Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Ancient Roman architecture wikipedia , lookup
Roman historiography wikipedia , lookup
Roman Republican governors of Gaul wikipedia , lookup
Roman funerary practices wikipedia , lookup
Education in ancient Rome wikipedia , lookup
Travel in Classical antiquity wikipedia , lookup
Culture of ancient Rome wikipedia , lookup
Roman agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Early Roman army wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Romans Ate Meals Most Americans Would Recognize By Joel N. Shurkin, Inside Science | February 6th 2015 08:46 AM Let's pretend it is 56 B.C. and you have been fortunate enough to be invited to a party at the home of Lucius Piso Caesoninus, Julius Caesar's father-in-law and a former consul of Rome. What's for dinner? You need to prepare for pig. Archaeologists studying the eating habits of ancient Etruscans and Romans have found that pork was the staple of Italian cuisine before and during the Roman Empire. Both the poor and the rich ate pig as the meat of choice, although the rich, like Piso, got better cuts, ate meat more often, and likely received larger quantities. They had pork chops, a form of bacon, and even served sausages; in other words, a meal not unlike what you'd find in Rome today -- or in South Philadelphia. Researchers discussed this ancient Mediterranean diet at a meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America in New Orleans. 1 Dinner parties were the way the Roman aristocracy showed off their wealth and prestige, according to Michael MacKinnon, professor of archaeology at the University of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. “Status in the upper class was declared with the presentation of the meal, the use of rare spices, and fine dinnerware,” he explained. "The wealthier you are the more you want to invest in display and advertising to your guests. Flash was perhaps more important than substance," said MacKinnon. "Whole animals showed great wealth." 1 “Besides the meat, there would be vegetables that looked a little different from what we eat,” said Angela Trentacoste of the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. “Except for grain, which was imported in huge quantities from places throughout the empire, like North Africa, everything was locally grown.” 2 MacKinnon and Trentacoste are zooarchaeologists, scientists who study the remains of animals found in archaeological sites. They rummage through ancient garbage dumps or middens, and occasionally even ancient latrines looking for the bones of animals and fish people ate. “People would sometimes dump garbage in latrines instead of walking to the neighborhood dump,” MacKinnon said. 2 From this, zooarchaeologists can deduce a great deal from bones about what life and diets were like in ancient Italy. Looking at the bones in an ancient dump, they can tell how the food supply worked. Zooarchaeologists also have literary evidence of what was eaten from writers, often denoted in satirical plays where extravagant indulgences were mocked. Trentacoste specializes in the Etruscan civilization that preceded Rome in Italy. Much of her digging was in the tombs of rich Etruscans who often were buried with food and utensils. On some sites, she found 20,000 animal bones amid the rubbish. “As the dominance of Rome grew so did the city, and what was a largely rural Etruscan society became a more urban Roman one,” she said. That changed the food supply. Most food, like today, came from farms outside the 2 city.” “But, the city dwellers still raised pigs. They take up little room, can be easily bred and transported,” Trentacoste said, “and are easy to raise.” “They also had chickens roaming that looked much like the chickens of today,” MacKinnon said, “and they were close to the same size.” Though cattle tended to take up too much room, rich Romans had beef occasionally, and sometimes goat. 3 The lower classes ate to stay alive. Some historians believe the lower class was mostly vegetarian but, according to MacKinnon and Trentacoste, that is not true. The lower class generally ate the same things the upper class did, but not the same cuts and probably not in the same quantities. Lower class Romans did not have fancy flatware. Instead, they used simple or makeshift utensils. Because only the upper class had kitchens at home, other Romans bought food from street vendors, something like the lunch wagons of today. “Mostly,” MacKinnon said, “they would put the food in large pots and make stews or a porridge. They might also boil the meat.” Only the wealthy were able to broil or barbecue. 3 Despite legend, most Romans or Etruscans did not eat exotic animals regularly. However, some upper class dinners might include songbirds swallowed whole. One midden in Rome even contained the bones of a slaughtered camel. Songbirds are still eaten in some parts of Italy. “One legend may be true,” MacKinnon stated: “Vomitoriums. With so much food at Piso’s table, many would want to indulge. To make room, they would excuse themselves from the table and purge.”