Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Iluka Resources Limited Company and Mineral Sands Sector Overview November / December 2010 1 Disclaimer – Forward Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risk factors associated with exploring for, developing, mining, processing and sale of minerals. Forward-looking statements include those containing such words as anticipate, estimates, should, will, expects, plans or similar expressions. It is believed that the expectations reflected in these statements are reasonable but they may be affected by a range of variables and changes in underlying assumptions which could cause actual results or trends to differ materially. These include, but are not limited to: price and currency fluctuations, actual supply versus demand, production results, reserve and resource estimates, loss of market, industry competition, environmental risks, physical risks, legislative and regulatory developments, economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions, political risks, project delay or advancement, approvals and cost estimates. Specific Risks & Sensitivities The information contained in this presentation is subject to, but not exclusively to, the following: • Changes in exchange rate assumptions • Changes in product pricing assumptions • Major changes in mine plans and/or resources • Changes in equipment life or capability • Emergence of previously underestimated technical challenges • Environmental or social pressures which impact licence to operate All currency referred to is Australian denominated unless otherwise indicated. 2 Contents Section 1 Iluka Overview and Investment Proposition Section 2 Industry Overview Section 3 Supply / Demand - Market Conditions Appendix 1st Half Financial 2010 Results Summary 3 1. Iluka Overview and Investment Proposition 4 Iluka Resources Overview and Investment Proposition Market capitalisation ~A$3.2 billion (418.7 million shares on issue) Industry Sector Materials (minerals sands exploration, project development, operations and marketing; iron ore royalty deriving from BHP Billiton’s Mining Area C, Western Australia Objective To create and deliver shareholder value Key Deliverables Capital efficient transformation of the asset base - delivery of two new globally significant, high margin production sources - Murray Basin (full production mid 2010) and Jacinth-Ambrosia (full production mid 2010) Supply discipline through global economic crisis - especially as market leader in zircon marketing and pricing outcomes in zircon and high grade titanium dioxide markets Investment Proposition: Improved Financial Characteristics (2011 - 2013 vs 2006 - 2008) Significantly lower capital expenditure Æ cash flow generation and balance sheet flexibility Higher production / sales of higher value products (rutile and zircon) Higher EBITDA / revenue margin and return on capital Increased contribution from low risk Mining Area C royalty stream 5 Shareholder Alignment Consistent internal articulation of objective: creation and delivery of shareholder value Key internal focus: profitability; sustainability and growth Financial performance and incentives linked to shareholder value creation return on capital the internal proxy for return on equity Short term incentives linked to ROC, EBIT and profitability (60%); sustainability measures (10%) and defined growth objectives (30%) any awards 50% in cash and 50% in share rights (full entitlement deferred for 2 years) - any share rights lapse if individual leaves the company Long term Incentives linked to relative TSR against two comparator groups and ROE (10% threshold and 14% target) $1,000 share grant to employees (twice) not eligible for short or long term incentives 6 Iluka Investment Proposition Confluence of Positive Factors 1. Transition to high quality long life production operations 2. Higher margin zircon and rutile production over the next 3 years+ 3. Positive pricing dynamic playing out in both main product suites 4. Growing contribution from low risk Mining Are C (BHP Billiton) iron ore royalty stream 5. Significantly improved financial characteristics expected from 2011 7 Iluka’s Evolution Following Appointment of David Robb as CEO in late 2006 2007 - Alignment • Performance management objectives aligned to shareholder objectives • Short and long term incentives aligned to shareholder value creation • Integrated business planning and decision making processes 2008 - Growth Commitments • Balance sheet recapitalisation – debt and equity • Commitment to new growth projects in capital-efficient manner • Re-focussed marketing / pricing disciplines 2009 – Global Economic Crisis • Business re-configuration accelerated • Projects kept on track • Zircon supply response to protect pricing outcomes • Further balance sheet funding headroom initiatives 8 Iluka’s Evolution Current and Prospective Phase 2010 - Recovery • Demand recovery – continued global volatility likely • • • • End of major project capex outflows Project ramp up in 1H and sustained performance at target in 2H Zircon prices increase ~30% Uncontracted titanium dioxide products sell >20% above contract prices 2011 - New Iluka • First year of unconstrained titanium dioxide prices/contracts • Higher margins and stronger free cash flows • Zircon and high titanium dioxide markets tight • First instalment of objective – create and deliver value for shareholders 2012 - New Industry • Demand based on more broadly based global growth • Supply an acknowledged problem – contractual flexibility • New growth horizons – for shareholders, employees and customers 9 Iluka Physical and Financial Trends 2011-2013 vs 2006-2008 Physical Trends Production (kt) Zircon Rutile Synthetic Rutile Total 2006 - 2008 average p.a. 2011 – 2013f average p.a. % change from 2006-2008 410 125 500 1,035 500 250 290 1,040 22 100 (42) While indicative and subject to change, Iluka expects to deliver: • higher contribution of higher margin production relative to 2006-2008 • synthetic rutile production levels dependent on Iluka decision on idling of kilns or otherwise 10 Iluka Physical and Financial Trends 2011-2013 vs 2006-2008 Financial Trends Cash prod costs ($m) Non cash costs (D&A) Operating cash flow ($m) Net debt ($m) Gearing (x) 2006 - 2008 average p.a. 2011 - 2013 average p.a. 585 127 510 175 120 468 35.9 ↑ ↓ ↓ While indicative and subject to change, Iluka expects to deliver: • lower unit cash cost of production in 2011-2013 compared with 2006-2008, from new asset base • stronger free cash flow generation • lower debt, greater balance sheet flexibility 11 Iluka Capital Expenditure, Cash Flow and Debt Profile 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20112013 (average) Capital Expenditure A$m 156 111 198 520 ~100 È Operating Cash Flow1 110 59 230 102 Ç Ç Net Debt 594 602 216 382 È È Gearing (net debt / debt+equity) % 45.3 44.5 17.4 25.9 È È Ç Increase versus 2006 - 2008 È Decrease versus 2006 - 2008 1 Operating cash flow, pre cash flows from investing activities and financing activities 12 Portfolio Characteristics Improved Margin Structure from Two Main Assets • Murray Basin and Jacinth-Ambrosia will contribute most of Iluka’s production from 2011 - 80-90% of zircon and rutile production • Higher cash margin structure than historical assets Jacinth-Ambrosia South Australia Murray Basin Victoria Zircon ~300 ~130 Rutile ~45 ~180 Ilmenite ~175 ~130 ~40 ~50 ~30 ~40 Indicative Asset Characteristics 2011 - 2013 average p.a. Production kt Indicative EBITDA Margin % based on 2009 average prices 90 cents 80 cents 13 Competitive Revenue:Cash Cost Position Second Quartile Murray Basin First Quartile Third Quartile Fourth Quartile Iluka WA Iluka US Iluka Iluka Avg 2006-08 = 1.3 0 * Other Iluka Avg 2011-13 = 1.8 Ratio JacinthAmbrosia Industry Revenue to Cash Cost Ratio* 2011 -2013 25 50 75 100 % TiO2 + Zr (kt) • Revenue to cash cost ratio is key measure of competitiveness • Ratio highly dependent on product price relativities • Iluka well placed - Jacinth-Ambrosia and Murray Basin operations forecast to be in first quartile • A significant number of existing operations forecast to have negative cash margin positions 14 Based on constant exchange rates; Iluka pricing, production and industry cost forecasts Jacinth-Ambrosia Capable of Supplying ~25% of Global Zircon Demand 15 Source: Iluka Jacinth-Ambrosia, South Australia Name plate production reached July 2010 16 Murray Basin Stage 2, Victoria Major Rutile and Zircon Production Province 17 Murray Basin Stage 2, Victoria Long Life Rutile and Associated Zircon Production 18 Mining Area C Iron Ore Royalty In-perpetuity Tier 1 Iron Ore Exposure Background • Mining Area C (MAC) covers a part of BHP BIlliton’s iron ore mining operations in WA’s Pilbara region, operated by BHP (85%) under a JV with Itochu and Mistui Royalty based on: • 1.25% of FOB sales less export duties and taxes; and • $1m one-off payment per 1Mt increase in annual production Outlook • BHP has stated intentions to increase total iron ore output from WA to 350Mtpa past 2015. MAC production at end of 2000 was ~40 million tonnes and is expected to be a significant proportion of this total increase • Potential sharing of facilities under proposed Rio Tinto JV also raises the likelihood of production increases from the region BHP and Rio Tinto Pilbara Iron Ore Operations Source: BHP • Source: BHP BHP forecasts demand for seaborne iron ore to rise to over 1,200Mt by 2015 and over 1,800Mt by 2025 19 MAC Cost Curve Position MAC Seaborne Iron Ore Fines Cost Curve 2010 (Business Cost USc/dmtu) • CRU regards MAC as one of the world’s lowest cost iron ore mine operations located near multiple infrastructure operations and with a large resource base 20 Source: CRU Report – April 2010 2. Industry Overview 21 Key Characteristics of the Mineral Sands Market Overview of Principal Product Streams 2008 Global Mineral Sands Market * Sales (Mt) Titanium Feedstocks, 2008 = 6.0Mt (2009 = 5.2Mt) Rutile (95% TiO2) Synthetic Rutile (SR) (90-96% TiO2) Upgraded Chloride Slag (UGS) (95% TiO2) Chloride Ilmenite and Leucoxene (60-70% TiO2) Chloride Slag (80-85% TiO2) Sulphate Slag and Ilmenite (50-80% TiO2) Zircon 2008 = 1.2Mt (2009 = 0.9Mt) 20% 80% Typical industry zircon to titanium dioxide units in mineral sands deposits - 20:80 * 2008 Global Sands Mineral market is more representative than 2009 due to GEC impact in 2009 Source: TZMI and Iluka 22 Main Product Usages and Applications Predominant End Consumer Applications - 2008 Zircon 2000-08 Average Annual Growth Other, 5% (8%) Zirconia & Chemicals, 18% 11% Refractories, 11% 0% Foundry, 11% 0% Titanium 2000-08 Average Annual Growth 11% 14% 2% Ceramics, 55% 4% Main Attributes: • Opacity, whiteness, abrasion resistance, temperature resistance and inertness Potential Substitutes: • White clays, kaolin and feldspar (in ceramics) Value in Final Product • Tiles ~5% to 10% (dependent on tile type, quality and colour) Source: TZMI and Iluka Main Attributes: • Opacity, whiteness, UV absorption (pigments) • Strong, lightweight, corrosion resistant (metals) Substitutes: • No major substitutes Value in Final Product 23 • Paint ~5% (dependent on paint application, quality and colour) Industry Structure and Participants Relative Industry and Geography Supply Consolidation - 2008 Zircon Titanium Major Producing Countries Major Producers Including: Indonesia, 6% China, 5% Vietnam, 3% India, 2% Including: China, 12% Norway, 7% Ukraine, 7% India, 4% Vietnam, 4% 24 Source: TZMI and Iluka Iluka Customer Structure Consolidated Titanium, More Fragmented Zircon Iluka Customer Industries Zircon • • • • • Zircon flour millers (ceramics), 60% Casting material manufacturers (refractories and foundry), 18% Fused zirconia, 10% ZOC chemical manufacturers, 7% Other, 5% Titanium • • • • Pigment producers, 90% Titanium sponge producers,5% Welding rod manufacturers, 3% Other, 2% Other ~ 10% Iluka Customer Segmentation Other ~ 55% Top 5 ~ 90% Top 5 ~ 45% 25 Note: Data based on 2008 sales Key Characteristics of the Mineral Sands Market Overview of Principal Product Streams Global Mineral Sands Market Characteristics Size of market (2008) Zircon Titanium 1.2Mt 6.0Mt Sulphate Slag and Ilmenite (50-80% TiO2) Historical demand 4.1% p.a. growth, 2000-08 3.0% p.a. Major markets Europe (30%) North America (25%) China (20%) Other (25%) China (40%) Europe (20%) Asia ex. China (20%) Chloride Ilmenite and Leucoxene (60-70% TiO2) Pricing (approx.) ~ US$800/t Start of Synthetic 2010 Rutile (SR) (90-96% TiO2) End of 2010 > US$1,000/t Rutile: SR: UGS: Chl. Ilmenite: Chl. Slag: Note: Titanium product pricing constrained by “cap and collar” contractual arrangements in 2010 Source: TZMI and Iluka ~ US$550/t ~ US$450/t ~ US$550/t ~ US$100/t ~ US$400/t 26 Zircon Demand End Use Demand and Regional Tile Consumption / Production 27 Source: Iluka, TZMI and Ceramic World Review Tile Consumption Developing Economies Constitute Major Demand Source: Ceramic World Review • • • • Source: IMF China, Brazil, India, Iran and Indonesia consume over half of the world’s tiles Zircon intensity of use in these economies remains well below developed economies These economies were relatively immune from 2009 GEC impacts Resilient demand indicated even if further global economic slowdown 28 China and India Exemplars of Developing Economy Demand Pigment and GDP per Capita (1980 - 2009) Tiles and GDP per Capita (1997^ - 2008) Pigment (kg) / capita 2.5 0.9 India 0.8 Tile sqm / capita China India GEC impact 0.7 China 2008 2 2009 0.6 1.5 0.5 1997 0.4 1 0.3 0.2 0.5 2009 0.1 2008 1980 2002 0 0 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 GDP / capita (US$) Note: GDP based on PPP Source: TZMI and IMF 6,000 7,000 GDP / capita (US$) ^Note: Indian tile data only available from 2002, GDP based on PPP Source: Ceramic World Review and IMF • Pigment and tile consumption increasing in China and India associated with GDP/capita growth - India per capita usage masked by population growth 3x that of China • Intensity of use still significantly lower than developed economies • Higher intensity of use and wealth effect (higher value product usage) may create “turbo” charged demand 29 Titanium Dioxide End Use Demand Titanium Market Segments ~6,050kt (2008) Other, 6% Metal, 4% Pigment, 90% Source: Iluka and TZMI 30 Titanium Dioxide Demand Rio’s Mid Cycle View – Similar Characteristics Apply to Zircon Demand Infrastructure Based Growth Urbanisation 2007 Population distribution in bands of income levels** Average Wealth per capita in PPP terms Inflection Point for growth phase Typically mid to late cycle demand characteristics Urbanisation and increased GDP per capital strong indicators to demand growth 31 Source: Rio Tinto TZMI Conference Singapore 3. Supply / Demand – Market Conditions 32 Zircon Demand Overview • Historically zircon demand dominated by European ceramics industry • Key trend in zircon market over last 20 years is the emergence of China and other developing countries • – China now accounts for ~40% of zircon demand, up from 3% in 1990 – in 2008 China produced ~40% of global tiles – zircon intensity of use in ceramics still low in developing countries Strong demand growth recently in zirconium and zircon chemicals market (10% CAGR 1998-2008) – China accounts for ~65% of global zircon demand in chemicals market – end uses include: pigments, abrasives, paper coatings, anti-perspirants, nuclear and industrial metals, fuel cells, cubic zirconia and many others Zircon Market Characteristics Current demand (kt) ~1,150kt (2007-09 average) Historical demand CAGR 3% p.a. (1980-2008) Historical Price CAGR 8% p.a. (1980-2008) 33 Global Zircon Demand Underpinned by Developing Economy Demand Global Zircon Demand Scenarios (1990 - 2020) Demand Scenarios 1990-07 Average Annual Growth Total = 3% China = 18% RoW = 1% Source: Iluka • Based on modest Chinese demand growth from 2011 of 6% p.a. (~ one third of recent levels) and flat rest of world (RoW) demand, global demand growth equates to ~3% (equal to 1990-07 average) • If China demand growth is 8% (less than half historical average) and RoW 0%, global zircon demand growth would exceed historical levels • Difficult to envisage a demand scenario where near term zircon demand is lower than historical levels, given the major influence of developing and urbanising economies 34 Zircon Supply and Demand Scenarios kt 2500 Iluka JA Existing Produc ers • Low Demand (China 6% and ROW 0% ) 2000 Base Demand (China 8%, RO W 0%, 4% CAGR) Assuming China demand growth of 8% and RoW 0%, results in a 2010-2020 CAGR of 4% - should this demand scenario occur an additional 5060kt of new supply is required to meet the annual demand increase 1500 - since 1990 Chinese zircon demand has grown at 18% p.a. (off a low base) 1000 • Even in the Low Demand (6% China, RoW 0%) scenario a considerable deficit is forecast 500 0 2000 Source: Iluka 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 35 Indicative Zircon Long Term Supply Curve Higher Prices Required to Rationally Induce Greenfield Projects • Iluka analysis of prospective projects shows that significant industry price rises needed to induce new supply • This chart illustrates potential production from new or mooted projects and the zircon price required to induce new projects 2015 Zircon Cost Curve 2015 demand, assuming 4% CAGR from 2010 Zircon (US$/t) 2,250 Existing 2,000 Inducement Curve ~30% higher high grade titanium prices Inducement Curve flat rutile prices 1,750 1,500 1,250 1,000 750 500 250 0 0 1,000 1,250 1,500 1,750 2,000 Zircon (kt) • Horizontal axis represents zircon tonnes (thousands) produced by existing producers and potential or mooted projects • Analysis assumes concurrent significant rise in rutile prices. Additional zircon price growth would be required under lower rutile prices • The above illustrates potential, sustained price increases required to meet demand, if lead times for new supply can be overcome • Iluka has capacity to increase production ahead of mooted projects • Actual prices may vary from indicated levels – refer disclaimer statement at commencement of presentation 36 Industry Zircon:TiO2 Ratio Despite Advent of Jacinth-Ambrosia, Industry Z:TiO2 Ratio Remains Stable 7.0 mt of TiO2 or Zircon Ratio t Zircon/t TiO2 0.35 TiO2 Historical Supply Zircon Historical Supply 0.3 6.0 Zircon/TiO2 Ratio All Feedstock Producers (including J-A) 5.0 0.25 0.2 4.0 3.0 0.15 Zircon/TiO2 Ratio Excluding Iluka 2.0 0.1 1.0 0.05 0.0 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010F 2013 • Decline in zircon:TiO2 ratio forecast from existing producers (excluding Iluka) • Despite Jacinth-Ambrosia (largest new supply source in 30 years) industry Z:TiO2 ratio stable • Given zircon demand growth historically > TiO2, zircon availability may come under further pressure if projected TiO2 volumes do not materialise 37 Source: TZMI and Iluka analysis Zircon Substitution Risk • Zircon typically = represents a low percentage of final products’ pricing Overview Ceramics • Few substitutes provide equivalent value in use • Lack of availability a potential cause of reduction in some lower value applications of zircon • Glazed and Porcellanato tiles (80% of global production), zircon = 5-10% of final product cost depending on tile type, quality and colour) • TZMI study - low iron clays and feldspar cannot provide equivalent value in use Foundries & Refractories Specialty Chemicals • Some evidence of substitution from chromite sand, cerabeads and kerphalite • Fused zirconia: zircon increased from 25% to 60% costs (‘03-’07) yet no substitution • Chemical zirconia: zircon increased from 25% to 50% costs (since late ’90s) = switch to lower quality zircon 38 Source: TZMI and Iluka research Zircon Market Summary • Market demand exceeded zircon supply in 2010 • Strong China and emerging economy demand expected to increase deficit over coming years • Paucity of material new supply at a stage of advanced evaluation / funding • Material price increases required to induce new supply − even then a lead time • Substitution a low risk - zircon a small percentage of final consumer costs • Iluka investigating opportunities to fill some part of the supply deficit 39 Titanium Demand Overview • Pigment is largest end use market of titanium feedstocks • Historically, pigment per capita demand increases with living standards, measured by GDP per capita • Impact of China has accelerated global pigment demand growth – China 2nd largest global pigment market • China has domestic titanium sources but is reliant on imports for high grade pigment, which accounts for ~30% of Chinese demand – high grade pigments needed for automotive, whitegoods and other specialty applications – China imports pigment from North America, Taiwan, Australia and Europe • Titanium metal market displays favourable dynamics with applications in aeronautics and other specialty manufactured goods – titanium metal properties include strong and lightweight Titanium Market Characteristics End use industries Pigment (91%), Metal (4%), Other (5%) (2009) Current demand (kt) ~5,900kt (2007-09 average) Historical demand CAGR 3% p.a. (1980-2008) - China 15% p.a., Rest of World 2% p.a. Forecast pigment demand CAGR DuPont (Sep09) = 5 to 10% (over 2009-15) TZMI (Jun10) = 5.1% (over 2009-20) Historical Price CAGR (%) 3.8% (1980-2008) (average Chl. Ilm., Rutile, SR, Chl. Slag) 40 Titanium Demand Pigment Demand Forecasts Global GDP per Capita and Pigment per Capita 1.2 Global Pigment Demand Pigment (kg) / Capita 8000 Pigment kt 7000 1.0 6000 0.8 2020 2010 0.6 2012-20 5000 3.5% CAGR 4000 2008 2009 3000 0.4 1980-08 2000 0.2 1980-2009 3.1% CAGR 2010-2020 1000 0.0 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 0 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 GDP / Capita (US$) • Historically, pigment per capita demand increases with living standards, measured by GDP per capita • Impact of China has accelerated global pigment demand growth Industry Pigment Forecasts Period CAGR DuPont (September 2009) 2009-15 5 to 10% TZMI (June 2010) 2009-20 5.1% Source: IMF, DuPont, TZMI and Iluka 41 Pigment Demand by Region, 1980 to 2009 Developing countries pigment use growing with GDP Pigment (kg) / person 5 North America 4 3 1980 Europe 2 2009 Japan 1 China Global Asia India 0 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 Real GDP / Capita (US$) • Developing countries intensity of pigment use (pigment per person) expected to grow with living standards (rising GDP/capita) • Developed countries show an intensity of pigment use ~2-4 kg per person. This level of pigment use in China would be a significant increase from current levels. Note: Conversion factor for US$ based on Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). Real 2008 Australian dollars. Source: TZMI and IMF 42 Chloride Titanium Supply and Demand Demand 2012-20 3.2% CAGR • Pigment producers typically require blend of feedstocks • Higher titanium feedstocks (e.g. rutile and synthetic rutile) typically provide greater production efficiencies, less waste • Substitutability between products not straightforward − limit to technical switching to lower TiO2 feedstocks • Iluka advantaged vis a vis rutile and synthetic rutile position − both products in tight supply Source: Iluka 43 Titanium Market Summary • Titanium feedstock demand and supply factors more complex - influenced by raw material feedstock requirements of pigment plants - supply availability of specific products globally • Iluka has idled synthetic rutile capacity given inadequate returns • Most upgrading capacity committed or idled - industry economics would not support investment in additional upgrading capacity • The high grade titanium market has tightened significantly in 2010 • Evident tightness of some products • Favourable factors for higher than historical titanium prices - tight market supply conditions - recovery in pigment demand - China demand for imported chloride pigment - recovery in niche markets (including titanium sponge / metal) - unconstrained pricing environment 44 Current Market Conditions Zircon • Strong recovery in demand from Q4 2009 • China consumption above pre GFC levels • US market remains buoyant – esp. foundry sector • Additional China milling capacity installed in 2010 • Some plants idled due to no feedstock • Tight market conditions expected to continue • Customers globally on minimal stocks • Demand from customers in excess of supply 45 Current Market Conditions Zircon Pricing and Contractual Arrangements • Zircon volume arrangements essentially on a “spot” basis • No contractual arrangements in excess of 3 months • Logistics chain (ex warehouse, small lot) developed to cater for China market • Warehouses operating already in Europe and planned for South America • Iluka has achieved 3 substantial price increases in 2010 • Price rises advised to customers approx. 1 month in advance • Iluka seeking to allow customers to pass on price increases • Significant opacifier price increases reported globally 46 Current Market Conditions Zircon Pricing and Contractual Arrangements • Average zircon price reflects quality differentials • Price to exit 2010 at greater than US$1000/t FOB • Continued tight supply conditions expected • Further upward price momentum in to 2011 • Internet Online Sales site now auction or sale • Currently both zircon and rutile auction on site 47 Physical Iluka Sales Flows – September YTD Importance of China and Developing Economies Europe Z – 90kt R – 47kt SR – 70kt China Z – 131kt R – 3kt SR – -kt Americas Z – 57kt R – 71kt SR – 52kt Mdl. East Z – 8kt R – 1kt SR – 16kt Asia Z – 44kt R – 28kt SR – 116kt 48 Notes: Data based on sales to September 2010. Asia includes Australia and Japan but excludes China. Enhanced Logistics and Market Supply Arrangements Warehouse and Small Lot Distribution Facilities Antwerp, Belgium Qingdao, China Zircon Premium Zircon Premium Castellon, Spain Zircon Premium Shanghai, China Zircon Premium Rutile Wilmington, Delaware Zircon Premium Xiamen, China Zircon Premium 49 Current Market Conditions Titanium Dioxide • High grade feedstock market tight in 2H 2010 • Anticipated it will remain so going into 2011 • Idled Iluka kiln capacity is impacting high grade feedstock availability • 2010 saw disruption of production from Eastern Europe • Iluka in 2010 still had products under long term contractual arrangements • Small amount of additional un contracted synthetic rutile (SR) production sold at higher prices • Anticipated low stock position for all high grade feedstock at the end of 2010 • Customers are very concerned over availability of high grade feedstocks • Significant pigment price increases reported globally • Reported rationing of supply occurring due to shortage of pigment 50 Synthetic Rutile (SR) Strategy • 2 of 4 kilns idled over 2008 / 2009, reducing SR capacity by ~300k tonnes • Inadequate EBIT returns led to decision to idle • Iluka indicated intention to idle SR3 (Mid West, WA) from mid 2010 • Higher spot product prices have enabled the kiln to run to end of 2010 • Iluka’s intent is to run SR3 as R&D kiln until mechanical failure • SR3 will require a major rebuild (circa A$15m plus) to commence a new campaign • Murray Basin and Jacinth-Ambrosia Ilmenite blends to be trialed • Technical success potentially provides a low cost ilmenite feed source • 1 kiln operation in 2011 - ~ 200kt of SR production • Re-activation of an additional kiln in 2012 is under consideration 51 Emerging Market Conditions End of Cap and Collar Contractual Arrangements • Most of Iluka’s legacy titanium contracts have had “cap and collar” pricing • Volume commitments with pricing increases / decreases constrained • Increases linked to CPI or low percentage increases – typically low single digits • All rutile legacy cap and collar contracts conclude in December 2010 • Only 1 legacy SR contract remains until December 2011 • This residual cap and collar SR contract considered immaterial to influence pricing • It is believed RBM titanium (slag) cap and collar contracts may extend beyond 2011 • Exxaro reportedly has 80% of 2011 slag sales not subject to price caps 52 Approach to Titanium Dioxide Contracting • Iluka has insufficient feedstock to meet all its customers requirements in 2011 • Major customers have been offered a proportion of their requirements • Volume commitments on all products in 2011 to be for a maximum of 1 year • Iluka does not intend to contract all planned production in 2011 • 2011 pricing negotiations are underway • All prices on initial 3 to 6 month volume basis only • A small residual volume held back and available for “spot” sales • Rutile has greater value in use than titanium slag to maximize output • High TiO2 offsets lower grade feedstocks i.e. 86% to 87% TiO2 53 Warehouse Alternative - Internet Sales and Auction Site Key Terms • • • • • Purchase or auction site as required Minimum purchase 26mt, a full container load Product bagged in 2mt Bulk Bags Payment terms are L/C or T/T No requirement to accept any offer Easily adapted to other products • • Now offering both zircon and rutile Ilmenite www.ios.iluka.com 54 China Zircon Market China Zircon Segments 2009 Other 7% China ~ 40% of global zircon sand consumption Zirconia & Chemicals 29% Ceramics 55% Ceramics ~ 43% of world ZrO2 / Chemicals ~ 65% of world Casting ~ 17% of world Refractory ~ 13% of world Other ~ 50% of world Foundry/Casting 5% Refractory 4% Total China Market ~ 400kt zircon 55 China Zircon Market • Over 70% of zircon sales are direct between Iluka and end users • Customer Profile - some large SOEs - mostly small to medium sized private enterprises • Sales Options - bulk bags ex China warehouse (4 strategically located warehouses) - bulk shipments direct to nominated port - container shipments direct to nominated port (loose or in bags) • Sales Contracts - price and quantity range from spot through to quarterly fixtures - flexible but secure payment options - sales transactions range from 20 tonnes through to 10,000 tonnes 56 China Zircon Market Over 90% of zircon consumed in China is imported Monthly China Import Comparison tonnes 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May 07 Cum Total Chinese Zircon Consumption: Jun 08 Cum Jul Aug 09 Cum Sep Oct Nov Dec 10 Cum 2007 − 390kt 2008 − 410kt 2009 − 390kt 2010 − 460-500kt (supply constrained) 57 China Zircon Market Iluka Zircon Sales to China mt % of Iluka Sales 60% 200000 180000 160000 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 50% 40% 30% During Q3, 2010 Iluka YTD 2010 sales exceeded FY 2009 20% 10% 0% 2004 2005 China 2006 2007 2008 2009 % China Sales Iluka sales in China reached 180kt in 2008 (excl. CRL zircon sales) 58 China Titanium Minerals Market China TiO2 Segments 2009 W elding and Other 11% Ti Metal 14% Pigment 75% Total China Market : 1.1-1.2Mt TiO2 units >1Mt as sulphate ilmenite used directly or in domestic slag The rest as imported slag and domestic and imported rutile and synthetic rutile China ~ 24% of global titanium feedstock consumption (in TiO2 units) Pigment ~ 20% of world Ti Sponge ~ 30% of world Welding / Other ~ 40% of world Current Est. Annual Iluka Sales to China Ilmenite ~ 260kt (incl. CRL) Rutile ~ 10-15kt (incl. CRL) Total consumption ~ 13% of China 59 China Titanium Minerals Market: Pigment Chinese Pigment Demand '000 tonnes 1200 1000 Pigment production and consumption likely to resume sharp upward trend in coming years 800 600 Major producers predicting 2010 Chinese consumption to far exceed 1Mt – perhaps even as much as 1.5Mt 400 200 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Pigment Production Net Imports Apparent Consumption • Imports of high grade pigment (250kt-300kt in 2007 and 2008) set to continue growth – fuelling production outside China • Chinese pigment production almost 100% sulphate technology (requiring low grade / low value, mainly domestic, feedstock) BUT… • Major new chloride pigment projects are under construction (requiring high grade, mainly imported, feedstock) 60 China Titanium Minerals Market: Outlook • Chinese production in all sectors to grow rapidly based on solid domestic demand growth and increasing acceptance in foreign markets • Solid growth opportunities for Iluka high value feedstock in: - chloride pigment - new generation titanium sponge - flux cored wire welding • Strong upside potential from new opportunities in existing and new Chinese operations stemming from Iluka’s Product and Technical Development 61 Mineral Sands Price Relativities Historical Prices to 2009 1000 US$ / tonne Zircon SR Chloride Ilmenite Rutile 800 600 400 200 0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 62 Source: TZMI For further information, contact: Dr Robert Porter General Manager, Investor Relations + 61 3 9225 5481; + 61 (0) 407 391 829 [email protected] www.iluka.com 63 Appendix - 1st Half Financial 2010 Results Summary 64 1st Half Overview – 30 June 2010 • Demand recovery across zircon and high grade titanium dioxide products • Significantly improved EBITDA • Reported earnings better than initial 2010 expectation • New operations ramped up; but 1st half impacted by residual issues - sales contribution from lower margin - unit cost inefficiencies during ramp up - contractual price constraints in TiO2 • Capital expenditure and net debt peak • Price increases achieved for zircon • Supply crunch both for zircon and high grade titanium dioxide markets 65 Group Results $m 1H 2009 1H 2010 % change Mineral Sands Revenue (pre hedging) 194.8 378.6 94.4 EBITDA 59.6 115.4 93.6 Depreciation and Amortisation (83.5) (101.5) (21.6) EBIT (23.9) 13.9 158.2 (8.4) (25.6) (204.8) Significant non-cash items (67.6) - N/A Profit / (Loss) Before Tax (99.9) (11.7) 88.3 Tax Benefit 33.4 5.1 (84.7) Profit from discontinued operation 22.9 - N/A Net Profit / (Loss) After Tax (43.6) (6.6) 84.9 Average A$:US$ exchange rate 71.23 89.39 (25.5) (11.0) (1.6) 85.5 Return on Equity % (annualised) (3.8) (0.6) 84.2 Interest cover (EBITDA / net interest expense) times 9.0 6.3 (30.0) Gearing / net debt (net debt + equity)% 21.5 28.8 (34.0) Net Interest and Financing Costs Financial Ratios EPS cents per share 66 Mineral Sands Results $m 1H 2009 1H 2010 % change 194.8 378.6 94.4 Eucla / Perth Basins 41.8 46.2 10.5 Murray Basin 17.7 39.0 120.3 US Operations 14.2 20.2 42.3 Exploration and Other (7.4) (10.1) (36.5) Total Mineral Sands EBITDA (pre hedging) 66.3 95.3 43.7 Depreciation and Amortisation (83.5) (101.5) (21.6) Mineral Sands EBIT (pre hedging) (17.2) (6.2) 64.0 Mineral Sands Revenue (pre hedging) EBITDA 67 Mining Area C Royalty 1H 2009 1H 2010 % change Annual Production to 30 June MDMT 37.8 42.5 12.4 Sales Volume to 30 June MDMT 19.5 20.4 4.6 Royalty Income $m 23.9 30.7 28.5 Capacity Payments $m 8.0 5.0 (37.5) Iluka EBIT $m 31.7 35.5 12.0 Comments • Higher iron ore sales volumes • Average AUD realised price increased by 23 per cent from pcp - 60 per cent higher 2Q 2010 versus 1Q 2010 - reflects greater proportion of spot sales • $5.0 million of annual capacity payments to 30 June (2009: $8.0 million) 68 1st Half 2010 Cash Flow and Net Debt $m 1H 2009 FY 2009 1H 2010 % change pcp (215.7) (215.7) (382.1) (77.1) (94.4) 83.8 42.6 N/A 28.2 55.2 19.8 (29.8) 0.4 2.1 1.3 225.0 Exploration (10.2) (20.0) (7.6) 25.5 Net Interest (6.0) (12.5) (12.3) (105.0) Tax (6.8) (4.4) (1.5) 77.9 (234.3) (521.6) (94.9) 59.5 Asset Sales 85.8 94.1 5.3 (93.8) Share Issues Net of Costs 113.5 113.5 - N/A Dividends Paid to CRL Minorities (1.8) (1.8) - N/A CRL Net Debt Eliminated on Sale 9.4 9.4 - N/A 22.5 35.8 (9.6) N/A (Increase) / Decrease in Net Debt (93.7) (166.4) (56.9) 39.3 Closing Net Debt (309.4) (382.1) (439.0) (41.9) Opening Net Debt Operating Cash Flow MAC Royalty Other Capital Expenditure Exchange Revaluation of Net US Debt 69