* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Strathclyde BS 2011
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Grey market wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
First-mover advantage wikipedia , lookup
Dumping (pricing policy) wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Pricing strategies wikipedia , lookup
Market analysis wikipedia , lookup
Street marketing wikipedia , lookup
Perfect competition wikipedia , lookup
Darknet market wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Market segmentation wikipedia , lookup
Service parts pricing wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup
Value proposition wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
Market penetration wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Global marketing wikipedia , lookup
Ten crucial questions Directors are asking their marketing colleagues--- and the answers they should be receiving by Professor Malcolm McDonald Strathclyde Business School June 7th 2011 Page Page 1 1 Objectives • To show how to ensure that marketers become more accountable for marketing expenditure Page 2 First, some basic concepts The purpose of strategic marketing planning The overall purpose of strategic marketing, and its principal focus is the identification and creation of sustainable competitive advantage. © Professor Malcolm McDonald Page 4 Map of the marketing domain Define markets & understand value Monitor value Asset Base Deliver value Determine value Proposition Financial Risk and Return High 1 Return 2 3 Low Low Adapted from Keith Ward, Cranfield School of Management Risk High Shareholder value-adding strategies “The customer is simply the fulcrum of the business and everything from production to supply chain, finance, risk management, personnel management and product development all adapt to and converge on the business value proposition that is projected to the customer”. (The Customer Information Wars, Sean Kelly, Wiley, 2005) Key elements of world class marketing 1. Profound understanding of the market-place 2. Creative segmentation and selection 3. Powerful differentiation positioning and branding 4. Effective marketing planning processes 5. Long-term integrated marketing strategies 6. Rigorous strategy risk assessment 7. Rigorous marketing measurement metrics 8. Market-driven organisation structures 9. Careful recruitment, training and career management 10. Total supply chain management Copyright Professor Malcolm McDonald Question 1 • Do we know and understand our key target markets? Market definition and segmentation Correct market definition is crucial for: • Share measurement • Growth measurement • The specification of target customers • The recognition of relevant competitors • The formulation of marketing strategy Page 11 Some Market Definitions (personal market) Market Need (on-line) Emergency Cash (‘Rainy Day’) Future Event Planning Asset Purchase Welfare Contingency Retirement Income Wealth Care and Building Day-to-Day Money Management Personal Financial Protection and Security from Motor Vehicle Incidents Cash to cover an undesired and unexpected event often the loss of/damage to property). Schemes to protect and grow money which are for anticipated and unanticipated cash calling events (eg. Car replacement/repairs, education, weddings, funerals, health care) Cash to buy assets they require (eg. Car purchase, house purchase, once-in-a -lifetime holiday). The ability to maintain a desired standard of living (for self and/or dependants) in times of unplanned cessation of salary. The ability to maintain a desired standard of living (for self and/or dependants once the salary cheques have ceased. The care and growth of assets (with various risk levels and liquidity levels). Ability to store and readily access cash for day-today requirements. Currently known as car insurance. Page 12 Market mapping …including the number of each customer type vol/ val % N N vol/ val % N vol/val % vol/val % vol/val % N Other Retailers Local Distributors N Contractors N vol/val % N vol/ val % Regional Distributors National Distributors vol/val % vol/ val % UK Sales vol/val % vol/val % N Spcist. Retailers N Detp. Retailers Local Builders N Private Companies N Local Government Users N Domestic Users vol/ val % vol/val % vol/val % N Sheds vol/val % vol/val % National Builders vol/val % vol/val % N = Number % = Your Share vol/val % NB. Sketch out complex junctions separately. Alternatively, build an outline map, applying details at the junctions to be segmented. Page 13 Market mapping Showing the number of each customer type, volumes and share Suppliers Distributors Retailers 60k 42% (25k) 35k 51% (18k) 15k 33% (5k) Regional General [18] [9] 300k 28% (84k) Final users Sketch out complex junctions separately. Alternatively, build an outline map, applying details at the junctions to be segmented. 75k 40% (30k) Contractors Segment 1 [90] [2500] 55k 36% (20k) [320] 35k 29% (10k) Suppliers Contractors 45k 22% (10k) 20k 50% (10k) Segment 3 [3000] 45k 42% (19k) National Specialists [3] [110] Segment 4 65k 38% (25k) 60k 40% (24k) 25k 28% (7k) Local [45] 90k 22% (20k) [5500] Sheds [4] 80k 19% (15k) Others [12 500] 140k 15% (21k) 45k 9% (4k) Key: Using ‘Segment 3’ as an example (one of three target segments); the total number of customers found here is [3000] and the total quantity of units they buy is 45k of which your company’s share is 42% which equates to (19k) units. Note: The number of units ‘consumed’ by the final users usually equates to the number of units entering the market (any surplus being ‘stock’) – 300k in this example. Please take some time to follow the routes through the map and you will observe that, like the work of an accountant, it all ‘balances’. Page 14 Radiator Market Map Primary Leverage Point Radiator Manufacturer Distributor Installer Specification Decision Distribution Sector Share Stelrad 2275 41.7% 1 2 3 4 Premier 1 860 2 15.8% 3 4 Supaline 1 605 2 11.1% 3 4 Barlo 1 480 2 8.8% 3 4 Warmastyle 1 300 2 5.5% 3 4 Other Imports1 905 2 17.1% 3 4 5455 1830 70.2 360 17.3 66 11.2 Nil Nil 555 21.3 280 12.8 26 4.3 Nil Nil 125 4.8 450 20.5 30 5.1 Nil Nil 90 3.4 270 12.3 120 20.7 Nil Nil 5 Nil 255 11.6 40 6.9 Nil Nil Nil Nil 556 25.3 300 51.8 80 100.0 1. National Merchants 2605 47.8% 5. British Gas 1 295 465 2 170 8.5% 3 Nil 4 Nil 6. Installer 1 2755 2 2. Large 50.5% 3 Independents 4 2190 40.1% 7. Contractor 1 1905 2 34.9% 3 3. Small 4 Independents 560 8. Self Installer 1 10.6% 80 2 1.4% 3 4 4. Sheds 80 9. Direct Works1 1.4% 250 2 4.6% 3 4 5455 Copyright Professor Malcolm McDonald 5455 1065 1360 360 Nil 1135 540 230 Nil Nil Nil Nil 80 120 130 Nil Nil Manufacturer 10 Nil 250 11 250 12 Nil 13 Nil 14 Nil Local 10 Nil Authority 11 Nil 1350 12 1050 13 50 14 250 Housebuilder 10 Nil 350 11 350 12 Nil 13 Nil 14 Nil British Gas 10 500 700 11 100 12 50 13 Nil 14 50 Contractor 10 Nil 200 11 100 12 Nil 13 Nil 14 100 Consultant 10 Nil 550 11 Nil 12 Nil 13 50 14 500 3400 End User Segment 31.3 10. Private Exitsting 2555 46.8% 5 385 6 2010 7 100 8 80 9 Nil 95.4 11. Private New 5 Nil 800 6 50 50.0 14.7% 7 750 27.8 8 Nil 9 Nil 43.8 12. Public Existing 1100 19.6 20.2% 12.5 4.5 5 50 6 395 7 506 8 Nil 9 150 5.6 13. Public New 5 Nil 100 6 Nil 1.8% 7 Nil 12.5 8 Nil 9 100 11.1 14. Commercial 5 50 900 6 300 16.5% 7 550 8 Nil 50.1 9 Nil 55.6 623 5455 Page 15 Market map – office equipment Direct Field Sales Manufacturers Type A Dealer Chain 5% 3% Type A Independent 7% 3% Type B Dealer Chain 0% 1% Type B Independent 1% 8% Type C Dealer Chain 15% 9% Type C Independent 7% 18% 5% 4% 7% 10% 4% 10% VARs Final Users Route to Market Buying Consortia Company’s Route to Market Retail Extracted from the complete map Direct Response Other 0% 4% 0% 6% 47% 24% Final Users Question 2 • Do we address real segments in our key target markets? high Speed low low high Price © Professor Malcolm McDonald Page 18 high Middle low high Middle low high Middle low © Professor Malcolm McDonald Page 19 Personalising segments Page 20 Global Tech Koala Bears Teddy Bears Polar Bears Yogi Bears Grizzly Bears Andropov Big Bears Uses an extended warranty to give them cover. Won’t do anything themselves, prefer to curl-up and wait for someone to come and fix it. Small offices (in small and big companies). 28% of market Lots of account management and love required from a single preferred supplier. Will pay a premium for training and attention. If multi-site, will require supplier to effectively cover these sites. (Protect me). Larger companies 17% of market Like Teddy Bears except colder! Will shop around for cheapest service supplier, whoever that may be. Full 3rd-party approach. Train me but don’t expect to be paid. Will review annually (seriously). If multi-site will require supplier to effectively cover these sites. Larger companies 29% of market A ‘wise’ Teddy or Polar bear working long hours. Will use trained staff to fix if possible. Needs skilled product specialist at end of phone, not a bookings clerk. Wants different service levels to match the criticality of the product to their business process. Large and small companies 11% of market Trash them! Cheaper to replace than maintain. Besides, they’re so reliable that they are probably obsolete when they bust. Expensive items will be fixed on a payas-when basis - if worth it. Won’t pay for training. Not small companies 6% of market My business is totally dependent on your products. I know more about your products than you do! You will do as you are told. You will be here now! I will pay for the extra cover but you will ……! Not small or very large companies. 9% of market Page 21 Listen to how customers talk about category need Customer View Advice • cutting costs • future technology direction Help • design & configuration • process engineering • electron commerce Run • international network • disaster recovery Supplier View • fast PAD family • multimedia FRADs • PIX firewall • Solutions • Gigabit Ethernet • solutions • high performance • LAN support Page 22 Understand the different category buyers Business Business perfectionist Save my budget Radical thinkers Profit engineer Business general “Reward” “Relief” Save my career Radical architect Technical idealist Conservative technocrat Technical Page 23 Quick Market Segmentation Solution • • Write down the main benefits sought by customers Hygiene factors are benefits that any product or service must have to be acceptable in the market. Try to ignore these. Motivators are those benefits that contribute towards the customer’s decision about which product to buy Take the ‘motivators’ and choose the 2 main ones Draw two straight horizontal lines and make an estimate of the percentage of customers at each end. So, for example, if service level is a key motivator of what is bought, see below: • • • 40% Low service 60% High service Likewise, if the breadth of the product range is a key motivator of what is bought, see below: 40% low range • 60% high range Take the left hand point of the first horizontal line and drag it over the second horizontal line to make cross as shown 60% high Service 24 36 40% 60% Large product range Small product range 16 24 40% low service • Starting at the top, and moving in a clockwise direction, multiply 60% by 60% to give 36% (see 1st circle). • Then multiply 60% by 40% to give 24% (see second circle) • Then multiply 40% (the bottom of the vertical axis) by 40% to give 16% (see third circle). • Lastly, multiply 40% by 40% to give 16% (see fourth circle). • The circles represent segments in the market. Interpretation • The 1st segment (36%), the biggest segment, requires both high service and a large product range. • The second segment (24%) prefers a large product range and is less interested in service. • The third segment (16%), doesn’t care much about either a large product range or service. • The fourth segment (24%) prefers good service and is less interested in a large product range. • Although not essential, you might consider giving each segment a name. Action • Ensure your ‘offer’, including the product, price, service and promotion reflect the differing needs of each segment. Example • An example of segmentation of the A4 paper market follows. Please note that if, as in the case of the A4 paper market, there is one very large segment (in this case 56%), the exercise ca be repeated for just this large segment, resulting in seven segments in total. Example = Copier Paper • • • • Service delivery – (Fast, paper always ‘there’ – point of delivery availability of products; service levels) Product fit for purpose - (Hi quality print finish for colour copiers; consistency of quality; paper that doesn’t screw up in the machine; print definition; no waste) Environmental factors - (Recyclable) Level of support - (Delivered in small lots; consignment stock; easy ordering {on-line]; delivered to difficult locations) Level of Support (less demanding) 20% Low 80% High (want lots of support) 70% Breath of Product Range Low (buy a narrow range But big quantities) 56% Drag Queens 70% (narrow product range required) 30% 80% (hi support requirements) High (buy a broad range) Prima Donnas 24% (expect to have their every whim catered for) 30% (broad product range required) 14% Easily Satisfied (paper is not Key to their Business - just want reliable supply) 6% Dictators (know their power as Large volume users) 20% (low support requirement) Question 3 • Do we know for sure what our sources of differential advantage are in each of the principal segments in our key target markets? SWOT analysis • By segment, what value is required by the customer? • What value are you offering to entice the customer to buy from you • Avoid SWAGs © Professor Malcolm McDonald Page 31 STRENGTHS OPPORTUNITIES WEAKNESSES THREATS Strengths • It can create value for the organisation and customers • It is unique • It is inimitable • It is lasting Opportunities • It is large • It is accessible • It is lasting Weaknesses • It is meaningful to the customer • It is unique • It is difficult to fix Threats • It is significant • It is lasting Five Key Buying Factors for UK Independent Schools Class size Media coverage Exam results, league table position Events Int’l connections, Guest community links speakers Life-enriching Results opportunities School trips Promotion Brochure Social mix Student successesexams, univ, competitions Course subjects/ options Skills-based learning Business skills Website/internet Headteacher quality Academic Enhance ment Staff image/ qualifications Classroom facilities International (incl ICT) Qualifications Art/Music reputation Art/Music facilities/ equipment GCSEs Transport routes/times & costs Sports reputation Cost s Results Fees Scholarships & Bursaries Boarding options Convenie nce Pastoral care Student welfare Bullying Note: Admissions Policy & Catchment: qualifying factors Front of house de vel School Sports op buildings facilities me History nt Grounds/landscape Social life Student relationship & happiness Academic support Facilities Religious/Cultural understanding Parent evenings School:Fa mily Relations hip Parent relationship Parent communications Academic Factors • • • • • • • • • • • • • Personality and vision of Head Exam results Class size League table position (compared to regional competitors) Student academic successes (Oxbridge, major universities, competitions) Academic planning: A level, IB, pre-U; IGCSE? New subjects? Flexibility of subject choice Academic history (results over a number of years) Quality/knowledge/experience of staff Facilities for teaching and learning Learning opportunities outside mainstream subjects (could be vocational skills) Reporting procedures Innovations in teaching and learning Enhancement/Attractiveness Factors • • • • • • • Facilities – Buildings and grounds – Specialist facilities (floodlit astroturf, ICT centre, theatre) – Development Planning: plans for new/better facilities People – Quality of staff (teaching and specialist – ie sports/music coaching) – Quality of staff recruitment – Front of House/customer focus – Understanding/delivery of mission by all staff – Strong alumni association – Active parents’ association “Preparation for Life” – Active careers department – Expertise in university entrance support – Work experience, Young Enterprise, Duke of Edinburgh’s Award, Sports Leader’s Award etc Community – Links through activities (charity fundraising, visits to elderly, working with handicapped etc) – Hire of facilities (pool, theatre, sports, hall for weddings and parties) – Compliant with Charities Act – Local reputation International links and opportunities – Language visits – Trips and expeditions – Other learning opportunities Technology – Up-to-date, campus-wide access – Resources online to enhance study Environmental – Clear policy and aims – Strong student involvement in campaigns and issues – Clear priority status within School – put into action Strategic marketing planning exercise – SWOT analysis 1. SEGMENT DESCRIPTION It should be a specific part of the business and should be very important to the organisation 2. CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS In other words, how do customers choose? 3. WEIGHTING (How important is each of these CSFs? Score out of 100) 4. STRENGTHS / WEAKNESSES ANALYSIS How would your customers score you and each of your main competitors out of 10 on each of the CSFs? Multiply the score by the weight. 1 2 1 3 2 4 3 5 4 5. OPPORTUNITIES / THREATS What are the few things outside your direct control that have had, and will have, an impact on this part of your business? OPPORTUNITIES You Total 100 Comp A Comp B Comp C Comp D 5 THREATS 1 2 3 4 5 6. KEY ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED What are the really key issues from the SWOT that need to be addressed? Page 37 Critical Success Factors (how customers choose) A B C D E F G A B C D E F G Importance to customer (1 to 5) SWOT Summary Matrix 1 = poor performance 5 = excellent performance 1 Your company’s performance (1 to 5) Importance to Customer 2 3 4 5 Your Company’s Performance 1 2 3 4 5 1 = relatively less important 5 = very important Instructions 1. List critical success factors – i.e. How customers choose in the first column. 2. For each CSF score its relative importance to the customer (between 1 and 5) NOTE: that a score of 1 or 2 doesn’t mean it is unimportant to customers – only that it is relatively less important than a CSF with a high score (the second column). 3. For each CSF, score your company’s actual or perceived performance (between 1 and 5) (the third column). 4. Transfer the joint scores for each CSF and performance to the matrix. 5. Interpretation • Scores in the bottom left of the matrix could indicate that you are overperforming • Scores in the top right of the matrix could indicate that you are underperforming Question 4 • Do we all agree on the prioritisation of our markets and the segments within each market? Market/segment selection criteria Market / segment attractiveness - Size - Growth - Profitability - Competitive intensity High Low High Invest / Grow Selectively Invest Low Maintain/ manage for sustained earnings Manage for Cash / Withdraw Business Strengths - Product Range - Product Efficacy - Service Quality (Including distribution) - Price - Associated Services (e.g. Technical advice) - Reputation / Image © Professor Malcolm McDonald Page 40 High High Our competitive position / business strength Directors Seminars Low Distance Education/ CMR Exec MBA C.S. G.M.Ps Market Attractiveness MANDAS Research ? KEY Present position Forecast position in 3 years Full-Time MBA C.S. Low Page 41 Market attractiveness evaluation Factor Scoring Criteria 10 5 0 Score Weighting Ranking 1. Market Size (£ millions) ³£250 £51.250 < £50 5 15 0.75 2. Volume Growth (Units) ³10% 5.9% < 5% 10 25 2.5 3. Competitive Intensity Low Medium High 6 10 0.6 4. Industry Profitability > 15% 10.15% < 10% 8 25 2.0 5. Vulnerability Low Medium High 3 15 0.9 6. Cyclicality Low Medium High 2.5 10 0.25 Total 7.0 This form illustrates a quantitative approach to evaluating market attractiveness. Each factor is score multiplied by the percentage weighting and totaled for the overall score. In this example, an overall score of 7 out of 10 places this mark in the highly attractive category. Page 42 Question 5 • Are the objectives for revenue growth and market share realistic? Setting expectations of performance P P high G C Supplier business strength with High customer Low High Strategic Star Strategic investment Selective investment Status Streamline Mkt/Segment attractiveness P medium Low C G high/ medium G C P low Pro-active Manage for cash maintenance C G Question 6 • Are the strategies (including products, services and solutions) consistent with the objectives? Programme guidelines suggested for different positioning on the directional policy matrix Invest for growth Maintain market position, manage for earnings Manage for cash Selective Opportunistic development Market Share Maintain or increase dominance Maintain or slightly milk for earnings Maintain selectivitysegment Forego share for profit Invest selectively in share Products Differentiation - line expansion Prune for less successful differentiate for segments Emphasise product quality Aggressively prune Differentiation - line expansion Price Lead - Aggressive pricing for share Stabilise prices / raise Maintain or raise Raise Aggressive - price for share Promotion Aggressive marketing Limit Maintain selectively Minimise Aggressive marketing Distribution Broaden distribution Hold wide distribution pattern Segment Gradually withdraw distribution Limited coverage Cost Control Tight control - go for scale economies Emphasise cost reduction viz. variable costs Tight control Aggressively reduce fixed & variable Tight - but not at expense of entrepreneurship Production Expand, invest (organic acquisition, joint venture) Maximise capacity utilisation Increase productivity e.g. specialisation Free up capacity Invest R&D Expand - invest Focus on specific projects Invest selectively None Invest Personnel Upgrade management in key functional areas Maintain, reward efficiency, tighten organisation Allocate key managers Cut back organisation Invest Investment Fund growth Limit fixed investment Invest selectively Minimise & divest opportunistically Fund growth Working Capital Reduce in process extend credit Tighten Credit- reduce accounts receivable increase inventory turn Reduce Aggressively reduce Invest Page 46 Activities by medium Activity Recognise Initiate potential dialogue Exchange Negotiate / information tailor Commit Personal contact Medium Direct mail Telephone Advertising Electronic Page 47 The Sunworshippers Internet Mobile telephone iTV Broadcast TV Traditiona l channels • Recognise Exchange potential • Initiate dialogue • Exchange information Negotiate/tail or Commit • Exchange value • Monitor Page 48 John and Mary Lively Internet Mobile telephone iTV Broadcast TV Traditiona l channels • Recognise Exchange potential • Initiate dialogue • Exchange information Negotiate/ta ilor Commit . • Exchange value • Monitor Page 49 Relevant? The Times 19th Jan 2005 Page 50 Question 7 • Have we assessed dispassionately the risks associated with our strategic marketing plan? Justifying investment in marketing assets Whilst accountants do not measure intangible assets, the discrepancy between market and book values shows that investors do. Expenditures to develop marketing assets make sense if the sum of the discounted cash flow they generate is positive. Balance sheet Assets Liabilities - Land - Buildings - Plant - Vehicles etc. - Shares - Loans - Overdrafts etc. £100 million £100 million © Professor Malcolm McDonald, Cranfield School of Management Balance sheet Assets - Land - Buildings - Plant - Vehicles etc. £100 million Liabilities - Shares - Loans - Overdrafts etc. £900 million © Professor Malcolm McDonald, Cranfield School of Management Balance sheet Assets - Land - Buildings - Plant - Vehicles Liabilities - Shares - Loans - Overdrafts etc. Goodwill £800m £900 million £900 million © Professor Malcolm McDonald, Cranfield School of Management Asset Breakdown for the top 6 countries by Enterprise Value (US$ millions, 2004) Asset Breakdown for the top 10 countries by Enterprise Value (US$ millions, 2010) Brands are key intangibles in most businesses Brands are estimated to represent at least 20% of the intangible value of businesses on the major world stock markets. Brands combine with other tangible and intangible assets to create value Developed Markets Brand Brand 20% Patents Marketing intangible Technology intangibles Software Intangible assets Other Intangible Assets Source: Brand Finance Customer intangible Distribution rights Assembled workforce 55% Tangible Assets 25% Customer relationships Contract intangibles Business Goodwill Tangible assets Illustrative Brands Increasingly Drive Business Results Brands affect business value by influencing the behaviour of a wide range of Shell’s stakeholders, some of which directly impact Shell’s P&L (and hence value) STAKEHOLDER PERCEPTION Customers - individuals, businesses Trademarks Suppliers / Partners Brand - businesses, energy asset owners Employees - current and potential Reputation Shareholders / Bankers - individual and institutional Indirect influence on value Other Stakeholders - government, media, opinion formers, academics, public, environmentalists STAKEHOLDER BEHAVIOUR • Pay price premium FINANCIAL IMPACT • Buy more Revenues • Lower prices • Better terms • Willingness to partner Costs Revenues SHAREHOLDER VALUE •(more opportunities) • Better retention • Lower salary expectations • Better qualified candidates Costs Productivity • Higher PE ratio • Lower volatility • Lower borrowing costs • Better repayment conditions Costs Risk Influences business and brand value Intangibles - P and G have paid £31 billion for Gillette, but have bought only £4 billion of tangible assets Gillette brand £ 4.0 billion Duracell brand £ 2.5 billion Oral B £ 2.0 billion Braun £ 1.5 billion Retail and supplier network £10.0 billion Gillette innovative capability £ 7.0 billion TOTAL £27.0 billion (David Haigh, Brand Finance, Marketing Magazine, 1st April 2005) “The information appearing in the majority of boardrooms remains predominantly financial in nature. Without (additional) information on valuecreating activities management are typically flying blind – when financials tell them there is a problem management have already missed the optimal point for taking appropriate corrective action”. PricewaterhouseCoopers – ValueReporting™ Review 2003, Transparency in Corporate Reporting, p.25 Marks & Spencer’s Trends Service Positive Value for Money Share Price (Indexed) 95 85 75 65 55 45 35 25 15 5 Nov 95 Base: M&S Customers Mar 98 Sept 99 Map of the marketing domain Define markets & understand value Monitor value Asset Base Measurement zone where metrics are applied (Levels 2 & 3) Deliver value Strategic zone where metrics are defined (Level 1) Determine value Proposition Three questions need to be answered • How does the company plan to generate its predicted future sales and profits? • Will the marketing strategy on which these plans are based work? • Will this strategy create shareholder value, given its inherent level of risk? What is Marketing Due Diligence? Marketing Due Diligence Risk Assessment Market Risk: Is the market there? Strategy risk: Will we get our planned share? Implementation risk: Will we get our planned profit? Market Risk Profile • Product Category Existence • Segment Existence The marketing strategy has a higher probability of success if the product category is well established If the target segment is well established • Sales Volumes If the sales volumes are well supported by evidence • Forecast Growth If the forecast growth is in line with historical trends • Pricing Assumptions If the pricing levels are conservative relative to current pricing levels Ansoff matrix PRODUCTS increasing technological newness New Present Present MARKETS increasing market newness New Market Penetration Product Development Market Extension Diversification © Professor Malcolm McDonald, Cranfield School of Management Market Share Risk Profile • Target Market Definition The marketing strategy has a higher probability of success if the target is defined in terms of homogeneous segments and is characterised by utilisable data If the proposition delivered to each segment is different from that delivered to other segments and addresses the needs which characterised the target segment • Proposition Specification • SWOT Alignment If the strengths and weaknesses of the organisation are independently assessed and the choice of target and proposition leverages strengths and minimises weaknesses If choice of target and proposition is different from that of major competitors • Strategy Uniqueness • Anticipation of market change If changes in the external microenvironment and macroenvironment are identified and their implications allowed for Shareholder Value Risk Profile • Profit Pool The marketing strategy has a higher probability of success if the targeted profit pool is high and growing • Profit Sources If the source of new business is growth in the existing profit pool • Competitor Impact If the profit impact on competitors is small and distributed • Internal Gross Margin Assumptions • Assumptions of Other Costs If the internal gross margin assumptions are conservative relative to current products If assumptions regarding other costs, including marketing support, are higher than existing costs Question 8 • Having taken account of the risks referred to above and having adjusted the forecast net free cash flows for each major product for market for each year, have we calculated whether the strategic marketing plan creates or destroys shareholder value? Valuing Key Market Segments Background/Facts ·Risk and return are positively correlated, ie. as risk increases, investors require a higher return. ·Risk is measured by the volatility in returns, ie. high risk is the likelihood of either making a very good return or losing all your money. This can be described as the quality of returns. ·All assets are defined as having future value to the organisation. Hence assets to be valued include not only tangible assets like plant and machinery, but intangible assets, such as Key Market Segments. ·The present value of future cash flows is the most acceptable method to value assets including key market segments. ·The present value is increased by: - increasing the future cash flows - making the future cash flows ‘happen’ earlier - reducing the risk in these cash flows, ie. improving the certainty of these cash flows, and, hence, reducing the required rate of return. © Professor Malcolm McDonald Suggested Approach ·Identify your key market segments. It is helpful if they can be classified on a vertical axis (a kind of thermometer) according to their attractiveness to your company. ‘Attractiveness’ usually means the potential of each for growth in your profits over a period of between 3 and 5 years. (See the attached matrix) ·Based on your current experience and planning horizon that you are confident with, make a projection of future net free cash in-flows from your segments. It is normal to select a period such as 3 or 5 years. · These calculations will consist of three parts: · revenue forecasts for each year; · cost forecasts for each year; · net free cash flow for each segment for each year. ·Identify the key factors that are likely to either increase or decrease these future cash flows. ·These factors are likely to be assessed according to the following factors: · the riskiness of the product/market segment relative to its position on the ANSOFF matrix; · the riskiness of the marketing strategies to achieve the revenue and market share; · the riskiness of the forecast profitability (e.g. the cost forecast accuracy ). · Now recalculate the revenues, costs and net free cash flows for each year, having adjusted the figures using the risks (probabilities) from the above. ·Ask your accountant to provide you with the overall SBU cost of capital and capital used in the SBU. This will not consist only of tangible assets. Thus, £1,000,000 capital at a required shareholder rate of return of 10% woul give £100,000 as the minimum return necessary. · Deduct the proportional cost of capital from the free cash flow for each segment for each year. · An aggregate positive net present value indicates that you are creating shareholder value – ie. achieving overall returns greater than the weighted average cost of capital, having taken into account the risk associated with future cash flows. Portfolio analysis - directional policy matrix (DPM) Relative company competitiveness High High Invest/ build Segment attractiveness Low ? NB. Suggested time period 3 years Maintain No change Present position © Professor Malcolm McDonald Low Manage for cash Forecast position in 3 years Question 9 • Have we agreed the measurement of effectiveness metrics we want reported to us and their frequency? Marketing Measurement • • • • • • • What needs measuring? Why does it need measuring? What is the relative importance of each? How should they be measured? What should be the frequency of each? To whom should the results be reported? What actions should be taken as a result? Measuring marketing performance isn’t like measuring factory output – a fact that many non-marketing executives don’t fully gasp. In the controlled environment of a manufacturing plant, it’s simple to account for what goes in one end and what comes out the other and then determine productivity. But the output of marketing can be measured only long after it has left the ‘plant’. HBR, November 2004, McGovern, G., Court, D., Quelch, A. and Crawford, B. Inter Tech’s 5 year performance Performance (£million) Base Year 1 2 3 4 5 Sales Revenue - Cost of goods sold £254 135 £293 152 £318 167 £387 201 £431 224 £454 236 Gross Contribution - Manufacturing overhead - Marketing & Sales - Research & Development £119 48 18 22 £141 58 23 23 £151 63 24 23 £186 82 26 25 £207 90 27 24 £218 95 28 24 Net Profit £16 £22 £26 £37 £50 £55 Return on Sales (%) 6.3% 7.5% 8.2% 9.6% 11.6% 12.1% Assets Assets (% of sales) £141 56% £162 55% £167 53% £194 50% £205 48% Return on Assets (%) 11.3% £206 45% 13.5% 15.6% 19.1% 24.4% 26.7% Why Market Growth Rates Are Important InterTech’s 5 Year Market-Based Performance Performance (£million) Base Year 1 2 3 4 5 Market Growth 18.3% 23.4% 17.6% 34.4% 24.0% 17.9% InterTech Sales Growth (%) Market Share(%) 12.8% 20.3% 17.4% 11.2% 27.1% 16.5% 10.9% 19.1% 18.4% 17.1% 16.3% 14.9% Customer Retention (%) New Customers (%) % Dissatisfied Customers 88.2% 11.7% 13.6% 87.1% 85.0% 82.2% 80.9% 80.0% 12.9% 14.9% 24.1% 22.5% 29.2% 14.3% 16.1% 17.3% 18.9% 19.6% Relative Product Quality Relative Service Quality Relative New Product Sales +10% +0% +8% +8% +0% +8% +5% -20% +7% +3% -3% +5% +1% -5% +1% 0% -8% -4% Map of the marketing domain Define markets & understand value Monitor value Asset Base Measurement zone where metrics are applied (Levels 2 & 3) Deliver value Strategic zone where metrics are defined (Level 1) Determine value Proposition Overall Marketing Metrics Model Intention/ actuality Business element Lead indicators Resource allocation/ spend budget funds & time Plan/ action actions, esp. marketing Strategy/ achievement PFs Lag indicators Objectives/ results Forecast/ profit product market segment corporate performance HFs budget Measurement Positioning of issues in the model application of spend £ £ £ £ what who what who what who what who costs, activity milestones & outputs Cost to achieve Responsibilities CSFs metrics on achievement of factor to required level ms% sales£ profit£ corporate rev£ profit£ performance by product market segment turnover, profit & shareholder value Required by Market growth customers. Customer acquisition/ retention/ Relative to uptrading/ X-selling/ regained competitors Product/customer mix Channel performance Map of the marketing domain Define markets & understand value Monitor value Asset Base Measurement zone where metrics are applied (Levels 2 & 3) Deliver value Strategic zone where metrics are defined (Level 1) Determine value Proposition Projected cash flows from investing in a promotion A DCF and NPV methods implicitly make this comparison B C More likely cash flow resulting from doing nothing Companies should be making this comparison Assumed cash flow resulting from doing nothing Note: Most executives compare the cash flow from promotion against the default scenario of doing nothing assuming, incorrectly, that the present health of the company will persist indefinitely if the investment is not made. For a better assessment of the promotion’s value, the comparison should be between the projected discounted cash flow and the more likely scenario of a decline in performance in the absence of promotional investment. Figure 10 Adapted from Christensen CM et al, ( 2008 ) £ - 7 million + £ - 1 million + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 (1+r) (1+r)² (1+r)³ (1+r)4 = £-0.6 million 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 (1+r) (1+r)² (1+r)³ (1+r)4 = £5.4 million Question 10 • Overall, are we happy that the time, effort and expense involved in developing marketing strategies are really worth it? Conditions determining a strong marketing strategy • That the marketing strategy defines real target segments. • That the marketing strategy defines segment-specific value propositions • That the marketing strategy allocates resources differentially by segment or market • That the marketing strategy aligns to the market via SWOT The Contents of a Strategic Marketing Plan (<20 pages) • Mission or Purpose Statement • Financial Summary Products Profit t.0 © Professor Malcolm McDonald T+1 T+2 T+3 Existing Revenue New 1 2 New Markets Existing 3 4 Key (revenue and profit growth) • from productivity • by product for market for existing products from existing markets • from new products in existing markets • from existing products in new markets • from new products in new markets Plus a few words of commentary Market Overview/Summary Market definition Market map showing vol/rev flows from supplier through to end user, with major decision points highlighted Where appropriate, provide a future market map Include commentary/conclusions/implications for the company At major decision points, include key segments © Professor Malcolm McDonald SWOT Analyses on Key Segments • include pictorial representations of the SWOTs, such as bar charts • highlight major conclusions/issues to be addressed Portfolio Summaries of the SWOTs • include Directional Policy Matrix (DPM) summaries of:- the attractiveness of the segments over the next 3-5 years - the current relative competitive position of your company in each segment - the planned competitive position of each segment over the next 3-5 years Marketing Objectives and Strategies for the next 3-5 years • include objectives (volume, value, market share, profit, as appropriate) for the next 3-5 years for each segment as represented by the planned position of each circle on the DPM • include strategies (the 4XPs) with costs for each objective Consolidated Budget for the next 3-5 years • this will be a consolidation of all the revenues, costs and profits for the next 3-5 years and should accord with the financial summary provided earlier © Professor Malcolm McDonald Take marketing into the boardroom, and connect marketing strategy to shareholder value Available to order now from… www.malcolm-mcdonald.com – insert offer code ATZ6 into the basket and receive 10% off plus free post and packing! A colourful, witty, original but deadly serious guide to understanding marketing principles! The international bestseller on marketing planning – essential reading for anyone serious about marketing Available to order now from… www.malcolm-mcdonald.com – insert offer code ATZ6 into the basket and receive 10% off plus free post and packing! [email protected] www.malcolm-mcdonald.com Prof. Malcolm McDonald free videos and downloads @www.oxlearn.com