Download Lecture 2: Atomic structure in external fields. The Zeeman effect.

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Nitrogen-vacancy center wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Ising model wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Casimir effect wikipedia , lookup

Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Tight binding wikipedia , lookup

Dirac bracket wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Magnetoreception wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup

Mössbauer spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup

Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
2
2.1
2.1.1
Atoms in static fields
Magnetic fields: the Zeeman effect
Origins
If an external magnetic field B is applied to an atom — which we shall
without loss of generality take to be in the z-direction, B = Bz ẑ — then it
becomes favourable for the atoms’ own magnetic moments to align with
the applied field. The shifts in the energies of different magnetic moment
configurations is expressed by the Zeeman Hamiltonian
ĤZeeman = µB L̂z Bz + gs µB Ŝz .
(38)
Provided the energy involved is small compared to the fine structure, such
that J is a good quantum number and the angular momentum vectors L
and S precess around J, this can be written as
ĤZeeman =
�(L̂ + gs Ŝ) · Ĵ�
µB Bz Ĵz = g J µB Bz Ĵz ,
J(J + 1)
(39)
where the Landé g-factor is given in terms of the relevant quantum numbers
gJ = 1 +
J(J + 1) − L(L + 1) + S(S + 1)
.
2J(J + 1)
(40)
For very strong external fields the transform into terms of Ĵ is not valid;
only L and S are good quantum numbers. This is the Paschen–Back
regime. Note that here we have also ignored any interaction of the nuclear
magnetic moment with the external field; in very strong fields that should
also be revisted.
2.1.2
Zeeman effect on hyperfine structure
Weak field
In weak magnetic fields, the Zeeman Hamiltonian lifts the degeneracy
between hyperfine levels with equal F and unequal MF in a linear fashion,
giving energy shifts
18
ΔEZ = gF µB Bz MF ,
(41)
where, in a similar way to g J , gF represents an average of a projection of
Ĵ onto F̂:
gF = g J
F(F + 1) + J(J + 1) − I(I + 1)
�Ĵ · F̂�
= gJ
.
F(F + 1)
2F(F + 1)
(42)
Strong fields
In stronger fields (but not strong enough to rival fine structure effects!)
the hyperfine Hamiltonian is dominated by the Zeeman Hamiltonian, and
M J , MI become the appropriate quantum numbers instead of F and MF .
This leads to energy shifts given by
ΔEZ ≈ g J µB Bz M J .
(43)
This is often termed the hyperfine Paschen–Back regime.
Intermediate fields
While the above limits are helpful for understanding, most interesting
experiments using hyperfine levels do not fall exactly in either regime.
Therefore, for a given term (such as 2P3/2 in Hydrogen) it can help to
study the problem non-perturbatively in the |J, I, M J , MI � basis. In this
case, one constructs a matrix representation of the sum of hyperfine and
Zeeman Hamiltonians for a given field, that is
ĤHFSZ = ĤHFS + ĤZ ,
(44)
and diagonalizes to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Such a calculation leads to a diagram of energy levels as a function of magnetic field,
typically referred to as a Breit–Rabi diagram (although Breit and Rabi only
made the calculation for Hydrogen) as shown in Fig. 4. Performing such
a calculation forms the core of exercise set 2.
2.2
Electric fields: the Stark effect
An external electric field also shifts the energy eigenvalues and eigenstates
of an atom. The calculation of this Stark effect is more involved than
the above calculations for the Zeeman effect, and we will not go into any
details beyond noting that the perturbing Hamiltonian is of the form
19
Figure 4: Schematic Breit–Rabi diagram showing the splitting of hyperfine
energy levels in an applied magnetic field due to the Zeeman Hamiltonian
for a 2 S 1 term (after Foot, Fig. 6.10).
2
HS = −d̂ · Ê ,
(45)
where d̂ is the atomic electric dipole moment operator, given in an Nvalence-electron atom by
d̂ = −e
N
�
r̂i .
i=1
(46)
Exercises 2
More angular momentum
1. Find the matrix representing jˆ2 for a j = 3/2 system.
(2 marks)
2. Consider two angular momenta, denoted A and B, with jA = jB =
3/2, which sum to form Ĵ = ĵA + ĵB . Find matrices representing
jˆ2A , jˆ2Az , and jˆ2B , jˆBz , in the uncoupled basis.
(4 marks)
20
A generalized Breit-Rabi diagram
4. Write a code that constructs the zero-field hyperfine Hamiltonian
for the 32 P3/2 term of 23 Na in the |M J , MI � basis25 . Diagonalize the
resulting Hamiltonian with, and without, the electric quadrupole
terms to find the resulting energy levels (in MHz).
You will find all necessary coefficients tabulated in Steck.
25
(6 marks)
5. By adding the Zeeman Hamiltonian, compute the Breit-Rabi diagram for the hyperfine Zeeman splitting of the 32 P3/2 term, in
fields of up to 100 Gauss (plot energies in MHz).
(6 marks)
6. Due to space issues, a student working experimentally on the 23 Na
D2 line finds themselves in a lab next to Prof. X’s super-magnet.
The ambient magnetic field strength is rising! At roughly what
field strength will the 32 P3/2 and 32 P1/2 manifolds intersect?26
(2 marks)
21
Hint: you don’t need to use
your code to estimate this.
26