* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Ionization
Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup
Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup
Photoelectric effect wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
' onization $ 1 Ionization & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 2 Ionization The basic mechanism is an inelastic collision of the moving charged particle with the atomic electrons of the material, ejecting off an electron from the atom : p + atom → p + atom+ + e− In each individual collision, the energy transfered to the electron is small. But the total number of collisions is large, and we can well define the average energy loss per (macroscopic) unit path length. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 3 Mean energy loss and energetic δ-rays dσ(Z, E, T ) dT is the differential cross-section per atom for the ejection of an electron with kinetic energy T by an incident charged particle of total energy E moving in a material of density ρ. One may wish to take into account separately the high-energy knock-on electrons produced above a given threshold Tcut (miss detection, explicit simulation ...). Tcut I (mean excitation energy in the material). Tcut > 1 keV in Geant4 Below this threshold, the soft knock-on electrons are counted only as continuous energy lost by the incident particle. Above it, they are explicitly generated. Those electrons must be excluded from the mean continuous energy loss count. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 4 The mean rate of the energy lost by the incident particle due to the soft δ-rays is : Z Tcut dσ(Z, E, T ) dEsof t (E, Tcut ) = nat · T dT (1) dx dT 0 nat : nb of atoms per volume in the matter. The total cross-section per atom for the ejection of an electron of energy T > Tcut is : Z Tmax dσ(Z, E, T ) dT (2) σ(Z, E, Tcut ) = dT Tcut where Tmax is the maximum energy transferable to the free electron. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 5 Mean rate of energy loss by heavy particles The integration of equation 1 leads to the well known Bethe-Bloch truncated energy loss formula [pdg] : (zp )2 dE 2 2 = 2πre mc nel 2 × dx T <Tcut β 2 2 2 Tup 2Ce 2mc β γ Tup 2 − β 1 + − δ − ln I2 Tmax Z & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 6 where classical electron radius: mc2 energy-mass of electron nel electrons density in the material zp charge of the incident particle Tup min(Tcut , Tmax ) I mean excitation energy in the material δ density effect function Ce shell correction function nel = Z nat & Geant4 Tutorial e2 /(4π0 mc2 ) re Nav ρ =Z A Tmax 2mc2 (γ 2 − 1) = 1 + 2γm/M + (m/M )2 % May 23, 2007 $ ' Stopping power [MeV cm2/g] onization 7 µ+ on Cu µ− 100 Bethe-Bloch 10 LindhardScharff AndersonZiegler Eµc Nuclear losses Radiative losses Radiative Minimum effects ionization reach 1% Without δ 1 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 0.1 1 10 100 1 & Geant4 Tutorial [MeV/c] βγ 100 1000 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 100 1 10 100 [GeV/c] Muon momentum [TeV/c] % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 8 mean excitation energy There exists a variety of phenomenological approximations for I, the simplest being I = 10eV × Z In Geant4 we have tabulated the recommended values in [icru84]. 22 20 18 16 I/Z (eV) ICRU 37 (1984) 14 Barkas & Berger 1964 12 10 8 & Geant4 Tutorial 0 10 20 30 40 50 Z 60 70 80 90 100 % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 9 the density effect δ is a correction term which takes into account of the reduction in energy loss due to the so-called density effect. This becomes important at high energy because media have a tendency to become polarised as the incident particle velocity increases. As a consequence, the atoms in a medium can no longer be considered as isolated. To correct for this effect the formulation of Sternheimer [Ster71] is generally used. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 10 the shell correction 2Ce /Z is a so-called shell correction term which accounts for the fact that, under certain conditions, the probability of collision with the electrons of the inner atomic shells (K, L, etc.) is negligible. The semi-empirical formula used in Geant4, applicable to all materials, is due to Barkas [Bark62]: Ce (I, βγ) = & Geant4 Tutorial a(I) b(I) c(I) + + (βγ)2 (βγ)4 (βγ)6 % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 11 low energies The mean energy loss can be described by the Bethe-Bloch formula only if the projectile velocity is larger than that of orbital electrons. In the low-energy region where this is not verified, a different kind of parameterisation must be used. For instance: • Andersen and Ziegler [Ziegl77] for 0.01 < β < 0.05 • Lindhard [Lind63] for β < 0.01 See ICRU Report 49 [icru93] for a detailed discussion of low-energy corrections. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 12 low energies in G4hIonisation, a simple parametrisation gives the energy loss as a function of τ = (T /Mproton c2 ) : √ dE/dx = nel · (A τ + Bτ ) √ dE/dx = nel · C/ τ for for τ ≤ τ0 τ ∈ [τ0 , τ1 ] The parameters A, B, C are such that dE/dx is a continuous function of the kinetic energy T at τ0 and τ1 . Above T1 the truncated Bethe-Bloch formula is used. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 13 PhysicsTables At initialization stage, the function BuildPhysicsTables() computes and tabulates the dE/dx due to the soft δ-rays, as a function on energy, and for all materials. The dE/dx of charged hadrons is obtained from that of proton (or antiproton) by calculating the kinetic energy of a proton with the same β, and using this value to interpolate the proton tables. Tproton & Geant4 Tutorial Mproton T = M % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 14 minimum ionization 2.5 10 6 5 H2 liquid 4 He gas 3 2 1 0.1 Sn Pb 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 & Geant4 Tutorial 1.0 10 100 βγ = p/Mc Fe Al C 1000 10 000 1.0 10 100 Muon momentum (GeV/c) 1000 1.0 10 100 Pion momentum (GeV/c) 10 100 1000 Proton momentum (GeV/c) 1000 10 000 〈– dE/dx〉min (MeV g –1cm2) − dE/dx (MeV g−1cm2) 8 H2 gas: 4.10 H2 liquid: 3.97 2.0 2.35 – 0.64 log10(Z) 1.5 Solids Gases 1.0 0.5 H He Li Be B C NO Ne 1 2 5 10 Z Fe 20 Sn 50 100 % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 15 Fluctuations in energy loss h∆Ei = (dE/dx).∆x gives only the average energy loss by ionization. There are fluctuations. Depending of the amount of matter in ∆x the distribution of ∆E can be strongly asymmetric (→ the Landau tail). The large fluctuations are due to a small number of collisions with large energy transfers. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 ' onization $ 16 The figure shows the energy loss distribution of 3 GeV electrons in 5 mm of an Ar/CH4 gas mixture [Affh98]. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 17 Energy loss fluctuations : the models in Geant The straggling is partially taken into account by the simulation of energy loss by the production of δ-electrons with energy T > Tcut . However continuous energy loss also has fluctuations. Two different models of fluctuations are applied depending on the value of the parameter κ which is the lower limit of the number of potential interactions of the particle in the step: κ= ∆E Tcut where ∆E is the mean continuous energy loss in a track segment of length ∆x. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 18 Energy loss fluctuations : Gaussian regime For κ ≥ 10 and if Tmax is not too big ( Tmax ≤ 2Tcut ) the straggling function approaches a Gaussian distribution with Bohr’s variance [icru93]: 2 2 β Z Ω2 = 2πre2 me c2 nel h2 ∆x Tcut 1 − β 2 (Zh is the charge of the incident particle in units of positron charge.) & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 19 Energy loss fluctuations : Urban model For κ < 10. It is based on a rather simple model of the particle-atom interaction. The atoms are assumed to have only two energy levels E1 and E2 . The particle-atom interaction can be : • an excitation with energy loss E1 or E2 • an ionization with energy loss distribution g(E) ∼ 1/E 2 , with E ∈ [E0 , Tup ]. Z Tup E0 Tup 1 g(E) dE = 1 =⇒ g(E) = Tup − E0 E 2 E0 & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 20 The macroscopic cross section for excitation (i = 1, 2) is : fi ln[2mc2 (βγ)2 /Ei ] − β 2 dE (1 − r) Σi = 2 2 2 dx Ei ln[2mc (βγ) /I] − β I = mean excitation energy Ei , fi = energy levels and oscillator strengths of the atom r is a model parameter. fi and Ei must satisfy the sum rules [Bichs88] : f1 + f 2 = 1 f1 · ln E1 + f2 · ln E2 = ln I & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 21 For ionization : Σ3 = dE dx Tup − E0 T E0 Tup ln( Eup ) 0 r E0 = ionization energy of the atom Tup = min(Tmax , Tcut ) & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 22 In a step of length ∆x the nb of collisions ni , (i = 1, 2 for excitation, 3 for ionization) follows a Poisson distribution with : hni i = ∆x Σi The mean energy loss in a step is the sum of the excitation and ionization contributions : ( ) Z Tup dE · ∆x = Σ1 E1 + Σ2 E2 + Eg(E)dE ∆x dx E0 E2 is approximately the K-shell energy of atoms : E2 = 10 eV Z 2 E0 = 10 eV Zf2 = 2 is the number of K-shell electrons. f1 and E1 can be obtained from the sum rules. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 ' onization $ 23 The parameter r is the only variable in the model which can be tuned. This parameter determines the relative contribution of ionization and excitation to the energy loss. Its value has been parametrized from comparison of simulated energy loss distributions to experimental data : Tup r = 0.03 + 0.23 ln ln I & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 ' $ onization 24 Sample the energy loss : the loss due to the excitation is ∆Eexc = n1 E1 + n2 E2 where n1 and n2 are sampled from Poisson distribution. The energy loss due to the ionization can be generated from the distribution g(E) by the inverse transformation method. Then, the contribution from the ionization will be : ∆Eion = n3 X j=1 E0 1 − uj Tup −E0 Tup n3 is the nb of ionizations sampled from Poisson distribution, uj is uniform ∈ [0, 1]. The total energy loss in a step ∆x is ∆E = ∆Eexc + ∆Eion The energy loss fluctuation comes from the fluctuations of the collision numbers ni & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 25 This simple model of the energy loss fluctuations is rather fast and it can be used for any thickness of the materials, and for any Tcut . This has been proved performing many simulations and comparing the results with experimental data, see e.g [Urban95]. Approaching the limit of the validity of Landau’s theory, the loss distribution approaches smoothly the Landau form. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 26 Fluctuations on ∆E lead to fluctuations on the actual range (straggling). penetration of e− (16 MeV) and proton (105 MeV) in 10 cm of water. WORL RUN EVENT NR NR 1 20 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 18/ 9/ 0 WORL RUN EVENT NR NR − e e p − pp − e e p pp p p − p − e− − e 18/ 9/ 0 p p p − e − e e− 1 20 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 e p p e− p p e− − e e− − e − − e e e p − p p e− − e 1 cm & Geant4 Tutorial 1 cm % May 23, 2007 ' onization $ 27 Bragg curve. More energy per unit length are deposit towards the end of trajectory rather at its beginning. MeV/mm proton 105 MeV in water: Bragg peak 5 p 105 MeV e- 16 MeV 4 3 2 1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 X(mm) Edep along X(MeV/bin) & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 28 Energetic δ rays The differential cross-section per atom for producing an electron of kinetic energy T, with I Tcut ≤ T ≤ Tmax , can be written : 2 2 z T T dσ p 1 = 2πre2 mc2 Z 2 2 1 − β 2 + dT β T Tmax 2E 2 (the last term for spin 1/2 only). The integration of equation(2) gives : 2πre2 Zzp2 1 Tmax β2 1 − ln − σ(Z, E, Tcut ) = β2 Tcut Tmax Tmax Tcut Tmax − Tcut + 2E 2 (the last term for spin 1/2 only). & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 29 Mean free path λ(E, Tcut ) = X i nati · σ(Zi , E, Tcut ) !−1 nati : nb of atoms per volume of the ith element in the material. At initialization stage, the function BuildPhysicsTables() computes and tabulates : • meanFreePath for all materials & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 30 sample the energy of the δ-ray Apart from the normalisation, the cross-section can be factorised : dσ = f (T ) g(T ) dT with T ∈ [Tcut , Tmax ] with : f (T ) g(T ) = 1 Tcut = 1−β 2 − 1 Tmax T Tmax 1 T2 T2 + 2E 2 (the last term in g(T ) for spin 1/2 only). The energy T is obtained by : 1. sample T from f (T ) 2. accept/reject the sampled T with a probability g(T ). & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 31 compute the final kinematic The function AlongStepDoIt() computes the energy lost by the ionizing particle, along its step. The function PostStepDoIt() samples the energy of the knock-on electron. Then, the direction of the scattered electron is generated with respect to the direction of the incident particle : θ is calculated from the energy momentum conservation. φ is generated isotropically. This information is used to calculate the energy and momentum of both scattered particles and to transform them into the global coordinate system. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 32 delta rays 200 MeV electrons, protons, alphas in 1 cm of Aluminium WORL & Geant4 Tutorial RUN EVENT NR NR 0.1cm 1 30 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6/ 9/ 0 % May 23, 2007 ' onization $ 33 muon : number of δ-rays per cm in Aluminium Tables for MUON + in Aluminium DRAY X-sec (1/cm) & Geant4 Tutorial muon kinetic energy (GeV) % May 23, 2007 ' onization $ 34 Incident electrons and positrons For incident e−/+ the Bethe Bloch formula must be modified because of the mass and identity of particles (for e− ). One use the Moller or Bhabha cross sections [Mess70] and the Berger-Seltzer dE/dx formula [icru84, Selt84]. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 35 truncated Berger-Seltzer dE/dx formula dE dx 1 × 2 β 2(γ + 1) ± (γ − 1, τup ) − δ + F ln (I/mc2 )2 = 2πre2 mc2 nel T <Tcut where Tcut τc τmax τup energy cut for δ − ray Tcut /mc2 maximum energy transfer: γ − 1 for e+ , (γ − 1)/2 for e− min(τc , τmax ) The functions F ± are given in [Selt84]. & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 ' onization $ 36 de/dx due to ionization (Berger-Seltzer formula) Tables for ELECTRON in Aluminium LOSS (MeV/cm) & Geant4 Tutorial electron kinetic energy (GeV) % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 37 differential cross section per atom (for T I) For the electron-electron (Möller) scattering we have: dσ d = 2πre2 Z × 2 β (γ − 1) 2 1 2γ − 1 1 1 2γ − 1 1 (γ − 1) − − + + γ2 γ2 1− 1− γ2 and for the positron-electron (Bhabha) scattering: 2πre2 Z B1 1 dσ 2 = + B − − B + B 2 3 4 d (γ − 1) β 2 2 & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 38 where E = energy of the incident particle γ = E/mc2 y = 1/(γ + 1) B1 = B2 = B3 = 2 − y2 B4 = (1 − 2y)(3 + y 2 ) = (1 − 2y)2 + (1 − 2y)3 T /(E − mc2 ) (1 − 2y)3 with T the kinematic energy of the scattered electron. The kinematical limits for the variable are: 0 = & Geant4 Tutorial Tcut 1 ≤ ≤ E − mc2 2 for e− e− 0 ≤ ≤ 1 for e+ e− % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 39 Total cross-sections per atom The integration of formula 2 gives the total cross-section per atom, for Möller scattering (e− e− ) : 1 1 2πre2 Z (γ − 1)2 1 −x + − σ(Z, E, Tcut ) = β 2 (γ − 1) γ2 2 x 1−x 2γ − 1 1 − x ln − γ2 x and for Bhabha scattering (e+ e− ) : 2 2πre Z 1 1 − 1 + B1 ln x + B2 (1 − x) σ(Z, E, Tcut ) = 2 (γ − 1) β x B B3 4 (1 − x3 ) − (1 − x2 ) + 2 3 & Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 40 where γ = E/mc2 B1 β2 = B2 x = 1 − (1/γ 2 ) y = & Geant4 Tutorial Tcut /(E − mc2 ) 1/(γ + 1) B3 B4 = 2 − y2 = (1 − 2y)(3 + y 2 ) = (1 − 2y)2 + (1 − 2y)3 = (1 − 2y)3 % May 23, 2007 $ ' onization 41 sample the energy of the δ-ray Apart from the normalisation, the cross-section are factorised as : dσ = f () g() d for e− e− scattering : f () g() = = 1 0 2 1 − 20 2 4 γ 2 2 2 (γ − 1) − (2γ + 2γ − 1) + 9γ 2 − 10γ + 5 1− (1 − )2 and for e+ e− scattering : f () = g() = 1 0 2 1 − 0 B 0 − B 1 + B 2 2 − B 3 3 + B 4 4 B0 − B1 0 + B2 20 − B3 30 + B4 40 Here B0 = γ 2 /(γ 2 − 1) and all the other quantities have been defined & above. Geant4 Tutorial % May 23, 2007 Ionization 41-1 References [Bark62] W. H. Barkas. Technical Report 10292,UCRL, August 1962. [Lind63] J. Lindhad and al., Mat.-Fys. Medd 33, No 14 (1963) [Mess70] H.Messel and D.F.Crawford. Pergamon Press,Oxford,1970. [Ster71] R.M.Sternheimer and al. Phys.Rev. B3 (1971) 3681. [Ziegl77] H.H. Andersen andJ.F. Ziegler, The stopping and ranges of ions in matter (Pergamon Press 1977) [Selt84] S.M. Seltzer and M.J. Berger, Int J. of Applied Rad. 35, 665 (1984) [icru84] ICRU Report No. 37 (1984) [icru93] ICRU Report No. 49 (1993) [Affh98] K. Affholderbach at al. NIM A410, 166 (1998) Geant4 Tutorial May 23, 2007 Ionization 41-2 [pdg] D.E. Groom et al. Particle Data Group . Rev. of Particle Properties. Eur. Phys. J. C15,1 (2000) http://pdg.lbl.gov/ [Bichs88] H.Bichsel Rev.Mod.Phys. 60 (1988) 663 [Urban95] K.Lassila-Perini, L.Urbán Nucl.Inst.Meth. A362(1995) 416 [geant3] geant3 manual Cern Program Library Long Writeup W5013 (1994) Geant4 Tutorial May 23, 2007