Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
JACC Vol. 6, No. I July 1985:161-2 161 Editorial Comment A New Look at Repolarization Abnormalities and Arrhythmias* ALLAN M. GREENSPAN, MD, FACC Philadelphia. Pennsylvania Ordered activation of the heart depends on synchronous and uniform conduction of the depolarizing electrical wave front and synchronous repolarization and recovery of excitability, and thereby obviates the development of substrates for the generation of arrhythmias. Such substrates occur when there is incomplete or delayed activation of myocardial segments ( 1) or when there is nonuniform repolarization and recovery of excitability (2). These conditions can lead to 1) the development of mUltiple activation pathways, allowing for reentry of the activation wave front; 2) the development of significant voltage gradients between myocardial segments that generate local extracellular current which can initiate abnormal automaticity (3); or 3) the alteration of properties of conduction and refractoriness that will allow perpetuation of the spread of abnormal activation wave fronts. Previously, emphasis was placed on the role of slowed conduction and conduction block in the generation of reentry as the major mechanism of clinical arrhythmias (4). More recently, with the demonstration of early and delayed afterdepolarizations that can be induced to generate repetitive propagated responses, the concept of triggered automaticity has been cited as a possible important mechanism for clinical arrhythmias (5), although there has been no clear clinical evidence. Focal repolarization abnormalities. The role of focal repolarization abnormalities in generating clinical arrhythmias has been discussed theoretically, but has not been given much emphasis, Part of the reason for this is the concept that abnormalities of repolarization are usually quite localized and generate potential differences of limited amplitude such that they cannot be propagated to any degree outside the local area of abnormality. Therefore their impact in generating arrhythmias would be small. Furthermore, unlike the depolarization waveform, re*Editorials published in Journal of the American College ofCardio.logy reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the vIews of JACC or the American College of Cardiology. From the Department of Clinical Electrophysiology. Hahnemann University. Philadelphia. Pennsylvania. Address for reprints: Allan M. Greenspan. MD. Clinical Electrophy~ iology Laboratory. Likoff Cardiovascular Institute of Hahne~ann Umversity. 6617 New College Building. Broad and Vine Streets. PhIladelphIa. Pennsylvania 19102. © 1985 by the American College of Cardiology polarization has been shown to propagate in the normal heart at such slow rates that there is no distinct repolarization waveform (6). At any time, a local region undergoing repolarization would be surrounded by regions whose repolarization processes were at a slightly greater or lesser degree of completion than its own, producing a rather gentle voltage gradient across the myocardium, which would effectively buffer any local abnormalities of repolarization in the immediate region (7). Thus it is theorized that only gross repolarization abnormalities could be transmitted beyond their local region of origin and have a significant impact on impulse generation or conduction. The novel findings in the report of Kupersmith and Hoff in this issue of the Journal (8) include the demonstration that abnormalities of repolarization can be transmitted rapidly and over a significant distance (5 to 10 mm) between isolated segments of a Purkinje fiber with differing repolarization activity by either electrotonic interaction or generation of a propagated response. This might indicate that abnormalities of repolarization are not spatially limited to immediate areas of damage or metabolic derangement, and could have effects from a distance. Other investigators (9) have suggested that electrotonic interactions between two regions separated by a well coupled but inexcitable segment could form the substrate for development of a steeper voltage gradient creating sinks and sources of current. These in tum could generate local circuit currents resulting in depolarization-induced automaticity as in the ischemic border zone model. In the present study the portion of the fiber tightly compressed by the rubber membrane may provide the functional equivalent of such a well coupled, inexcitable segment, and thus create the necessary conditions for transmission of the repolarization abnormality. Incomplete transmission of repolarization abnormality. Another important finding of Kupersmith and Hoff (8) is the observation that there can be incomplete transmission of the repolarization abnormality, perhaps dependent on the amplitude of the voltage gradient and the components of longitudinal and axial resistance that affect the degree of coupling between the segments. Thus, a repolarization abnormality characterized by a prolonged plateau and a secondary hump. which in the abnormal segment produces no regenerative action potential, when transmitted as only the secondary hump to the normal segment becomes a delayed afterdepolarization and triggers a closely coupled repetitive response that can initiate a sustained arrhythmia. Electrotonic coupling of remote and abnormal segments. The other novel finding in this report (8) is the demonstration that transmission of repolarization characteristics is a two-way phenomenon with the capability of transmitting normalizing properties from the normal to the deranged segment, as well. This has major implications for 0735-1097/85/$3.30 162 JACC Vol. 6, No. I GREENSPAN EDITORIAL COMMENT antiarrhythmic drug interventions, because it suggests that for a drug that alters abnormal repolarization to be effective, it need not be physically at the site of arrhythmia generation, but can influence that site from remote areas by electrotonic coupling to the abnormal segments. Thus a drug could suppress arrhythmias occurring in acutely ischemic tissue even if there were little or no effective blood supply to the arrhythmogenic region. Clinical implications. Although further work is required to establish the role of repolarization abnormalities in the generation of clinical arrhythmias, there are two clinical conditions in which the propagation of repolarization abnormalities has a plausible role: 1) arrhythmias occurring in the setting of acute metabolic derangements (electrolyte disturbances and ischemia), and 2) arrhythmias associated with the long QT syndrome. In both of these situations surface epicardial and endocardial recordings of bizarre T waves have been made that are associated with abnormal repolarization (10, II). In the case of the acutely ischemic border zone, these deep negative T waves that generally precede development of ventricular premature complexes are associated with the occurrence of separate regions of current sources and sinks due to differences in the state of repolarization between ischemic and adjacent normal border zone tissue. In a patient with the long QT syndrome, a similar bizarre local endocardial slow wave occurring at the time of the T wave was also recorded and could well reflect afterdepolarizations generated by the inhomogenous repolarization found in this condition. Limitations. There are limitations to the present study. First, the manipulations performed to generate the repoJarization abnormalities are quite unphysiologic and only demonstrate that the repoiarization abnormalities can be transmitted, without investigating the actual physiologic circumstances under which they could occur. Second, the study is purely descriptive, without attempting to analyze July 1985:161-2 the mechanism for transmission of repolarization abnormalities. Despite these limitations, the findings of this study that the properties of repolarization, both normal and abnormal, under specific circumstances are not spatially limited and can be transmitted over reasonable distances imply that a new look should be given to the role of abnormal repolarization in the generation of clinically important arrhythmias. References I. Wit AL, Rosen MR, Hoffman BF. Electrophysiology and pharmacology of cardiac arrhythmias. II. Relationship of normal and abnormal electrical activity of cardiac fibers to the genesis of arrhythmias. B. Re-entry. Section I. Am Heart J 1974; 88:664-70. 2. Moe GK, Abildskov JA, Han J. Factors responsible for the initiation and maintenance of ventricular fibrillation. In: Surawicz B, Pellegrino ED, eds. Sudden Cardiac Death. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1964:56. 3. Katzung BG, Hondeghem LM, Grant AO. Cardiac ventricular automaticity induced by current of injury. Pflugers Arch 1975;360: 193-7. 4. Han J. Mechanism of ventricular arrhythmias associated with myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1969;24:800-13. 5. Cranefield PF. Action potentials, afterpotentials and arrhythmias. Circ Res 1977;41:415-23. 6. Cranefield PF, Hoffman BF. Propagated repolarization in heart muscle. J Gen Physiol 1958;41 :633-49. 7. Moe GK, Mendez C. Physiologic basis of premature beats and sustained tachycardia. N Engl J Med 1973;288:250-4. 8. Kupersmith J, Hoff P. Occurrence and transmission of localized repolarization abnormalities in vitro. J Am Coli CardioI1985;6: 152-60. 9. Janse MJ, Van Capelle FJL. Morsink H, et al. Flow of "injury" current and patterns of excitation during early ventricular arrhythmias in acute regional myocardial ischemia in isolated canine and porcine hearts. Circ Res 1980;47:151-65. 10. Janse MJ, Kleber AG. Electrophysiologic changes and ventricular arrhythmias in the early phase of regional myocardial ischemia. Circ Res 198 I ;49: 1069-81. I I. Schechter E, Freeman CC, Lazzara R. Afterdepolarizations as a mechanism for long QT syndrome: electrophysiologic studies of a case. J Am Coli Cardiol 1984;5: 1556-61.