Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Dwarf Galaxies: •! •! •! •! Low-luminosity: 106 – 1010 L! Low-mass: 107 – 1010 M! Small in size, ~few kpc Often low surface brightness, so they are hard to find! •! Why are dwarf galaxies important?? Schechter Function by environment Bingelli (1988) Field – dominated by Spirals, faint end dIrr Clusters – many more E/S0 galaxies, faint end dE, more dwarfs than in field Dwarf Galaxies: •! Why are dwarf galaxies important?? –! Majority of galaxies are dwarfs!! –! Dwarf galaxies may be remnants of galaxy formation process: “proto-dwarf” gas clouds came together to form larger galaxies (hierarchical formation) –! Dwarf galaxies are currently being “absorbed” by larger galaxies –! Dwarf galaxies are relatively simple systems, not merger products Dwarf Galaxies: •! Different types of dwarf galaxies –! Dwarf ellipticals (dE): Note that these are structurally very different from luminous E’s. Gas-poor, old stellar population. Note that many dE’s have nuclei (dE,N). –! Dwarf spheroidals (dSph): Gas-poor, diffuse systems. Low luminosity (low surface brightness end of dE’s. –! Dwarf irregulars (dIrr): Extreme end of late type spirals. Active, ongoing star-formation but low surface brightness (like dSph’s). Gasrich. Note that there are no dwarf spirals!! •! Is there an evolutionary link between dE’s and dIrr’s?? NGC205 (dE,N) M31 M32 (cE) NGC205 (dE) Leo I, dSph Pegasus, dSph Sagittarius, dIrr Dwarf Ellipticals: Sagittarius, dIrr Surface brightness of Virgo dE’s, Binggeli & Jerjen 1998 •! dE’s are structurally very different than luminous ellipticals. –! Probably means different formation history. •! dE’s approximately follow exponential profiles, –! I(r) = I0 exp{-r/re} –! Not r1/4 law!! –! More generally, follow a Sersic profile: I(r) = I(re) exp{-b(r/re)1/n –1} with varying n •! Note that compact ellipticals (cE’s) do have similar structural properties to luminous ellipticals. They may have lost their outer portions due to tidal stripping. (e.g., M32 interacting with M31) 1/n values Effective radius vs Absolute magnitude Central surface brightness & core radius relations (Kormendy) Average surface brightness vs Absolute magnitude Dwarf Irregulars: •! Show knots of star formation •! Surface brightness profile (in IR where it is tracing old stars) is exponential •! HI gas is more extended relative to stellar distribution than in spirals •! Blue compact dwarfs (BCDs) are extreme dwarf irregulars only a few regions of star formation –! BCDs may be young objects forming stars for the first time •! Star formation in dIrr’s and BCDs leads to bubbles of HII gas which can cause significant mass loss Cannon et al. 2002 WFPC2 observations of I Zw 18 H! Wilcots et al, Observations of IC10 H" HI Meurer et al. 1992, 1998 Observations of NGC 1705 Blue=HI Green=optical (B) Pink=H! H! Star formation histories: •! In the Local Group, we can study the resolved stellar population (color magnitude diagrams) to determine the star formation histories of dwarf galaxies •! Dwarf ellipticals are generally old (stars formed > 10 Gyr old), but some may have had more recent (a few Gyr ago) weaker episodes of star formation •! Dwarf irregulars tend to have quasi-continuous star formation (perhaps interspersed with bursts). Lower luminosity dIrr’s more likely to have a bursty history •! Environmental effects may play a role (e.g., tidal stripping removing gas from dSph’s) •! No two galaxies have the same star formation history! Theoretical isochrones and CMD for IC 1613 Skillman et al. 2003 Star formation history and metal enrichment history of IC 1613 Skillman et al. 2003 From Grebel (2000) Population Box (after Hodge, 1989) Abundances: From Grebel (2000) Abundances in dwarf galaxies, Mateo 1998 •! Dwarf galaxies have low metallicities (significantly less than solar) •! Dwarf galaxies obey a metallicity luminosity relation, but dIrr’s and dE/dSph’s follow separate tracks •! Evidence against a evolutionary path from dIrr to dSph Kinematics: •! Measure kinematics of dE’s and dSph’s via highresolution spectroscopy of absorption lines in individual stars •! dIrr galaxies are dominated by rotation, can measure rotation curves of the HI gas •! All dwarf galaxies are dark matter dominated (throughout the galaxy), with M/L ~ 3- 100 Square = dE or dSph Triangles = “transition objects” Circles=dIrr Filled=[Fe/H] from stars Open=[O/H] from HII regions and PNe Geha et al. 2003 Central M/L Velocity dispersions of dE’s in Virgo Total M/L Filled square = dSph Open square=dIrr Note M/L is probably underestimated for dSph Using dwarf galaxies to measure dark halos of massive galaxies: •! We can use isolated satellite dwarfs as “tracer particles” to measure the dark matter content of massive galaxies at large galactocentric radii –! Why do we need isolated galaxies to do this? •! Measure radial velocities in large statistical samples, find that velocities are large, even at several 100 kpc, implying large dark halos! –! What are potential problems with this analysis? Zaritsky et al 1997 Future of dwarf galaxies: SDSS Prada et al. 2004 •! Dwarf galaxies are easily disrupted via interactions with larger galaxies •! We see this happening in the Local Group! •! Larger galaxies may be built up by “eating” dwarf galaxies •! The Milky Way is a cannibal!! Escape velocity Sagittarius dwarf, shredded by the Milky Way Majewski et al. 2003 Canis Major, shredded by the Milky Way Ibata et al. 2003, nearest galaxy to MW, recently discovered! Andromeda is also a cannibal -- Ibata et al 2004 NGC 4013, Gabany et al (2008) -- including C. Palma (PSU) Tidal Dwarfs: •! Dwarf galaxies can form from the debris torn from more massive galaxies during interactions & mergers •! Do not contain dark matter •! May have high metallicities The Antennae WFPC2 imaging of the tail of the Antennae HI observations of the tail of the Antennae Saviane et al. 2004 Saviane et al. 2004 Yellow=young stellar assoc. Blue=bright blue stars Yellow cross= faint blue stars Red=bright red stars (supergiants) The number of dwarf galaxies increases with redshift … Galaxy groups & interactions: •! Galaxies are social creatures, almost all are found in pairs, groups, and clusters •! Groups have < 50 galaxies, sizes ~1-2 Mpc, # ~ 100-500 km/s •! In contrast, clusters have 50 – several thousands of galaxies, sizes ~ few Mpc, # ~ 700-1200 km/s •! Nearby groups: –! The Local Group! –! M81 group –! Sculptor group •! Groups have HI gas and x-ray halos Properties of groups: Neighborhood of the Milky Way •! Prototypical group has 3-6 bright members and 30-40 faint ones •! Velocity dispersions ~100-500 km/s •! X-ray luminosities ~ 1042-1043 erg/s •! M/L ~200 !!! •! Groups show morphological segregation, spirals and irregulars tend to lie on the edges of the groups, dE’s and dSph’s are companions to massive galaxies •! Groups are dominated by spirals and irregulars Map of the Local Group Local Group to scale The Leo I (or M96) Group The M81 Group