Download Transient right axis deviation during anterior wall

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup

History of invasive and interventional cardiology wikipedia , lookup

Angina wikipedia , lookup

Drug-eluting stent wikipedia , lookup

Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup

Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup

Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Seediscussions,stats,andauthorprofilesforthispublicationat:http://www.researchgate.net/publication/19449464
Transientrightaxisdeviationduringanterior
wallinfarctionorischemia:
Electrocardiographicandangiographic
correlation
ARTICLEinJOURNALOFTHEAMERICANCOLLEGEOFCARDIOLOGY·AUGUST1986
ImpactFactor:16.5·DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80087-0·Source:PubMed
CITATIONS
READS
26
27
6AUTHORS,INCLUDING:
AlexSagie
BorisStrasberg
MeirMedicalCenter
RabinMedicalCenter
195PUBLICATIONS4,132CITATIONS
270PUBLICATIONS4,033CITATIONS
SEEPROFILE
SEEPROFILE
EldadRechavia
RabinMedicalCenter
106PUBLICATIONS1,940CITATIONS
SEEPROFILE
Availablefrom:AlexSagie
Retrievedon:30November2015
27
JACC Vol. 8, No.1
July 1986:27-31
Transient Right Axis Deviation During Acute Anterior Wall Infarction
or Ischemia: Electrocardiographic and Angiographic Correlation
SAMUEL SCLAROVSKY, MD, ALEX SAGlE, MD, BORIS STRASBERG, MD, FACC,
RUBEN F. LEWIN, MD , ELDAD REHAVIA, MD , JACOB AGMON, MD, FACC
Tel Aviv , Israel
Eleven patients, three with acute anterior myocardial
infarction and eight with anterior ischemia, who developed transient right axis deviation with a left posterior
hemiblock pattern during the acute phase of myocardial
infarction or ischemia are described (study group). A
correlation between their electrocardiographic pattern
and the angiographic findings was made. The arteriographic findings were compared with those of a group
of 24 patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction
or ischemia without transient right axis deviation (control group).
The main electrocardiographic characteristics of the
right axis deviation pattern were: 1) an average shift of
the mean frontal axis to the right of 4r (10° to 94°); 2)
increased voltage of R waves in leads II, III and aVF
and appearance of small Q waves or decreased voltage
of Q waves if previously present in the same leads; 3)
decreased voltage of R waves and appearance of deep 8
Left anterior hemiblock is the most frequent type of intraventricular conduction defect observed in the course of anterior myocardial infarction ( I ). Its frequent appearance is
explained by the thin structure of this fascicle , which receives its blood supply mainly from the left anterior descending coronary artery and which is often vulnerable to
ischemic and necrotic insults (2, 3). Right axis deviation and
left posterior hemiblock are by far the least frequent of all
the intraventricular condu ction defects during acute anterior
myocardial infarction (4, 5) . Their infrequent appearance is
explained by the double blood supply to the posterior fascicle of the left bundle branch (6).
We describe 11 patients with anterior myocardial infarction or ischemia who developed transient right axis deviation
From the Israel and lone Massada Center for Heart Diseases , Beilinson
Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel and the Tel Aviv University Sackler
School of Medicine, Tel Avi v, Israel.
Manuscript received October 3 1. 1985 ; revi sed manuscript received
January 20, 1986, accepted February 3, 1986 .
Addres s for reprints: Jacob Agmon , MD, Massada Center for Heart
Diseases, Beilinson Medical Center, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel.
© 1986 by the Americ an College of Cardiology
waves in lead aVL; and 4) inverted T waves and isoelectric 81' segments in leads II, III and aVF.
Coronary angiography revealed that the study group
had a higher incidence of significant right coronary artery obstruction and collateral circulation between the
left coronary system and the posterior descending artery
than did the control group (100 versus 25% and 73 versus 0%, respectively; p < 0.01). There were no differences between the groups regarding left anterior descending and circumflex artery disease. Transient right
axis deviation during anterior myocardial infarction or
ischemia represents different degrees of left posterior
hemiblock, which is probably a consequence of decreased blood supply to the left posterior fascicle and is
highly correlated with the presence of significant right
coronary artery stenosis and collateral circulation between the right and left coronary systems.
(J Am Coil CardioI1986;8:27-31)
with a left posterior hemiblock pattern during the acute phase
of infarction or ischemia. The purpose of this study was:
I) to describe the electrocardiographic phenomena of transient right axis deviation during the acute phase of anterior
myocard ial infarction or ischemia; 2) to determine whether
there is a correlation between this uncommon electrocardiographic pattern and the coronary angiographic findings;
and 3) to compare the angiographic findings in these patient s
with those of a similar group of patients with acute anterior
myocardial infarction or ischemia but no right axis deviat ion
during the acute phase of infarction or ischemia.
Methods
Study patients. The hospital records of 1,800 patients
admitted to our intensive coronary care unit with evidence
of acute anterior myocardial infarction or ischemia during
the 4 year period from January 1980 to January 1984 were
reviewed . Of these 1,800 patients , 40 (2.8%) had transient
right axis deviation during the acute event according to
criteria defined later. Eleven (25%) of these patients (three
0735-1097/86/$3.50
28
SCLAROVSKY ET AL.
RIGHT AXIS DEVIATION IN MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA
JACC Vol. 8. No. I
July 1986:27-31
with myocardial infarction and eight with ischemia) underwent coronary angiography within 2 weeks of the acute
event and constitute the study group . A consecutive group
of 24 patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction or
ischemia without transient right axis deviation during the
acute phase, who underwent coronary angiography within
2 weeks of the acute event, were selected as the control
group. The important clinical characteristics of these two
groups of patients are presented in Table I.
The diagnosis of acute anterior myocardial infarction
was established by a history of chest pain , appearance of
new pathologic Q waves in precordial chest leads V2 to V4
and a typical elevation of serum cardiac enzymes. Acute
anterior wall ischemia was defined as any transient changes
in T waves or ST segment, or both, in precordial chest leads
V I to V4 during episodes of typical chest pain and without
subsequent elevation in cardiac enzymes .
Transient right axis deviation was defined as axis deviation of the mean frontal plane to the right at any range with
the following patterns: I) increased voltage of R waves and
appearance of small Q waves or decreased voltage of Q
waves if previously present in leads II, III and aVF; 2)
decreased voltage of R waves and appearance of deep S
waves in lead aVL; 3) decreased voltage of R waves in lead
I with or without appearance of S waves; and 4) inverted
T waves and isoelectric ST segments in leads III and aVF.
All these changes had to be transient and to appear during
the hyperacute phase of anterior myocardial infarction or
ischemia. For patients with myocardial infarction, right axis
deviation had to disappear within 6 hours ; for patients with
myocardial ischemia, it had to disappear once the ischemic
event subsided (usually in less than 30 minutes). Patients
with right axis deviation due to right ventricular hypertro-
Table 1. Patient Characteristics
Age (yr)
Mean
Range
Male
Female
Risk factors
Arterial hypertension
Diabetes mellitus
Smoking
Hyperlipidemia
Previous infarction
Anterior wall
Inferior wall
Acute event
Anterior wall ischemia
Anterior wall infarction
NS
=
not significant.
Study Group
(II patients)
Control Group
(24 patients)
63
43 to 72
7 (64%)
4 (36%)
56.6
42 to 75
21 (88%)
3 (13%)
5
6
6
2
9
2
7
(45%)
(54%)
(54%)
(18%)
(82%)
(18%)
(64%)
7 (25%)
4 (17%)
14 (56%)
2 (8%)
< 0.0 1
8 (73%)
3 (27%)
15 (63%)
9 (37%)
NS
NS
p Value
NS
0
2 (8%)
0
< 0.01
NS
phy, lateral wall myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism or a vertical heart were excluded.
Coronary angiographic analysis. The coronary angiographic films were reviewed independently by two observers
without knowledge of the clinical or electrocardiographic
findings . Coronary stenosis of greater than 70% of the luminal diameter in any view and stenosis of greater than 50%
of the left main coronary artery were considered significant.
The posterior descending artery was carefully evaluated.
Anterograde filling was considered present if the posterior
descending artery filled from the right coronary artery. Retrograde filling was considered present if this artery filled
through collateral vessels from the left coronary system .
Statistical analysis. The statistical analysis was done
by comparison of two sample proportions by the normal
difference test and by the t test for paired data.
Results
Electrocardiographic findings (Fig. 1 and 2; Table 2).
By study design all II patients studied met our criteria for
transient right axis deviation. The average mean frontal axis
was 79° (range 50 to 124) during the acute phase and 37°
(range 18 to 60) after the acute phase (p < 0.01). The
average right axis deviation was 42° (range 10 to 94). Right
bundle branch block was present in 2 of the II patients.
The control group had no electrocardiographic criteria
for transient right axis deviation. The average mean frontal
axis was 3.1° (range - 45 to 60) during the acute phase and
12° (range - 45 to 60) after the acute phase (p = NS).
There was an average 9° deviation of the axis to the left.
The difference between the two groups in the mean frontal
axis during and after the acute phase was highly significant
(p < 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively) .
Coronary angiographic findings (Table 3). Right coronary artery disease. In all II study patients there was significant stenosis of the right coronary artery . In seven (64%)
there was total obstruction and in the remaining four (36%)
there was greater than 90% stenosis. In contrast, only 6
(25%) of the 24 patients in the control group had significant
stenosis of the right coronary artery (p < 0.01) .
Left anterior descending and circumflex artery disease.
There was no statistical difference between the groups regarding the extent of disease in the left anterior descending
and circumflex arteries. There was 100% correlation between electrocardiographic signs of anterior myocardial infarction or ischemia and the presence of significant obstruction of the left anterior descending coronary artery.
Posterior descending artery filling. Retrograde filling of
the posterior descending artery through collateral vessels
from the left coronary system was observed in eight patients
(73%) from the study group. Collateral circulation was supplied by the left anterior descending artery in seven patients
and by the left circumflex artery in the remaining one . In
29
SCLAROVSKY ET AL.
RIGHT AXIS DEVIATION IN MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA
JACC Vol. 8, No.1
July 1986:27-31
R
l
v
F
7.10.82
700
A
7.10
-----7.10
r
9'"
C
contrast, no patient from the control group showed retrograde filling of the right coronary artery.
Number of vessels involved . Eight patients (73%) from
the study group had three vessel disease and none had one
vessel disease. In contrast, II patients (46%) from the control group had one vessel disease and only 6 (25%) had
three vessel disease (p < 0.01).
Discussion
Right axis deviation versus left posterior hemiblock.
In their original description, Rosenbaum et aI. (7,8) diagnosed left posterior hemiblock when an axis of 120° was
reached. Nevertheless, several investigators (9-14) have
utilized lesser degrees of right axis deviation as a requirement for this diagnosis. Rosenbaum et al. (8) also, in fact,
expressed the opinion that left posterior hemiblock may
occur with lesser degrees of right axis deviation, which
probably represent incomplete forms of left posterior hemiblock. Eliminating other causes of right axis deviation such
as lateral myocardial infarction, right ventricular hypertrophy and a vertical heart, it is reasonable to assume that the
acute shift in the electrical axis to the right is due to increasing block of the left posterior fascicle (13,15,16) .
L,
R
\
12.5
.
L
Figure 1. Case 11. Example of transient right axis deviation with
a left posterior hemiblock pattern during anterior wall ischemia in
a patient with oldinferior andanterior wall infarction. A, Obtained
2 hours before theischemic event, showingoldinferior andanterior
wall myocardial infarction. D, Obtained during severe chest pain,
showing new ST segment elevation in precordial leads V2 to V5
and increasedvoltage ofR waves inleads II, IIIandaVF, decreased
voltage of Q waves in leads III and aYF and decreased voltage of
R waves with appearance of a deep S wave in lead aVL. C,
Obtained 15 minutes after the acute anterior wall ischemic event
subsided. The frontal axis has returned to the preischemic value.
In this study the average shift of the mean frontal axis
to the right was 42°. In four cases (Patients 2,5 ,7 and 10)
there was only a slight shift of the electrical axis to the right
(12°, 12°, 10° and 10°, respectively){Table 2) but all patients
had the pattern of left posterior hemiblock. In only one case
Figure2. Case 1. Example of transient right axis deviation before.
during and after the hyperacute phase of anterior wall infarction.
A, Slight right axis before the acute event. D, Right axis deviation
with a leftposterior hemiblock pattern during thehyperacute phase
of anterior wall infarction. C, Obtained 2 hours later. showing a
lesser degree of right axis deviation.
F
72!l -"'-..........
,
A
• ........ -.",.- - - - -
12.5 I
1I
-
1022-
I
B
.J
..., ,
30
SCLAROVSKY ET AL.
RIGHT AXIS DEVIAnON IN MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA
JACC Vol. 8, No.1
July 1986:27-31
Table 2. Electrocardiographic Data of the 11 Study
Group Patients
Mean Frontal Axis
Without Ischemia
Mean Frontal Axis
During Ischemia
Right Axis
Deviation
Case
(0)
(0)
(")
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
30
66
30
30
64
20
40
46
20
40
10
37
74
78
124
98
76
74
50
88
60
50
64
79
44
12
94
68
12
54
10
42
40
10
54
42
Average
(Patient 3) was the resultant axis more than 120°; this occurred in a patient with associated right bundle branch block.
The main electrocardiographic characteristics of left
posterior hemiblock in our study were: I) increased R wave
voltage in leads II, III and aVF and the appearance of small
Q waves or decreased voltage of Q waves if previously
present in the same leads; 2) decreased R wave voltage and
the appearance of deep S waves in lead aVL; and 3) inverted
T waves and isoelectric ST segments in leads II, III and
aVF. This last point is of great importance, because during
inferior wall ischemia the electrical axis shifts toward the
lead recording the acute event and produces a pattern resembling left posterior hemiblock. In this situation the T
waves and ST segment also shift to the right (positive T
wave and ST segment elevation). This phenomenon is difTable 3. Angiographic Findings
Left main stenosis >50%
RCA stenosis
100%
>90%
>70%<90%
LAD stenosis
100%
>70%
LCx stenosis
100%
>70%
Extent of disease
Single vessel
Double vessel
Triple vessel
PDA filling
Anterograde filling
Retrograde filling
Study Group
(II patients)
Control Group
(24 patients)
3 (27%)
II (100%)
7 (64%)
4 (36%)
0
II (100%)
4 (36%)
7 (63%)
6 (55%)
1(9%)
5 (46%)
3 (12.5%)
6 (25%)
1(4%)
2 (8%)
3 (12.5%)
24 (100%)
4 (17%)
20 (83%)
9 (38%)
0
9 (38%)
p Value
<0.01
<0.01
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0
3 (27%)
8 (73%)
II (46%)
7 (29%)
6 (25%)
<0.01
3 (27%)
8 (73%)
24 (100%)
0
<0.01
<0.01
NS
<0.01
LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; LCx = left circumflex
coronary artery; NS = notsignificant; PDA = posterior descending artery;
RCA = right coronary artery.
ferent from that of left posterior hemiblock because it is due
to an acute focal conduction defect. In all of our cases the
ST segments were isoelectric and the T waves inverted,
which indicates that the right axis deviation is probably a
consequence of some degree of left posterior hemiblock and
not due to acute ischemia in the posterior wall. Nevertheless,
the reduction in blood flow could not be selective to the
posterior fascicle alone, so there was probably some degree
of ischemia to the inferior wall as well. It is possible that
in these cases either the ischemia was not severe enough to
cause electrocardiographic changes or these changes were
obscured by the left posterior hemiblock or the anterior wall
ischemic changes.
A further possibility is that in the patients who developed
right axis deviation, the blood supply to the left posterior
fascicle was dependent on the left coronary system, because
most of them had old inferior wall infarction. For the six
patients in the control group with old inferior infarction but
without a right axis shift, it is possible that the anterior wall
ischemia was not severe enough to limit the blood supply
to the posterior fascicle or that, despite the inferior infarction, blood supply to the fascicle through the right coronary
artery was maintained. Other factors such as stretch or mechanical coupling between normal and ischemic (anterior
wall) tissue that could influence left posterior fascicle conduction unrelated to local ischemia cannot be excluded.
The significance of right axis deviation in relation to
the extent of coronary artery disease. It is well known
that anterior myocardial infarction or ischemia is associated
with left axis deviation and left anterior hemiblock in about
10% of cases. This association is explained by the anatomic
fact that the anterior fascicle of the left bundle branch receives its blood supply mainly from the left anterior descending artery, which is the vessel involved in most cases
of anterior myocardial infarction or ischemia. Inferior myocardial infarction is associated with right axis deviation during the acute phase in a large number of cases (15). The
frequent appearance of right axis deviation is explained by
the fact that the posterior fascicle receives its blood supply
partly from the posterior descending artery, which is the
vessel involved in most cases of posterior myocardial infarction (4). The right axis deviation probably represents an
incomplete form of left posterior hemiblock. It has been
shown (17-20) that selective left coronary dye injection can
produce transient left axis deviation and left anterior hemiblock and that right coronary dye injection produces the
reverse changes, namely transient right axis deviation. These
electrocardiographic phenomena can be explained by the
same anatomic facts just described.
In this study we observed an unusual appearance of transient right axis deviation during the hyperacute phase of
anterior myocardial infarction or ischemia. To explain this
electrocardiographic phenomenon we searched for an angiographic correlation. We found that in all of our 11 cases
the right coronary artery was severely stenotic, and in 7
JACC Vol. 8, No. I
July 1986:27-31
cases (63%) it was totally obstructed. In eight cases (73%)
the posterior descending artery filled retrogradely from collateral vessels of the left coronary artery. The left anterior
descending artery , as expected , was severely obstructed in
all cases. From these angiographic findings we assume that
during anterior myocardial infarction or ischemia there is
total or near total reduction of flow through the left anterior
descending artery . The posterior descending artery , which
originally filled retrogradely from the left anterior descending artery, has a reduction in its blood supply to the posterior
fascicle, which becomes ischemic , and right axis deviation
occurs . In the three cases in which there was no collateral
circulation between the left and right coronary systems, we
assume that the reduction of flow through the left anterior
descending artery during anterior ischemia in the presence
of severe right coronary artery stenosis is great enough to
make the posterior fascicle partially ischemic and result in
only slight right axis deviation (Cases 2, 5 and 7).
In the control group there was no collateral circulation
between the left and right coronary systems and significant
right coronary artery stenosis was present in only 25% of
the 24 cases. These difference s from the study group were
statistically significant. However, seven patients (64%) in
the study group had a history of old inferior myocardial
infarction as compared with only two patients (8%) in the
control group and in this sense the two groups are not identical. One can state that the electrocardiographic evidence
of old inferior wall myocardial infarction is sufficient to
predict the presence of significant right coronary artery stenosis . However, during the acute ischemic phase when there
is right axis deviation, the Q waves in leads II, III and aVF
become smaller and the signs of old inferior myocardial
infarction are obscured. We could predict the presence of
right coronary artery stenosis in such cases from the occurrence of right axis deviation during anterior wall ischemia. Moreover, in four cases without old inferior myocardial infarction we could predict the presence of severe
right coronary artery stenosis.
Conclusions and clinical implications. I) Transient right
axis deviation during anterior wall ischemia or infarction is
highly correlated with the presence of significant right coronary artery stenosis (sensitivity 100%). 2) Transient right
axis deviation during anterior wall ischemia or infarction is
highly sensitive in predicting the presence of collateral circulation between the right and left coronary systems . 3) The
study group represents a subgroup of patients with severe
two or three vessel disease. 4) The absence of right axis
deviation during anterior wall ischemia or infarction does
not preclude the existence of right coronary artery disease
(specificity 75%). 5) The right axis shift may obscure the
diagnosis of inferior myocardial infarction .
Patients who develop transient right axis deviation with
a left posterior hemiblock pattern during anterior myocardial
infarction or ischemia represent a group of patients with
severe coronary artery disease. The clinician can predict
SCLAROVSKY ET AL.
RIGHT AXIS DEVIATION IN MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA
31
with high probability the presence of severe right coronary
artery stenosis and collateral circulation between the right
and left coronary systems . This subgroup of patients may
be candidates for early coronary angiography.
The acute right axis shifts may be quite minimal and
difficult to perceive if they are not specifically sought. In
addition , after the disappearance of the right axis shifts ,
signs of old inferior myocardial infarction should be looked
for.
References
I . Buyukozturk K, Korbut F, Meric M. Prognostic significance of isolated left anterior hemiblock and left axis deviation in the course of
acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1977;39:1192-5.
2. Lenegre J. Etiology and pathology of bilateral bundle branch block
in relation to complete heart block. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1964;6:409-44.
3. Massing GK, James TN . Anatomical configuration of the His bundle
and proximal bundle branches in the human heart. Circulation
1971;64(suppl 11):11-43-4.
4. Marriott HJL, Hogan P. Hemiblock in acute myocardial infarction.
Chest 1970;58:342-4 .
5. Scheinmen M, Brenman B. Clinical and anatomic implications of
intraventricular conduction blocks in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1972;46:753-60.
6. Castellanos A Jr, Myerburg RJ. The Hemiblocks in Myocardial infarction. New York: Appleton Century Crofts, 1976:91.
7. Rosenbaum MB, Elizari MR, Lazzari JO. The Hemiblocks . Oldsmar ,
FL: Tampa Tracing, 1970:94- 6.
8. Rosenbaum MB, Elizari MV, Lazzari JO, Kratz A, Da Ruestt O. The
clinical causes and mechanism of intraventricular conduction disturbances. in: Schlant RS, Hurst JW, eds. Advances in Electrocardiography. New York: Grone & Stratton , 1972:157-60.
9. Ferrer MI. The significance of axis deviation. Chest 1972;61:2-3 .
10. Medrano GA , Brenes CP, Micheli A, Sodi Pallares D. Clinical,
electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic diagnosis of left posterior hemiblock, isolated or associated with right bundle branch block .
Am Heart J 1972;84:727-37.
II . Lopes VM, Pereira Miguel JM , Des Res DD, Da costa BCB, De
Padva F. Left posterior hemiblock: clinical and vectorcardiographic
study of twenty cases. J ElectrocardioI1974;7:197-214.
12. Glasser SP, Flannery EP, Czarenckis W. Intermittent isolated left
posterior fascicular block. Am J Med Sci 1971;261:155-60.
13. Laham J , Maquad J, Heller J , DuPuis B, Gerbaux A. L'Hemiblock
posterieur gauche isole au associe. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris)
1978;27:199-208.
14. Lewin RF, Sclarovsky S, Strasberg B, Arditti A, Erdberg A, Agmon
J. Right axis deviation in acute myocardial infarction. Clinical significance, hospital evolution and long term follow-up . Chest
1984;85:489-93.
15. Castellanos A Jr, Myerburg RJ. In Ref.6:88-127.
16. Bobba P, Salerano JA, Casari A. Transient left posterior hemiblock .
Circulation 1972;46:931-8 .
17. Smith RF, Hartorne JW, Sanders CA. Vectorcardiographic changes
during intracoronary injections. Circulation 1967;36:63-76.
18. Maytin 0 , Castillo CA, Castellanos J Jr. The genesis ofQRS changes
produced by selective coronary arteriography and left heart catheterization. Circulation 1970;49:247-55 .
19. Rosenbaum M, Shabetai R, Peterson K. et al. Nature of the conduction
disturbance in selective coronary arteriography and left heart catheterization. Am J Cardiol 1972;30:334-7 .
20. Fernandez F, Heller J, Trevi GP. et al. The QRS loop in left anterior
and posterior hemiblocks. Vectorcardiographic study during selective
coronary arteriography. Am J Cardiol 1972;29:337-43.