* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Prognostic benefits of heart rate reduction in cardiovascular disease
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup
Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Rheumatic fever wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup
European Heart Journal Supplements (2003) 5 (Supplement G), G10—G14 Prognostic benefits of heart rate reduction in cardiovascular disease R. Ferrari1,2, S. Censi1, F. Mastrorilli1 and A. Boraso2 1Cattedra di Cardiologia, Università di Ferrara, Ferrara Salvatore Maugeri, IRCCS, Cardiovascular Pathophysiology Research Centre, Gussago, Brescia, Italy 2Fondazione KEYWORDS Cellular energetic needs; Heart rate; Metabolic rate; Life expectancy Increased heart rate is associated with high blood pressure and metabolic disturbances that lead to hypertension, atherosclerosis and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this respect, elevated heart rate can be considered a marker of risk. Whole body temperature and energy needs are controlled by heart activity, and the ‘language’ employed by the heart could be considered its rate, which, via the intensity and frequency of shear stress, it uses to regulate endothelial function and vascular tone. A close link between body temperature, metabolism and heart rate has been observed, and so heart rate may determine metabolic demand and ‘control’ the duration of life. In mammals, the calculated number of heart beats in a lifetime is remarkably constant, despite a 40-fold difference in life expectancy. According to this view, a reduction in heart rate would increase life expectancy also in humans. The heart produces and utilizes approximately 30 kg adenosine triphosphate each day, and slowing its rate by 10 beats/min would result in a saving of about 5 kg in a day. Considering that heart rate is a major determinant of oxygen consumption and metabolic demand, heart rate reduction would be expected to diminish cardiac workload. Clinical studies with beta-blockers have already shown a reduction in mortality and improvement in outcome as a result of reduction in heart rate. © 2003 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved Introduction In the past decade, several studies have shown that resting heart rate is closely correlated to blood pressure and is prospectively related to atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension. Furthermore, epidemiological studies suggest that low heart rate is not only associated with decreased cardiovascular Correspondence: Prof. Roberto Ferrari, Cattedra di Cardiologia, University of Ferrara and Fondazione S. Maugeri, IRCCS, Cardiovascular Pathophysiology Research Centre, Corso Giovecca, 203, 44100 Ferrara, Italy. mortality but also with decreased all-cause mortality. Drugs that do not reduce heart rate after myocardial infarction have not been found to improve survival. A typical example is that of calcium channel blockers; the dihydropyridines, which increase heart rate, have no effect or could even worsen prognosis,1,2 whereas verapamil and diltiazem, which reduce heart rate, have a favourable effect.3,4 Mounting evidence indicates that increased heart rate is associated with high blood pressure and metabolic disturbances that lead to hypertension, atherosclerosis and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this respect, elevated 01520-765X/03/0G0010 + 05 $35.00/0 © 2003 The European Society of Cardiology, Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Benefits of heart rate reduction heart rate, and in particular low heart rate variability, can be considered a marker of risk and an independent factor in the induction of risk (i.e. for myocardial infarction). After myocardial infarction, reduction in heart rate variability — a measure of cardiac autonomic innervation by the brain — is a strong predictor of death. Loss of normal autonomic nervous system control of heart rate and rhythm is, in fact, an important risk factor for adverse cardiovascular events. The sympathetic overactivity that follows may explain the increase in heart rate and blood pressure, and metabolic abnormalities. With heart rate being a major determinant of oxygen consumption and metabolic demand, a decrease in rate would be expected to decrease cardiac workload. High heart rate increases the pulsatile nature of arterial blood flow and arterial stress. Experimental studies in monkeys have shown that heart rate can exert a direct atherogenic action on the arteries through increased wall stress.5,6 The body’s metabolic demand is controlled by heart rate Whole body temperature and energy need are controlled by heart activity, via its rate. The way in which the heart sends ‘messages’ and ‘talks’ to the whole body is through the circulatory system, with the help of the endothelium. The ‘language’ chosen by the heart is very probably its rate, via the intensity and frequency of shear stress, thus exerting an important regulatory role on endothelial function and vascular tone.7 This particular effect has been observed experimentally in monkeys, as previously reported.5,6 The endothelium releases nitric oxide and other vasoactive compounds in response to shear stress, thus regulating the degree of vasodilatation and therefore the amount of blood and oxygen delivered to peripheral muscles. The heart could be viewed as the connection between the central nervous system and the periphery, determining and regulating the activities of peripheral muscles via its rate. Physical activity regulates metabolic demand, which is determined by heart rate itself. Regression analysis on a logarithmic scale between body mass and metabolic demand among animals yields a straight line with the same slope as that between body mass and heart rate.8 There is a close link between temperature, metabolism and heart rate; therefore, because heart rate determines metabolic demand, a relationship between heart rate and lifespan may be produced for the entire animal kingdom, including humans. G11 In a lifetime the total number of heart beats is constant Among mammals, it has been observed that the calculated number of heart beats in a lifetime is remarkably constant, despite a 40-fold difference in life expectancy. When the number of heart beats in a lifetime is plotted against body weight, the range span is 0.5 million-fold, from hamster to whale.9 This can be summarized by reference to the fact that life and energy available are equally important in evolution, and the intrinsic concept can be interpreted as the less energy needed, the longer the lifespan. Azbel10 stressed the concept that smaller animals have a higher heart rate and shorter lifespan than do larger animals, with a 35-fold difference in heart rate and a 20-fold difference in lifespan, and suggested that life expectancy is predetermined by the basic energetics of living cells and that the inverse relationship between longevity and heart rate reflects an epiphenomenon in which heart rate is a marker for or a determinant of metabolic rate and energetic needs. In homeotherms a fall in body temperature is prevented by an increase in metabolic rate, which, as we know, is related to an increase in heart rate. In hibernating animals, the fall in metabolic rate is achieved by a drop in body temperature and heart rate. In marmots, mean heart rate drops to 3—5 beats/min in hibernation, from 150 beats/min. Following the observation of a constant total number of heart beats in a lifetime in mammals, there are good reasons to believe that this can be extended to the whole animal kingdom. A Galapagos tortoise has a heart rate of 6 beats/min and a life expectancy of 177 years, with a total number of heart beats of 5.6 × 108 in a lifetime.11 This figure is close to that obtained for a rat (6.3 × 108), with a heart rate of 240 beats/min and a life expectancy of about 5 years. Is prolongation of lifespan possible? In humans a reduction in heart rate could, in theory, prolong lifespan. Below, we analyze this possibility in detail. Coburn et al.12 tested this hypothesis in mice; those investigators fed the animals with digoxin and observed a prolongation of life and a slower heart rate in treated mice. However, treated mice had a lower body weight; this, together with other confounding factors, made it impossible to infer a clear cause—effect relationship. G12 Another aspect must be considered. With a heart rate of 70 beats/min and a life expectancy of 80 years, humans are already an exception to the equation for heart rate and life expectancy in mammals. The explanation is provided by a fundamental metabolic theory based on heat loss and production, the ratio of which increases as body size decreases. However, it is true that in the general population the risk for death for all causes, including cardiovascular events, is higher as resting heart rate increases. Several clinical studies have demonstrated that heart rate is an important risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, not only among patients with established heart disease13 or well-known cardiovascular risk factors such as atherosclerosis14 and hypertension,15 but also in the general population.16 Contraction of the heart The heart requires regular oscillations of cytoplasmic calcium (the ultimate messenger of contraction) and availability of energy [in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)] if it is to contract continuously. The mechanisms that are involved are finely regulated and result in a continuum of systole and diastole (i.e. heart beats). During each action potential cytoplasmic calcium transiently increases and interacts with the contractile elements, leading to contraction (i.e. systole), in the process known as excitation—contraction coupling. During excitation—contraction coupling, two different types of calcium channels are involved. In the sarcolemma the L-type/dihydropyridinesensitive calcium channels are opened by depolarization; this initiates the action potential, causing flux of calcium ions, following their electrochemical gradient, into the cytoplasm.17 However, the level of calcium reached is not sufficient to initiate contraction in the heart, but allows the release of further calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum through the ryanodinesensitive/calcium-release channels, via a mechanism known as calcium-induced calcium release.17,18 This increase in intracellular calcium concentration, to nearly millimolar levels, then leads to contraction. Other calcium channels have been identified in the sarcolemma of myocytes in the conduction system (e.g. the Purkinje fibres). The T-type calcium channels (also referred to as lowthreshold or low-voltage-activated channels) play a role in pacemaker activity and open in response R. Ferrari et al. to a smaller depolarization of the sarcolemma (approximately —40 mV) than is required by the L-type calcium channels (high-threshold or highvoltage-activated channels), which require depolarization to —20 mV from a resting potential of —80/—100 mV, to open and sustain contraction. T-type calcium channels (like sodium channels) participate in the early stage of pacemaker depolarization, and therefore they may contribute to initiation of the heart beat. Relaxation of the heart During diastole three main proteins are involved in the cell to lower calcium in the cytoplasm: the sodium—calcium exchanger and, with limited capacity, a calcium pump in the sarcolemma; and a more powerful calcium pump in the sarcoplasmic reticulum. In cardiac muscle, activity of the latter is regulated by a mechanism involving phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of phospholamban — a 27-kDa protein that is also associated with the sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane. Phospholamban phosphorylation leads to a marked increase in calcium transport activity across the sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane and, therefore, to cardiac muscle relaxation.17 Only during pathological conditions are mitochondria involved in removing calcium from the cytoplasm. There is in fact competition between mitochondrial calcium transport and ATP production as the two processes utilize the same electrochemical gradient.20 How the heart spends its energy The primary source of energy in the heart is ATP, which is used for electrical excitation, contraction, relaxation and recovery of the resting electrochemical gradients across membranes. Although the heart may suddenly increase its output by up to sixfold and so require a huge amount of energy, unlike other tissues it stores low quantities of ATP that are just sufficient to sustain a few beats. However, the low ATP levels in the heart are counterbalanced by a higher level of creatine phosphate, which permits availability of ATP from adenosine diphosphate in a phosphorylation reaction that is catalyzed by creatine kinase.21 In the myocyte ATP is synthesized in the mitochondria from various aerobic substrates.22 At rest ATP is generated from beta-oxidation of fatty acids (60—70%) and catabolism of carbohydrates Benefits of heart rate reduction (30%), including exogenous glucose and lactate. Amino acids and ketone bodies are less frequently utilized as substrates. In the presence of cardiac arrest or ventricular fibrillation, oxygen uptake by the heart is reduced by 60—70%. Therefore, most of the production of high-energy phosphates (i.e. ATP and creatine phosphate) via oxidative phosphorylation is used for contractile activity. ATP is hydrolyzed by myosin heads during contraction, but also in order to effect the reuptake of calcium into the sarcoplasmic reticulum and to remove it from the cytoplasm,23 or to transport sodium, potassium and calcium ions across the sarcolemma to maintain the resting potential. The sodium— potassium pump in the sarcolemma utilizes 10— 15% of total ATP and less than 5% is used for action potential generation and conduction.24 A small amount of ATP is also required for phosphorylation of proteins via cyclic adenosine monophosphate production or protein kinase activation. Furthermore, ATP is hydrolyzed to transport ions across mitochondrial membranes and for processes that maintain mitochondrial volume and structure, synthesis of triglycerides and glycogen (among other substances), and in futile cycles.23,24 However, of the total ATP, most is converted into heat and only 20—25% is turned into mechanical work. Benefits of heart rate reduction In humans the heart beats on average 100,800 times per day. This figure corresponds to 36.8 × 106 in a year and 29 × 108 heart beats in a lifetime (80 years on average). The heart produces and consumes approximately 30 kg ATP every day, such is its turnover, corresponding to nearly 11,000 kg per year and approximately 880,000 kg in a lifetime. It follows that each heart beat has its own cost — approximately 300 mg ATP. Considering the equation between heart rate and life expectancy in mammals,9 a decrease in heart rate from 70 to 60 beats/min would increase life expectancy from 80 to 93.3 years. This means that slowing the heart rate by 10 beats/min would result in a saving of about 5 kg ATP in a day. To produce ATP the myocardium needs oxygen, which is used by the mitochondria in oxidative phosphorylation. Azbel10 calculated that the basal oxygen consumption per body atom of all animals is approximately 10 molecules of oxygen in a lifetime. This figure corresponds to approximately 10—8 molecules of oxygen per heart beat.10 It is astonishing to see that the total number of heart beats in a lifetime calculated G13 using these data (10 × 108) is similar to the mean value observed among mammals (7.3 × 108).7 In the final analysis, all of these considerations lead back to heart rate, albeit using simplified figures, and may provide an idea of what powerful consequences heart rate reduction may yield at the cellular level. Considering that oxygen delivery to heart muscle occurs mainly during diastole, via the coronary flow, it is important to note the threat of reduced oxygen delivery in the damaged heart, such as in ischaemic heart disease and certain forms of heart failure. These conditions improve if agents that lower heart rate are administered.2,3,25—27 As noted at the start of the present review, heart rate is a major determinant of oxygen consumption and metabolic demand, and heart rate reduction would be expected to diminish cardiac workload. Conclusion The use of beta-blockers would improve myocardial energy balance and induce a less negative force— frequency relationship. The saving of energy at the myocardial level therefore represents just one aspect of the equation between heart rate and life expectancy, the other being a reduction in the metabolic rate of the body. Interestingly, the increase in mortality among people with a high heart rate is mostly attributed to a higher risk for death from coronary artery disease. Atrial fibrillation, especially in the post-operative period, is a common complication of cardiac surgery, and a combination of beta-blockers and/ or calcium channel blockers would be a logical treatment. Thus, the heart determines heart rate, and heart rate itself can be harmful to the heart; otherwise stated, the heart is the cause and the target of the same paradigm. At present, it is not clear whether a primary reduction in heart rate may effectively prolong life in patients, although many clinical studies suggest that agents that decrease heart rate do improve survival in patients with myocardial infarction,28 hypertension and heart failure.29,30 A controlled reduction in heart rate, without altering the normal variability, is a worthy therapeutic objective not only in the whole population but also, and especially, in those patients who are at risk for cardiovascular events. References 1. Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Meyer JV. Nifedipine. Dose-related increase in mortality in patients with heart disease. Circulation 1995;92:1326—31. G14 2. Gibson RS, Boden WE. Calcium channel antagonists: friend or foe in postinfarction patients? Am J Hypertens 1996;9: 172S—6S. 3. The Multicenter Diltiazem Postinfarction Trial Research Group. Effect of diltiazem on mortality and reinfarction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1988;319:385— 92. 4. The Danish Study Group on Verapamil in Myocardial Infarction. Effect of verapamil on mortality and major events after acute myocardial infarction (The Danish Verapamil Infarction Trial II — DAVIT II). Am J Cardiol 1990; 66:779—85. 5. Beere PA, Glagov S, Zarins CK. Experimental atherosclerosis at the carotid bifurcation of the cynomolgus monkey. Localization, compensatory enlargement, and the sparing effect of lowered heart rate. Arterioscler Thromb 1992; 12:1245—53. 6. Beere PA, Glagov S, Zarins CK. Retarding effect of lowered heart rate on coronary atherosclerosis. Science 1984;226: 180—2. 7. Rubanyi GM, Romero JC, Vanhoutte PM. Flow-induced release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Am J Physiol 1986;250:H1145—9. 8. Schmidt-Nielsen K. Animal physiology: adaptation and environment. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1975. 9. Levine HJ. Rest heart rate and life expectancy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1104—6. 10. Azbel MY. Universal biological scaling and mortality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:12453—7. 11. Spector WS. Handbook of biological data. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1956. 12. Coburn AF, Grey RM, Rivera SM. Observations on the relation of heart rate, life span, weight and mineralization in the digoxin-treated A/J mouse. Johns Hopkins Med J 1971; 128:169—93. 13. Hjalmarson A, Gilpin E, Kjekshus J et al. Influence of heart rate on mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:547—53. 14. Palatini P, Julius S. The physiological determinants and risk correlations of elevated heart rate. Am J Hypertens 1999; 12:3S—8S. 15. Gillman M, Kannel W, Belanger A, D’Agostino R. Influence of heart rate on mortality among persons with hypertension: the Framingham Study. Am Heart J 1993;125:1148— 54. R. Ferrari et al. 16. Kannel W, Kannel C, Paffenbarger R, Cupples A. Heart rate and cardiovascular mortality: The Framingham Study. Am Heart J 1987;113:1489—94. 17. Bers DM. Excitation—contraction coupling and cardiac contractile force. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1991. 18. Fabiato A. Appraisal of the physiological relevance of two hypotheses for the mechanism of calcium release from the mammalian cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum: calciuminduced release versus charge-coupled release. Mol Cell Biochem 1989;89:135—40. 19. Tada M, Kadoma M, Fujii J, Kimura Y, Kijima Y. Molecular structure and function of phospholamban: the regulatory protein of calcium pump in cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. Adv Exp Med Biol 1989;255:79—89. 20. Opie LH. The heart: physiology and metabolism. New York, Raven Press, 1991. 21. Balaban RS. Regulation of oxidative phosphorylation in the mammalian cell. Am J Physiol 1990;258:C377—89. 22. Clausen T, van Hardeveld C, Everts ME. Significance of cation transport in control of energy metabolism in thermogenesis. Physiol Rev 1991;71:733—74. 23. Gudbjarnason S, Mathes P, Ravens KG. Functional compartmentation of ATP and creatine phosphate in heart muscle. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1970;1:325—39. 24. Newsholme EA, Chaliss RAJ, Crabtree B. Substrate cycles: their role in improving sensitivity in metabolic control. Trends Biochem Sci 1984;9:277—80. 25. Kjekshus J. Importance of heart rate in determining betablocker efficacy in acute and long-term myocardial infarction intervention trials. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:43F—9F. 26. Furberg CD, Hawkins CM, Lichstein E, for the Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial Study Group. Effect of propranolol in postinfarction patients with mechanical or electrical complications. Circulation 1984;69:761—5. 27. Ferrari R. Prognosis of PTS with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction treatment with calcium channel antagonists. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:22—5. 28. Hjalmarson A. Significance of reduction of heart rate in cadiovascular disease. Clin Cardiol 1998;21:II3—7. 29. Lechat P. Beta-blocker treatment in heart failure. Role of heart rate reduction. Basic Res Cardiol 1998;93:148—55. 30. Packer M, Colucci WS, Sackner-Bernstein JD et al. Doubleblind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of carvedilol in patients with moderate to severe heart failure. Circulation 1996;94:2793—9.