* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Different Distribution of Cellulose Synthesizing Complexes in Brittle
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Plant Cell Physiol. 40(3): 335-338 (1999) JSPP © 1999 Short Communication Different Distribution of Cellulose Synthesizing Complexes in Brittle and Non-Brittle Strains of Barley Satoshi Kimura', Naoki Sakurai2 and Takao Itoh '•3 1 2 Wood Research Institute, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto, 611-0011 Japan Faculty of Integrated Arts & Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8521 Japan The cause of low cellulose content in brittle mutants of barley was studied. No differences were found in the dimension of crystalline cellulose microfibrils among mutant and normal strains by X-ray diffraction analysis. By contrast, the number of cellulose synthesizing terminal complexes (TCs) in a selected brittle mutant, Kobinkatagi 4, decreased to one fifth of that in the normal strain. These findings suggest that the low cellulose content in brittle mutants of barley is caused by the decrease in the number of TCs on its plasma membrane. normal strains of barley (Kokubo et al. 1991). Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the relation between the low cellulose content and the width and number of cellulose microfibrils. We examined whether the physical and chemical nature of the mutant and normal strains in barley mentioned above is due to the difference in the width of microfibrils or in the cellulose synthesizing ability. We have reexamined the thickness of cell walls in different tissues of mutant and normal strains of Kobinkatagi 4 by scanning electron microscopy. The cell wall thickness in outer layer cells (four cells width including epidermis and collenchyma), parenchyma cells and the cells in vascular bundle showed significant differences between mutant and normal strains (Fig. 1). The cell walls in outer layer cells in the normal strain was most distinct in their thickness compared to that in other regions. We did the statistical analysis of the cell wall thickness in three different regions (Table 1). The cell wall in the outer layer cells of normal strains was 3.6±0.4yum thick, being two times thicker than that of mutant strains (1.7±0.3//m). The thickness of the parenchyma cell wall of normal strains was also greater, 1.5 ± 0.2/im compared to 1.0±0.1//m, of mutant strains. Cells in vascular bundle also showed significant differences in cell wall thickness in both normal and mutant strains. It should be noted that the culm strength is dependent on the cell wall thickness of the outer cell layer in barley. Key words: Barley — Brittle mutant — Cellulose microfibrils — TCs — X-ray diffraction. Single-gene brittle mutants of barley (Hordeum valgare L., cv. Ohichi [fs2], cv. Shiroseto [fs2], and cv. Kobinkatagi 4 [fs3] are spontaneous mutants and produce about 20% of cellulose in the cell walls of corresponding non-brittle barley strains that were isogenic with the corresponding mutant strains, except for the brittle gene (Kokubo et al. 1991). The genetic background of Ohichi is different from that of Shiroseto. The maximum bending stress of culms of brittle mutant strains is less than half of that of non-brittle normal strains. The amounts of lignin, pectin and non-cellulosic polysaccharides in the cell walls did not show any significant differences between mutant and normal strains. Thus, the culm brittleness of the mutant strains was attributed to the lower cellulose content of the cell walls. Cellulose microfibrils are composed of bundling of single glucan chains. Thus, either the shortening of glucan chains or narrowing of the bundling of glucan chains may affect the low cellulose content in the brittle mutants of barley. This means that the low cellulose content in the mutants are dependent on either the molecular weight of cellulose, that is the degree of polymerization (DP) of cellulose, or the length of cellulose crystals. However, the DP of cellulose has been reported to be similar in mutants and There are three possible reasons for the lower cellulose content in the mutants; firstly, the width of microfibrils and the number of glucan chains within single microfibrils are the same, but the length of microfibrils is shorter in the mutant than in the normal strains; secondly, the length and number of microfibrils are the same, but the number of glucan chains within a single microfibril is smaller in the mutant than in the normal strains; thirdly, the length and width of single microfibrils are the same, but the number of microfibrils is smaller in the mutant than in the normal strains. Kokubo et al. (1991) reported that the length of each cellulose molecule is almost the same between the normal and corresponding mutant strains. Therefore, the first hypothesis should be discarded. If the width of cellulose crystals is smaller in the mutants than in normal strains, the lower cellulose content 3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel, + 81-77438-3631; Fax, +81-774-3635; E-mail, [email protected] 335 336 TC distribution in brittle and non-brittle barley Table 2 Crystalline width of cellulose microfibril by Xray diffraction analysis Strain m Fig. 1 Scanning electron micrographs of cross section in the 4th internode of normal (a) and mutant (b) strain of Kobinkatagi 4. The thickness of outer layer cell is particularly different between normal and mutant strains. results from the small width of cellulose crystals. Alternatively, if the width of cellulose crystals in mutants is similar to that in the normal strains, then the number of cellulose microfibrils and thus cellulose-synthesizing complexes should be smaller in mutants. The fourth internode of the three mutant and normal strains of barley, cv. Ohichi, Shiroseto, and Kobinkatagi 4, was investigated by X-ray diffraction analysis. The crystal width of cellulose microfibrils in the cell wall of this internode in these strains was between 5.2 and 5.4 nm (Table 2), Table 1 Cell wall thickness in outer layer cell, parenchyma and cells in vascular bundle of Kobinkatagi 4 Cell wall thickness Normal Mutant Outer layer cell 3.6±0.4 1.7±0.3 Parenchyma cell 1.5±0.2 1.0±0.1 Cells in vascular bundle 1.7±0.3 l.l±0.2 Ohichi Crystalline width (nm) Kobinkatagi 4 Shiroseto Normal 5.3 5.3 5.4 Mutant 5.4 5.4 5.2 for all three mutant and normal strains, no distinct difference in the crystal width being found among these strains. Clearly, the number of cellulose molecules per single microfibril is the same in the mutant and normal strains of barley. This indicates that the brittleness is due to the fewer cellulose microfibrils in the cell walls of mutants, resulting in the reduction of culm strength. Some modification must have occurred in the pathway of cellulose biosynthesis in the mutants such as the level of UDP-Glc, breakdown of cellulose synthesizing enzyme complexes, so-called terminal complexes (TCs), activity, of individual TCs and number of TCs. Among all, the most probable candidate causing the small number of microfibrils and low cellulose content is the difference in the number of TCs per unit area of plasma membrane in the mutant cells. Finally, we investigated the distribution of TCs in the plasma membrane of cortical and/or parenchyma cells in the mutant and normal strains of Kobinkatagi 4. The TCs in the normal strain showed frequent distribution in the plasma membrane of collenchyma and/ or parenchyma cells (Fig. 2a), although the number of TCs per unit area was variable in individual cells, possibly because the cellulose synthesizing activity of TCs is different from cell to cell even in the same tissue or different among cell types such as epidermal, collenchyma, and parenchyma cells. We found TCs in the mutant strain with a very low frequency of distribution (Fig. 2b). In order to prove these observations, we made a statistical analysis on the distribution of TCs by measuring the number of rosettes per unit area as shown in Figure 3. The data were obtained from the observation of 19 cells of the normal and 13 cells of the mutant strain of Kobinkatagi 4. It is evident that the number of rosettes in the normal strain shows a broad range compared to that of the mutant strain which show a distribution of rosettes in a narrow range mostly inclined toward a small number of less than five per unit area. The distribution of TCs in the normal strain is significantly different from that of the mutant at the \% level by Kolmogorov-Smirnov analysis. The average number of rosettes in the normal strain (11.8 ±1.9) was significantly higher than that in the mutant (2.5±0.4) per 200 fxm2, which means that the distribution of rosettes in the normal strain is five times higher than that in the mutant. TC distribution in brittle and non-brittle barley 337 Fig. 2 Freeze fracture images of P-fracture face in the 1st internode of normal (a) and mutant (b) strain of Kobinkatagi 4. The frequency of TCs (encircled) is decreased in the plasma membrane of the mutant. The evidence is in good coincidence with the previous result of Kokubo et al. (1991) that the sugar content of cellulose fraction was conspicuously lower in mutants than in normal strains, ranging from 17.5 to 20.3%. Arioli et al. (1998b) demonstrated that the Arabidopsis Rswl mutant makes non-crystalline cellulose with disassembly of TCs upon exposure at a high temperature. They also showed that the defective gene of Rswl is a homolog of the cotton CelA genes (Pear et al. 1996) which encode the catalytic subunit of cellulose synthase. Thus, direct evidence was provided that TC contains the catalytic subunits for cellulose synthesis. We demonstrated that the amount of cellulose microfibrils decreased corresponding to the number of TCs in the barley mutant, supporting their view that cellulose production is closely related to the number of TCs; however, there are some differences between the Rswl mutant of Arabidopsis and barley mutant. In barley mutant, there are no irregular TCs and clustered membrane particles which are observed in the Rswl mutant of Arabidopsis. Non-crystalline microfibrils were not de- TC distribution in brittle and non-brittle barley 338 • m 2 8 Ia Kobinkatagi 4 Normal (19cells) 1 Kobinkatagi 4 Mutant (13cells) 1 78 3 r 34 • 56 0 1. 11 10 15 17 20 22 27 33 11 II 1 ....I. 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Number of rosettes (Number / 200\im2) Fig. 3 Frequency distribution of number of TCs in the 1st internode of normal and mutant strain of Kobinkatagi 4. The frequency of TCs in the mutant is little with narrow distribution range. By contrast, that of the normal strain shows wide range distribution. tected in mutant strains of barley. These findings suggest that the decrease in TCs in the barley mutant is caused by the decreased secretion of TCs, not by the disassembly of TCs. The function of the defective gene may be different in Arabidopsis Rswl and barley mutants. The defective gene of barley mutant may encode one of the regulator genes involved in the secretion of TCs for plasma membrane. Recently, Arabidopsis has been reported to contain several homologs of cotton CelA (Csl= cellulose synthase-like gene) by the analysis of expressed sequence tags from the database (Cutler and Somerville 1997, Arioli et al. 1998a). It is presumed that more than one gene controls the secretion of rosettes and the expression of these genes is differently controlled in the respective tissues and in the stage of development. In another Arabidopsis mutant, cellulose deposition is decreased in secondary walls of xylem cell, as a result of tissue-specific cellulose deficiency (Turner and Somerville 1997). This mutant (Irx) has a normal appearance, but shows a decrease in stiffness in stem. The Irx mutant, therefore, in Arabidopsis is similar to the barley mutant. The characterization and comparison of the Irx and the defective gene of barley mutant is prerequisite for future work. This work is supported by Grant-in-Aid for "Research for the Future" Program (nos. JSPS-RFTF 96L00605) from the Ministry of Education, Sciences, Sports and Culture of Japan. References Arioli, T., Burn, J.E., Betzner, A.S. and Williamson, R.E. (1998a) How many cellulose synthase-like gene products actually make cellulose? Trends Plant Sci. 3: 164-165. Arioli, T., Peng, L., Betzner, S., Burn, J., Wittke, W., Herth, W., Camilleri, C , Hofte, H., Plazinski, J., Birch, R., Cork, A., Glover, J., Rehmond, J. and Williamson, R.E.(1998b) Molecular analysis of cellulose biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Science 279: 717-720. Cutler, S. and Somerville, C. (1997) Cellulose biosynthesis: cloning in silico. Curr. Biol. 7: R108-R111. Kokubo, A., Sakurai, N., Kuraishi, S. and Takeda, K.(1991) Culm brittleness of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mutants is caused by smaller number of cellulose molecules in cell wall. Plant Physiol. 97: 509-514. Pear, J.R., Kawagoe, Y., Scheckengost, W.E., Delmer, D.P. and Stalker, D.M. (1996) Higher plants contain homologues of the bacterial celA genes encoding the catalytic subunit of cellulose synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 12637-12642. Turner, S.R. and Somerville, C.R. (1997) Collapsed xylem phenotype of Arabidopsis identifies mutants deficient in cellulose deposition in the secondary cell wall. Plant Cell 9: 689-701. (Received August 1, 1998; Accepted December 21, 1998)