Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 52, 45-52, 2008 INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE ON THE GROWTH, PROTEASE PRODUCTION, AND HEAT RESISTANCE OF AEROMONAS HYDROPHILA (HG-1), A. BESTIARUM (HG-2), AND A. SALMONICIDA (HG-3) LESZEK GUZ, AND ANTONINA SOPIŃSKA Sub-department of Fish Diseases and Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Agricultural University in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland [email protected] Received for publication September 03, 2007 Abstract The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of different temperatures on caseinase and elastase production and growth of Aeromonas hydrophila K-101, A. bestiarum 15s, and A. salmonicida A-11 strains, isolated from diseased carp. In order to study the influence of the temperature on proteolytic yield and growth of the strains, standard spectrophotometric methods were used. For the determination of caseinase and elastase activity, the azocasein and elastinCongo red as substrates were used. It was shown that K-101, 15s, and A-11 strains isolated from motile Aeromonas septicaemia (MAS) affected carp grew better at 28ºC than at 18ºC and 38ºC. The highest proteolytic activity of all studied strains was obtained when the bacteria were grown at 28ºC. At 60ºC the D-value for K-101, 15s, and A-11 were 7, 4, and 3, respectively. In summary, the temperature influenced the growth of the strains isolated from MAS affected carp. The adaptation of these strains to environmental factors imply their possible long survival in the water, which is a potential threat to public and animal health. From these results, it can be concluded that the potential virulent ability of the ECP might vary due to culturing at different incubation temperatures. Key words: fish, Aeromonas, temperature. Aeromonas species are ubiquitous inhabitants of the aquatic environment and are also an opportunistic and primary pathogen of fish, predisposing to the infection as a result of stress (4, 30, 31). As part of the normal microbiota, aeromonads usually do not cause disease in healthy fish. Some of the aeromonads produce a number of toxic extracellular products such as haemolysins, cytotoxins, enterotoxins, and different proteolytic enzymes (11, 24, 28). These properties have been suggested to be associated with the virulence of these pathogens (2). Widely distributed in aqueous environments, aeromonads have been isolated from rivers, drinking water, swimming pools, estuaries, and lakes (4, 16). Aeromonas strains could be of public health significance in food products that have an extended shelf-life at refrigeration temperatures (3, 6). The classification of the genus Aeromonas has been dogged by confusion and controversy. According to Joseph and Carnahan (13), this genus is now classified within the family Aeromonadaceae and consists of 14 different confirmed species. Species Aeromonas hydrophila (HG-1), A. bestiarum (HG-2), and A. salmonicida (HG-3) are included in the so-called “A. hydrophila” complex (12). The effect of temperature on the growth kinetics of strains of A. hydrophila was evaluated by Knochel (18), Stecchini et al. (37), Santos et al. (32), Sautour et al. (33), and Wang and Gu (39). Many studies are done to assess the influence of different factors on the survival of A. hydrophila (15, 22, 39). Palumbo et al. (26) studied the combined effects of temperature, NaCl, pH, and NaNO2 on the aerobic growth of A. hydrophila. It is well known that the temperature is an important factor controlling the rate of development of microbial populations. A modulation of enzyme synthesis by the growth temperature has been observed in several microorganisms (8, 22). There are no data concerning the effect of temperature, protease yields and growth of bacteria belonging to the different hybridysation groups (HG) of A. hydrophila “complex” species. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of different temperatures on caseinase and elastase yields and growth of A. hydrophila K-101, A. bestiarum 15s and A. salmonicida A-11 strains, isolated from diseased carp. Material and Methods Bacteria and growth conditions. A. hydrophila K-101 (HG-1), A. bestiarum 15s (HG-2), and A. salmonicida A 11 (HG-3) strains, isolated from motile aeromonas septicaemia (MAS) affected carp (Cyprinus carpio L.), were kindly provided by Dr. 46 Kozińska (Department of Fish Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Poland). The bacteria were cultured in tryptic soy agar (TSA). The agar plates were incubated for 24 h at 28ºC. For the production of extracellular proteases, the bacteria were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) at 28ºC for 24 h. The culture from slants was inoculated into 250 ml of TSB in 500 ml Erlenmeyer flasks, and then incubated at three different temperatures (18°C, 28°C, and 38ºC). The samples were removed from the incubator at specified time intervals (0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h) and examined for bacterial growth by determining in the spectrophotometer their optical density at 620 nm. The samples for the measurement of proteolytic activity were centrifuged for 30 min at 10 000 g at 4ºC, filtered through 0.22 µm membrane (Millipore), and frozen at -80ºC for later analysis. Measurement of proteolytic activity of ECPs. Protein levels of ECP solutions were determined using the Sigma protein assay kit with bovine albumin as a standard. Caseinase activity. The caseinase activity was determined by the azocasein procedure described by Leung and Stevenson (20), with slight Mateos et al. (22) and own modifications. Briefly, the reaction mixture consisting of 0.1 ml of a 10% (w/v) azocasein solution (Sigma), 0.1 ml of supernatant fluid sample, and 2.3 ml of 0.1 mol l-1 sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, was incubated at 28ºC for 30 min. The reaction was stopped with 2.5 ml of 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and after 30 min at room temperature, the precipitate was removed by centrifugation. Equal volumes of supernatant fluid and NaOH 1 mol l-1 were mixed and absorbance was read at 450 nm. TCA was added to the blank before incubation. Elastase activity. The elastase activity was determined by the elastin-Congo red procedure described by Bjorn et al. (1), with slight Mateos et al. (22) and own modifications. Briefly, 1 ml of culture supernatant fluids was added to 2 ml of Tris-maleate buffer (0.1 mol l-1, pH 7.0) supplemented with CaCl2 (0.001 mol l-1) containing 10 mg of elastin-Congo red. The mixture was incubated at 28ºC for 30 min and the reaction was stopped by the addition of 2 ml of sodium phosphate buffer (0.7 mol l-1, pH 6.0). The precipitate was removed by centrifugation. The blank consisted of 3 ml of the buffer containing 10 mg of elastin-Congo red. Elastase activity was determined by reading absorbance of the supernatant fluid at 495 nm. Heat stability. Heat stability of the bacteria was measured as described by Spinks et al. (35) with own modifications. Briefly, 10 ml portions of the final stationary phase cultures were centrifuged (35 000xg, 10 min) at 4ºC, and pellets were resuspended in sterile distilled water to give approximate concentrations of 1010 cells ml-1. The inocula were determined by serial dilutions and plated on TSA. A fixed volume of sterile distilled water was placed into an Erlenmeyer flask held in water bath at the appropriate lethal temperature (55°C, 60°C, and 65ºC) prior to inoculation. After temperature stabilisation, 1 ml of resuspended culture was injected into the water medium and timing was immediately initiated. Surviving bacteria were enumerated by serial dilutions, plated on TSA, and then incubated at 28ºC for 48 h. The “decimal reduction time” (D-value) was defined as the time required to reduce a bacterial population by 90% or 1 log reduction, and was derived from the formula: Dx = (T2 – T1)/(logC1 – logC2). where Dx is the D-value in seconds for temperature x, T2 is the number of elapsed seconds at the final sample point since time zero, T1 is the number of elapsed seconds at the initial sample point since time zero, C1 is the concentration of bacteria at T1, and C2 is the concentration of bacteria at T2. The stability of proteases was measured as described by Khalil and Mansour (15) by subjecting the samples to heat treatment ranging from 30 to 100ºC for 15 min. After the heat treatment, the residual proteolytic activity was measured as described above. Results Three bacterial strains isolated from MAS affected carp for the current investigations were identified as hybridisation groups HG-1, HG-2, and HG3 (19). After 96 h cultivation, the optical density, expressing the growth rate at 3 different temperatures, for A. hydrophila K-101 (HG-1), A. bestiarum 15s (HG2), and A. salmonicida A-11 (HG-3) strains were 3.2, 2.4, 1.6 at 18ºC, 4.6, 3.7, 2.8 at 28ºC, and 4.1, 2.8, 1.8 at 38ºC, respectively (Fig. 1). The highest proteolytic activity of ECPs from K-101, 15s, and A-11 cultures grown at 18°C, 28°C, and 38ºC was obtained when the bacteria were grown at 28ºC (Fig. 2). The lowest proteolytic activity was obtained when the strains were grown at 18ºC, while the cultures grown at 38ºC showed moderate proteolytic activity (Fig. 2). The heat resistance of the strains was studied at 50°C, 55°C, and 60ºC. D-values expressed as the time required to achieve 90% reduction in the concentration of bacteria from three replicate experiments were calculated (Table 1). The reductions in bacterial count were observed at all temperatures used (Fig. 3). The capacity for heat resistance was greatly diminished at 60ºC with several log reductions occurring below 30 s. The caseinase activity of K-101 and 15s ECPs was relatively stable when heated for 15 min at 60ºC (95% and 72.5%, respectively), although caseinases of A-11 were more labile (30.5% activity). Complete inactivation of the caseinolytic enzymes was observed after heating the ECPs at 100ºC, 90ºC and 80ºC, respectively (Fig. 4). The elastase activity of K-101, 15s, and A-11 ECPs was stable when heated for 15 min at 50ºC (98%, 92%, and 93%, respectively). Complete inactivation of the elastolytic enzymes was observed after heating the ECPs at 90ºC, 90ºC, and 80ºC, respectively (Fig.4). 47 (A) 3.5 A. hydrophila K-101 O.D. 620 nm 3 A. bestiarum 15s A. salmonicida A 11 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0h 6h 12 h 24 h 48 h 72 h 96 h 48 h 72 h 96 h 48 h 72 h 96 h Time (h) (B) O.D. 620 nm 5 4.5 4 A. hydrophila K-101 A. bestiarum 15s A. salmonicida A 11 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0h 6h 12 h 24 h O.D. 620 nm Time (h) (C) 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 A. hydrophila K-101 A. bestiarum 15s A. salmonicida A 11 0h 6h 12 h 24 h Time (h) Fig. 1. Effect of incubation time and temperature on A. hydrophila, A. bestiarum, and A. salmonicida growth at 18ºC (A), 28ºC (B), and 38ºC (C). 48 (A) Proteolytic activity (U) 40 K-101 15s A 11 35 30 38°C 28°C 25 20 18°C 15 10 5 0 0h 6h 12 h 24 h 48 h 72 h 96 h Incubation time (h) (B) Proteolytic activity (U) 25 K-101 15s A 11 20 38°C 28°C 15 10 5 18°C 0 0h 6h 12 h 24 h 48 h 72 h 96 h Incubation time (h) Fig. 2. Effect of incubation time and temperature on A. hydrophila, A. bestiarum, and A. salmonicida caseinase (A) and elastase (B) activity. A unit of caseinolytic activity was defined as the enzyme activity in a 0.1 ml volume of sample that produced an increase in absorbance of 0.1 at 450 nm. Elastase activity unit is expressed as the activity contained in 1 ml of supernatant fluid that increased the absorbance by 0.1 at 495 nm. 49 (A) Survivors (%) 100 50ºC 10 55ºC 1 60ºC 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.00001 0 10 20 30 60 90 120 Time (secs) (B) 100 50ºC 10 55ºC Survivors (%) 1 60ºC 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.00001 0.000001 0.0000001 0 10 20 30 60 90 120 240 Time (secs) (C) 100 50ºC 10 55ºC Survivors (%) 1 60ºC 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.00001 0.000001 0.0000001 0 10 20 30 60 90 120 Time (secs) Fig. 3. The reduction of cells following exposure to heat for A. hydrophila (A), A. bestiarum (B) and A. salmonicida (C). 50 (A) Proteolytic activity (%) 120 A. hydrophila K-101 A. bestiarum 15s 100 A. salmonicida A 11 80 60 40 20 0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Heating temperatureo (OC) (B) Proteolytic activity (%) 120 A. hydrophila K-101 A. bestiarum 15s 100 A. salmonicida A 11 80 60 40 20 0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Heating temperatureo ( C) O Fig. 4. Heating stability of extracellular caseinase (A) and elastase (B) treated at different temperatures for 15 min. Table 1 D-values expressed as the time required to achieve 90% reduction in the concentration of bacteria. Means (± standard error) from three replicate experiments Temperature (ºC) Bacteria A. hydrophila K-101 A. bestiarum 15s A. salmonicida A 11 50 55 60 27 (±2) 33 (±3) 10 (±0.8) 13 (±0.9) 21 (±2) 9 (±0.4) 7 (±0.6) 4 (±0.5) 3 (±0.2) 51 Discussion Temperature is considered as the major controlling factor in the distribution of the bacteria in natural environment. Temperature dependent seasonal variations have been observed for Aeromonas sp. with the highest population in summer and the lowest one in winter (14). The growth temperature range for aeromonads is from 4 to 44ºC, but individual strains typically have a restricted growth range according to their ecological niche, and growth of strains at both extremes of the range are rare (4, 17). Our investigations have shown that A. hydrophila K-101 (HG-1), A. bestiarum 15s (HG-2) and A. salmonicida A 11 (HG-3) strains, isolated from MAS diseased carp, grew better at 28ºC than 18ºC and 38ºC. These results are consistent with the findings of Khalil and Mansour (15), who found that the optimum temperature for A. hydrophila growth in TSB medium was 30ºC, but in contrast to our study, at this temperature the bacteria growth reached its maximum after 24 h of incubation time. Palumbo et al. (27) observed the same lag time at 28ºC and 37ºC with the shortest generation time at 28ºC for one strain. Although the optimum growth temperature is considered to be 28ºC (29), Statner et al. (36) found that in some cases better growth of bacteria could occur at 37ºC. The maximum growth temperature for most strains of A. hydrophila appears to be at least 42ºC with most enterotoxigenic strains capable of growth at 43ºC (25, 26). Hänninen et al. (7) observed that the determination of the tmax can be applied for differentiation of HG-1 from HG-2 and HG-3 (A. hydrophila phenospecies). Hybridisation group of 2 and 3 strains, which in most cases originated from water or food, had tmax about 3639ºC (7). Some species, including most A. salmonicida strains, do not grow at 35ºC (7, 21). Merino et al. (23) found that A. hydrophila strains grown at 20ºC contained, relative to those cultured at 37ºC, increased levels of the phospholipid fatty acids; hexadecanoate and octadecanoate and reduced levels of the corresponding saturated fatty acids. Furthermore, the strains were more virulent for fish and mice when they were grown at 20ºC than when they were grown at 37ºC. They also showed increased different extracellular activities when they were grown at 20ºC (23). Ishiguro et al. (9) also found that virulent strains that grew at a higher than optimal temperatures (26°C to 27ºC for the three A. salmonicida strains studied) resulted in the selection of spontaneous attenuated derivatives in the initial bacterial population. Our results indicated that the highest proteolytic activities of all studied strains ECP were obtained when the bacterium were grown at 28ºC. These results are consistent with the findings of Khalil and Mansour (15), who showed the highest proteolytic activity of ECPs at 30ºC. Mateos et al. (22) found that production of caseinases, elastases, and growth yields of environmental strains decreased sharply during cultivation at 37ºC. Moreover, the human strains differed from the environmental strains in response to growth temperatures, their protease activity decreased at 37ºC, although growth yield was not affected. Tsai et al. (38) found that the maximal toxin titres were the same at both 28ºC and 37ºC, but that toxins were produced slightly sooner at the lower temperature. Heat stability of three strains studied in our experiment has shown that K-101, 15s, and A-11 were resistant to heat with critical temperature 60ºC. Similar results were reported by Spinks et al. (35) who studied A. hydrophila (wild type) and found that temperature range from 55°C to 65ºC was critical for effective elimination of pathogenic bacterial components and supported the thesis that hot water systems should operate at a minimum of 60ºC. The thermal resistance at any given temperature may conveniently be expressed as the “decimal reduction time” (D), which is defined as the time for the survivors to be destroyed by one log cycle, which represents 90% of the initial population. According to the reported data, the heat resistance varies with species (35). Large variations in thermal inactivation rates were observed between the tested bacterial species as well as between the tested temperatures for each species. The influence of growth temperature on the heat resistance of A. hydrophila has been reported by Spinks et al. (35). The capacity for heat resistance of A. hydrophila was greatly diminished at 60ºC with several log reduction occurring within 1 min (35). Sheldon and Schuman (34) determined D-values (1.5, 0.10, and 0.03) at 51°C, 57°C, and 60ºC, indicating that such thermal processes can provide a large safety factor with regard to the inactivation of A. hydrophila in liquid egg. Isonhood et al. (10) found that A. hydrophila is not heat or freeze/thaw resistant and does not appear to have a measurable phenotypic cross-protective stress response to starvation or cold storage that enhances heat or freeze thaw tolerance. In our study, at 60ºC the D-value for K101, 15s, and A-11 were, 7, 4, and 3, respectively. For all the strains studied, the inactivation curves were linear at 60ºC, while survival curves at 50ºC and 55ºC were characterised by a slower initial phase of inactivation followed by a faster phase. In summary, the temperature influenced the bacterial growth of three isolates from MAS diseased carp. Adaptations to environmental parameters by these strains imply their possible long survival in water, which is a potential threat to public and animal health. From these results, it can be concluded that the potential virulent ability of the ECP might vary due to culturing at different incubation temperatures. References 1. 2. 3. Bjorn M.J., Sokol P.A., Iglewski B.H.: Influence of iron on yields of extracellular products in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures. J Bacteriol 1979, 138, 193-200. Cahill M.M.: Virulence factors in motile Aeromonas species. J Appl Bacteriol 1990, 69, 1-16. Daskalov H.: The importance of Aeromonas hydrophila in food safety. Food Control 2006, 17, 474-483. 52 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Environmental Protection Agency: Aeromonas: human health criteria document. Washington, 2006. Esch G.W., Hazen T.C.: Stress and body condition in a population of largemouth bass: implications for red-sore disease. Trans Am Fish Soc 1980, 109, 532-536. Feldhusen F.: The role of seafood in bacterial foodborne diseases. Microb Infect 2000, 2, 1651-1660. Hänninen M.L., Salmi S., Siitonen A.: Maximum growth temperature ranges of Aeromonas spp. isolated from clinical or environmental sources. Microb Ecol 1995, 29, 259-267. Herendeen S.L., Van Bogelen R.A., Neidhardt F.C.: Levels of major proteins of Escherichia coli during growth at different temperatures. J Bacteriol 1979, 139, 185-194. Ishiguro E.E., Kay W.W., Ainsworth T., Chamberlain J.B., Austen R.A., Buckley J.T., Trust T.J.: Loss of virulence during of Aeromonas salmonicida at high temperature. J Bacteriol 1981, 148, 333-340. Isonhood J.H., Gererd P., Leenanon B., Drake M-A.: Stress response of Aeromonas hydrophila following environmental challenges. Food Microbiol. 2002, 19, 285-293. Janda J.M., Abbott S.L.: Human pathogens. In: The genus Aeromonas, edited by B. Austin, M. Altwegg, P. Gosling, S.W. Joseph (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY) 1996, pp. 39-76. Janda J.M., Abbott S.L.: Evolving concepts regarding the genus Aeromonas: an expanding panorama species, disease presentations, and unanswered questions. Clin Infect Dis 1998, 27, 332-344. Joseph S.W., Carnahan A.M.: Update on the genus Aeromonas. ASM News 2000, 66, 218-223. Kaper J.B., Lockman H., Colwell R.R.: Aeromonas hydrophila: ecology, and toxigenicity of isolates from an estuary. J Appl Bacteriol 1981, 50, 359-377. Khalil A.H., Mansour E.H.: Toxicity of crude extracellular products of Aeromonas hydrophila in tilapia, Tilapia nilotica. Lett Appl Microbiol 1997, 25, 269-273. Khardori N., Fainstein V.: Aeromonas and Plesiomonas as etiological agents. Annu Rev Microbiol 1988, 42, 395419. Kirov S.M., Ardestani E.K., Hayward L.J.: The growth and expression of virulence factors at refrigeration temperature by Aeromonas strains isolated from foods. Int J Food Microbiol 1993, 20, 159-168. Knochel S.: Growth characteristics of motile Aeromonas spp. isolated from different environments. Int J Food Microbiol. 1990, 10, 235-244. Kozińska A., Figueras M.J., Chacon M.R., Soler L.: Phenotypic characteristics and pathogenicity of Aeromonas genomospecies isolated from common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). J Appl Microbiol 2002, 93, 1-8. Leung K.Y., Stevenson R.M.W.: Tn 5-induced proteasedeficient strains of Aeromonas hydrophila with reduced virulence for fish. Inf Immun 1988, 56, 2639-2644. Martin-Carnahan A., Joseph S.W.: Aeromonadaceae. In: The Proteobacteria, Part B, Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edition, vol. 2, edited by D.J. Brenner, N.R. Krieg, J.T. Staley, G.M. Garrity (SpringerVerlag, New York, NY), 2005. Mateos D., Anguita J., Naharro G., Paniagua C.: Influence of growth temperature on the production of extracellular virulence factors and pathogenicity of environmental and human strains of Aeromonas hydrophila. J Appl Bacteriol 1993, 74, 111-118. 23. Merino S., Camprubi S., Tomás J.M.: Effect of growth temperature on outer membrane components and virulence of Aeromonas hydrophila strains of serotype O:34. Infect Immun 1992, 60, 4343-4349. 24. Mokracka J., Krzeminska S., Szczuka E.: Virulence factors of clinical isolates of Aeromonas caviae. Folia Microbiol 2001, 46, 321-326. 25. Palumbo S.A., Morgan D.R., Buchman R.I.: Influence of temperature, NaCl and pH on the growth of Aeromonas hydrophila. J Food Sci 1985, 50, 1417-1421. 26. Palumbo S.A., Williams A.C., Buchanan R.L., Phillips J.G.: Model for the aerobic growth of Aeromonas hydrophila K144. J Food Prot 1991, 54, 429-435. 27. Palumbo S., Stelma G.N., Abeyta C.: The Aeromonas hydrophila group. In: Microbiological safety and quality of food, edited by B.M. Lund, T.C. Baird-Parker, G.W. Gould (Springer-Verlag), 2000, pp. 1011-1028 28. Pin C., Marin M.L., Selgas M.D., Garcia M.L., Tormo J., Casas C.: Virulence factors in clinical and food isolates of Aeromonas species. Folia Microbiol 1994, 39, 342-364. 29. Popoff M.: Genus III. Aeromonas Kluyver and Van Niel 1936, 545-548 in N.R. Kreig, J.G. Holt (Eds): Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore/London, 1984. 30. Řehulka J.: Aeromonas causes severe skin lesions in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): clinical pathology, haematology and biochemistry. Acta vet Brno 2002, 71, 351-360. 31. Řehulka J.: The blood indices of the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) in Aeromonas-induced ulcerous dermatitis. Acta vet Brno 1998, 67, 317-322. 32. Santos J.A., González C.J., Lòpez-Diaz T.M., GarciaLòpez M.L., Otero A.: Extracellular protease production by dairy strains of Aeromonas hydrophila as affected by growth media and incubation temperature. Food Microbiol 1996, 13, 47-51. 33. Sautour M., Mary P., Chihib N.E., Hornez J.P.: The effects of temperature, water activity and pH on the growth of Aeromonas hydrophila and on its subsequent survival in microcosm water. J Appl Microbiol 2003, 95, 807-813. 34. Sheldon B.W., Schuman J.D.: Thermal and biological treatments to control psychrotrophic pathogens. Poult Sci 1996, 75, 1126-1132. 35. Spinks A.T., Dunstan R.H., Harrison T., Coombes P., Kuczera G.: Thermal inactivation of water-borne pathogenic and indicator bacteria at sub-boiling temperatures. Water Res 2006, 40, 1326-1332. 36. Statner B., Jones M.J., George W.L.: Effect of incubation temperature on growth and soluble protein profiles of motile Aeromonas strains. J Clin Microbiol 1988, 26, 392-393. 37. Stecchini M.L., Sarais I., Milani S.: The effect of incubation temperature, sodium chloride and ascorbic acid on the growth kinetics of Aeromonas hydrophila. Lett Appl Microbiol 1993, 17, 238-241. 38. Tsai G-J., Tsai F-C., Kong Z-L.: Effects of temperature, medium composition, pH, salt and dissolved oxygen on heamolysin and cytotoxin production by Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from oyster. Int J Food Microbiol 1997, 38, 111-116. 39. Wang Y., Gu J-D.: Influence of temperature, salinity and pH on the growth of environmental Aeromonas and Vibrio species isolated from Mai Po and the Inner Deep Bay Nature Reserve Ramsar Site of Hong Kong. J Basic Microbiol 2005, 45, 83-93.