Download AP - Intec Pharma

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Drug design wikipedia , lookup

Polysubstance dependence wikipedia , lookup

Biosimilar wikipedia , lookup

Clinical trial wikipedia , lookup

Orphan drug wikipedia , lookup

Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup

Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup

Psychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Drug interaction wikipedia , lookup

Prescription drug prices in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Medication wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacokinetics wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Pharmaceutical industry wikipedia , lookup

Neuropharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Prescription costs wikipedia , lookup

Theralizumab wikipedia , lookup

Bad Pharma wikipedia , lookup

Bilastine wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Intec
Pharma
Unfolding drug delivery solutions
Investor Presentation
Nasdaq: NTEC
September 2016
Forward Looking Statements
This presentation by Intec Pharma Ltd. (referred to as “we” or “our”) contains forward-looking statements about our expectations, beliefs
and intentions regarding, among other things, our product development efforts, business, financial condition, results of operations,
strategies, plans and prospects. In addition, from time to time, we or our representatives have made or may make forward-looking
statements, orally or in writing. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believe”,
“expect”, “intend”, “plan“, “may“, “should“, “could“, “might“, “seek“, “target“, “will”, “project“, “forecast“, “continue” or “anticipate” or
their negatives or variations of these words or other comparable words or by the fact that these statements do not relate strictly to
historical matters. Forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results as of the date they are
made. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks
and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by the forwardlooking statements. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from the activities and results anticipated
in forward-looking statements, including those described in the sections entitled “risk factors” in the documents that we file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
We believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, these statements are only current predictions and are subject to
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity,
performance or achievements to be materially different from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Given these
uncertainties, you should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf speak only as of the date of this presentation and are
expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this presentation. We undertake no obligations to update or
revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events, except as required by applicable law. In evaluating forward-looking statements, you should consider these risks and
uncertainties.
The presentation contains information about investigation-stage drug products under development, which have not yet been approved
by the FDA for commercial distribution in the United States. All representations in this Presentation are based upon investigations in
certain clinical and other research, but which accordingly should not be construed as general claims for the safety or efficacy of the
products when used by patients.
2
Investment Highlights
• Late clinical stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing drugs based on our
proprietary oral drug delivery system – the Accordion PillTM (AP)

The Accordion Pill is designed to provide a significant improvement in the
pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of various drugs and a corresponding improvement in
efficacy and safety
• Future potential value drivers:

AP Carbidopa/Levodopa (AP-CDLD) for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD)
symptoms: Currently in pivotal Phase III clinical trial (US, EU, ISR)

AP Cannabinoids (AP-CBD/THC) for various indications including pain management –
planned initiation Phase I clinical study in 1Q 2017

AP Zaleplon (AP-ZP) for the treatment of insomnia: Phase II clinical trial completed
• Utilizing 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway – faster and less expensive pathway to market
• Strong and long-term IP protection
• Experienced management team with proven abilities to execute
3
Accordion Pill Platform Technology
• Combines drugs and inactive ingredients into polymeric films that are welded into a planar
structure, folded into the shape of an accordion and placed inside a capsule
• Retained in the stomach for 8 to 12 hours compared to as little as 2 to 3 hours for other solid
dosage forms
• Releases the drug in a pre-defined profile
• Prolongs the absorption phase of drug in the upper part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract
• All inactive ingredients are included in the FDA’s list of approved inactive ingredients
• We have conducted more than 30 clinical trials with over 3,000 administrations
4
Drug Candidates for the Accordion Pill Technology
Poorly soluble drugs
Absorbed mainly in the
upper GI tract (Narrow
Absorption Window)
Act locally in the upper
GI tract
5
Product Pipeline
Product Candidate
Research
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
AP-CDLD*
Parkinson's disease
symptoms in advanced Parkinson’s
disease patients
AP-ZP*
Insomnia
AP-Undisclosed Drug
Prevention and treatment of
gastroduodenal and small bowel
nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)
induced ulcers
AP-CBD/THC**
Cannabinoid treatments for various
indications, including pain
management
AP-Undisclosed Drug
Under collaboration with Biogen
* Under 505(b)(2)Disease
** Planned initiation of Phase I clinical trial - 1Q17
6
AP-CDLD
Parkinson’s disease
Symptoms in Advanced Parkinson’s
Disease Patients
7
Parkinson’s Disease
• Progressive, degenerative disease characterized by movement symptoms such as
involuntary tremor, muscle rigidity, slowness of and a decline in movement and impaired
balance and coordination
• The second most common neurodegenerative disorder in elderly, affecting 1%–2% of
individuals ages ≥65 years worldwide1
• Disease progression and motor complications have a considerable impact on quality of
life
• Approximately 6.3 million people worldwide have Parkinson's disease2
• Drug market in the Seven Major Markets plus Brazil: $3.6 billion annually in 2012,
forecasted $4.67 billion annually by 20221,3
1 Source:
Global Data
European Parkinson’s Association, 2007
3 The Seven Major Markets include the United States, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom
2 Source:
8
Levodopa is the Most Common
Parkinson's Disease Treatment
•
•
•
Levodopa (LD) remains the most effective and most prescribed therapy for Parkinson’s
disease throughout early and late-stage Parkinson's disease
However, frequent LD plasma level fluctuations are correlated with:
 Off episodes (debilitating periods of decreased motor functions)
 Troublesome dyskinesia (vigorous involuntary movements)
These PK fluctuations are due to:
 A very short half-life of about 90 minutes
 LD is absorbed only in the upper part of the GI tract (Narrow Absorption Window)
In advanced Parkinson's patients, stabilizing LD plasma levels
becomes the major factor for improving anti-parkinsonian control1
Dyskinesia
Levodopa
Plasma
Levels
Day
Desired levodopa profile
Current typical levodopa oral medications
Good
On
Off Episodes
1 PK/PD Crossover Comparison of Two LD Extension Strategies, Peter LeWitt et all, Movement Disorders, Vol 24, No.9, 2009
Night
9
AP-CDLD: New Horizon for Levodopa Treatment
Phase 2 clinical trial has shown that AP-CDLD:
 Provided more stable LD plasma levels
 Significantly reduced motor complications
 Significantly reduced number of LD administrations per
day
In comparison to patients’ current LD treatment
BID or TID administration of AP-CDLD is
designed to provide basal, therapeutic,
stable LD plasma levels for PD patients in
various stages of the disease, for the
purpose of significantly improved LD
therapy
Accordion films contain
Levodopa and Carbidopa
Accordion is folded
into a capsule
10
AP-CDLD Phase II Structure
Trial Purpose
Population
Group Number
Trial Design
Group 1
Open-label, multi-dose, 2-way crossover comparative
multi-center, randomized PK trial
Group 2
This trial was orignially planned in early non-fluctuators with a dose of 50/375 mg b.i.d. In light of the satisfactory PK
results with the 50/250 mg b.i.d in this population, the higher dose was considered unneccessary and therefore the
trial was not performed
Group 3
Open-label, multi-dose, 2-way crossover comparative
multi-center, randomized PK and PHDS trial
Advanced PD
patients
10a
AP-CDLD 50/375
mg
b.i.d for
7 days
Group 4**
Open-label, multi-dose, 2-way crossover comparative
multi-center, randomized PHDS trial
Advanced PD
patients
16
AP-CDLD 50/375
mg
b.i.d for
21 days
Group 5b**
Open-label, multi-dose, 2-way crossover comparative
multi-center, randomized PHDS trial
Advanced PD
patients
4
AP-CDLD 50/500
mg
b.i.d for
21 days
Group 6**
Open-label, multi-dose, 2-way crossover comparative
multi-center, randomized PHDS trial
Advanced PD
patients
18
AP-CDLD 50/500
mg
b.i.d for
21 days
Early-stage
PD patients
N (PP) Test Treatment
Treatment and
Duration*
12
AP-CDLD 50/250
mg
b.i.d for
7 days
a Eight
patients completed the PK trial
5 was terminated early due to low enrollment
d = days; PP = per protocol; N = number of subjects; PD = Parkinson’s disease; PHDS = pharmacodynamics
* Not including add-on dosing of immediate release Carbidopa/Levodopa, if needed
** Compared vs. each patient’s optimized current Levodopa treatment
b Group
11
Phase II, Advanced Patients - Study Design
Phase II Group 3
PK
Day 7
6 days
Randomization
AP-CDLD 50/375 mg bid
Day 7
6 days
PK
Phase II Groups 4 & 6
test
17 days
optimization
4 days
Current CD/LD Tx
Screening
Randomization
(4) AP-CDLD 50/375 mg bid*
(6) AP-CDLD 50/500 mg bid*
17 days
conversion
6 days
Day 14
Current CD/LD Tx
Current CD/LD Tx
Screening
PK
4 days
test
AP-CDLD 50/375 mg bid
Day 14
6 days
PK
test
17 days
optimization
4 days
Current CD/LD Tx
(4) AP-CDLD 50/375 mg bid*
(6) AP-CDLD 50/500 mg bid*
4 days
17 days
conversion
test
* If needed, additional IR CD/LD were allowed
12
AP-CDLD Phase II Results Advanced Parkinson Patients
More Stable PK Observed
Significantly Reduced TSD
Significantly Reduced Off Time
Reduced Pill Burden
13
AP-CDLD Status
Regulatory and Clinical:
 Phase III clinical study ongoing
 Patient recruitment initiated in April 2016
 Eligibility for 505(b)(2) regulatory route confirmed
 Only one pivotal study needed for NDA submission
IP:
 Specific AP-CDLD IP is granted in the US and Europe, with expiration in April
2029
14
AP-CDLD Phase III Design
• Design: a multi-center, global, randomized,
double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled,
parallel-group study in adult patients with fluctuating PD
• Primary endpoint: Total Off Time (% of waking hours)
• Secondary endpoints: Daily Off time (hours), On time with and w/o troublesome
dyskinesia (hours), Number of daily LD doses, Questionnaires: CGI-I ,Parkinson’s Disease
Questionnaire, Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale, UPDRS
• 460 patients will be enrolled, 130 sites in US, Europe and Israel
• Active control: Sinemet®
15
AP-CDLD Phase III Design
Double Blind
13 Weeks
Open label
Treatment Period
Open label
Sinemet + AP CDLD dummy
Screening
Stabilization
on Sinemet®
AP- CDLD
Conversion
2 Weeks
12 Months
AP CDLD + Sinemet dummy
N=~460
4 Weeks
Follow
Up
Open
Label
Ext.
w/APCDLD
6 Weeks
Treatment Period
6 Weeks
50/400, 50/500 BID, TID
With reference drug =
Sinemet
13 Weeks
Randomization
16
AP-CBD/THC Cannabinoid Therapies
17
AP-CBD/THC
• Cannabinoids could represent ~10% of overall specialty pharmaceutical market over the next
five years – a market size of at least $20 billion1
• AP-CBD/THC is an Accordion Pill that contains the primary cannabinoids contained in
Cannabis sativa: Cannabidiol (CBD) and 9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)
• Intec plans to develop AP- CBD/THC for various indications, including pain management
Market Opportunity
Drawbacks to current methods of treatment
with cannabis and cannabinoids are:




short duration of effect
delayed onset
variability of exposure
dose variability,


narrow therapeutic
window
adverse events that
correlate with peak
levels
Intec’s Solution Under Development
Accordion Pill’s gastric retention and specific
release mechanism is planned to extend the
absorption phase for CBD and THC, in order
to provide a prolonged and more consistent
therapeutic effect
Phase I PK study to evaluate AP-CBD/THC is planned to initiate in 1Q 2017
1 Source:
Viridian Capital Advisors. (2015, December 2). REPORT: The Cannabis biotech/Pharma market could surpass $20 Billion by 2020. Retrieved
September 1, 2016, from Equities, https://www.equities.com/news/report-the-cannabis-biotech-pharma-market-could-surpass-20-billion-by-2020
18
AP- Zaleplon (ZP) for the
Treatment of Insomnia
19
Insomnia Market Overview
• In 2013, there were approximately 140 million prevalent cases of chronic insomnia in the
Seven Major Markets1,2,3
• The sleep disorder drug market in these markets is forecasted to reach ~$1.8 billion in 20231,3
• Available insomnia drugs, prescribed for both sleep induction and sleep maintenance, do not
provide a comprehensive solution that:
 rapidly induces the onset of sleep within a short time
 maintains continuous sleep throughout the night
 has no or minimal “next-day” residual side effects, such as drowsiness or “hangover”
• In 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that drowsy driving
contributes to ~100,000 car accidents and ~1,500 deaths each year in the United States4
1
Source: Global Data
Seven Major Markets include the United States, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom
3 Includes cases both fulfilling the definition of chronic insomnia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth
Edition (DSM-IV), and not fulfilling the DSM-IV criteria
4 Source: Medscape from WebMD
2 The
20
Next Day Safety Concerns
of Existing Insomnia Drugs

May :2013 The FDA announced that patients who take CR formulations of
Zolpidem should refrain, for the day after using the drug, from driving or
engaging in any activity that requires full alertness, even if the patient has slept
for the required eight-hour period after taking the drug.

January 2014: The FDA ordered a reduction of the recommended dosages of
drugs that contained Zolpidem by 50% due to the decline in next day
functionality and alertness.

May 2014: The FDA ordered a reduction of the recommended starting dose of
Lunesta, to the minimum approved dose because the drug levels in some
patients may be high enough the next morning to impair activities that require
alertness, including driving.
21
AP-ZP
• AP-ZP contains Zaleplon (generic Sonata) in both immediate and controlled release forms
• Zaleplon is approved for sleep induction. Its short half life (~1 hour) results in limited or
no next-day effects
• Positive data from a Phase II clinical trial (N=83) with AP-ZP 25mg met the primary
endpoint of a statistically significant increase in Total Sleep Time
 Met secondary endpoint of statistically significant improvement of latency to
persistent sleep
 Residual next-day effects were not observed in comparison to placebo
• Additional Phase I clinical trial with AP-ZP 30mg and 35mg revealed no difference in
next-day cognitive side-effects between the two doses of AP-ZP and placebo
• 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway confirmed
• Seeking strategic partner for further clinical development and commercialization
22
Collaboration with Biogen
23
Collaboration with Biogen
• April 2015, entered into an agreement with Biogen to develop a designated Accordion Pill with one
of Biogen’s marketed, proprietary drugs
• Intec to receive up to $920k to develop and execute the research plan, $8mm upon exercise of the
option, and up to $139mm in milestone and royalty payments
• Upon exercise of the option, Biogen will be responsible for all costs associated with pre-clinical and
clinical activities required for obtaining regulatory approval, as well as for the manufacturing and
commercialization thereof
$250k up front to
fund research
plan
Up to $670k for
research
milestones
$8mm upon
exercise of
option
Up to $39mm for
milestones
Up to $100mm
in aggregate
royalties
24
Accordion Pill Platform for
Poorly Soluble Drugs
25
Prolonging Absorption to Provide
an Increased Bioavailability
• The AP platform technology is also designed for drugs with low solubility,
namely Biopharmaceutics Classification System, or BCS, Class II (low solubility,
high permeability) and Class IV (low solubility, low permeability) drugs
• Of the top 200 oral drugs in the United States, UK, Spain and Japan in 2006,
around 40% were BCS Class II or Class IV drugs*
• Further, Approximately 90% of New Chemical Entities, in development in 2006,
were either BCS Class II or Class IV drugs**
• Poorly soluble drugs are sometimes characterized by:
 Low bioavailability
 Non-linear pharmacokinetics
• An Accordion Pill has clinically demonstrated an increased bioavailability of a
commercially available BCS Class II/IV drug
*AAPS Journal published by the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists
** Drug Development & Delivery
26
The Accordion Pill with
Poorly Soluble Drugs: PK Clinical Study
Drug concentration ng/ml
Example: Low Solubility Marketed Drug
AP Xmg
2 AP Xmg
Commercial formulation Xmg
0
12
24
36
Hour
48
60
72
N=12
• PK issues of drug X include only 30% absorption and lack of dose proportionality above
an approved marketed dose (Xmg)
• AP significantly extended the absorption phase of the drug
• Approximately a 100% increase in bioavailability in 12 healthy volunteers, with the AP
at Xmg
• Dose proportionality obtained with AP at 2x dose vs. 1x dose
27
Strong Rationale for the Accordion Pill Technology
for Poorly Soluble Drugs
For poorly soluble drugs, we believe that our technology acts through the
following mechanism of action:
• The gradual delivery of a drug from the AP in the stomach, is proposed to
enable complete dissolution of the drug dose during gastric retention and over
the delivery period. This gradual passage enables an increase in the amount of
the drug that can be dissolved, and thus absorbed, in the upper small bowel
• Bile secretion in the upper part of the GI tract facilitates the intestinal
environment for in vivo drug solubility and therefore better absorption
• The significant dilution of the drug solution in the small bowel caused by
prolonged delivery is posited to increase the opportunity for complete drug
absorption of these poorly soluble actives
28
Intellectual Property
29
Three Layers of IP Protection
• Platform IP
Various Accordion Pill dosage forms
 Latest US patent expires in 2029

• Manufacturing IP
Methods for making/folding gastroretentive drug delivery system
 US patent expires in 2028

• IP related to integration of specific drugs into designated Accordion
Pill products

For example, US patent of AP-CDLD expires in 2029
30
Corporate Overview
31
Experienced Management Team
Zeev Weiss,
BSc, CPA
Nadav Navon,
PhD, MBA
Nir Sassi,
CPA, BA
Pnina Strauss-Levy,
BSc, MBA
Chief Executive Officer
EVP R&D and Operations
Chief Financial Officer
VP of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs
•
Former Head of Life
Sciences Strategic
Consulting, PwC Israel
•
Former Head Analytical
and QA operations,
Sharon Laboratories
•
15 years of experience
in healthcare corporate
development, strategic
planning and corporate
finance
•
Former Manager R&D
Programs, Negev’s
Nuclear Research Center
•
Former Senior Manager
at PwC Israel
•
Former VP of Clinical
Development & IP,
Kamada (NASDAQ:
KMDA)
32
Scientific Advisory Board
Parkinson's disease
Dr. Peter LeWitt
• Professor of Neurology at Wayne State University School of Medicine in Detroit
Dr. Werner Poewe
• Professor of Neurology and Director of the Department of Neurology at Innsbruck Medical
University in Innsbruck, Austria
Prof. Nir Giladi
• Associate professor at the Sackler Faculty of Medicine at Tel Aviv University and chairman of the
Department of Neurology at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Insomnia
Prof. Thomas Roth
• Professor of Neurology and Director of the Department of Neurology at Innsbruck Medical
University in Innsbruck, Austria
Dr. James Walsh
•
Executive director and senior scientist of the Sleep Medicine and Research Center at St. Luke’s
Hospital in St. Louis, a visiting professor in the Department of Psychiatry at Stanford University
and an adjunct professor of psychology at Saint Louis University
33
Recent Milestones
 Enrolled First Patient In pivotal Phase III with our AP-CDLD in advanced Parkinson's
disease patients, in April 2016
 Completed a Phase I clinical trial with our product for the prevention and
treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, in 1Q 2016
 Initiated Cannabinoid development project with the Accordion Pill platform
technology
 Nominated Dr. John W. Kozarich, Chairman of Ligand Pharmaceuticals (LGND), as
Chairman of the Board of Directors, in May 2016
 Received approval for $5.2 Million grant for the 2016 R&D program from the Israeli
National Authority for Technological Innovation, in May 2016
 Granted European Patent for AP-CDLD, in September 2016
34
Goals for 2016/2017
• Continue advancing pivotal Phase III clinical trial for APCDLD in advanced Parkinson’s disease patients
• Launch AP Cannabinoids program with the planned
initiation of Phase I study of AP-CBD/THC in 1Q 2017
• Pursuing discussions with various pharmaceutical
companies for potential collaborations and/or licensing
agreements
• Build and expand intellectual property portfolio
35
INSTITUTIONAL
HODLERS
CASH
CAPITAL
STRUCTURE
Capital Structure and Cash Position
11.4
$6.00
MILLION
Ordinary
Shares
Outstanding
IPO Stock Price
(08/04/2015)
$21.4M
in cash and
short term bank
deposits and
financial assets
as of June 30,
2016
$
30.61%
% of Institutional
Holders
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
$70.3M
Market Cap
(09/01/2016)
$5.2M
Approved grant from the
Israeli National Authority for
Technological Innovation
(NATI)
Cormorant Asset Management, LLC
Sabby Management, LLC
Opaleye Management, Inc.
DAFNA Capital Management
Phoenix Holdings
Migdal Insurance and Financial Holdings
Meitav Dash
36
Investment Highlights
• Late clinical stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing drugs based on our
proprietary oral drug delivery system – the Accordion PillTM (AP)

The Accordion Pill is designed to provide a significant improvement in the
pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of various drugs and a corresponding improvement in
efficacy and safety
• Future potential value drivers:

AP Carbidopa/Levodopa (AP-CDLD) for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD)
symptoms: Currently in pivotal Phase III clinical trial (US, EU, ISR)

AP Cannabinoids (AP-CBD/THC) for various indications including pain management –
planned initiation Phase I clinical study in 1Q 2017

AP Zaleplon (AP-ZP) for the treatment of insomnia: Phase II clinical trial completed
• Utilizing 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway – faster and less expensive pathway to market
• Strong and long-term IP protection
• Experienced management team with proven abilities to execute
37
INTEC PHARMA LTD.
12 Hartom st. (RMPE building) P.O. Box 45219, Jerusalem
9777512 Israel
Tel: +972-2-5864657
Fax: +972-2-5869176
[email protected]
38