Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
76s Biochemical Society Transactions (1997) 25 The effects of bile salts on the kinetic properties of enzymes used in the diagnosis of liver and kidney damage WINSTON A. MORGAN, BALWANT KALER and PETER H. BACH Interdisciplinary Centre for Cell Modulation Studies, University of East London, Faculty of Science and Health, Romford Road, London E l 5 4LZ. The determination of serum and urinary enzymes levels is widely used to assess both liver and kidney damage. However, during obstructive liver disease there is a concurrent elevation in the concentrations of serum and urinary hydrophobic bile salts, which have been reported to alter the activity of a number of enzymes making the accurate assessment of enzymic activity difficult [l]. Bile salts are also used in a number of in vitro studies in an attempt to determine their mechanism of cytotoxicity [2]. However, the methods often used to assess cytotoxicity rely on the determination of enzyme activity such as the leakage of lactate dehydrogenase or the reduction of dimethylthiaml-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetramlium (MTT), consequently the results obtained may be compromised where bile salts interfere with these enzyme activity. Presently there is little information on the direct effects of bile salts on the kinetics of enzymes widely used in clinical diagnosis or in routine biochemistly. The present study assesses the effect of three hydrophobic bile salts (chenodeoxycholic acid, deoxycholic acid and lithocholic) on the kinetic properties of four enzymes (lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), alkaline phosphatase (AP) and y-glutamyltransferase (y-GT)) which are widely used either in clinical diagnosis or as biochemical markers of cell injury. The enzymes were extracted from the kidneys of male Wistar rats (250-3OOg). Kidneys were cut into small pieces and placed in ice cold Earle's-Hepes buffer (pH 7.4) then homogenised using a Potter-Elvehjem teflon-glass homogenizer. The homogenate was then centrifuged for 20 min at lOOOg and stored at -20°C. Prior to assay the homogenate was then centrifuged at lOOOg for 20 min and the supernatant used to determine enzyme activity in the presence of the bile salts. The enzymes were determined by standard biochemical methods [3,4]. Kinetic parameters were determined from either a plot of substrate concentration against initial velocity or from a Lineweaver-Burk plot. Bile salts are potent detergents which are thought to be toxic by a number of mechanisms including the solubilizing of membrane components, the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration and the generation of reactive oxygen species [5,6]. In the present study bile salts appear to be potent inhibitors of enzyme activity, inhibition of LDH, AP and GDH by the three bile acids appears to be noncompetitive, while the bile salts has a slight activating effect on y GT. Lithocholic acid the most hydrophobic bile salt used the study caused the greatest inhibition while chenodeoxycholic and deoxycholic had similar effects on enzyme activity. The mitochcndrial enzyme GDH was the most susceptible to the bile salts; lithocholic (lOOpM), chenodeoxycholic (1000pM) and deoxycholic acid (lOOOpM) decreased the V, of GDH by 88% (P < 0.001), 95% (P < 0.001) and 94% (P c 0.001) as shown in (Table 1). Chenodeoxycholic (lOOOpM) and deoxycholic acid (1000pM) decreased the V, of LDH by 66% and 48% (P < 0.001) respectively, chenodeoxycholic (lOOOpM) and lithocholic acid (100pM) decreased Ap activity by 39% (P < 0.001) and 15% respectively, while the effect of the bile salts on yglutamyltransferase was not significant (Table 1). Lithocholic acid the most hydrophobic bile salt used in the study caused the greatest inhibition while chenodeoxycholic and deoxycholic had similar effects on enzyme activity, this is in agreement with previous studies which suggest cytotoxicity of bile salts correlate with hydrophobicity [2]. The mitochondrial enzyme GDH was the most Table 1. The effect of hvdrophobic bile salts on ennlme kinetics K, (mM) GDH 3.77 0.83** 1.7** 1.8 (n=4) LDH 0.0145 0.0078* 0.013 ND V, (% control) GDH 11.6** 5** 6.3** (n = 4) Control Cheno (1000pM) Deoxy ( IOOOpM) Litho (100pM) AP 0.022 0.020 0.020 0.022 Cheno (1000yM) Deoxy (1000pM) Litho (lOOpM) AP 61** ND 85 LDH 34** 52** ND S T 1.52 2.05 1.76 1.3 S T 94 112 107 The enzymes were entracted from the kidneys of male Wistar rats. Enzyme activity was determined by incubating the enzyme with increasing substrate concentration. The K, and V, values were then extrapulated from either a plot of substrate concentration against initial velocity or from a Lineweaver-Burk plot. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.001 significantly different from control. ~ ~~ susceptible to the bile salts; and may in part explain the inhibition of mitochondria1 respiration. The effect on LDH and AP suggest that bile salts are capable of inhibiting both membrane-bound and cytosolic enzymes. These results suggest that any assessment of enzyme activity in presence of bile acids must take into consideration the direct effect bile acids on the enzyme. Furthermore, these results suggest that the alteration of enzyme activity observed at concentrations of bile salts found in this study may play a role in the liver damage and the renal failure observed during obstructive jaundice. I. Nakagawa, S. and Mashimo, K. (1969) Gastroenterology, 56,1033- 1039 Heuman, D.M., Mills, AS., McCall, J., Hylemon, P.B. and Pandak, W. M. (1991) Gasreroenterology, 100, 203-21 1 Bergmeyer, H.U. and Bernt, E. (1978) Methods Enzymat. Anal., Vol 1. p574-579. Plumber, D.T. and Ngaha, E.O. (1978) Nephrotoxicity, pp 175191. N.Y. Masson Inc. Aoyagi, T. and Lowenstein, L. (1967) Gastroenterology. 4, 686691. Sokol, R.J., Winkihoferrood, B.M., Devereaux, M.W. and McKim, J (1995) Gastroenterology, 109, 1249-1256 1. Mikimo, 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.