Download How does the martian ionosphere respond to

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Magnet wikipedia , lookup

Multiferroics wikipedia , lookup

Ferrofluid wikipedia , lookup

Force between magnets wikipedia , lookup

Magnetism wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup

Magnetoreception wikipedia , lookup

Maxwell's equations wikipedia , lookup

Faraday paradox wikipedia , lookup

Magnetochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Computational electromagnetics wikipedia , lookup

Earth's magnetic field wikipedia , lookup

Aurora wikipedia , lookup

Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup

Magnetohydrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Eddy current wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnetic field wikipedia , lookup

Magnetotellurics wikipedia , lookup

History of geomagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
A better way of modeling
ionospheric electrodynamics
Paul Withers
Boston University
([email protected])
Center for Space Physics Journal Club
Tuesday (Monday) 2008.02.19
Not all magnetic fields are like Earth’s. This affects plasma
motions and currents. Theories used on Earth can be made
more general and applied elsewhere.
How do textbooks calculate ion
velocities in an ionospheric model ?
• Two separate sections – vertical motion and horizontal motion
• Vertical motion – weak magnetic field
– No current. Vertical ambipolar diffusion. Non-zero Eparallel set by
gravity and pressure gradients.
• Vertical motion – strong magnetic field
– No current. Ambipolar diffusion along fieldline. Non-zero Eparallel set by
gravity and pressure gradients.
• Horizontal motion – neglect gravity and pressure gradients
– Currents are non-zero. Conductivity tensor relates currents and electric
field.
• Typical 3D model – mix assumptions
– Use “horizontal” assumptions to show that Eparallel is zero, go to
fieldline-integrated equations, solve for electric field. Re-introduce
gravity and pressure gradients, find 3D ion motion
• Why two sections?
Why no intermediate magnetic field?
Why mix assumptions?
Why no general theory?
“Justification” of Assumptions –
Relative Sizes of Terms
• Nj (number density of charged species) from the continuity equation
N j
t
 
 . N j v j 
Pj 
Lj
Loss timescale vs.
Transport timescale
• Rate of change of Nj = Production - Loss
• vj (species velocity) is given by the steady-state momentum equation

1
0  mj g 
N j kTj   q j E  q j v j  B  m j jn v j  u
Nj
• Gravity Pressure gradient
Gyrofrequency (qB/m) vs.
Collision frequency (vjn)
Lorentz force

Ion-neutral collisions
What does this mean for the
terrestrial ionosphere?
Earth is not the only possible case
• Earth
• Mars
z
Strong field
Weak field
Transport
Photochem
Strong field
Weak field
Transport
Photochem
Ne
Weak/strong transition occurs when
Vertical plasma motion is important in
vertical motion is irrelevant, so horizontal weak field region, strong field region, and
assumption seems reasonable
nasty transition (dynamo) region.
Preceding assumptions fail badly.
Alternative Approach
Y j  m j jn v j  q j v j  B
1
m j jn
Y j  Ivj 
qjB
m j jn
Y contains grav, pressure, E, etc
v j

qjB 
Y j  I 
 v j


m j jn
m

j
jn


1
J  Q  S E
Replace the nasty cross product
Leads to equation for vj = ….
Eventually get J/E relationship, generalization of
J   E
Use div J = 0, curl of E = 0, plus boundary conditions to get equations
that can be solved for E. Substitute solution for E in other equations to
get J, vj, etc. Use vj in continuity equation to step Nj forward in time.
What are Q and S in J  Q  S E  ?
• S is the usual conductivity tensor
• Q is sum of gravity and pressure gradient
terms
– Direction of Q is vertical for weak field
– Direction of Q is field-aligned for strong field
j 
qjB
Ratio of gyrofrequency to collision frequency
m j jn
X  B  X
defines 


1
I   j    m j g  N j kTj 
Q
m j jn
Nj


N j q 2j
I   j 1 Direction depends on Kj
S 
m j jn
N jq j
1
Gravity and
Pressure gradient
vz using J  Q  S E  (solid line), vz using weak-field limit of ambipolar diffusion
(dashed line), and vz using strong-field limit of ambipolar diffusion (dotted line).
Application to a 1-D
Mars-like model
Very simple,
Don’t over-interpret
vz is negative below 150 km and positive above 150 km.
vz transitions smoothly from the weak-field limit at low altitudes to the strong-field
limit at high altitudes.
-Jx (dashed line), Jy (dotted line) and |J| (solid line). Jz = 0.
Ke = 1 at 140 km, Ki = 1 at 200 km
|J| is >10% of its maximum value between 150 km and 260 km
Currents are significant within and above the 140 km – 200 km “dynamo region”
Conclusions
• Conditions on Mars are outside parameter
range common to terrestrial work
• This forces re-examination of basic
assumptions
• J   E  can be generalized to J  Q  S E 
• This formalism can handle 3D plasma
motion and currents in any magnetic field
strength