* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Phys 210A — Spring 2016 Problem Set #3: Quantum Statistical
Survey
Document related concepts
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Density functional theory wikipedia , lookup
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Phys 210A — Spring 2016 Problem Set #3: Quantum Statistical Mechanics Due date: Wednesday May 11th 1. Relativistic Electron Gas — For an electron whose energy is much larger than the rest energy me c2 , the relation between energy and momentum can be approximated by the extreme relativistic form ε = p · c. This can happen at very high electron density or very high temperature regardless of density. (a) Compute (up to a constant) the classical partition function, i.e., using Boltmann statistics, for a gas of N electrons confined in a volume V maintained at a temperature T . [You may assume that a background of fixed positive charges exists and that the Coulomb interaction between the particles are screened out.] (b) Obtain the mean thermal energy E(T ) and the specific heat CV (T ) of this system. Compare to the result of the equipartition theorem. For what range of temperatures is the use of the extreme relativistic form justified. (c) Obtain the equation of state using the grand canonical ensemble and compare to that of the ideal nonrelativistic gas. (d) At low temperatures, the relativistic form is still valid at sufficiently high density, if the effect of quantum statistics is included. Compute the density of states D(ε) and obtain the relation between the Fermi energy εF and the electron density. For what temperature range is the use of quantum statistics necessary? [You may assume the electrons to be confined in a ‘‘periodic’’ cubic box.] 2. Ideal Fermi Gas — In class, we showed that in the limit T → 0, the chemical potential µ of an ideal Fermi gas is given by the Fermi energy h̄2 εF = 2m !2/3 6π 2 ρ g , where m is the mass of the fermion, g is the degree of degeneracy, and ρ is the density of the gas. In this problem, you are asked to computer the leading order correction to the following quantities at low temperatures: (a) the chemical potential, (b) the pressure exerted by the gas, (c) average energy. From your answer to (c), find the specific heat to leading order in T . 3. Ideal Gas in Two Dimensions — Consider an ideal gas consisted of N spin-0 particles of mass m in a two-dimensional periodic box of size L × L, kept at a constant temperature T . In studying this problem. it will be convenient to introduce the grand canonical ensemble as a mathematical device. (a) Find the density of states, D(ε). (b) Write down the pressure P in terms of the fugacity f ; write down also the auxiliary condition which determines f (N ). (c) In the limit of low density and high temperature, find the equation of state P (N ) to leading nonlinear order. (d) Show that in the thermodynamic limit, no Bose-Einstein condensation occurs at any finite temperature. More specifically, show that TBE ∝ 1/ log(N ). 4. Vibrational Specific Heat of Solids — In this problem, we will analyze the contribution to the specific heat of a crystalline solid due to its quantized lattice vibrations, phonons. In the Einstein model of lattice vibration, one approximates a lattice of N atoms by noninteracting (quantum) harmonic oscillators, each with frequency ω. Three oscillators per atom are used to describe motion in the x, y, z directions. (a) Compute the partition function of this system, and hence obtain the mean energy ε(T ; ω) per atom. (b) Find the specific heat CV (T ). Show that in the limit T → ∞, the DulongPetit law of classical physics is recovered. Show also that CV (T ) → 0 as T → 0. The explanation of vanishing specific heat at low T , as a result of quantum mechanics, was a great triumph of the Einstein theory. A more quantitatively accurate theory was due to Debye, who assumed that each oscillator can take on a range of frequencies ωi , corresponding to the different normal mode k of lattice vibration. Alternatively, one can view the quantized lattice vibrations (phonons) as an ideal bose gas, with energies ε(k) = h̄ω(k). It is useful to introduce the frequency distribution function D(ω), where D(ω)dω describes the number of modes having frequency between ω and ω + dω. (c) What is the mean energy per atom ε(T ) in term of D(ω) ? Find ε(T ) in the limit of high temperature, thereby showing that the high temperature behavior is indepedent ofR the choice D(ω). [Note the normalization condition on D(ω) is 0∞ dωD(ω) = 3N .] (d) Low temperature behavior does depend on the form of D(ω), which can be obtained from the knowledge of the phonon dispersion relation ω(k). Assuming that ω(k) = v·|k|, where v is the sound speed, show that D(ω) = αV ω 2 , with V being the volume of the solid and α being a proportionality constant. To satisfy the normalization condition on D(ω), Debye introduced an approximation in which he took the result of (d) up to some cutoff frequency ωD , chosen to give a total of 3N modes. For ω > ωD , Debye assumed that D(ω) = 0. (e) Using Debye’s approximation, write down an expression for the mean energy per atom ε in terms of h̄ωD and a dimensionless parameter TD /T , where the Debye temperature TD is defined by kB TD = h̄ωD . (f ) Find the vibrational specific heat CV (T ) for T TD . Show that the T dependence follows generally from the k → 0 limit of the dispersion relation and is insensitive to Debye’s approximation. What is the T -dependence for a d-dimensional solid ?