* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Morphology review
Chinese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Compound (linguistics) wikipedia , lookup
Zulu grammar wikipedia , lookup
Navajo grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lithuanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sanskrit grammar wikipedia , lookup
Agglutination wikipedia , lookup
Old Irish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Macedonian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ojibwe grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Ukrainian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup
Japanese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Norse morphology wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Esperanto grammar wikipedia , lookup
Morphology (linguistics) wikipedia , lookup
Swedish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Italian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Russian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
French grammar wikipedia , lookup
Turkish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sotho parts of speech wikipedia , lookup
Old English grammar wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Malay grammar wikipedia , lookup
Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Morphology Morphology is the study of shapes. Morphology in linguistics has to do with the shapes of words. How are words formed in a certain language? What rules determine when and how they may adjust their shapes? some terminology: morpheme: a minimal formal shape that expresses meaning (this can be quite tricky to determine) bound morpheme: a morpheme that must be attached to some other morpheme e.g. affix, bound root, clitic free morpheme: a morpheme that does not have to attach to some other form allomorph: a variant pronunciation of a morpheme morphophonemic rules: phonological rules that are restricted to certain morphological contexts root: an unanalyzable form that expresses the basic lexical content of the word derivation: an operation that changes the grammatical category of a root or that changes the valence of a verb (e.g. causative) inflection: an operation required by the syntactic environment of a root e.g. person, number, gender, tense, aspect, mode morphological typology: isolating: every word consists of one morpheme (e.g. Vietnamese) polysynthetic: words tend to consist of several morphemes (e.g. Inuit) fusional: one form can simultaneously express several meanings (e.g. Spanish verb endings) agglutinating: each component of meaning is expressed by a separate morpheme (e.g. Turkish) Questions for the field worker: Is the language dominantly isolating or polysynthetic? If the language is at all polysynthetic, is it dominantly agglutinative or fusional? Give examples of its dominant pattern and any secondary patterns. morphological processes: prefixation suffixation infixation stem modification (e.g. sing vs sang) reduplication: part or all of root is repeated suprafixation: tone or stress pattern signals a morphological operation suppletion: replacement of one stem by another (e.g. go vs went) head/dependent marking: where the relationship between a head and its dependent is marked (e.g. possession is marked on the dependent in English (‘s), but on the head in Farsi) Anthro237b 1 Questions for the field worker: If the language is at all agglutinative, is it dominantly prefixing, suffixing or neither? Illustrate the major and secondary patterns (including examples from all morphological processes if possible). If the language is at all polysynthetic, is it dominantly “head-marking” or “dependentmarking”, or mixed? Give examples of each type of marking the language exhibits. Grammatical categories In traditional grammar, grammatical categories are called “parts of speech”. Sometimes, they are called “lexical categories”. • noun, verb • adjective, adverb • conjunction, particle, adposition distributional properties: how words are distributed in phrases, clauses and texts structural properties: internal structure (e.g. case, number on nouns) properties of nouns: can appear in subject, object position; can take descriptive modifiers, genitive pronouns; pluralization; determiners classification of nouns: proper names, types of possession (e.g. possessable vs. unpossessable; alienably possessed vs. inalienably possessed), count vs. mass nouns, pronouns vs. clitics Questions for the field worker: What are the distributional properties of nouns? What are the structural properties of nouns? What are the major formally distinct subcategories of nouns? What is the basic structure of the noun word (for polysynthetic languages) and/or noun phrase (for more isolating languages)? Does the language have free pronouns and/or anaphoric clitics? Give a chart of the free pronouns and/or anaphoric clitics. verb classes: weather verbs, states, involuntary processes, bodily function, motion, position, action, action-processes, cognition, sensation, emotion, utterance, manipulation also consider argument structure and semantic roles (thematic roles) Questions for the field worker: What are the distributional properties of verbs? What are the structural properties of verbs? What are the major formally distinct subcategories of verbs? Describe the order of various verbal operators within the verbal word or verb phrase. Give charts of the various paradigms, e.g. tense/aspect/mode etc. Indicate major allomorphic variants. Are directional and/or location notions expressed in the verb or verb phrase at all? Anthro237b 2 Questions to answer for all verbal operations: Is this operation obligatory? Is it productive? Is this operation primarily coded morphologically, analytically, or lexically? Are there any exceptions to the general case? Where in the verb phrase or verbal word is this operation likely to appear? Can it occur in more than one place? adjectives: age, dimension, value, colour, shape, non-numeral quantifiers, numerals Questions for the field worker: If you posit a morphosyntactic category of adjectives, give evidence for not grouping these forms with the verbs or nouns. What characterizes a form as being an adjective in this language? How can you characterize semantically the class of concepts coded by this formal category? Do adjectives agree with their heads? What kind of system does the language employ for counting? How high can a native fluent speaker count without resorting to either to words from another language or to a generic word like many? Exemplify the system. Do numerals agree with their head nouns? adverbs: manner, time, direction/location, evidential (source of information), epistemic (degree to which the speaker is committed to the truth of the clause) Questions for the field worker: If you posit a morphosyntactic category of adverbs, give evidence for not grouping these forms with the verbs, nouns or adjectives. What characterizes a form as being an adverb in this language? List some members of different types of adverbs and specify whether there are any restrictions relative to that type. Are any of these classes of adverbs related to older complement-taking verbs? Anthro237b 3