* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lab 6: Work-Energy Theorem
Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup
Internal energy wikipedia , lookup
Specific impulse wikipedia , lookup
Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Hunting oscillation wikipedia , lookup
Newton's theorem of revolving orbits wikipedia , lookup
Mass versus weight wikipedia , lookup
Equipartition theorem wikipedia , lookup
Brouwer fixed-point theorem wikipedia , lookup
Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup
Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup
Kinetic energy wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Work (thermodynamics) wikipedia , lookup
LAB 6 Work–Energy Theorem OBJECTIVES 1. To study the interplay between the work done on an object and its change in kinetic energy. 2. Predict and compare how the work done on an object changes its kinetic energy. EQUIPMENT Dynamics track, force sensor, photogate pulley sensor, photogate timers, simple pendulum, supports, masses, steel balls, string. THEORY The Work-Energy theorem states that if net force is applied to an object a distance, the work done changes the kinetic energy of the object such that W F d K K 2 K1 21 mv 22 21 mv12 PROCEDURE Part 1: Work-Energy Theorem applied to a Cart-Mass System a. Hang a mass over a pulley to provide a constant force to the cart. How big is that force? Hint: it’s not equal to mhangingg. Predict the work WT done on the cart by the string using the fact that it traveled a distance d. b. Using a motion sensor (set Capstone to measure velocity to 3 significant figures) to measure the cart’s maximum velocity. Repeat ten times, determine vexpt and σv, and record your data a table. At this point, you should measure the mass of the cart and hanging mass. c. From the velocity vexpt, determine the change in kinetic energy ∆Kexpt of the cart. d. Propagate the velocity error σv to the change in kinetic energy error σK using σK = 2∆Kexpt σv / vexpt. Plot a 2 σK-distribution curve for your data. e. Is the predicted work WT consistent with a 2 σK-distribution curve from your data? That is, are the quantities WT and ∆Kexpt as predicted by the work-energy theorem? Explain. f. The work done by friction W f was not accounted for in this experiment. Here is the way to estimate this work. Give the cart a light push while recording its speed and position (no hanging mass). Measure the deceleration due to friction and then calculate the force of friction using N2L. Now estimate the work done by friction W f in the original experiment and recalculate the net work done on the cart from (1a). Does the net work done Wnet,thy = W T – W f on the cart fall within the 2 σKdistribution curve from your data? Part 2: Work-Energy Theorem applied to the Simple Pendulum with a Peg When the bob of a simple pendulum of length L is released from rest from a horizontal position, it swings down and the string will hit a thin peg located a distance d below the support. Using the work-energy theorem, predict the minimum length of d such that the bob just swings completely around in a circle. a. Experimentally locate the peg’s location such that the bob is able to just swings completely around in a circle – this is your measured peg’s location. Have everyone in your lab group measure this once and average these values to determine dexpt. 1 b. Predicting dthy using the Work-Energy theorem Write an expression for the net work done on the pendulum’s bob such that the work done on the bob from point A is able to swing completely around in a circle at point C. Hint: W AB increases the ∆K while W BC decreases ∆K. Using the centripetal acceleration from N2L, predict the minimum velocity vthy required for the bob to just swing completely around in a circle. In other words, apply Newton’s condition for circular motion at point C. Combine the calculations from (2b) and (2c) using the work-energy theorem, and predict the minimum value of dthy. c. Compare the experimental measured dexpt with the predicted dthy using a percent difference. How do they compare? Is the work-energy theorem consistent within experimental errors? Explain. 2