Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
42 paul r. powers OFFENDING HEAVEN AND EARTH: SIN AND EXPIATION IN ISLAMIC HOMICIDE LAW* PAUL R. POWERS Abstract The Qur"§n clearly condemns homicide and assigns the freeing of a slave to any who kill accidentally. Classical fiqh manuals, however, display a remarkable range of responses to and disagreements about this dictate. Many jurists hold that freeing a slave here is an instance of kaff§ra (expiation), understood as an antidote to sin. Yet accidental homicide is widely deemed non-sinful, so kaff§ra is assigned for a non-sin. Further, many say the sin of intentional homicide cannot be expiated. \anafÊs often add the idiosyncratic assertion that freeing a slave is not kaff§ra but rather an instance of “thanking the benefactor,” an altogether different kind of act. I conclude that freeing a slave in response to homicide is not consistently treated as the expiation of sin. Further, the jurists’ treatment of kaff§ra forces a reconsideration of the commonplace assertion that Islamic law treats murder as more tort than crime. Introduction One way of describing the difference between fiqh al-#ib§d§t and fiqh al-mu#§mal§t is to assert that the former governs relations between humans and the divine, while the latter governs relations among humans.1 Most Muslim jurists, of course, work with the premise that Correspondence: Paul R. Powers, Lewis & Clark College, Dept. of Religious Studies, 0615 S.W. Palatine Hill Road, Portland, Oregon, 97219; E-mail: ppowers@ lclark.edu * I am thankful to Kenneth Garden, Maurice Pomerance, Marion Katz, A. Kevin Reinhart, and the Editors and readers at Islamic Law and Society for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. 1 Such a description is commonplace, especially in scholarly works intended for a general audience. See, e.g., Frederick Mathewson Denny, An Introduction to Islam, 3d ed. (Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006), 196-7; Abdulaziz Sachedina, “Woman, Half-the-Man? Crisis of Male Epistemology in Islamic Jurisprudence,” in Perspectives on Islamic Law, Justice and Society, ed. R. S. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2007 Also available online – www.brill.nl ils-powers_CS2.indd 42 Islamic Law and Society 14, 1 6-3-2007 16:45:03