Download Do large cash holdings and low leverage always

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Private equity in the 2000s wikipedia , lookup

Leveraged buyout wikipedia , lookup

International investment agreement wikipedia , lookup

Foreign direct investment in Iran wikipedia , lookup

History of private equity and venture capital wikipedia , lookup

Environmental, social and corporate governance wikipedia , lookup

Socially responsible investing wikipedia , lookup

Internal rate of return wikipedia , lookup

Private equity wikipedia , lookup

Private equity in the 1980s wikipedia , lookup

Corporate venture capital wikipedia , lookup

Investment management wikipedia , lookup

Early history of private equity wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
“Do large cash holdings and low leverage always lead to overinvestment?
Modification of the ex ante overinvestment measure.”
Hyungjin Cho
Coauthored by Lee-Seok Hwang, Hosik Shim, and Bomi Song
Abstract:
This study provides the first empirical evidence on the validity of the ex ante investment
efficiency measure in Biddle, Hilary, and Verdi (2009) and improves its ability to capture
inefficient investments. We find that investments improve rather than deteriorate
future performance for firms that are supposed to be more prone to overinvestment,
which is inconsistent with Biddle et al. (2009)’s expectation. To improve the measure’s
ability to predict suboptimal investments, we modify the measure using the residual
values of cash holdings and leverage after controlling for the dynamic relations among
firm characteristics. We show that our modification improves the power of the measure
to predict the likelihood that firms engage in inefficient investments. We also highlight
the importance of using the modified measure by showing that the previous empirical
result in Biddle et al. (2009) can be different depending on the modification of the
overinvestment measure.