* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Endocardial mapping of atrial fibrillation in the human right atrium
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Mitral insufficiency wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Lutembacher's syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup
Heart arrhythmia wikipedia , lookup
Atrial septal defect wikipedia , lookup
European Heart Journal (2000) 21, 550–564 doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1851, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Endocardial mapping of atrial fibrillation in the human right atrium using a non-contact catheter R. J. Schilling2, A. H. Kadish1, N. S. Peters2, J. Goldberger1 and D. Wyn Davies2 1 Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago IL, U.S.A.; 2St. Mary’s Hospital and Imperial College School of Medicine, London, U.K. Background Endocardial mapping of atrial fibrillation in humans is limited by its low resolution and by complexities in the arrhythmia and atrial anatomy. Methods and Results A catheter mounted non-contact multielectrode was deployed in the right atrium of 11 patients with atrial fibrillation and used to reconstruct 3360 electrograms, superimposed onto a computer-simulated model of the endocardium, using inverse solution mathematics. This allows construction of isopotential maps of the right atrium. Patients had either sustained atrial fibrillation (n=3) for >6 months or developed atrial fibrillation during the study (n=8). Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation was recorded in one patient and was demonstrated by the non-contact system to arise from two successive atrial ectopic beats from the site of a roving contact catheter. Reconstruction of electrograms recorded during atrial fibrillation was validated by comparison with contact electrograms with cross-correlation. During established atrial fibrillation, four patients predominantly had a single right atrial wave front, two had two wave fronts and five Introduction Moe’s original hypothesis that atrial fibrillation was caused by continuous reentry[1–3], was confirmed by later experimental studies[4–6] so that it is now widely accepted that atrial fibrillation is a reentrant arrhythmia[7]. Drug treatment to prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation has limited efficacy and chronic antiarrhythmic therapy can be associated with increased mortality[8]. Catheter ablation strategies to restore and maintain sinus rhythm after atrial fibrillation have been developed following the success of surgical ablation procedures[9], but their Revision submitted 5 July 1999, and accepted 21 July 1999. Correspondence: D. Wyn Davies, Waller Department of Cardiology, St. Mary’s Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, U.K. 0195-668X/00/070550+15 $35.00/0 patients had three to five wave fronts for most of the time. Periods of electrical silence were seen in the right atrium in eight patients, after which, activity emerged from consistent septal sites alone, suggesting a left atrial origin. During intravenous administration of flecainide, atrial fibrillation in two patients terminated spontaneously or following pacing manoeuvres, while in the remaining patient sinus rhythm was restored via atrial tachycardia. Conclusion Non-contact mapping of the right atrium has demonstrated modes of initiation and termination of atrial fibrillation, characterized different patterns of right atrial activation in atrial fibrillation and suggests that the left atrium may sustain atrial fibrillation in some patients. Simultaneous mapping of the right and left atrium is required to further elucidate the mechanisms of human atrial fibrillation. (Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 550–564) 2000 The European Society of Cardiology Key Words: Mapping, atrial, fibrillation. success will be critically dependent on improved understanding of atrial fibrillation mechanisms. Atrial fibrillation has been mapped in animal models[10–16] and humans[16–24] and has provided insights on the arrhythmia mechanism, but studies have been limited by the resolution of the mapping system used[25], the extent of atrium mapped[20], or the need for the procedure to be performed after thoracotomy[20–22], which has an associated morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a non-contact mapping system to map atrial fibrillation in the human right atrium. Because the system continuously acquires high-resolution data simultaneously from the entire right atrium and is deployed percutaneously it may overcome some of the problems associated with the atrial fibrillation mapping techniques used to date. 2000 The European Society of Cardiology Non-contact endocardial mapping of human right atrial fibrillation Table 1 Patient 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 551 Patient demographics Age (years) 55 40 66 42 34 76 73 75 36 34 74 Drugs RA lat/TA (cm) RA-AP (cm) Digoxin, warfarin Disopyramide Verapamil, warfarin None Amiodarone, warfarin Digoxin, diltiazem, warfarin Diltiazem, metoprolol None Amiodarone None Amiodarone 5·5 4·3 4 4 5·6 5·4 5·8 6·2 9·9 7·4 8·4 4·3 3·5 3·2 3·2 4·7 3·7 3·6 2·8 5·1 4·3 5·3 Underlying arrhythmia AF P Septal WPW A flutter Paroxysmal AF AF AF A flutter A flutter A flutter AVRT A flutter Underlying arrhythmia=the patients’ presenting clinical arrhythmia and the reason for undergoing electrophysiological study; AF=atrial fibrillation; P Septal WPW=a postero-septal accessory pathway presenting as Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome; A flutter=atrial flutter; Drugs=the drug therapy the patient was taking prior to the mapping study; RA lat/TA=the right atrial lateral wall to tricuspid distance (cm); RA-AP=the right atrial anterior to posterior distance (cm). Methods Patients Right atrial mapping was performed in 11 patients (8 male, mean age 55 years, range 34 to 76 years) (Table 1). Three patients had a history of chronic atrial fibrillation in whom non-contact mapping studies were carried out under the supervision of the local ethics committee in order to assess the validity and feasibility of non-contact mapping of human atrial fibrillation. No therapeutic procedures were performed in these patients. In the remaining patients non-contact mapping was performed to characterize other arrhythmia substrates and atrial fibrillation was induced during the course of the study. One patient was undergoing an electrophysiological study for a right posteroseptal accessory pathway and the remaining patients had a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and flutter. All patients underwent preoperative echocardiography. Anticoagulation was stopped 3 days prior to study in the patients on warfarin therapy (Table 1) and was reinitiated immediately after the procedure. Antiarrhythmic drugs were unchanged after the procedure in those patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and were stopped in patients with an accessory pathway or atrial flutter after successful catheter ablation procedures subsequent to atrial fibrillation mapping. A 12-lead electrocardiogram was recorded during atrial fibrillation either immediately prior to the mapping procedure in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation or during atrial fibrillation in the patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation was divided into ‘coarse’ or ‘fine’ according to the appearance of the diastolic interval on the surface ECG[26,27]. Mapping procedure The study was approved by the local ethics committee whose guidelines were followed (n=6) or the Insti- tutional Review Board at Northwestern University (n=5). All patients were studied in the post-absorptive state, having given written informed consent. A quadripolar catheter was placed in the right ventricular apex and a 7 French deflectable mapping/ablation 4 mm tip catheter placed in the right atrium via right femoral venous sheaths. Systemic arterial blood pressure was continuously monitored via a 6 French femoral arterial sheath. A 9 French sheath was placed in the left femoral vein to introduce the non-contact mapping catheter. Contact catheter data and surface ECGs were recorded simultaneously on both a conventional electrophysiology system and the non-contact mapping system. Non-contact mapping system The non-contact mapping system (EnSite 3000Endocardial Solutions, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.) has been described in detail elsewhere[28]. Briefly, it consists of a catheter-mounted multielectrode array, a custom built amplifier system, and a Silicon Graphics workstation that runs specially designed system software. The multielectrode array catheter consists of a 7·5 ml balloon mounted on a 9F catheter (Fig. 1) around which is woven a braid of 64 0·003 inch diameter wires. Each wire has one 0·025 inch break in insulation producing a non-contact unipolar electrode; these 64 electrodes constitute the multielectrode array. The raw far-field electrographic data are acquired and fed into a multichannel recorder and amplifier system, sampling at 1·2 kHz, and filtered with a band width of 0·1 to 300 Hz. Unipolar signals are recorded using a ring electrode as a reference which is located on the proximal shaft of the multielectrode array catheter at the level of the inferior vena cava. Before deployment of the multielectrode array, patients were given 10 000 IU heparin, with later boluses to maintain ACT between 300 and 400 s. The multielectrode array catheter was deployed in the right atrium of all patients, over a 0·032 inch J-tipped guide wire, Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 552 R. J. Schilling et al. Figure 1 (a) A postero-anterior radiograph showing the multielectrode array deployed around the balloon filled with 7·5 ml of contrast (B) in the right atrium with the pigtail tip positioned near the superior vena cava. Also seen is a mapping catheter positioned on the inferior vena cava-TV isthmus (Map) a coronary sinus catheter (CS) and a halo catheter (H) which were used to map and ablate this patient’s atrial flutter after mapping of atrial fibrillation by creating a line of block across the TA-inferior vena cava isthmus. (b) A postero-anterior radiograph showing the multielectrode array (B) deployed in the right atrium and canted over towards the tricuspid annulus by a guide wire passed through the central lumen and out through the right ventricular outflow tract, so that the pigtail of the multielectrode array is straightened and sited on the ventricular side of the TA. Also seen are catheters sited at the high right atrium (HRA), right ventricular apex (RVA), His bundle (His) and coronary sinus (CS). A mapping/ablation catheter has been positioned on the TA-inferior vena cava isthmus (arrow). Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 Non-contact endocardial mapping of human right atrial fibrillation advanced to the superior vena cava (n=8) (Fig. 1(a)) or the pulmonary outflow tract (n=3) having been positioned using a 7 French multipurpose catheter (Fig. 1(b)). This was done in patients with a postero-septal accessory pathway or a large right atrium and atrial flutter in order to maximize the system’s resolution of that area by canting the balloon towards the atrioventricular junction or inferior vena cava tricuspid valve isthmus. Previous data have demonstrated that the accuracy of electrogram reconstruction improves with decreasing distance between the multielectrode array and the endocardium[28]. At the end of the procedure, heparin was reversed with protamine and the sheaths removed immediately the ACT was below 120 s. Catheter location The system locates any other catheter in the chamber with respect to the multielectrode array by passing a 5·68 kHz, low current locator signal between the catheter being located and alternately between ring electrodes proximal and distal to the multielectrode array on the non-contact catheter. This locator signal serves two purposes. Firstly it can be used to construct a threedimensional computer model of the endocardium (virtual endocardium), providing the geometry matrix for the inverse solution. Geometric points are sampled by dragging the located catheter around the cardiac chamber at the beginning of a study, either during sinus rhythm (sampled points being gated 6 ms before the R-wave) or arrhythmia (no gating). Secondly the locator signal is used to display and log the position of any catheter on the virtual endocardium during a study (Fig. 2(a)). This is used to mark anatomical locations (identified using fluoroscopy and electrogram characteristics) on the virtual endocardium. Reconstruction of electrograms The electrical activity detected by the electrodes on the surface of the multielectrode array is generated primarily by the potential field on the endocardial surface. The electrograms detected by non-contact electrodes are of lower amplitude and frequency than the source on the endocardium. A technique to enhance and resolve these far-field potentials has been devised from an inverse solution to Laplace’s equation using a boundary element method. The inverse solution considers how a signal detected at a remote point would have appeared at source; the boundary element method is used to apply the inverse solution, allowing resolution of a matrix of such signals originating at a known boundary (the blood– endocardial boundary). Using these techniques the system is able, from the multielectrode array potentials, to reconstruct >3000 unipolar electrograms simultaneously and superimpose them onto the virtual endocardium (Fig. 2(a)) to produce isopotential or isochronal maps with a colour range representing voltage or timing of onset. The colour range on the isopotential maps can be narrowed in order to produce a form of activation map with the threshold for activation being set at an arbitrary level by the operator. Electrograms may also be selected 553 from any site of interest on the virtual endocardium and displayed individually (Fig. 2(b)). Mapping protocol The mean cycle length of the atrial fibrillation in the right and left atrium were determined from bipolar electrograms recorded simultaneously by conventional multipolar catheters in fluoroscopically stable positions in the high right atrium and coronary sinus. If atrial fibrillation was chronic no attempt was made to terminate it, but atrial fibrillation induced and persisting during the procedure was then terminated using intravenous flecainide at a dose of 2 mg . kg 1, with a maximum dose of 150 mg infused over 10 min. The infusion was terminated if the patient reverted to sinus rhythm. Recording of endocardial activation was continued throughout this infusion and non-contact mapping data was analysed off-line for all patients. For the purposes of analysing termination of atrial fibrillation after intravenous flecainide, data were recorded continuously during the infusion and 10 s samples of data were analysed every minute. The number of wave fronts present was plotted against time. Validation of electrogram reconstruction A previously described method for computerized crosscorrelation comparison was used[28] to compare reconstructed with contact electrograms, taken from the same endocardial point identified by the catheter location system. Signals for both contact and reconstructed electrograms were filtered with a bandwidth of 4 to 300 Hz. Definitions Atrial fibrillation Atrial fibrillation was defined as an irregular tachycardia with beat-to-beat change in contact intracardiac atrial electrogram timing and morphology (either right atrium or coronary sinus) and with an irregular ventricular response[15–17]. Number of wave fronts A wave front was defined as a discreet and moving front of endocardial depolarization identified on unipolar isopotential maps. They were identified as regions of negative polarity on isopotential maps and when two wave fronts collided and fused, they were then counted as one. Conversely, when a wave front bifurcated, two wave fronts were present from then on[14]. A wave front was defined as the leading edge of a progressive and sequential wave of depolarization across the endocardium. Wave fronts were detected by increasing the sensitivity threshold of the isopotential map without displaying noise. The initiation of a wave front was confirmed by differentiating between endocardial activation and background noise. This was achieved by examining Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 554 R. J. Schilling et al. reconstructed electrograms from the location of this wave front initiation. Further confirmation of the validity of endocardial activation, as indicated on the isopotential map, was performed by electrogram examination each time the wave front changed direction. Reentry circuits A reentry circuit was defined as a complete circuit of re-excitation with a wave front completing at least two rotations through the same circuit. Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 Focal activity Focal activity or breakthrough of electrical activity was defined as a wave front emerging from a point on the endocardium where the surrounding endocardium was electrically silent so that activation was not propagating from a detectable wave front. Atrial fibrillation type The pattern of atrial fibrillation in the right atrium was divided into three categories using a similar Non-contact endocardial mapping of human right atrial fibrillation classification to that of Konings et al.[18] and defined as follows: (1) Type I atrial fibrillation—only one wave front present in the right atrium for >50% of the time. (2) Type II atrial fibrillation—two independent wave fronts present in the right atrium for >50% of the time. (3) Type III atrial fibrillation—three or more wave fronts present in the right atrium for >50% of the time. Our definitions differed from that of Konings et al. in that data were acquired from the entire right atrium and we stipulated that a set number of wave fronts should be present for >50% of the time period analysed, rather than for the entire period. Thus, in this study, larger areas of the right atrium were analysed and for much longer periods than had been possible in Konings’ study, so that there was a variation in the number of wave fronts present in most of the cases analysed. After atrial fibrillation had been established for at least 30 s and prior to any drug or pacing intervention, atrial fibrillation was then categorized as type I, II or III atrial fibrillation according to the number of wave fronts present on activation maps for the majority of the time period analysed. Statistics Data are presented as means and standard deviations. Means of continuous, normally distributed data were compared with Student’s t-test. Other data were compared using Chi-squared analysis. Results Isopotential maps of atrial fibrillation were recorded for 558597 s (meanSD) (range 9 to 1453 s) on the non-contact mapping system. Mean atrial fibrillation cycle length Mean right and left atrial fibrillation cycle lengths were determined from 322 electrogram intervals (mean 29 555 intervals per patient, range 16–60 per patient). The right atrial fibrillation cycle length was 16936·5 ms (meanstandard deviation), (range 58–285 ms) and left atrial fibrillation cycle length was 169·240·9 ms (range 43–292 ms) which were not significantly different (P=0·8). Validation of atrial fibrillation electrogram reconstruction Comparison of non-contact reconstructed electrograms and contact electrograms was performed for all patients (Fig. 3). Approximately 3600 electrogram complexes were compared with a mean cross-correlation of 0·740·19. Initiation of atrial fibrillation Initiation of atrial fibrillation in four patients without chronic atrial fibrillation was caused by catheter manipulation and in four atrial fibrillation occurred during attempted entrainment of atrial flutter. This happened before introduction of the multielectrode array in one patient. Initiation of atrial fibrillation was recorded by the non-contact mapping system in one patient (Fig. 2(a) and (b)). Figure 2(a) shows a series of activation maps which demonstrate that the mapping/ablation catheter, the position of which was determined on the virtual endocardium using the locator signal, had initiated two atrial ectopic beats, resulting in a macroreentry circuit. This then divided into three wave fronts in the septum, which then continued to propagate in an unpredictable manner resulting in persistent atrial fibrillation. Mapping of established atrial fibrillation Atrial fibrillation, which had been established for at least 1 min, was recorded in all patients. The results of atrial fibrillation mapping and termination are given in Table 2. Figure 2 (a) A series of unipolar activation maps showing initiation of atrial fibrillation. The frames have not been evenly spaced in time in order to show the activation patterns clearly, but the timing of each frame with reference to the electrograms and the surface ECG is shown in (b) as a yellow number. A focal atrial wave front emerges from the point of contact of the catheter (indicated by the green locator line) (frame 1), splits around the TV (frame 2) and fuses in the superior right atrium (frame 3). A period of electrical silence in the right atrium (frame 4) followed by a second focal activation wave front (frame 5), splits and is blocked in the isthmus (frame 6). The more superior limb rotates around the TV and forms a macroreentry circuit which competes two circuits (frames 7 to 11) before degenerating to atrial fibrillation. (b) Wave forms showing the period during which the activation maps were recorded. The yellow numbers indicate the timing of the corresponding frame shown in (a) and a time scale is shown at the bottom of the figure in blue (ms). ECG II=surface ECG lead II; Catheter=bipolar electrograms recorded from the roving contact catheter which was the source of focal activity; a to f are reconstructed unipolar electrograms recorded from positions displayed on the activation maps. Note that after the first focal activation, electrograms from a and f are of roughly equal timing, but after the second beat, electrograms from a to f show double potentials. The first one is a far-field ventricular activation, which is immediately followed by atrial electrograms in the same sequence and similar morphology. In the subsequent beat when a macroreentry circuit is established the activation timing from a to f is again similar in morphology and timing as a result of activation progress around the tricuspid annulus. This is then followed by more disorganized activity corresponding with the initiation of atrial fibrillation (not shown in figures). Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 556 R. J. Schilling et al. Table 2 Patient 1 2* 3* 4* 5 6 7* 8 9 10 11 Results AF on ECG AF type Focal activation Termination by flecainide Coarse Fine Fine Fine Coarse Fine Coarse Fine Coarse Coarse Fine I III III III II III I II I I III No No Sup and CS sept No Sup sept Sup mid and CS sept Sup and CS sept Sub sept Sup mid and CS sept Sup sept Sup mid and CS sept No To A flutter (pace terminated) To A flutter (blocked in isthmus) Atrial ectopics No No No No No No No AF on ECG=the appearance of the baseline atrial activity on ECG, recorded during arrhythmia either immediately prior or during the procedure (see text for details); AF type=the type of atrial fibrillation as identified on non-contact mapping of the right atrium (see text); Focal activation=evidence of a wave front emerging from a focus surrounded by electrically silent tissue; Termination by flecainide=whether termination using flecainide was attempted and the mode of termination (see text). *Indicates patients in whom AF was initiated by catheter manipulation. By these criteria four patients had predominantly type I, two patients had predominantly type II and five patients had predominantly type III atrial fibrillation in the right atrium. The patients with type I atrial fibrillation had coarse P wave activity on the surface ECG (Fig. 4(a)). Of patients with type II atrial fibrillation, one had coarse and one had fine P wave activity on the ECG. All of the patients with type III atrial fibrillation had fine P wave activity (Fig. 4(b)) on the surface ECG. A coarse pattern of atrial fibrillation on the surface ECG was significantly associated with type I atrial fibrillation (P=0·01). Periods of right atrial electrical silence lasting >50 ms were observed in the right atrium of eight patients (3 type I, 2 type II, 3 type III atrial fibrillation) despite evidence of continuing atrial fibrillation on the surface ECG and coronary sinus catheter electrograms. In all patients, the re-initiation of right atrial activation was via consistent locations on the right atrial septum, possibly representing breakthrough from the left atrium. In three patients the focus was in the superior septum in the region of Bachmann’s bundle. In two patients, two foci were observed in the superior septum (Bachmann’s bundle) and near the coronary sinus os. In three patients, three foci were observed in the superior septum/Bachmann’s bundle, mid septum and near the coronary sinus os. Example of type I atrial fibrillation An example of 1·5 cycles of type I atrial fibrillation is shown in Fig. 5 and the patient’s 12-lead ECG is seen in Fig. 4(a). The reentry wave front rotates around a line of block situated in the posterior septum and posterolateral wall near the crista terminalis. This line of block did not vary during atrial fibrillation, but slight variations in the path of the wave front were seen in other regions of the right atrium. Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 Example of type II atrial fibrillation An example and description of type II atrial fibrillation is shown in Fig. 6. Example of type III atrial fibrillation An example of type III atrial fibrillation is shown and described in Fig. 7. Termination of atrial fibrillation Termination of atrial fibrillation following flecainide infusion was observed and recorded in three patients, all with type III atrial fibrillation. Mean flecainide dose was 140 mg. Termination of atrial fibrillation example 1 Flecainide infusion in a patient with type III atrial fibrillation resulted in progressively fewer wave fronts with longer periods of right atrial electrical silence. This then evolved into a single reentry wave front, which encountered a line of block in the superior posteroseptal wall. The right atrium was then reactivated several times from the septum, presumably as breakthrough from the left atrium. The length of these periods of electrical silence and number of wave fronts present over the period of flecainide infusion are plotted in Fig. 8. Following one period of electrical silence, right atrial tachycardia emerged as a uniform wave front from a focus on the lateral right atrial wall in the region of the crista terminalis. A second wave front emerged from a similarly located focus, which was then followed by a longer pause. This was then followed by slow regular activity emerging from the same right atrial point, as recorded during sinus rhythm, indicating the resumption of sinus rhythm. Non-contact endocardial mapping of human right atrial fibrillation 557 Figure 3 Three examples of the surface ECG with contact (C) and reconstructed (R) electrograms recorded from the same endocardial location in patients with type I (top), II (middle) and III (bottom) atrial fibrillation. Termination of atrial fibrillation example 2 Flecainide infusion resulted in progressively fewer wave fronts, until a single wave front remained rotating in a macroreentry circuit around the right atrium, consistent with typical atrial flutter. This terminated several times and random reentry[29,30] was re-established by local reactivation from the septum. After a further two rotations, this wave front then blocked in the region of the TA-inferior vena cava isthmus, resulting in termination of tachycardia and resumption of sinus rhythm. Termination of atrial fibrillation example 3 In the remaining patient, an infusion of flecainide resulted in organization and slowing of the wave front so that a consistent atrial flutter reentry circuit was formed. This then required overdrive pacing to terminate tachycardia. Procedural complications No patient suffered complications as a result of the mapping procedures. Postoperative investigations remained unchanged and echocardiography revealed no evidence of intracardiac thrombus, trauma or pericardial effusion. Discussion We describe the validation and first results of noncontact mapping of human atrial fibrillation using a previously validated system[28]. These data are the first to provide maps of the entire right atrial endocardium including the septum. Non-contact mapping of atrial fibrillation in the human right atrium has confirmed the presence of a wide variation in atrial fibrillation patterns in different patients, which correspond with the three broad classifications of types I, II and type III, as described by Konings et al.[18]. The system has also recorded and demonstrated right atrial activation during termination of atrial fibrillation by intravenous flecainide. Drug therapy in atrial fibrillation is disappointing; the success rate of chemical cardioversion of acute atrial fibrillation is only 70–86%[31–33], whereas chronic antiarrhythmic therapy has a high recurrence rate and an associated mortality[8]. Developments of potentially curative procedures have been based on data from multi-site mapping studies reported by Allessie et al.[4,5] which supported the multiple wavelet hypothesis proposed by Moe et al. in 1959[1–3]. Cox et al. used such mapping data, from patients undergoing surgical ablation of Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome, to develop the surgical Maze procedure[9]. The high success rate (100%) when using the most recent modification in a highly selected group, has been tempered by a recurrence rate for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter of 7% and an associated morbidity and mortality[9]. Attempts to reproduce the Maze procedure using percutaneous catheter techniques have so far had low success rates, high recurrence rates and required Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 558 R. J. Schilling et al. (a) I aVR V1 V4 II aVL V2 V5 III aVF V3 V6 RHYTHM STRIP: II –1 –1 25 mm.s ; cm.mV F 40 08523 LOC 00000–0000 (b) I aVR V1 V4 II aVL V2 V5 III aVF V3 V6 VI II V5 Figure 4 (a) A surface ECG recorded prior to mapping of the patient with type I atrial fibrillation, showing a coarse pattern of atrial activity. (b) A surface ECG recorded prior to mapping of a patient with type III atrial fibrillation showing a fine pattern of atrial activity. long procedure times[34–36]. Increased understanding of the mechanisms underlying atrial fibrillation by detailed mapping techniques is likely to improve these results. Many mapping studies of atrial fibrillation have been published to date[4–6,10–14]. Human studies have recorded data from limited endocardial contact sites[19,23] or have used epicardial electrode arrays to record high resolution data over limited areas[11,18,20,37] or low resolution data over large areas[16,24], often in patients with Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 normal atria who had atrial fibrillation induced during a surgical procedure. Validation of non-contact mapping of atrial fibrillation This mapping system has previously been validated in the human left ventricle during sinus rhythm[29] and Non-contact endocardial mapping of human right atrial fibrillation 559 Figure 5 (a) A series of unipolar activation maps, at 30 ms intervals, of type I atrial fibrillation showing a macroreentry wave front rotating around a line of block indicated by the blue line. The wave front passes superiorly up the septum (frame 1) and passes over the TV and line of block (frame 2). It then passes inferiorly along the anterolateral aspect of the line of block (frames 3 to 5) before turning around the inferior vena cava (frame 5) and passing up the septum (frame 6) to complete another circuit (frames 6 to 9). (b) Unipolar reconstructed electrograms taken from the points labelled on the activation maps a to g showing sequential activation around the right atrium, also seen is the surface ECG lead II. The yellow numbers indicate the points at which the corresponding sequential activation map frame has been displayed. Note the double potentials seen on electrogram c which are closely spaced corresponding to the electrogram’s proximity to the end of a line of block. By comparison, electrogram g has widely spaced double potentials; the second potential (of lower amplitude and frequency) corresponds with activation of electrogram d which is taken from the opposite side to the line of block from electrogram g. ventricular tachycardia[38], and in the canine right atrium during atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter[39]. The low amplitude and fractionated electrograms recorded during atrial fibrillation may not be as accurately reconstructed as those recorded during sinus rhythm or ventricular tachycardia. While satisfactory, the crosscorrelation data presented in this study are similar, but not as good as that reported for cross-correlation of Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 560 R. J. Schilling et al. Figure 6 A series of unipolar activation maps of type II atrial fibrillation shown at 30 ms intervals. After a period of electrical silence (frame 1), two simultaneous sources of right atrial activation are seen from the superior and inferior septum (frame 2). The inferior wave front progresses inferiorly towards the border of the right atrium and inferior vena cava. The superior wave front splits in the region of the posterior septum, with one wave front turning at the septum and progressing superiorly and the other progressing across the lateral right atrium (frames 3 and 4) before blocking in the inferior vena cava-TC isthmus (frame 5). The septal wave front follows a complex path, finally progressing interiorly (frame 5), turning (frame 6), passing around the superior vena cava (frames 6 to 7), moving inferiorly (frame 7) and blocking at the lateral right atrium (frame 8). The inferior wave front progresses superiorly and blocks at the superior septum (frames 4 to 9). Electrical silence (frame 10) is followed by reactivation of right atrium from the superior septum (frame 11). contact and reconstructed electrograms in the fibrillating canine right atrium[30] (0·8), and the human left ventricle during sinus rhythm[28] (0·83) and ventricular tachycardia[38] (0·86). Possible reasons for this difference are the increased size of the human right atrium compared with the canine right atrium (resulting in an increased distance between the multielectrode array and the endocardium), the increased complexity of the atrial fibrillation electrogram and the decreased amplitude of the atrial electrogram. Initiation of atrial fibrillation There are little data pertaining to the mechanisms of spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation[40]. One study has published data describing spontaneous and adenosine triphosphate induced conversion of atrial flutter to atrial fibrillation and atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter in a canine sterile pericarditis model[13]. We have presented data on only one patient with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in whom atrial fibrillation was initiated by catheter-induced right atrial ectopic beats. These Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 resulted in the establishment of a reentry circuit which encountered varying lines of block causing multiple wave fronts and atrial fibrillation akin to previous descriptions[13]. Mapping of atrial fibrillation Atrial reentry The range of activation patterns presented here are compatible with previous studies[14,18–20]. We demonstrate three broad classifications of activation pattern of atrial fibrillation ranging from a single reentry wave front in the right atrium (type I), two simultaneous wave fronts (type II) and three or more simultaneous wave fronts (type III). This fits with the similar classification of Konings et al.[18] but it is of interest that the majority of patients described in Konings’ study had a predominantly type I pattern, whereas most of our small number of patients had predominantly type III patterns. This may be explained by bias resulting from the small numbers included in our study, or by the global Non-contact endocardial mapping of human right atrial fibrillation 561 Figure 7 (a) A series of activation maps, shown at 20 ms intervals, during type III atrial fibrillation. Activity emerges from the coronary sinus septum and splits into three separate lateral, central and medial wave fronts (frames 1 and 2). The centre of these wave fronts is slow and of low amplitude and splits further into two wave fronts travelling superiorly and inferiorly (frame 3). The more inferior wave front collides in the isthmus with the medial wave front that has rotated around the TV (frames 3 and 4) while the more superior wave front collides with a line of block established by earlier activation by the medial wave front (frame 4). The lateral and medial wave fronts fuse in the anterolateral right atrium (frames 2 and 3) and the resulting wave front divides in the superior right atrium with one front rotating around the TV (frames 3 and 4) and the other rotating in the superior septum before fusing with the central superior wave front (frames 4 and 5). Subsequent activation maps show the continuing complex patterns of activation seen in type III atrial fibrillation. (b) Surface ECG lead II and unipolar reconstructed electrograms from points a to e on the activation maps are shown demonstrating the complexity of electrograms seen when compared to type I atrial fibrillation (Fig. 4(b)). The points in time at which each activation map is made are shown by the yellow numbers corresponding to each frame at the top of the figure. Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 562 R. J. Schilling et al. 3 2 Pt 4 SR 1 0 Number of wave fronts 4 3 Pt 3 2 SR 1 AFL 0 4 3 Pt 2 2 SR 1 AFL 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 Time (s) Figure 8 The number of wave fronts plotted against time (s) over the period of flecainide infusion for the three patients in whom flecainide terminated atrial fibrillation. The patient number corresponds with the numbering of Table 2. Onset of atrial flutter is indicated by an arrow with the legend AFL and restoration of sinus rhythm is indicated by an arrow and the legend SR. nature of our mapping technique which revealed the presence of other wave fronts which may not have been apparent to Konings’ group when mapping a small atrial area. The observation of type I right atrial activity during atrial fibrillation is consistent with previously published data from studies which performed simultaneous left and right atrial mapping[16,18]. These describe wave fronts penetrating the septum from a single reentry wave front in the right atrium and reactivating the left atrium[16]. A single reentry circuit during atrial fibrillation, which may be maintaining atrial fibrillation, is a potential target for catheter ablation and may therefore greatly simplify catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. However, the relevance of these single reentry circuits to the maintenance of atrial fibrillation has not been examined in this study. Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 Focal atrial activation Focal atrial activation during atrial fibrillation has been described by several mapping studies[14,18,20,22,37,41,42]. The presence of micro-reentry presenting as focal activation can only be excluded by studies using highdensity mapping. Of these high density mapping studies, the majority have used epicardial arrays applied during surgery and have concluded that the focal activation seen was a result of epicardial breakthrough of an atrial fibrillation wave front propagating in a free running atrial trabeculum[18,20,37]. One study has used simultaneous endo- and epicardial mapping in canines to confirm the existence of this phenomenon[42]. The data presented in this paper demonstrate activity emerging solely from the septum mainly in the region of Bachmann’s bundle and the septum near the coronary sinus where the orientation of atrial fibres might Non-contact endocardial mapping of human right atrial fibrillation encourage inter-atrial conduction. We surmise from these data that this activity is the result of breakthrough of activation from the left atrium. These conclusions are supported by previous studies which have used simultaneous left and right atrial mapping in canines[14] and humans[22] to identify breakthrough of activation from one atrium to the other, in some cases resulting in reactivation of unstable reentry circuits. Termination of atrial fibrillation In this study, intravenous flecainide administration during atrial fibrillation resulted in a progressive reduction in the number of wave fronts within the right atrium, culminating in a single reentry wave front. Three modes of arrhythmia termination were then observed, firstly the right atrium wave front continued to circulate, resulting in an organized reentrant arrhythmia requiring termination by pacing. Secondly the reentry wave front encountered a line of block at a ‘vulnerable’ site in the circuit (i.e. the inferior vena cava-TV isthmus); the right atrium was then reactivated by wave fronts emerging from the septum until sinus rhythm was restored in the left atrium. Thirdly the reentry wave front blocked and was followed by an atrial tachycardia, emerging from a focus in the right atrium remote from the septum which stopped before sinus rhythm was restored. Previous studies have used either low resolution endocardial catheter mapping in humans[21] or high resolution epicardial mapping of canines[10,12,13] and humans[17] to demonstrate the mechanism of termination of a number of different models of atrial fibrillation using a variety of drugs. It has been shown that flecainide increases the size and reduces the number of reentry circuits[10]. In addition, flecainide may convert atrial fibrillation to a regular tachycardia before terminating the arrhythmia[10,12,17] and termination of atrial fibrillation may follow the establishment of a macroreentry circuit[10]. Mechanisms of termination of atrial fibrillation, similar to the cases described here, have been demonstrated previously, showing that failure of re-excitation of the right atrium from the left atrium was important, and that termination may be preceded by wave fronts emerging from a focus[12]. A considerable interrelation between atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter and spontaneous conversion between the two has also been shown previously[13], which fits with our observations of the development of a reentry circuit identical to right atrial flutter preceding the termination of atrial fibrillation. Limitations of study This study does not examine activation within the left atrium. It is well known that the conduction properties of the left atrium and right atrium are inhomogeneous[44,45] and that the fibrillation rates may differ between the two[44]. We are therefore unable to draw any 563 conclusions about the activation patterns of the left atrium and while it is likely that the local activation emanating from the right atrial septum is likely to be left atrial in origin, our data could not prove this. Because these results describe initial studies to confirm the feasibility of using a novel mapping technology to study atrial fibrillation, the number of patients included are limited. Conclusion Non-contact mapping of human right atrial fibrillation has been validated. Identification of types I, II and III atrial fibrillation using non-contact mapping of the entire human right atrium confirms previous observations made by mapping limited areas of the right atrium and identifies a wide variability in pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation. The ability to rapidly produce high resolution simultaneous global maps of atrial fibrillation offers the potential opportunity to customize a catheter ablation procedure, according to the pattern of atrial fibrillation seen in an individual patient. Further studies of the left atrium may confirm this system’s potential for guiding catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation. References [1] Moe GK, Abildskov JA. Atrial fibrillation as a self sustaining arrhythmia independent of focal discharge. Am Heart J 1959; 58: 59–70. [2] Moe GK. On the multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1962; 140: 183–8. [3] Moe GK, Rheinboldt WC, Abilskov JA. A computer model of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 1964; 64: 200–20. [4] Allessie MA, Lammers WJEP, Smeets JRLM, Bonke FIM, Hollen J. Total mapping of atrial excitation during acetylcholine-induced atrial flutter and fibrillation in the isolated canine heart. In: Kulbertus HE, Olsson SB, Schlepper M, eds. Atrial fibrillation. Molndal, Sweden: Lindgren and Soner; 1982: 44–62. [5] Allessie MA, Lammers WJEP, Bonke FIM, Hollen J. Experimental evaluation of Moe’s multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Arrhythmias. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1985: 265–76. [6] Allessie MA, Kirchhof CJHJ, Bonke FIM. The role of the sinus node in supra ventricular arrhythmias. In: Mazgalev T, Dreifus LS, Michelson EL, eds. Electrophysiology of the Sinoatrial and Atrioventricular Nodes. New York: Alan R Liss, 1988: 53–66. [7] Waldo AL. Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and ectopic tachycardia: a brief review. Circulation 1987; 75: III-37–III-40. [8] Flaker GC, Blackshear JL, McBride R, Kronmal RA, Halperin JL, Hart RG. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy and cardiac mortality in atrial fibrillation: the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 527–32. [9] Cox JL, Schuessler RB, Lappas DG, Boineau JP. An 8Y year clinical experience with surgery for atrial fibrillation. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 267–75. Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 564 R. J. Schilling et al. [10] Wang Z, Page P, Nattel S. Mechanism of flecainide’s antiarrhythmic action in experimental atrial fibrillation. Circ Res 1992; 71: 271–87. [11] Kirchhof C, Chorro F, Scheffer GJ et al. Regional entrainment of atrial fibrillation studied by high-resolution mapping in open-chest dogs. Circulation 1993; 88: 736–49. [12] Wang J, Bourne GW, Wang Z, Villemaire C, Talajic M, Nattel S. Comparative mechanisms of antiarrhythmic drug action in experimental atrial fibrillation importance of usedependent effects on refractoriness. Circulation 1993; 88: 1030–44. [13] Ortiz J, Niwano S, Abe H, Rudy Y, Johnson NJ, Waldo AL. Mapping the conversion of atrial flutter to atrial fibrillation and atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter: insight into mechanisms. Circ Res 1994; 74: 882–94. [14] Kumagai K, Khrestian C, Waldo AL. Simultaneous multisite mapping studies during induced atrial fibrillation in the sterile pericarditis model: insights into the mechanism of its maintenance. Circulation 1997; 95: 511–21. [15] Allessie MA, Wijffels MCEF, Kirchhof CJHJ. Experimental models of arrhythmias: Toys or truth? Eur Heart J 1994; 15 (Suppl A): 2–8. [16] Cox JL, Canavan TE, Schuessler RB et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation II. Intraoperative electrophysiologic mapping and description of the electrophysiologic basis of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 101: 406–26. [17] Brugada J, Gursov S, Brugada P, Atie J, Guiradon G, Andries E, Cibenzoline transforms random reentry into ordered reentry in the atria. Eur Heart J 1993; 14: 267–72. [18] Konings KTS, Kirchhof CJHJ, Smeets JRLM, Wellens HJJ, Penn OC, Allessie MA. High density mapping of electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation 1994; 89: 1665–80. [19] Daoud EG, Pariseau B, Niebauer M et al. Response of type I atrial fibrillation to atrial pacing in humans. Circulation 1996; 94: 1036–40. [20] Holm M, Johansson R, Brandt J, Luhrs C, Olsson SB. Epicardial right atrial free wall mapping in atrial fibrillation: documentation of repetitive activation with a focal spread — a hitherto unrecognised phenomenon in man. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 290–310. [21] Sih HJ, Ropella KM, Swiryn S, Gerstenfeld EP, Sahakian AV. Observations from intraatrial recordings on the termination of electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans. PACE 1994; 17: 1231–42. [22] Harada A, Sasaki K, Fukushima T et al. Atrial activation during chronic atrial fibrillation in patients with isolated mitral valve disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 104–12. [23] Jais P, Haissaguerre M, Shah DC, Chouairi S, Clementy J. Regional disparities of endocardial atrial activation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. PACE 1996; 19: 1998–2003. [24] Chang BC, Schuessler RB, Stone CM et al. Computerized activation sequence mapping of the human atrial septum. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49: 231–41. [25] Josephson ME, Seides SF. Clinical cardiac electrophysiology. Technique and interpretations, 1st edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1979; 198–9. [26] Hewlett AW, Wilson FN. Coarse auricular fibrillation in man. Arch Int Med 1915; 15: 786–93. [27] Nelson RM, Jenson CB, Davis RW. Differential atrial arrhythmias in cardiac surgical patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969; 58: 581–7. Eur Heart J, Vol. 21, issue 7, April 2000 [28] Schilling RJ, Peters NS, Davies DW. A non-contact catheter for simultaneous endocardial mapping in the human left ventricle: comparison of contact and reconstructed electrograms during sinus rhythm. Circulation 1998; 98: 887–98. [29] Hoffman BF, Rosen MR. Cellular mechanisms for cardiac arrhythmias. Circ Res 1981; 49: 1–15. [30] Allessie MA, Kirchhof CJCHJ, Konings KTS. Unravelling the mysteries of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 1996; 17 (Suppl C): 2–9. [31] Crijins HJGM, van Wiljk LM, van Gilst WH, Kingma JH, van Gelder IC, Lie KI. Acute conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: Clinical efficacy of flecainide acetate: Comparison of two regimens. Eur Heart J 1988; 9: 634–8. [32] Borgeat A, Goy JJ, Maendly R, Kaufmann U, Grbic M, Sigwart U. Flecainide versus quinidine for conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58: 496–8. [33] Bianconi L, Boccadamo R, Pappalardo A, Gentili C, Pistolese M, Effectiveness of intravenous propafenone for conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter of recent onset. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 335–8. [34] Avitall B, Hare J, Mughal K et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation in a dog model (Abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 276A. [35] Kempler P, Littmann L, Chuang CH et al. Radiofrequency ablation of the right atrium: acute and chronic effects (Abstr). PACE 1994; 17: 797. [36] Elvan A, Pride HP, Zipes DP. Replication of the ‘maze’ procedure by radiofrequency catheter ablation reduces the ability to induce atrial fibrillation (Abstr). PACE 1994; 17: 274. [37] Holm M, Johansson R, Olsson SB, Brandt J, Luhrs C. A new method for analysis of atrial activation during chronic atrial fibrillation in man. IEEE Transactions on biomedical engineering 1996; 43: 198–210. [38] Schilling RJ, Peters NS, Davies DW. Feasibility of noncontact catheter for endocardial mapping of human ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1999; 99: 2543–52. [39] Kadish A, Hauck J, Pederson B, Beatty G, Gornick C. Mapping of atrial activation with a noncontact, multielectrode catheter in dogs. Circulation 1999; 99: 1906–13. [40] Ferguson TB, Schuessler RB, Hand DE, Boineau JP, Cox JL. Lessons learned from computerized mapping of the atrium. Surgery for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. J Electrocardiol 1993; 26: 210–19. [41] Haissaguerre M, Marcus FJ, Fischer B, Clementy J. Radiofrequency catheter ablation in unusual mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: Report of three cases. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1994; 5: 743–51. [42] Schuessler RB, Kawamoto T, Hand DE et al. Simultaneous epicardial and endocardial activation sequence mapping in the isolated canine right atrium. Circulation 1993; 88: 250–63. [43] Allessie MA, Kirchhof CJHJ, Scheffer GJ, Chorro FJ, Brugada J. Regional control of atrial fibrillation by rapid atrial pacing in conscious dogs. Circulation 1991; 84: 1689– 97. [44] Alessi R, Nusynwitz M, Abildskov JA, Moe GK. Nonuniform distribution of vagal effects on the atrial refractory period. Am J Physiol 1958; 194: 406–10. [45] Han J, Millet D, Chizzonitti B, Moe GK. Temporal dispersion of recovery of excitability on atrium and ventricle as a function of heart rate. Am Heart J 1966; 71: 481–7.