Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
MICROPALEONTOLOGY AND PALEOECOLOGY (GEY 402) ASSIGNMENT DONE BY ARIYIBI OLAWALE EMMANUEL (MATRIC NO: 12/SCI14/006) OF THE DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, COLLEGE OF SCIENCES, AFE BABALOLA UNIVERSITY ADO, EKITI EKITI STATE March, 2016 LECTURER IN CHARGE: Mr. Jide Adedipe Aladesanmi QUESTIONS Write short note on the following and their applications in Hydrocarbon explorations 1. Calcareous microfossils 2. Calcareous nannofossils 3. Siliceous microfossils 4. Phosphatic microfossils QUESTION 1: CALCAREOUS MICROFOSSILS Calcareous microfossils have shells composed of calcite or aragonite. These organisms are present in most marine and in some nonmarine environments. At great oceanic depths characterized by low temperature and high hydrostatic pressure, however, calcareous remains are largely or completely dissolved. The depth below which this occurs, which varies in different oceanographic settings, is termed the carbonate compensation depth (CCD). There are three principal types of calcareous microfossils: - calcareous foraminifera - ostracods, and - calcareous nannofossils. 1.1 Calcareous Foraminifera Foraminifera will be discussed under the following headings: - General statement - Classification- taxonomy - Living Foraminifera - Biology - Tests - Deep-Sea species - Evolutionary significance - Uses - Gallery General Statement Foraminifera is a latin word which means ‘hole bearers’, (informally called "forams"). They are members of a phylum or class of amoeboid protists characterized by streaming granular ectoplasm that among other things is used for catching food, and commonly by an external shell or "test" made of various materials and constructed in diverse forms. All but perhaps a very few are aquatic and most are marine, the majority of which live on or within the seafloor sediment (i.e., are benthic) while a smaller variety are floaters in the water column at various depths (i.e., are planktonic). A few are known from freshwater or brackish conditions and some soil species have been identified through molecular analysis of small subunit ribosomal DNA. Foraminifera typically produce a test, or shell, which can have either one or multiple chambers, some becoming quite elaborate in structure. These shells are commonly made of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) or agglutinated sediment particles. Over 50,000 species are recognized, both living (10,000) and fossil (40,000). They are usually less than 1 mm in size, but some are much larger, the largest species reaching up to 20 cm. Classification- taxonomy The taxonomic position of the Foraminifera has varied since their recognition as protozoa (protists) by Schultze in 1854, there referred to as an order, Foraminiferida. Loeblich and Tappan (1992) reranked Foraminifera as a class as it is now commonly regarded. The Foraminifera have typically been included in the Protozoa, or in the similar Protoctista or Protist kingdom. Compelling evidence, based primarily on molecular phylogenetics, exists for their belonging to a major group within the Protozoa known as the Rhizaria. Prior to the recognition of evolutionary relationships among the members of the Rhizaria, the Foraminifera were generally grouped with other amoeboids as phylum Rhizopodea (or Sarcodina) in the class Granuloreticulosa. The Rhizaria are problematic, as they are often called a "supergroup", rather than using an established taxonomic rank such as phylum. Cavalier-Smith defines the Rhizaria as an infrakingdom within the kingdom Protozoa. Some taxonomies put the Foraminifera in a phylum of their own, putting them on par with the amoeboid Sarcodina in which they had been placed. Although as yet unsupported by morphological correlates, molecular data strongly suggest the Foraminifera are closely related to the Cercozoa and Radiolaria, both of which also include amoeboids with complex shells; these three groups make up the Rhizaria. However, the exact relationships of the forams to the other groups and to one another are still not entirely clear. Living Foraminifera Modern Foraminifera are primarily marine organisms, but living individuals have been found in brackish, freshwater and even terrestrial habitats. The majority of the species are benthic, and a further 40 morphospecies are planktonic. This count may, however, represent only a fraction of actual diversity, since many genetically discrepant species may be morphologically indistinguishable. A number of forams have unicellular algae as endosymbionts, from diverse lineages such as the green algae, red algae, golden algae, diatoms, and dinoflagellates. Some forams are kleptoplastic, retaining chloroplasts from ingested algae to conduct photosynthesis. Biology The foraminiferal cell is divided into granular endoplasm and transparent ectoplasm from which a pseudopodial net may emerge through a single opening or through many perforations in the test. Individual pseudopods characteristically have small granules streaming in both directions. The pseudopods are used for locomotion, anchoring, and in capturing food, which consists of small organisms such as diatoms or bacteria. The foraminiferal life-cycle involves an alternation between haploid and diploid generations, although they are mostly similar in form. The haploid or gamont initially has a single nucleus, and divides to produce numerous gametes, which typically have two flagella. The diploid or schizont is multinucleate, and after meiosis fragments to produce new gamonts. Multiple rounds of asexual reproduction between sexual generations is not uncommon in benthic forms. Abundance of certain Foraminifera is sometimes used by researchers as an indicator of the completeness of vertical mixing in certain seas such as the Celtic Sea. Tests The form and composition of their tests are the primary means by which forams are identified and classified. Most have calcareous tests, composed of calcium carbonate. In other forams, the tests may be composed of organic material, made from small pieces of sediment cemented together (agglutinated), and in one genus, of silica. Openings in the test, including those that allow cytoplasm to flow between chambers, are called apertures. The test contains an organic matrix, which can sometimes be recovered from fossil samples. Tests are known as fossils as far back as the Cambrian period, and many marine sediments are composed primarily of them. For instance, the limestone that makes up the pyramids of Egypt is composed almost entirely of nummulitic benthic Foraminifera. Production estimates indicate that reef Foraminifera annually generate about 43 million tons of calcium carbonate per year, thus play an essential role in the production of reef carbonates. Genetic studies have identified the naked amoeba "Reticulomyxa" and the peculiar xenophyophores as foraminiferans without tests. A few other amoeboids produce reticulose pseudopods, and were formerly classified with the forams as the Granuloreticulosa, but this is no longer considered a natural group, and most are now placed among the Cercozoa. Foraminiferan tests (ventral view) Deep-sea species Foraminifera are found in the deepest parts of the ocean such as the Mariana Trench, including the Challenger Deep, the deepest part known. At these depths, below the carbonate compensation depth, the calcium carbonate of the tests is soluble in water due to the extreme pressure. The Foraminifera found in the Challenger Deep thus have no carbonate test, but instead have one of organic material. Four species found in the Challenger Deep are unknown from any other place in the oceans, one of which is representative of an endemic genus unique to the region. They are Resigella laevis and R. bilocularis, Nodellum aculeata, and Conicotheca nigrans (the unique genus). All have tests that are mainly of transparent organic material which have small (about 100 nm) plates that appear to be clay. Evolutionary significance Dying planktonic Foraminifera continuously rain down on the sea floor in vast numbers, their mineralized tests preserved as fossils in the accumulating sediment. Beginning in the 1960s, and largely under the auspices of the Deep Sea Drilling, Ocean Drilling, and International Ocean Drilling Programmes, as well as for the purposes of oil exploration, advanced deep-sea drilling techniques have been bringing up sediment cores bearing Foraminifera fossils. The effectively unlimited supply of these fossil tests and the relatively high-precision age-control models available for cores has produced an exceptionally high-quality planktonic Foraminifera fossil record dating back to the mid-Jurassic, and presents an unparalleled record for scientists testing and documenting the evolutionary process. The exceptional quality of the fossil record has allowed an impressively detailed picture of species interrelationships to be developed on the basis of fossils, in many cases subsequently validated independently through molecular genetic studies on extant specimens Larger benthic Foraminifera with complex shell structure react in a highly specific manner to the different benthic environments and, therefore, the composition of the assemblages and the distribution patterns of particular species reflect simultaneously bottom types and the light gradient. In the course of Earth history, larger Foraminifera are replaced frequently. In particular, associations of Foraminifera characterizing particular shallow water facies types are dying out and are replaced after a certain time interval by new associations with the same structure of shell morphology, emerging from a new evolutionary process of adaptation. These evolutionary processes make the larger Foraminifera useful as index fossils for the Permian, Jurassic, Cretaceous and Cenozoic. Uses Because of their diversity, abundance, and complex morphology, fossil foraminiferal assemblages are useful for biostratigraphy, and can accurately give relative dates to sedimentary rocks. The oil industry relies heavily on microfossils such as forams to find potential hydrocarbon deposits. Calcareous fossil Foraminifera are formed from elements found in the ancient seas where they lived. Thus, they are very useful in paleoclimatology and paleoceanography. They can be used to reconstruct past climate by examining the stable isotope ratios and trace element content of the shells (tests). Global temperature and ice volume can be revealed by the isotopes of oxygen, and the history of the carbon cycle and oceanic productivity by examining the stable isotope ratios of carbon; see δ18O and δ13C. The concentration of trace elements, like magnesium (Mg), lithium (Li) and boron (B), also hold a wealth of information about global temperature cycles, continental weathering, and the role of the ocean in the global carbon cycle. Geographic patterns seen in the fossil records of planktonic forams are also used to reconstruct ancient ocean currents. Because certain types of Foraminifera are found only in certain environments, they can be used to figure out the kind of environment under which ancient marine sediments were deposited. For the same reasons they make useful biostratigraphic markers, living foraminiferal assemblages have been used as bioindicators in coastal environments, including indicators of coral reef health. Because calcium carbonate is susceptible to dissolution in acidic conditions, Foraminifera may be particularly affected by changing climate and ocean acidification. Foraminifera have many uses in petroleum exploration and are used routinely to interpret the ages and paleoenvironments of sedimentary strata in oil wells. Agglutinated fossil Foraminifera buried deeply in sedimentary basins can be used to estimate thermal maturity, which is a key factor for petroleum generation. The Foraminiferal Colouration Index (FCI) is used to quantify colour changes and estimate burial temperature. FCI data is particularly useful in the early stages of petroleum generation (about 100 °C). Foraminifera can also be used in archaeology in the provenancing of some stone raw material types. Some stone types, such as limestone, are commonly found to contain fossilised Foraminifera. The types and concentrations of these fossils within a sample of stone can be used to match that sample to a source known to contain the same "fossil signature". Gallery Fossil nummulitid foraminiferans showing microspheric and megalospheric individuals; Eocene of the United Arab Emirates; scale in mm. The miliolid foraminiferan Quinqueloculina from the Belgian part of the North Sea. Thin section of a peneroplid foraminiferan from Holocene lagoonal sediment in Rice Bay, San Salvador Island, Bahamas. Scale bar 100 micrometres. Ammonia beccarii, a benthic foram from the North Sea. Typical Calcareous Foraminifera 1.2 Ostracod Ostracods will be discussed under the following headings: - General statement - Fossils - Description - Paleoclimatic reconstruction - Ecology General Statement Ostracods, or ostracodes, are a class of the Crustacea (class Ostracoda), sometimes known as seed shrimp. Some 70,000 species (only 13,000 of which are extant) have been identified, grouped into several orders. They are small crustaceans, typically around 1 mm (0.039 in) in size, but varying from 0.2 to 30 mm (0.0079 to 1.1811 in) in the case of Gigantocypris. Their bodies are flattened from side to side and protected by a bivalve-like, chitinous or calcareous valve or "shell". The hinge of the two valves is in the upper (dorsal) region of the body. Ostracods are grouped together based on gross morphology, but the group may not be monophyletic; their molecular phylogeny remains ambiguous. Ecologically, marine ostracods can be part of the zooplankton or (most commonly) are part of the benthos, living on or inside the upper layer of the sea floor. Many ostracods, especially the Podocopida, are also found in fresh water, and terrestrial species of Mesocypris are known from humid forest soils of South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and Tasmania. They have a wide range of diets, and the group includes carnivores, herbivores, scavengers and filter feeders. As of 2008, around 2000 species and 200 genera of nonmarine ostracods are found. However, a large portion of diversity is still undescribed, indicated by undocumented diversity hotspots of temporary habitats in Africa and Australia. Of the known specific and generic diversity of nonmarine ostracods, half (1000 species, 100 genera) belongs to one family (of 13 families), Cyprididae. Many Cyprididae occur in temporary water bodies and have drought-resistant eggs, mixed/parthenogenetic reproduction, and the ability to swim. These biological attributes preadapt them to form successful radiations in these habitats. Fossils Ostracods are "by far the most common arthropods in the fossil record" with fossils being found from the early Ordovician to the present. An outline microfaunal zonal scheme based on both Foraminifera and Ostracoda was compiled by M. B. Hart. Freshwater ostracods have even been found in Baltic amber of Eocene age, having presumably been washed onto trees during floods. Ostracods have been particularly useful for the biozonation of marine strata on a local or regional scale, and they are invaluable indicators of paleoenvironments because of their widespread occurrence, small size, easily preservable, generally moulted, calcified bivalve carapaces; the valves are a commonly found microfossil. A find in Queensland, Australia in 2013, announced in May 2014, at the Bicentennary Site in the Riversleigh World Heritage area, revealed both male and female specimens with very well preserved soft tissue. This set the Guinness World Record for the oldest penis. Males had observable sperm that is the oldest yet seen and, when analysed, showed internal structures and has been assessed as being the largest sperm (per body size) of any animal recorded. It was assessed that the fossilisation was achieved within several days, due to phosphorus in the bat droppings of the cave where the ostracods were living. Description The body of an ostracod is encased by two valves, superficially resembling the shell of a clam. A distinction is made between the valve (hard parts) and the body with its appendages (soft parts). Soft parts- The body consists of a head and thorax, separated by a slight constriction. Unlike many other crustaceans, the body is not clearly divided into segments. The abdomen is regressed or absent, whereas the adult gonads are relatively large. The head is the largest part of the body, and bears most of the appendages. Two pairs of welldeveloped antennae are used to swim through the water. In addition, there is a pair of mandibles and two pairs of maxillae. The thorax typically has two pairs of appendages, but these are reduced to a single pair, or entirely absent, in many species. The two "rami", or projections, from the tip of the tail, point downwards and slightly forward from the rear of the shell. Ostracods typically have no gills, instead taking in oxygen through branchial plates on the body surface. Most ostracods have no heart or circulatory system, and blood simply circulates between the valves of the shell. Nitrogenous waste is excreted through glands on the maxillae, antennae, or both. The primary sense of ostracods is likely touch, as they have several sensitive hairs on their bodies and appendages. However, they do possess a single naupliar eye, and, in some cases, a pair of compound eyes, as well. Paleoclimatic reconstruction A new method is in development called mutual ostracod temperature range (MOTR), similar to the mutual climatic range (MCR) used for beetles, which can be used to infer palaeotemperatures. The ratio of oxygen-18 to oxygen-16 (δ18O) and the ratio of magnesium to calcium (Mg/Ca) in the calcite of ostracod valves can be used to infer information about past hydrological regimes, global ice volume and water temperatures. Ecology Lifecycle- Male ostracods have two penes, corresponding to two genital openings, or gonopores on the female. The individual sperm are often large, and are coiled up within the testis prior to mating; in some cases, the uncoiled sperm can be up to six times the length of the male ostracod itself. Mating typically occurs during swarming, with large numbers of females swimming to join the males. Some species are partially or wholly parthenogenetic. In most ostracods, eggs are either laid directly into the water as plankton, or are attached to vegetation or the substratum. However, in some species, the eggs are brooded inside the shell, giving them a greater degree of protection. The eggs hatch into nauplius larvae, which already have a hard shell. Predators- A variety of fauna prey upon ostracods in both aquatic and terrestrial environments. An example of predation in the marine environment is the action of certain Cuspidariidae in detecting ostracods with cilia protruding from inhalant structures, thence drawing the ostracod prey in by a violent suction action.[16] Predation from higher animals also occurs; for example, amphibians such as the rough-skinned newt prey upon certain ostracods. Bioluminescence- Some ostracods have a light organ in which they produce luminescent chemicals. Most use the light as predation defense, while some use the light for mating (only in the Caribbean). These ostracods are called "blue sand" or "blue tears" and glow blue in the dark at night. 1.3 Calcareous Nannofossil The term calcareous nannofossils includes both fossil coccoliths and nannoliths. Coccoliths are minute (<25μm) calcite objects produced by unicellular marine plants (golden-brown algae). The origin of nannoliths is uncertain, but these calcite bodies are associated with fossil coccoliths assemblages in marine sediments and are also organically derived. Calcareous nannofossils are an excellent biostratigraphic tool because of their rapid evolution and geographic dispersal (i.e., their entire life cycle is in the photic zone of the ocean) as well as their varied and distinct morphologies. The oldest known calcareous nannofossils are Late Triassic; they are a crucial microfossil group in calibrating the Jurassic-Holocene marine record. Relatively little has been published about the paleogeographic distributions of calcareous nannofossils; less is known about their exact paleoenvironmental preferences, although they have been shown occasionally to penetrate into shallow marine environments. Their main industrial application is their calibration to published time scales and sequence stratigraphic records, especially the association of high abundance with condensed marine sections. Typical calcareous nannofossils Application of Calcareous Microfossil in Hydrocarbon Exploation 1. Benthic Foraminifera provides information about the environment of deposition of sediments suspected for Hydrocarbon. 2. Planktonic Foraminifera are useful in time and space correlation across a depositional basin or even across whole oceans. N.B: Other uses of Microfossils in general in hydrocarbon exploration include: - Biostratigraphy - Paleoenvironmental analysis - Paleoclimatology - Biogeography - Thermal maturation QUESTION TWO: CALCAREOUS NANNOFOSSIL Introduction Calcareous nannofossils include the coccoliths and coccospheres of haptophyte algae and the associated nannoliths which are of unknown provenance. The organism which creates the coccosphere is called a coccolithophore, they are phytoplankton (autotrophs that contain chloroplasts and photosynthesise). Their calcareous skeletons are found in marine deposits often in vast numbers, sometimes making up the major component of a particular rock, such as the chalk of England. One freshwater species has been reported. Formally coccolithophores are separated from other phytoplankton such as diatoms by the presence of a third flagella-like appendage called a haptonema, although the flagella bearing stage is often only one of a multi-stage life cycle. A coccolith is a single disc-like plate which is secreted by the algal organism and held in combination with several other, sometimes varying shaped plates by an organic coating to form the coccosphere. On death the individual coccoliths invariably become separated and it is these that are most commonly preserved in the sedimentary record. Occasionally complete coccospheres are preserved and provide valuable information, particularly regarding coccospheres which possess two or more morphologicaly different coccoliths. There are two forms of coccoliths, the holococcoliths which are formed from calcite crystals which are essentially identical in shape and size and the heterococcoliths which are formed from larger calcite crystals which vary in size and shape. Most living forms are known to produce only heterococcoliths and then only during the non-motile stage of their life cycle. Those that do produce holococcoliths do so only during their motile stage. History of Study The first recorded use of the term "coccoliths" is from Ehrenberg's 1836 study of the chalk from the island of Rugen in the Baltic Sea. Ehrenberg and other early workers beleived coccoliths to have an inorganic origin. It was not untill the second half of the nineteenth century when Wallich found coccoliths joined to form coccospheres that an organic origin was suggested. Even after the publication of Sorby's 1861 paper, following which the organic origin of coccoliths was generally accepted, Ehrenberg remained unconvinced. The 1872 HMS Challenger expedition recovered coccospheres from the upper water layers and correctly concluded that they were the skeletons of calcareous algae. The term nannoplankton was coined by Lohmann in 1902. The study of coccolithophores has flourished since the 1960's, with much ground breaking work done on their biology as well as on the systematics of fossil and living forms. The Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP), now the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP), brought the stratigraphic value of calcareous nannofossils to the attention of industry as well as the scientific community. Today, due to the speed of preparation, calcareous nannofossils have bec ome the preferred tool for quick accurate stratigraphic age determination in post-Palaeozoic calcareous sequences. Biology Culture techniques have resulted in great advances in the study of coccolithophore life cycles. The existence of a haploid and diploid phase has been proved by the extraction of DNA, with mitotic reproduction occurring in both stages. Syngamy (sexual reproduction) has not been observed but is assumed to occur, the recent discovery of combination coccospheres (where coccoliths of two distinct forms occur on the same coccosphere) has meant the traditional classification will have to be radically revised and updated. The defining feature of the haptophytes is the flagella-like haptonema which is generally coiled. It differs from the flagella proper in its internal structure and its basal attachment. During the non-motile phase the flagella disappear but the haptonema often remains, the exact function of the haptonema is not fully understood. The algal cell contains a nucleus and two golden-brown chloroplasts which may be moved around the cell to optimise collection of available light. The cell also contains mitochondria which contain enzymes which produce the energy for cell function, vacuoles which deal with waste products and the Golgi body which is the site of coccolith secretion in many species. In many species overlapping oval organic scales coat the outer cell membrane. These have concentric ridges on their distal faces and radiating ridges on their proximal faces. It seems the organic scales act as bases for the precipitation of the calcite coccoliths. A variety of coccolith secretion strategies have been observed in different species, however it is probably true of all coccolithophores that the production of coccoliths is controlled by light. Emiliania huxleyi has been observed to start coccolith production within half an hour of being introduced to light, and produce an individual coccolith in one hour and a complete coccosphere in about thirty hours. Above diagram from Bown,P.(Ed.), 1998, Calcareous Nannofossil Biostratigraphy. Chapman and Hall. Range First recorded occurrences of calcareous nannofossils (nannoliths) are from the late Triassic (Carnian). The locations from which the earliest nannofossils are found include; the Northern and Southern Calcareous Alps, Timor, North-West Australia and Queen Charlotte Islands (Canada), all low latitude sites at the time. There are many claims for earlier occurrences but a lack of substantiated evidence means these must be excluded. One consequence of the first occurrence of calcareous nannofossils in the late Triassic lies in the fact that this was the first time open ocean planktonic organisms utilised calcareous skeletons and exported calcium carbonate into the deep oceans. This has important repercussions in terms of biogeochemical cycles. Today coccolithophores are one of the most important forms of phytoplankton found in the oceans, and may be described as the grass of the sea. Lifecycle Reproduction of coccolithophores is by single or double fission sometimes accompanied by a swarm-spore stage. The information we have on coccolithophore reproduction is based on only a few species so care must be taken when making generalisations, however, it is thought the coccolith-bearing phase is diploid and capable of asexual (mitotic) reproduction. This allows rapid population growth during periods of optimum conditions, producing what are known as "blooms". Motile naked haploid gametes may be produced by meiosis and nonmotile benthic stages are also known to be produced. Sexual fusion has rarely been observed but is inferred by the variation of DNA found within coccolithophpores. Mineralogy of Coccoliths The calcium carbonate in coccoliths normally crystallizes as calcite and to a lesser degree as aragonite. In laboratory cultures traces of third polymorph of lime, vaterite have also been found (Wilber and Watabe, 1963). In fossil state only calcite is found. Coccolithophore Ecology Coccolithophores are exclusively planktonic marine organisms which are distributed from open ocean, neritic (shelf) environment to near shore littoral and inshore lagoonal environment. Coccolithophores rely on photosynthesis as its prime nutritional mode limiting them to photic zone of the oceans (Fig. 2). Environmental parameters affect plankton communities both spatially and temporally (Honjo, 1976). Temperature plays a key role and is important in controlling species distribution in largely defined latitudinally arranged biogeographical zones (Baumann et al., 2005). By and large coccolithophores live in open ocean and are adapted to salinities 32-37 ppt (Baumann et al., 2005). Coccolithophorid species diversity is highest in stratified, warm, oligotrophic environments where salinity values are high. The coastal areas are dominated by lower salinities and thus the nannofloral species diversity is low e.g. dominance of Emiliania huxleyi (Houghton, 1988, 1991). Only one coccolithophorid species Hymenonas roseola is known to inhabit freshwater environment (Baumann et al., 2005). All phytoplankton require some nutrients for their growth and biochemical reactions. The most important nutrients are nitrate and phosphate. Nitrate is essential for growth and calcification, whereas phosphate is a controlling agent for calcification (Baumann et al., 2005). In eutrophic (nutrient-rich) environments coccolithophores are outcompeted by diatoms forming relatively minor components of the total communities. High productivity of coccolithophorids takes place in eutrophic conditions whereas K-selected ones are adapted to oligotrophic conditions. However, coccolithophores as a group achieve highest relative abundances within phytoplankton communities in oligotrophic environments (Winter and Siesser, 1994). Being photosynthetic they require light for carbon fixation. Most species thrive in upper photic waters. Some species, such as Florisphaera profunda inhabit the lower photic zone i.e. LPZ (<1% to 4% of the surface irradiance). The LPZ is usually a permanent feature of the subtropical gyres but may develop in well-stratified waters in subtropical and temperate regions in summer months. Application of Calcareous Nannofossils in Hydrocarbon Exploration Calcareous nannofossils are extremely small objects (less than 25 microns) produced by planktonic unicellular algae. As the name implies, they are made of calcium carbonate. Nannofossils first appeared during the Mesozoic era and have persisted and evolved through time. The function of the calcareous “plates”, even in living forms, is uncertain. One extant group that produces “nannofossils” is the Coccolithophorans, Planktonic golden-brown algae that are very abundant in the world’s oceans. The calcareous plates accumulate on the ocean floor, become buried beneath later layers, and are preserved as nannofossils. Like the planktonic foraminifera, the planktonic mode of life and the tremendous abundance of calcareous nannofossils make them very useful tools for biostratigraphy. Nannofossils are amongst the rare group of fossils which have been tied with chronologic time through magnetostratigraphy or rarely radiometric dates, during the vast amount of data gathered during the Deep Sea Drilling and Ocean Drilling Projects. This advantage along with the fine chronostratigraphic resolution of nannofossil zones and events make them one of the most potent tools for stratigraphic correlation. This is of prime importance in the hydrocarbon industry, where fine zonations are required to decipher pay zone level correlations. The added advantage of nannofossils is that where ever present, their distribution is largely independent of the depositional facies in which they occur, the only danger being diagenetic modification and destruction. QUESTION THREE: SILICEOUS MICROFOSSILS Siliceous microfossils are protists with shells constructed of opaline (amorphous) silica. There is no intense dissolution of siliceous remains in the deep ocean. Sediments deposited below the carbonate compensation depth are commonly enriched in silica by removal of the carbonate, sometimes to the point of forming siliceous oozes. With subsequent remobilization of the silica, deep-sea cherts may be formed. Siliceous microfossils are subject to burial diagenesis and become rare at great well depths except when recrystallized, preserved in nodules or concretions, or replaced by pyrite or calcite. There are three major groups of siliceous microfossils: - Radiolarians - Diatoms and - Silicoflagellates. Radiolarians Radiolarians are planktonic protists that occur primarily in open marine, deep-water settings. They are useful time indicators and are found in rocks of Cambrian to Holocene age. They may be the only common microfossils in abyssal environments, commonly forming radiolarian oozes. Radiolarian chert, the product of silica diagenesis, is fairly widespread in the geologic record. Radiolarians are common in some marine source rocks. Typical radiolarians Diatoms Diatoms are photosynthesizing protists that occur in both marine and nonmarine environments. Marine diatoms range from Upper Jurassic or Lower Cretaceous to Holocene and are particularly useful for age and environmental determinations in the upper Cenozoic. Nonmarine diatoms range from Eocene to Holocene and also are useful in the upper Cenozoic. These microfossils can be a major rock-forming group, forming sedimentary rock (diatomites) consisting primarily of diatoms. Diatomaceous sediments, when altered by burial diagenesis, are converted to siliceous shale, porcellanite, and chert. Such rocks can serve as sources and fractured reservoirs for hydrocarbons (e.g., Monterey Formation of California). The changes in rock properties associated with silica diagenesis permit seismic definition of silica phase transformation zones in the subsurface (e.g., bottom-simulating reflector). Typical diatoms Silicoflagellates Silicoflagellates are another group of planktonic photosynthesizing marine protists; they commonly occur with diatoms. Silicoflagellates range in age from Cretaceous to Holocene. Although not as common as diatoms, they are useful time indicators, particularly in the upper Cenozoic. As a group, they were much more abundant during the early and middle Cenozoic than today. They have been used to estimate marine paleotemperatures in the late Tertiary and Quaternary. Typical silicoflagellates Application of Siliceous Microfossils in Hydrocarbon Exploration Just like other Microfossils, Siliceous Microfossils have the following application in Hydrocarbon exploration: - Biostratigraphy (Biostratigraphy is the differentiation of rock units based upon the fossils which they contain) - Paleoenvironmental analysis (this is the interpretation of the depositional environment in which the rock unit formed, based upon the fossils found within the unit) - Paleoclimatology - Biogeography - Thermal maturation QUESTION FOUR: PHOSPHATIC MICROFOSSILS Phosphatic microfossils, notably conodonts, are composed of crystallites of calcium phosphate (apatite) embedded in an organic matrix. There is one type of stratigraphically significant phosphatic microfossils (conodonts); but fish teeth, of less practical utility, are found in some marine strata. Conodonts Conodonts are extinct toothlike microfossils composed of calcium phosphate whose biological affinities, while poorly understood, lie with chordates. Conodonts are widely distributed in marine rocks of Cambrian through Triassic age. They are excellent indicators of time and thermal maturity—especially in carbonates, where other methods of evaluating organic thermal maturity are less successful. Conodonts are commonly used as zonal indices for the latest Cambrian through Triassic because they were abundant, evolved rapidly, and were widespread geographically. Although found in most marine rocks, conodonts are most efficiently recovered from the insoluble residues of carbonates dissolved in weak acids or from easily disaggregated shales. Individual conodonts vary greatly in morphology, and taxonomy was originally based on the morphology of these individual specimens. While conodonts are common, the preserved remains of the soft-bodied animal that bore them are extremely rare. Based on a few preserved whole-animal specimens discovered recently (e.g., conodonts appear to have been located in the cephalic area and may have functioned as teeth. However, the conodont animal apparently bore many conodonts of differing shapes and morphologies, based on the study of the very rare whole-animal specimens and rare bedding-plane groupings of conodonts representing individual animals. This recent information has led to more accurate multielement species concepts. Typical conodonts Application of Phoshatic Microfossils in Hydrocarbon Exploration Just like other Microfossils, Phosphatic Microfossils have the following application in Hydrocarbon exploration: - Biostratigraphy (Biostratigraphy is the differentiation of rock units based upon the fossils which they contain) - Paleoenvironmental analysis (this is the interpretation of the depositional environment in which the rock unit formed, based upon the fossils found within the unit) - Paleoclimatology - Biogeography - Thermal maturation References 1. Calcareous Microfossils.2016. In AAPG wiki. Retrieved 20 March, 2016, From https:en.m.aapgwiki.org/wiki/calcareous_microfossils 2. Foraminifera. 2016. In Wikipedia Encyclopedia. Retrieved 20 March, 2016, From https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/foraminifera 3. Giere, Olav (2009). Meiobenthology: the microscopic motile fauna of aquatic sediments (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3540686576. 4. Lejzerowicz, Franck; Pawlowski, Jan; Fraissinet-Tachet, Laurence; Marmeisse, Roland (1 September 2010). "Molecular evidence for widespread occurrence of Foraminifera in soils". Environmental Microbiology 12 (9): 2518–26. 5. Kennett, J.P.; Srinivasan, M.S. (1983). Neogene planktonic foraminifera: a phylogenetic atlas. Hutchinson Ross. ISBN 978-0-87933-070-5. 6. Ald, S.M. et al. (2007) Diversity, Nomenclature, and Taxonomy of Protists, Syst. Biol. 56(4), 684–689, DOI: 10.1080/10635150701494127. 7. Pawlowski, J., Lejzerowicz, F., & Esling, P. (2014). Next-generation environmental diversity surveys of foraminifera: preparing the future. The Biological Bulletin, 227(2), 93-106. 8. "World Foraminifera Database". 9. Marshall M (3 February 2010). "Zoologger: 'Living beach ball' is giant single cell". New Scientist. 10. Loeblich Jr, A.R.; Tappan, H. (1964). "Foraminiferida". Part C, Protista 2. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Geological Society of America. pp. C55–C786. ISBN 08137-3003-1. 11. Sen Gupta, Barun K. (2002). Modern Foraminifera. Springer. p. 16. ISBN 978-14020-0598-5. 12. Cavalier-Smith, T (2004). "Only Six Kingdoms of Life" (PDF). 13. Cavalier-Smith, T (2003). "Protist phylogeny and the high-level classification of Protozoa". European Journal of Protistology 34 (4): 338–348. 14. Sen Gupta, Barun K. (1982). "Ecology of benthic Foraminifera". In Broadhead, T.W. Foraminifera: notes for a short course organized by M.A. Buzas and B.K. Sen Gupta. Studies in Geology 6. University of Tennessee, Dept. of Geological Sciences. pp. 37– 50. ISBN 0910249059. 15. Hemleben, C.; Anderson, O.R.; Spindler, M. (1989). Modern Planktonic Foraminifera. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-96815-3. 16. Kucera, M.; Darling, K.F. (April 2002). "Cryptic species of planktonic foraminifera: their effect on palaeoceanographic reconstructions". Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 360 (1793): 695–718. 17. Bernhard, J. M.; Bowser, S.M. (1999). "Benthic Foraminifera of dysoxic sediments: chloroplast sequestration and functional morphology". Earth Science Reviews 46: 149–165. 18. Moore, R.C.; Lalicker, A.G.; Fischer, C.G. (1952). "Ch 2 Foraminifera and Radiolaria". Invertebrate Fossils. McGraw-Hill. 19. Lana, C (2001). "Cretaceous Carterina (Foraminifera)". Marine Micropaleontology 41: 97. 20. Dartnell L (8 May 2008). "Sea creatures had a thing for bling". New Scientist (2655). 21. Foraminifera: History of Study, University College London, retrieved 20 September 2007 in Wikipedia Encyclopedia(2016) 22. Langer, M. R.; Silk, M. T. B.; Lipps, J. H. (1997). "Global ocean carbonate and carbon dioxide production: The role of reef Foraminifera". Journal of Foraminiferal Research 27 (4): 271–277. 23. Adl, S. M.; Simpson, A. G. B.; Farmer, M. A.; Anderson; et al. (2005). "The new higher level classification of Eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of Protists". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 52 (5): 399–451. 24. Gooday, A.J.; Todo, Y.; Uematsu, K.; Kitazato, H. (July 2008). "New organic-walled Foraminifera (Protista) from the ocean's deepest point, the Challenger Deep (western Pacific Ocean)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 153 (3): 399–423 25. http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/fossil/fossil_1.html 26. Journal bioinformatics and biology insights, Using the Multiple Analysis Approach to Reconstruct Phylogenetic Relationships among Planktonic Foraminifera from Highly Divergent and Length-polymorphic SSU rDNA Sequences 27. Boardman, R.S.; Cheetham, A.H.; Rowell, A.J. (1987). Fossil Invertebrates. Wiley. ISBN 0865423024. 28. Zachos, J.C.; Pagani, M.; Sloan, L.; Thomas, E.; Billups, K. (2001). "Trends, Rhythms, and Aberrations in Global Climate, 65 Ma to Present". Science 292 (5517): 686–693. 29. Branson, Oscar; Redfern, Simon A.T.; Tyliszczak, Tolek; Sadekov, Aleksey; Langer, Gerald; Kimoto, Katsunori; Elderfield, Henry (December 2013). "The coordination of Mg in foraminiferal calcite". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 383: 134–141. 30. Misra, S.; Froelich, P. N. (26 January 2012). "Lithium Isotope History of Cenozoic Seawater: Changes in Silicate Weathering and Reverse Weathering". Science 335 (6070): 818–823. 31. Hemming, N.G.; Hanson, G.N. (January 1992). "Boron isotopic composition and concentration in modern marine carbonates". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56 (1): 537–543 32. Jones, R.W. (1996). Micropalaeontology in petroleum exploration. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-854091-5. 33. McNeil, D.H.; Issler, D.R.; Snowdon, L.R. (1996). Colour Alteration, Thermal Maturity, and Burial Diagenesis in Fossil Foraminifers. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 499. Geological Survey of Canada. ISBN 978-0-660-16451-9. 34. Ostracod.2016. In Wikipedia Encyclopedia. Retrieved 20 March, 2016, From https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ostracod 35. Calcareous Nannofosils and their Applications by Jyotsana and Abha (2010). In spcial edition issue on ‘Applied Micropaleontology’. ISSN 0970-261X 36. Siliceous Microfossils.2016. In AAPG wiki. Retrieved 20 March, 2016, From https:en.m.aapgwiki.org/wiki/siliceous_microfossils 37. Phosphatic Microfossils.2016. In AAPG wiki. Retrieved 20 March, 2016, From https:en.m.aapgwiki.org/wiki/phosphatic_microfossils