Download The IGF-I Generation Test Revisited: A Marker of GH Sensitivity

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Psychedelic therapy wikipedia , lookup

Pharmaceutical industry wikipedia , lookup

Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup

Prescription costs wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacokinetics wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Clinical trial wikipedia , lookup

Theralizumab wikipedia , lookup

Bilastine wikipedia , lookup

Bad Pharma wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Implications of Recent Clinical Trials
for the National Cholesterol
Education Program
Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines
Scott M. Grundy; James I. Cleeman;
C. Noel Bairey Merz; H. Bryan Brewer, Jr.;
Luther T. Clark; Donald B. Hunninghake;
Richard C. Pasternak; Sidney C. Smith, Jr.;
Neil J. Stone; for the Coordinating Committee
of the National Cholesterol Education Program
Implications of Recent Clinical Trials
for the NCEP ATP III Guidelines
Background
• The Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III) of the
National Cholesterol Education Program
issued an evidence-based set of
guidelines on cholesterol management
in 2001
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Implications of Recent Clinical Trials
for the NCEP ATP III Guidelines
Background
• Since the publication of ATP III,
5 major clinical trials of statin therapy with
clinical end points have been published
• These trials addressed issues that were
not examined in previous clinical trials
of cholesterol-lowering therapy
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Implications of Recent Clinical Trials
for the NCEP ATP III Guidelines
Objective
• To review the results of these recent trials
and assess their implications for
cholesterol management
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Log-Linear Relationship Between
LDL-C Levels and Relative Risk for CHD
3.7
2.9
Relative Risk 2.2
for Coronary
Heart Disease 1.7
(Log Scale) 1.3
1.0
40
70
100
130
160
190
LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL)
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Doses of Currently Available Statins Required
to Attain an Approximate 30% to 40% Reduction
of LDL-C Levels (Standard Doses)
Dose,
mg/d
LDL
Reduction, %
Atorvastatin
10 †
39
Lovastatin
40 †
31
Pravastatin
40 †
34
Simvastatin
20-40 †
35-41
Fluvastatin
40-80
25-35
Rosuvastatin
5-10 ‡
39-45
Drug
† All of these are available at doses up to 80 mg. For every doubling
of the dose above the standard dose, an approximate 6% decrease
in LDL-C level can be obtained.
‡ For rosuvastatin, doses available up to 40 mg; the efficacy for 5 mg
is estimated by subtracting 6% from the FDA reported efficacy at 10 mg
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
ATP III LDL-C Goals and Cutpoints for TLC and Drug Therapy
in Different Risk Categories and Proposed Modifications
Based on Recent Clinical Trial Evidence
Risk Category
Consider
Drug Therapy
LDL-C Goal
Initiate TLC
<100 mg/dL
(optional goal:
<70 mg/dL)
100 mg/dL
100 mg/dL
(<100 mg/dL:
consider drug
options)
Moderately high risk:
2+ risk factors
(10-year risk 10% to 20%)
<130 mg/dL
130 mg/dL
130 mg/dL
(100-129 mg/dL:
consider drug
options)
Moderate risk:
2+ risk factors
(10 year risk <10%)
<130 mg/dL
130 mg/dL
160 mg/dL
Lower risk:
0-1 risk factor
<160 mg/dL
160 mg/dL
190 mg/dL
(160-189 mg/dL:
LDL-lowering
drug optional)
High risk:
CHD or CHD risk equivalents
(10-year risk >20%)
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Recommendations for Modifications to Footnote
the ATP III Treatment Algorithm for LDL-C
Overview of Recommendations
• Therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLC) remain
an essential modality in clinical management
• TLC have the potential to reduce CV risk
through several mechanisms beyond
LDL lowering
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Recommendations for Modifications to Footnote
the ATP III Treatment Algorithm for LDL-C
High-Risk Persons
• Recommended LDL-C goal is <100 mg/dL
– An LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL is
a therapeutic option on the basis
of available clinical trial evidence,
especially for patients at very high risk
– If LDL-C is 100 mg/dL, an LDL-lowering drug
is indicated simultaneously with
lifestyle changes
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Recommendations for Modifications to Footnote
the ATP III Treatment Algorithm for LDL-C
High-Risk Persons
• Recommended LDL-C goal is <100 mg/dL
– If baseline LDL-C is <100 mg/dL, institution
of an LDL-lowering drug to achieve an
LDL-C level <70 mg/dL is a therapeutic option
on the basis of available clinical trial evidence
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Recommendations for Modifications to Footnote
the ATP III Treatment Algorithm for LDL-C
High-Risk Persons
• Recommended LDL-C goal is <100 mg/dL
– If a high-risk person has high triglycerides
or low HDL-C, consideration can be given
to combining a fibrate or nicotinic acid
with an LDL-lowering drug
– When triglycerides are 200 mg/dL, non-HDL-C
is a secondary target of therapy, with a goal
30 mg/dL higher than the identified LDL-C goal
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Recommendations for Modifications to Footnote
the ATP III Treatment Algorithm for LDL-C
Moderately High-Risk Persons
• Recommended LDL-C goal is <130 mg/dL
– An LDL-C goal <100 mg/dL is
a therapeutic option on the basis
of available clinical trial evidence
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Recommendations for Modifications to Footnote
the ATP III Treatment Algorithm for LDL-C
Moderately High-Risk Persons
• Recommended LDL-C goal is <100 mg/dL
– When LDL-C level is 100 to 129 mg/dL,
at baseline or on lifestyle therapy,
initiation of an LDL-lowering drug
to achieve an LDL-C level <100 mg/dL
is a therapeutic option on the basis
of available clinical trial evidence
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Recommendations for Modifications to Footnote
the ATP III Treatment Algorithm for LDL-C
High Risk/Moderately High-Risk Persons
• Any person at high risk or moderately
high risk who has lifestyle-related
risk factors (e.g., obesity, physical inactivity,
elevated triglyceride, low HDL-C,
or metabolic syndrome) is a candidate
for TLC to modify these risk factors regardless
of LDL-C level
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Recommendations for Modifications to Footnote
the ATP III Treatment Algorithm for LDL-C
High Risk/Moderately High-Risk Persons
• When LDL-lowering drug therapy
is employed in high-risk or moderately
high-risk persons, it is advised that intensity
of therapy be sufficient to achieve at least
a 30% to 40% reduction in LDL-C levels
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.
Recommendations for Modifications to Footnote
the ATP III Treatment Algorithm for LDL-C
Lower-Risk Persons
• For people in lower-risk categories,
recent clinical trials do not modify
the goals and cutpoints of therapy
Grundy, S. et al., Circulation 2004;110:227-39.