* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Genetic regulation of vertebrate eye development
Primary transcript wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics in stem-cell differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Clin Genet 2014: 86: 453–460 Printed in Singapore. All rights reserved © 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd CLINICAL GENETICS doi: 10.1111/cge.12493 Developmental Biology: Frontiers for Clinical Genetics Section Editors: Jacques L. Michaud, e-mail: [email protected] Bruno Reversade, e-mail: [email protected] Genetic regulation of vertebrate eye development Zagozewski J.L., Zhang Q., Eisenstat D.D. Genetic regulation of vertebrate eye development. Clin Genet 2014: 86: 453–460. © John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2014 Eye development is a complex and highly regulated process that consists of several overlapping stages: (i) specification then splitting of the eye field from the developing forebrain; (ii) genesis and patterning of the optic vesicle; (iii) regionalization of the optic cup into neural retina and retina pigment epithelium; and (iv) specification and differentiation of all seven retinal cell types that develop from a pool of retinal progenitor cells in a precise temporal and spatial manner: retinal ganglion cells, horizontal cells, cone photoreceptors, amacrine cells, bipolar cells, rod photoreceptors and Müller glia. Genetic regulation of the stages of eye development includes both extrinsic (such as morphogens, growth factors) and intrinsic factors (primarily transcription factors of the homeobox and basic helix-loop helix families). In the following review, we will provide an overview of the stages of eye development highlighting the role of several important transcription factors in both normal developmental processes and in inherited human eye diseases. Conflict of interest None to declare. J.L. Zagozewskia , Q. Zhangb and D.D. Eisenstata,c,d a Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, b Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, c Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, and d Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Key words: bHLH genes – eye malformations – genetic eye diseases – homeobox genes – retina development – transcription factor Corresponding author: Professor David D. Eisenstat, MD, MA, FRCPC, Departments of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Room 8-43B Medical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2H7, Canada. Tel.:780-492-9738; fax: 780-492-1998; e-mail: [email protected] Received 30 June 2014, revised and accepted for publication 20 August 2014 Vertebrate eye development is a complex process regulated by intrinsic and extrinsic factors that work in concert to specify an area of the forebrain as the prospective eye field (EF), and then produce the neural retina (NR). Their importance is shown in the ocular abnormalities that result from inherited mutations (Table 1). Eye development begins at the late gastrula stage when the EF is organized and bilaterally separated in the neural plate (1, 2). At embryonic day (E) 8.5, the optic vesicles (OVs) appear and evaginate laterally from the forebrain, growing towards the overlying surface ectoderm (Fig. 1a, Table 2) (3). As the OV comes in close contact with the surface ectoderm, the surface ectoderm thickens into the lens placode (LP). Then, the OV and the LP invaginate, forming the optic cup (OC) and the lens (Fig. 1b,c). The OC consists of two layers: the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and the NR. The NR develops further into the mature trilaminated retina (Fig. 1d). In this review, we highlight the genetic mechanisms integral to eye development, with an emphasis on the NR and on the role of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) and homeobox gene transcription factors. 453 Zagozewski et al. Table 1. Transcription factors mutated in ocular diseases Transcription factor Disease(s) Crx Cone-rod dystrophy Leber congenital amaurosis Retinitis pigmentosa Microphthalmia Aniridia Ocular coloboma Coloboma of optic nerve Microphthalmia Holoprosencephaly Microphthalmia with cataract Microphthalmia Micropththalmia Micropththlamia with coloboma Nrl Otx2 Pax6 Rax Six3 Six6 Vax1 Vsx2 Phenotype MIM number Gene MIM number 120970 613829 613750 610125 106210 120200 120430 611038 157170 212550 614402 610093 610092 602225 602225 162080 600037 607108 607108 607108 601881 603714 606326 604294 142993 142993 Fig. 1. Overview of vertebrate eye development. The OVs are the first visible structures of the vertebrate eye. The OVs evaginate from the midline of the forebrain towards the overlying SE (a). Once OV contact is made with the thickened SE, which is now the LP, invagination of the OV and the LP develop into the OC and the LV, respectively (b). The OC is divided into the NR and the RPE (c). The NR is further specified into six distinct neural cell types: RGC (purple), AC (orange), BC (green), HC (light blue), cone PR (red) and rod PR (dark blue) and one glial cell (not shown). The retina is organized into three cellular layers including the GCL, the INL and the ONL. Synaptic connections between the cellular layers are maintained in the IPL and the OPL (d). GCL, ganglion cell layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; LP, lens placode; LV, lens vesicle; NR, neural retina; OC, optic cup; OV, optic vesicle; SE, surface ectoderm. Eye field specification The eyes are an extension of the developing forebrain with EF specification preceded by neural induction and patterning. Graded Wnt signalling is required to establish anterior–posterior (A–P) polarity in the developing forebrain with increased Wnt signalling promoting posterior neural fates (4–6). Wnt mutants have reduced/absent eyes and telencephalon, while the diencephalon expands anteriorly (7). 454 In the anterior neural plate, the EF is specified by the coordinated expression of the EF transcription factors (EFTFs). EFTFs have been best studied in Xenopus laevis and include Rx1/Rax, Pax6, Six3, Lhx2, tll/Tlx, Optx2/Six6 and ET/Tbx3 (8). Loss of function of individual EFTFs, including Rax, Pax6, Six3 and Lhx2, leads to abnormal or absent eyes, showing their importance in early eye development (9–12). In humans, RAX and PAX6 mutations result in anophthalmia and aniridia, Review of eye development Table 2. Key developmental stages in vertebrate eye development (3) Eye developmental stage Days gestation (human) Embryonic age (in days) (mouse) <22 22 28 32 33 E8.0 E8.5 E9.5 E10.0 E11.5 Eye field specification OV Evagination LP formation OV and LP invagination OC, start of retinal neurogenesis respectively (13, 14). EFTFs are necessary and also sufficient for eye development. Overexpression of individual EFTFs including Pax6, Rx1, Pax6 and Six3, or an EFTF ‘cocktail’ can induce ectopic eye formation (8, 10, 15, 16). Otx2 plays a permissive role in EF specification. Otx2 is first required for forebrain specification, which is subsequently competent to specify the EF by EFTF expression. As a result, Otx2 does not directly induce EFTF expression (8). Splitting the eye field Two separate and identical eyes are formed following establishment of the midline and splitting of the EF into two lateral components. Failure of EF splitting results in cyclopia. Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signalling is critical for midline establishment. Mutant mice lacking Shh from the prechordal plate mesoderm fail to establish the ventral midline and split the EF, producing a single midline eye and holoprosencephaly (17). Shh mutants fail to upregulate Pax2, which marks optic stalk (OS) cells. Six3, an EFTF, regulates the expression of Shh in the developing forebrain and is associated with holoprosencephaly (11, 18, 19). Mutations in an upstream Shh enhancer or in the SIX3 homeodomain reduce or abolish binding affinity of SIX3 for the enhancer element, decreasing Shh signalling (20). Optic vesicle development Optic vesicle evagination Following EF bisection, bilateral OVs form by evagination of the ventral forebrain neuroepithelium towards the overlying surface ectoderm. Rax mutations in humans, mice and zebrafish have no eyes, showing the importance of the homeobox gene Rax in early eye development (9, 14, 21–23). Rax (rx3 in zebrafish) mutants fail to develop OVs (9, 21, 22). In zebrafish, expansion and lateral evagination of the OVs from the forebrain are driven by lateral migration of rx3 positive retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) (24). rx3−/− mutant RPC cells converge at the midline without lateral migration, highlighting the importance of rx3 in establishing OV outgrowth; rx3 controls expression of the cell adhesion molecule, nlcam, and the chemokine signalling receptor, cxcr4a, providing some insight into targets of rx3 essential for enabling OV lateral evagination (25, 26). Optic vesicle patterning As the OV evaginates, it is patterned along both the dorsal–ventral (D–V) and the proximal–distal (P–D) axes. Shh signalling from the ventral midline is necessary for axial patterning. In D–V patterning, Shh establishes ventral identity in the OV. Shh drives expression of the ventralizing homeodomain transcription factors Vax1 and Vax2 (27, 28). Overexpression of Shh expands Vax gene expression into the dorsal OV. Conversely, Vax induction fails in the absence of Shh signalling. In early optic development (E9.5), corresponding to the OV stage, Vax1 and Vax2 expression co-localize in the presumptive ventral OS and NR boundary (29, 30). Following invagination of the OV to initiate OC formation (E10.5), Vax1 expression is restricted to the OS (29, 31, 32) while Vax2 expression localizes to the ventral NR of the OC (29, 33, 34). Retinal ganglion cell (RGC) projections from Vax2 null mice are dorsalized (34). Vax1/Vax2 double mutants have a severe dorsalized eye phenotype where the ventral OS transforms into NR (29). The expanded NR domain of the Vax1/Vax2 double mutant expresses the RPC marker, Pax6 at the expense of Pax2+ cells of the ventral OS, showing the requirement for Pax6 in OV ventralization (29). Vax1 null mice have axonal path-finding defects and coloboma whereas axial patterning is largely unaffected (31). In addition to its role in D–V patterning, Shh is also critical for P–D OV patterning. As described, Pax2 and Pax6 expression demarcate the proximal OS (35, 36) and the distal OC (37, 38), respectively. Ectopic Shh activity expands the Pax2 expression domain distally with a corresponding decrease in Pax6+ cells in the distal OV (39, 40). In addition, Pax2 and Pax6 repress each other to maintain the P–D OS/OC boundary. Pax6 mutation in the OV (E9.5) leads to an expanded domain of Pax2 expression into the OC primordia (41). Conversely, Pax6 expression extends into the ventral OS of Pax2 mutant OVs (41). Dorsal identity of the OV requires bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4), of the transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) family. BMP4 induces Tbx5 expression in the dorsal OV (27, 42, 43). Overexpression of BMP4 results in ventrally expanded Tbx5 expression at the expense of Vax gene expression, which is normally localized to the ventral OV as described above (27, 42, 43). Mis-expression of Tbx5 in ventral OVs represses Vax expression, resulting in aberrant projection of RGC axons (42). The LIM homeodomain transcription factor, Lhx2, also patterns the developing OV. Lhx2 mutant mice are anophthalmic (12, 44, 45). However, human anophthalmia resulting from LHX2 mutations has not been reported. Without Lhx2, eye development arrests prior to the OV to OC transition (12, 44, 45). In the arrested vesicles, D–V patterning defects are evident as D–V determinants, Tbx5 and Vax2, are not upregulated or maintained in the absence of Lhx2, respectively (44). In addition, BMP signalling is not maintained in mutant OVs. Collectively, these observations highlight a critical role for Lhx2 in D–V patterning. 455 Zagozewski et al. Optic cup stage Regionalization of the neural retina and the retinal pigment epithelium Regionalization of the OV into NR and the RPE occurs concurrently with D–V/P–D patterning along the evaginating OV. Invagination of the OV following contact with the surface ectoderm initiates formation of the OC. The outer layer of the OC gives rise to the RPE while the inner layer develops into the NR. The prospective NR is derived from the distal/ventral OV adjacent to the surface ectoderm. The prospective RPE is specified by TGFβ signalling from the extraocular mesenchyme (46, 47). In the mouse, TGFβ signalling induces the expression of the bHLH transcription factor, Mitf , and the homeodomain transcription factor, Otx2 in the distal OV. As the OV approaches the surface ectoderm, Vsx2 expression initiated from surface ectoderm signals (see below) represses Mitf , allowing the distal OV to develop into NR. The Wnt pathway plays a role in both specification and maintenance of RPE (48, 49). Loss of β-catenin at the OV stage results in failed Mitf and Otx2 upregulation in the prospective RPE domain while the NR marker, Vsx2 (formerly Chx10) expands dorsally into this domain (49). Eye development in these mutants halts prior to OC formation producing anophthalmic mice. At the OC stage, β-catenin mutants fail to maintain Mitf and Otx2 in the OC, inducing ectopic NR at the expense of RPE. Hence, β-catenin is essential to specify and to maintain RPE identity in the OC (48). Mitf and Otx2 bind to and activate genes required for RPE differentiation including QNR71, Tyr, Trp1 and Trp2 (50, 51). Loss of function of Mitf or Otx2 results in ectopic NR formation with upregulation of NR-specific markers at the expense of RPE, showing the importance of these transcription factors for specification and differentiation of the RPE, and restriction of NR formation (52–55). Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling expressed from the surface ectoderm overlying the OV specifies the distal/ventral OV as NR. Addition of FGF2 to cultured OVs transforms prospective RPE into NR (56). Conversely, blocking FGF2 in OV blocks specification of NR tissue. FGF1 and FGF2 are highly expressed in the surface ectoderm (57). Removing the surface ectoderm from OV explants fails to maintain NR Vsx2 expression, and upregulates Mitf . This inversion from NR to RPE is rescued by exogenous FGF1/FGF2 expression (57). Vsx2 is the earliest transcription factor in the presumptive NR, with expression initiating at E9.5 (58). While not required for NR specification, Vsx2 is required to maintain NR identity, in part by repressing Mitf (47, 59). Vsx2 also plays a crucial role in RPC proliferation (discussed below). The molecular mechanisms required for NR specification are poorly understood. Pax6 is known to be a master regulator of eye development and its function is highly conserved. Pax6−/− embryos fail to form eye structures (38, 60). Contact between the mutant OV and surface ectoderm and subsequent OV invagination fails followed by OV degeneration. However, regionalization of the OV into the 456 prospective RPE and NR is sustained in Pax6−/− OV with maintained Mitf and Vsx2 expression. Hence, Pax6 is a critical regulator for eye development, but it is dispensable for early OV formation. PAX6 is mutated in a number of human ocular disorders including aniridia, coloboma, optic nerve hypoplasia and cataracts (13, 61). Six3 is also involved in NR specification (62). NR specification is abrogated upon the conditional loss of Six3 in the OV. However, normal RPE development is observed despite Six3 loss. NR arrest is attributed to rostral expansion of Wnt8b, a transcriptional target of SIX3 in vivo. Development of the retina The vertebrate retina is comprised of six neural and one glial cell type, arising from a common pool of multipotent RPCs (63). Retinal cells are born in a temporally, highly conserved, overlapping manner in the following order: RGC, horizontal cells, cone photoreceptors, amacrine cells, bipolar cells, rod photoreceptors, and Müller glia (64). Cells are organized into a trilaminar structure in the mature retina, which include the ganglion cell layer, the inner nuclear layer and the outer nuclear layer. Synaptic connections are made between the cells of the retina and are organized into additional layers known as the inner and outer plexiform layers. Several transcription factor families maintain RPC multipotency, specify retinal cell fate and promote differentiation of retina cells (Table 3). Retinal progenitor cells Multipotent RPC are competent to produce all seven retinal cell types. Pax6 is indispensible for maintaining RPC multipotency. Pax6−/− RPCs produce only amacrine cells and fail to upregulate proneural genes required to specify the remaining retinal cell types, severely restricting RPC competence (65). Vsx2 plays a critical role in RPC proliferation (66). In the ocular retardation mouse, a mutation introducing a premature stop codon in Vsx2 impairs VSX2 production. Eyes lacking VSX2 are significantly smaller owing to dramatically decreased cell proliferation. Retinal ganglion cells RGC convey visual information from the retina to the brain via the optic nerves composed of bundled RGC axons. Photoreceptors process light to neurochemical signals which are then sent to bipolar cells and finally to RGCs and the brain. RGC are the earliest born retina cell type. The bHLH transcription factor, Atoh7 (formerly Math5) is required for RGC specification (67, 68). Mice lacking Atoh7 do not produce RGCs or optic nerves. The POU (Pit1, Oct1/Oct2, Unc-86)-homeodomain transcription factor Brn3b is required for terminal RGC differentiation (69, 70). Brn3b expression is absent in Atoh7 mutants, demonstrating the requirement of Atoh7 to specify RGCs and upregulate genes required for RGC differentiation and survival (67, 68). Consequently, Review of eye development Table 3. Transcription factors required for specification and differentiation of vertebrate retina cells Retina cell type Transcription factors expressed Retinal progenitor Retinal ganglion cell Horizontal cell Cone photoreceptor Amacrine cell Rod photoreceptor Bipolar cell Müller glia Vsx2, Pax6, Atoh7, Brn3b, Dlx1/Dlx2 Foxn4, Ptf1a, Onecut1 Otx2, Crx, Rorβ, Trβ2, Blimp1 Foxn4, Ptf1a, Math3, NeuroD Otx2, Crx, Nrl, Blimp1 Vsx2, Mash1, Math3 Notch1, Hes1, Hes5, Sox2, Sox8, Sox9 Brn3b mutations result in up to 80% loss of RGC due to increased apoptosis while RGC specification is not affected (69, 70). The Dlx homeobox genes also play a role in vertebrate RGC development. RGC numbers are reduced by ∼33% in the Dlx1/Dlx2 double knockout retina due to increased apoptosis of late-born RGC (71). Dlx-mediated RGC survival may be partly due to regulation of the neurotrophin receptor TrkB, a downstream target upregulated by DLX2 during retinal development in vivo (72). In addition, DLX2 positively regulates expression of Brn3b (Zhang et al., submitted). Horizontal cells Horizontal cells mediate lateral interactions between photoreceptors and bipolar cells in the outer plexiform layer. The forkhead/winged helix transcription factor, Foxn4, is essential for horizontal cell development (73). Complete loss of horizontal cells and near complete loss of amacrine cells (discussed below) occur in the absence of Foxn4 in RPC. Downstream of Foxn4, Onecut1 and Ptf1a are required concurrently to specify horizontal cells from Foxn4+ RPCs. Similar to Foxn4 null retinas, Ptf1a−/− retinas are devoid of horizontal and most amacrine cells (74). Onecut1 mutants lack 80% of horizontal cells (75). RPCs expressing only Ptf1a produce amacrine cells. Homeobox genes Prox1 and Lhx1 (Lim1), downstream of Onecut1 and Ptf1a, are critical for horizontal cell development and laminar positioning, respectively (76, 77). Photoreceptors Photoreceptors detect and convert light into visual signals by phototransduction. In addition to specifying the forebrain and the RPE, Otx2 is also required to specify rod and cone photoreceptors (78). Otx2 mutants specify amacrine cells instead of photoreceptors and bipolar cells (78). The cell fate decision for Otx2+ precursors to become photoreceptors over bipolar cells depends on Blimp1 (79–81). Blimp1 negatively regulates bipolar cell specification in Otx2+ precursors by restricting Vsx2 expression required for bipolar cell development (66, 79–81). The importance for OTX2 function in retinal development is signified by many ocular abnormalities including microphthalmia and anophthalmia (82, 83). The related Otx family member, Crx, is required for development and maintenance of photoreceptors. In Crx knockouts, photoreceptor outer segments fail to develop (84). Mutations in CRX lead to human cone-rod dystrophies and retinitis pigmentosa (85, 86). Once photoreceptors are specified, rod or cone cell fate depends on the expression of additional transcription factors. Becoming a rod relies on expression of Nrl (87). Without Nrl, prospective rods switch cell fate to become S cones. Human NRL mutation has been linked to retinitis pigmentosa (88). Specification of cones is not as well described. However, it is hypothesized that following photoreceptor commitment by Otx2, Crx and Rorβ maintain a default S cone state, whereas expression of Nrl drives rod development and Trβ2 expression promotes M cone development over the default S cone fate (87, 89, 90). Amacrine cells Amacrine cells, primarily located in the inner nuclear layer, extend their processes into the inner plexiform layer to meditate lateral interactions between bipolar cells and RGC. Specification of amacrine cells requires many of the same genes as horizontal cells. Foxn4 expression confers RPC competency to specify amacrine cells, and Ptf1a, downstream of Foxn4, then determines amacrine cell fate (73, 74). The combined loss of two bHLH genes, Math3 and NeuroD, completely abolishes amacrine cell production with those cells switching to RGC and Müller glia fates (91). In the absence of Foxn4, Math3/NeuroD expression is reduced but not abolished, and is maintained in Ptf1a mutant retinas. Collectively, these findings suggest a gene regulatory network where parallel expression of Ptf1a and Math3/NeuroD drives amacrine cell production in Foxn4+ RPC, while a distinct RPC Foxn4- population also require Math3/NeuroD to determine a subpopulation of amacrine cells. Many amacrine cell subtypes exist (40+ ); this topic is beyond the scope of this review (92). Bipolar cells Bipolar cells link photoreceptors and RGCs. In addition, bipolar cells interact laterally with both amacrine cells and horizontal cells during this process. Independent of its role in RPC proliferation, Vsx2 is critical for bipolar cell specification as Vsx2 null retinas have few bipolar cells (66). As described above, Blimp1 restricts Otx2+ precursors from producing bipolar cells in favour of photoreceptors by restricting Vsx2 expression (79–81). Vsx2 restricts photoreceptor gene expression to favour bipolar cell development (93, 94). Retinas lacking expression of both Math3 and Mash1 lose all bipolar cells with a cell fate switch to Müller glia. Similar to amacrine cells, bipolar cells have many subtypes defined by unique gene expression profiles (95). Müller glia Müller glia cells, the last cell type produced in the developing NR, have cell processes that span the entire retina 457 Zagozewski et al. and support retinal function. The Notch-Hes pathway is implicated in Müller glia development. Loss of function of Notch1, Hes1 or Hes5 reduces Müller glia cell numbers, whereas gain of function of Notch1, Hes1 or Hes5 promotes Müller glia (96, 97). The SRY-related HMG box transcription factors Sox2, Sox8 and Sox9 are also involved. Down-regulation of these genes also impairs Müller glia development (98, 99). Knockdown of the Sox transcription factors and the Notch-Hes genes promote rod photoreceptor at the expense of Müller glia development, showing a requirement for these genes to promote Müller glial fate over rod photoreceptors (99, 100). Conclusions Development of the vertebrate eye requires a complex interplay between extracellular signalling molecules and intrinsic transcription factors. The essential nature of these factors is shown in the human ocular disorders that result from their mutation. Understanding the role of these genetic interactions in vertebrate eye morphogenesis is essential to develop novel therapies for inherited human eye diseases. Acknowledgements J. L. Z. received graduate student funding from the Manitoba Health Research Council (MHRC), from the Manitoba Institute of Child Health (MICH) and CancerCare Manitoba Foundation (CCMF), from the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute (WCHRI) and the University of Alberta; Q. Z. received MHRC, MICH and CCMF graduate student scholarships. D. D. E. has received funding from the CIHR, The Foundation Fighting Blindness (Canada) and the Muriel & Ada Hole Kids with Cancer Society Chair in Pediatric Oncology (University of Alberta) in support of his retina research programmes. References 1. Chow RL, Lang RA. Early eye development in vertebrates. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2001: 17: 255–296. 2. Kim HT, Kim JW. Compartmentalization of vertebrate optic neuroephithelium: external cues and transcription factors. Mol Cells 2012: 33: 317–324. 3. Schoenwolf GC, Larsen WJ. Larsen’s human embryology. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, 2009. 4. Lekven AC, Thorpe CJ, Waxman JS et al. Zebrafish wnt8 encodes two wnt8 proteins on a bicistronic transcript and is required for mesoderm and neurectoderm patterning. Dev Cell 2001: 1: 103–114. 5. Erter CE, Wilm TP, Basler N, Wright CV, Solnica-Krezel L. Wnt8 is required in lateral mesendodermal precursors for neural posteriorization in vivo. Development 2001: 128: 3571–3583. 6. Kiecker C, Niehrs C. A morphogen gradient of Wnt/beta-catenin signalling regulates anteroposterior neural patterning in Xenopus. Development 2001: 128: 4189–4201. 7. Heisenberg CP, Houart C, Take-Uchi M et al. A mutation in the Gsk3-binding domain of zebrafish Masterblind/Axin1 leads to a fate transformation of telencephalon and eyes to diencephalon. Genes Dev 2001: 15: 1427–1434. 8. Zuber ME, Gestri G, Viczian AS, Barsacchi G, Harris WA. Specification of the vertebrate eye by a network of eye field transcription factors. Development 2003: 130: 5155–5167. 9. Mathers PH, Grinberg A, Mahon KA, Jamrich M. The Rx homeobox gene is essential for vertebrate eye development. Nature 1997: 387: 603–607. 10. Chow RL, Altmann CR, Lang RA, Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Pax6 induces ectopic eyes in a vertebrate. Development 1999: 126: 4213–4222. 458 11. Carl M, Loosli F, Wittbrodt J. Six3 inactivation reveals its essential role for the formation and patterning of the vertebrate eye. Development 2002: 129: 4057–4063. 12. Porter FD, Drago J, Xu Y et al. Lhx2, a LIM homeobox gene, is required for eye, forebrain, and definitive erythrocyte development. Development 1997: 124: 2935–2944. 13. Brown A, McKie M, van Heyningen V, Prosser J. The human PAX6 mutation database. Nucleic Acids Res 1998: 26: 259–264. 14. Voronina VA, Kozhemyakina EA, O’Kernick CM et al. Mutations in the human RAX homeobox gene in a patient with anophthalmia and sclerocornea. Hum Mol Genet 2004: 13: 315–322. 15. Loosli F, Winkler S, Wittbrodt J. Six3 overexpression initiates the formation of ectopic retina. Genes Dev 1999: 13: 649–654. 16. Oliver G, Loosli F, Koster R, Wittbrodt J, Gruss P. Ectopic lens induction in fish in response to the murine homeobox gene Six3. Mech Dev 1996: 60: 233–239. 17. Chiang C, Litingtung Y, Lee E et al. Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog gene function. Nature 1996: 383: 407–413. 18. Geng X, Speirs C, Lagutin O et al. Haploinsufficiency of Six3 fails to activate Sonic hedgehog expression in the ventral forebrain and causes holoprosencephaly. Dev Cell 2008: 15: 236–247. 19. Wallis DE, Roessler E, Hehr U et al. Mutations in the homeodomain of the human SIX3 gene cause holoprosencephaly. Nat Genet 1999: 22: 196–198. 20. Jeong Y, Leskow FC, El-Jaick K et al. Regulation of a remote Shh forebrain enhancer by the Six3 homeoprotein. Nat Genet 2008: 40: 1348–1353. 21. Loosli F, Staub W, Finger-Baier KC et al. Loss of eyes in zebrafish caused by mutation of chokh/rx3. EMBO Rep 2003: 4: 894–899. 22. Loosli F, Winkler S, Burgtorf C et al. Medaka eyeless is the key factor linking retinal determination and eye growth. Development 2001: 128: 4035–4044. 23. Andreazzoli M, Gestri G, Angeloni D, Menna E, Barsacchi G. Role of Xrx1 in Xenopus eye and anterior brain development. Development 1999: 126: 2451–2460. 24. Rembold M, Loosli F, Adams RJ, Wittbrodt J. Individual cell migration serves as the driving force for optic vesicle evagination. Science 2006: 313: 1130–1134. 25. Brown KE, Keller PJ, Ramialison M et al. Nlcam modulates midline convergence during anterior neural plate morphogenesis. Dev Biol 2010: 339: 14–25. 26. Bielen H, Houart C. BMP signaling protects telencephalic fate by repressing eye identity and its Cxcr4-dependent morphogenesis. Dev Cell 2012: 23: 812–822. 27. Sasagawa S, Takabatake T, Takabatake Y, Muramatsu T, Takeshima K. Axes establishment during eye morphogenesis in Xenopus by coordinate and antagonistic actions of BMP4, Shh, and RA. Genesis 2002: 33: 86–96. 28. Take-uchi M, Clarke JD, Wilson SW. Hedgehog signalling maintains the optic stalk-retinal interface through the regulation of Vax gene activity. Development 2003: 130: 955–968. 29. Mui SH, Kim JW, Lemke G, Bertuzzi S. Vax genes ventralize the embryonic eye. Genes Dev 2005: 19: 1249–1259. 30. Ohsaki K, Morimitsu T, Ishida Y, Kominami R, Takahashi N. Expression of the Vax family homeobox genes suggests multiple roles in eye development. Genes Cells 1999: 4: 267–276. 31. Bertuzzi S, Hindges R, Mui SH, O’Leary DD, Lemke G. The homeodomain protein vax1 is required for axon guidance and major tract formation in the developing forebrain. Genes Dev 1999: 13: 3092–3105. 32. Hallonet M, Hollemann T, Pieler T, Gruss P. Vax1, a novel homeoboxcontaining gene, directs development of the basal forebrain and visual system. Genes Dev 1999: 13: 3106–3114. 33. Barbieri AM, Lupo G, Bulfone A et al. A homeobox gene, vax2, controls the patterning of the eye dorsoventral axis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999: 96: 10729–10734. 34. Mui SH, Hindges R, O’Leary DD, Lemke G, Bertuzzi S. The homeodomain protein Vax2 patterns the dorsoventral and nasotemporal axes of the eye. Development 2002: 129: 797–804. 35. Krauss S, Johansen T, Korzh V, Fjose A. Expression of the zebrafish paired box gene pax[zf-b] during early neurogenesis. Development 1991: 113: 1193–1206. 36. Puschel AW, Westerfield M, Dressler GR. Comparative analysis of Pax-2 protein distributions during neurulation in mice and zebrafish. Mech Dev 1992: 38: 197–208. Review of eye development 37. Walther C, Gruss P. Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS. Development 1991: 113: 1435–1449. 38. Grindley JC, Davidson DR, Hill RE. The role of Pax-6 in eye and nasal development. Development 1995: 121: 1433–1442. 39. Ekker SC, Ungar AR, Greenstein P et al. Patterning activities of vertebrate hedgehog proteins in the developing eye and brain. Curr Biol 1995: 5: 944–955. 40. Macdonald R, Barth KA, Xu Q et al. Midline signalling is required for Pax gene regulation and patterning of the eyes. Development 1995: 121: 3267–3278. 41. Schwarz M, Cecconi F, Bernier G et al. Spatial specification of mammalian eye territories by reciprocal transcriptional repression of Pax2 and Pax6. Development 2000: 127: 4325–4334. 42. Koshiba-Takeuchi K, Takeuchi JK, Matsumoto K et al. Tbx5 and the retinotectum projection. Science 2000: 287: 134–137. 43. Behesti H, Holt JK, Sowden JC. The level of BMP4 signaling is critical for the regulation of distinct T-box gene expression domains and growth along the dorso-ventral axis of the optic cup. BMC Dev Biol 2006: 6: 62. 44. Yun S, Saijoh Y, Hirokawa KE et al. Lhx2 links the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that control optic cup formation. Development 2009: 136: 3895–3906. 45. Hagglund AC, Dahl L, Carlsson L. Lhx2 is required for patterning and expansion of a distinct progenitor cell population committed to eye development. PLoS One 2011: 6: e23387. 46. Fuhrmann S, Levine EM, Reh TA. Extraocular mesenchyme patterns the optic vesicle during early eye development in the embryonic chick. Development 2000: 127: 4599–4609. 47. Fuhrmann S. Eye morphogenesis and patterning of the optic vesicle. Curr Top Dev Biol 2010: 93: 61–84. 48. Westenskow P, Piccolo S, Fuhrmann S. Beta-catenin controls differentiation of the retinal pigment epithelium in the mouse optic cup by regulating Mitf and Otx2 expression. Development 2009: 136: 2505–2510. 49. Hagglund AC, Berghard A, Carlsson L. Canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signalling is essential for optic cup formation. PLoS One 2013: 8: e81158. 50. Goding CR. Mitf from neural crest to melanoma: signal transduction and transcription in the melanocyte lineage. Genes Dev 2000: 14: 1712–1728. 51. Martinez-Morales JR, Dolez V, Rodrigo I et al. OTX2 activates the molecular network underlying retina pigment epithelium differentiation. J Biol Chem 2003: 278: 21721–21731. 52. Nishihara D, Yajima I, Tabata H et al. Otx2 is involved in the regional specification of the developing retinal pigment epithelium by preventing the expression of sox2 and fgf8, factors that induce neural retina differentiation. PLoS One 2012: 7: e48879. 53. Nakayama A, Nguyen MT, Chen CC et al. Mutations in microphthalmia, the mouse homolog of the human deafness gene MITF, affect neuroepithelial and neural crest-derived melanocytes differently. Mech Dev 1998: 70: 155–166. 54. Mochii M, Ono T, Matsubara Y, Eguchi G. Spontaneous transdifferentiation of quail pigmented epithelial cell is accompanied by a mutation in the Mitf gene. Dev Biol 1998: 196: 145–159. 55. Martinez-Morales JR, Signore M, Acampora D et al. Otx genes are required for tissue specification in the developing eye. Development 2001: 128: 2019–2030. 56. Pittack C, Grunwald GB, Reh TA. Fibroblast growth factors are necessary for neural retina but not pigmented epithelium differentiation in chick embryos. Development 1997: 124: 805–816. 57. Nguyen M, Arnheiter H. Signaling and transcriptional regulation in early mammalian eye development: a link between FGF and MITF. Development 2000: 127: 3581–3591. 58. Liu IS, Chen JD, Ploder L et al. Developmental expression of a novel murine homeobox gene (Chx10): evidence for roles in determination of the neuroretina and inner nuclear layer. Neuron 1994: 13: 377–393. 59. Horsford DJ, Nguyen MT, Sellar GC et al. Chx10 repression of Mitf is required for the maintenance of mammalian neuroretinal identity. Development 2005: 132: 177–187. 60. Hill RE, Favor J, Hogan BL et al. Mouse small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene. Nature 1991: 354: 522–525. 61. Tzoulaki I, White IM, Hanson IM. PAX6 mutations: genotypephenotype correlations. BMC Genet 2005: 6: 27. 62. Liu W, Lagutin O, Swindell E, Jamrich M, Oliver G. Neuroretina specification in mouse embryos requires Six3-mediated suppression of Wnt8b in the anterior neural plate. J Clin Invest 2010: 120: 3568–3577. 63. Turner DL, Cepko CL. A common progenitor for neurons and glia persists in rat retina late in development. Nature 1987: 328: 131–136. 64. Young RW. Cell differentiation in the retina of the mouse. Anat Rec 1985: 212: 199–205. 65. Marquardt T, Ashery-Padan R, Andrejewski N et al. Pax6 is required for the multipotent state of retinal progenitor cells. Cell 2001: 105: 43–55. 66. Burmeister M, Novak J, Liang MY et al. Ocular retardation mouse caused by Chx10 homeobox null allele: impaired retinal progenitor proliferation and bipolar cell differentiation. Nat Genet 1996: 12: 376–384. 67. Brown NL, Patel S, Brzezinski J, Glaser T. Math5 is required for retinal ganglion cell and optic nerve formation. Development 2001: 128: 2497–2508. 68. Wang SW, Kim BS, Ding K et al. Requirement for math5 in the development of retinal ganglion cells. Genes Dev 2001: 15: 24–29. 69. Gan L, Xiang M, Zhou L et al. POU domain factor Brn-3b is required for the development of a large set of retinal ganglion cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996: 93: 3920–3925. 70. Erkman L, McEvilly RJ, Luo L et al. Role of transcription factors Brn-3.1 and Brn-3.2 in auditory and visual system development. Nature 1996: 381: 603–606. 71. de Melo J, Du G, Fonseca M et al. Dlx1 and Dlx2 function is necessary for terminal differentiation and survival of late-born retinal ganglion cells in the developing mouse retina. Development 2005: 132: 311–322. 72. de Melo J, Zhou QP, Zhang Q et al. Dlx2 homeobox gene transcriptional regulation of Trkb neurotrophin receptor expression during mouse retinal development. Nucleic Acids Res 2008: 36: 872–884. 73. Li S, Mo Z, Yang X et al. Foxn4 controls the genesis of amacrine and horizontal cells by retinal progenitors. Neuron 2004: 43: 795–807. 74. Fujitani Y, Fujitani S, Luo H et al. Ptf1a determines horizontal and amacrine cell fates during mouse retinal development. Development 2006: 133: 4439–4450. 75. Wu F, Li R, Umino Y et al. Onecut1 is essential for horizontal cell genesis and retinal integrity. J Neurosci 2013: 33: 13053–13065, 13065a. 76. Dyer MA, Livesey FJ, Cepko CL, Oliver G. Prox1 function controls progenitor cell proliferation and horizontal cell genesis in the mammalian retina. Nat Genet 2003: 34: 53–58. 77. Poche RA, Kwan KM, Raven MA et al. Lim1 is essential for the correct laminar positioning of retinal horizontal cells. J Neurosci 2007: 27: 14099–14107. 78. Nishida A, Furukawa A, Koike C et al. Otx2 homeobox gene controls retinal photoreceptor cell fate and pineal gland development. Nat Neurosci 2003: 6: 1255–1263. 79. Brzezinski JA, Uoon Park K, Reh TA. Blimp1 (Prdm1) prevents re-specification of photoreceptors into retinal bipolar cells by restricting competence. Dev Biol 2013: 384: 194–204. 80. Brzezinski JA, Lamba DA, Reh TA. Blimp1 controls photoreceptor versus bipolar cell fate choice during retinal development. Development 2010: 137: 619–629. 81. Katoh K, Omori Y, Onishi A et al. Blimp1 suppresses Chx10 expression in differentiating retinal photoreceptor precursors to ensure proper photoreceptor development. J Neurosci 2010: 30: 6515–6526. 82. Ragge NK, Brown AG, Poloschek CM et al. Heterozygous mutations of OTX2 cause severe ocular malformations. Am J Hum Genet 2005: 76: 1008–1022. 83. Beby F, Lamonerie T. The homeobox gene Otx2 in development and disease. Exp Eye Res 2013: 111: 9–16. 84. Furukawa T, Morrow EM, Li T, Davis FC, Cepko CL. Retinopathy and attenuated circadian entrainment in Crx-deficient mice. Nat Genet 1999: 23: 466–470. 85. Freund CL, Gregory-Evans CY, Furukawa T et al. Cone-rod dystrophy due to mutations in a novel photoreceptor-specific homeobox gene (CRX) essential for maintenance of the photoreceptor. Cell 1997: 91: 543–553. 86. Sohocki MM, Sullivan LS, Mintz-Hittner HA et al. A range of clinical phenotypes associated with mutations in CRX, a photoreceptor transcription-factor gene. Am J Hum Genet 1998: 63: 1307–1315. 87. Mears AJ, Kondo M, Swain PK et al. Nrl is required for rod photoreceptor development. Nat Genet 2001: 29: 447–452. 459 Zagozewski et al. 88. Bessant DA, Payne AM, Mitton KP et al. A mutation in NRL is associated with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Nat Genet 1999: 21: 355–356. 89. Swaroop A, Kim D, Forrest D. Transcriptional regulation of photoreceptor development and homeostasis in the mammalian retina. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010: 11: 563–576. 90. Ng L, Hurley JB, Dierks B et al. A thyroid hormone receptor that is required for the development of green cone photoreceptors. Nat Genet 2001: 27: 94–98. 91. Inoue T, Hojo M, Bessho Y et al. Math3 and NeuroD regulate amacrine cell fate specification in the retina. Development 2002: 129: 831–842. 92. Masland RH. The tasks of amacrine cells. Vis Neurosci 2012: 29: 3–9. 93. Dorval KM, Bobechko BP, Fujieda H et al. CHX10 targets a subset of photoreceptor genes. J Biol Chem 2006: 281: 744–751. 94. Livne-Bar I, Pacal M, Cheung MC et al. Chx10 is required to block photoreceptor differentiation but is dispensable for progenitor proliferation in the postnatal retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006: 103: 4988–4993. 460 95. Star EN, Zhu M, Shi Z et al. Regulation of retinal interneuron subtype identity by the Iroquois homeobox gene Irx6. Development 2012: 139: 4644–4655. 96. Hojo M, Ohtsuka T, Hashimoto N et al. Glial cell fate specification modulated by the bHLH gene Hes5 in mouse retina. Development 2000: 127: 2515–2522. 97. Furukawa T, Mukherjee S, Bao ZZ, Morrow EM, Cepko CL. rax, Hes1, and notch1 promote the formation of Muller glia by postnatal retinal progenitor cells. Neuron 2000: 26: 383–394. 98. Lin YP, Ouchi Y, Satoh S, Watanabe S. Sox2 plays a role in the induction of amacrine and Muller glial cells in mouse retinal progenitor cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009: 50: 68–74. 99. Muto A, Iida A, Satoh S, Watanabe S. The group E Sox genes Sox8 and Sox9 are regulated by Notch signaling and are required for Muller glial cell development in mouse retina. Exp Eye Res 2009: 89: 549–558. 100. Jadhav AP, Mason HA, Cepko CL. Notch 1 inhibits photoreceptor production in the developing mammalian retina. Development 2006: 133: 913–923.