitionistic logic wikipedia , lookup

Law of thought wikipedia , lookup

Laws of Form wikipedia , lookup

Truth-bearer wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Logic of Natural Language Semantics: Presuppositions and Conventional Implicatures
Mingya Liu
[email protected]
Abstract: In proposition logic or first-order logic, a meaningful declarative sentence expresses
a proposition, which can be true or false. However, as linguists and philosophers have already
noticed, sometimes, a declarative sentence also expresses some extra content on which the
truth value of its proposition depends. Such contents are known as presuppositions and they
are so called because if the presupposition of a sentence is not true, the proposition of the
sentence is undefined, i.e. lacks a truth value. In addition to presuppositions, linguists and
philosophers have also noticed another special kind of entailments, called conventional
implicatures (CIs), as defined below.
(1) CIs (Potts 2005)
a. CIs are part of the conventional meaning of words.
b. CIs are commitments, and thus give rise to entailments.
c. These commitments are made by the speaker of the utterance ‘by virtue of the
meaning’ of the words he chooses.
d. CIs are logically and compositionally independent of what is ‘said (in the favored
sense)’, i.e. independent of the at-issue entailments.
In this talk, I mainly present Potts (2005) that shows a range of different empirical phenomena
such as expressive expressions, appositive nominals (ANs) or appositive relative clauses
(ARCs), and supplementary adverbs can all be treated formally, i.e in his two-dimensional
logic of CIs.
References (selected): Potts, Chris. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford
Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, Oxford University Press.
报告人:刘明亚, 德国哥廷根大学英语系语言学分支,研究员(researcher)