Download On the Significance of the Investment Chapter of the Energy Charter

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Corporate venture capital wikipedia , lookup

Internal rate of return wikipedia , lookup

Fund governance wikipedia , lookup

Foreign direct investment in Iran wikipedia , lookup

Private money investing wikipedia , lookup

Early history of private equity wikipedia , lookup

Socially responsible investing wikipedia , lookup

Investment management wikipedia , lookup

Investment banking wikipedia , lookup

Environmental, social and corporate governance wikipedia , lookup

History of investment banking in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Investor-state dispute settlement wikipedia , lookup

International investment agreement wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
2009.3.30/ “STRENGHTENING THE
LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF TRADE,
INVESTMENT AND TRANSIT
IN THE ENERGY SECTOR IN THE ASIAPACIFIC REGION"
On the Significance of the
Investment Chapter of the
Energy Charter Treaty
Akira KOTERA
Professor of International Law
University of Tokyo
1
Why shall we discuss the
Investment Chapter ?
• The Investment Part: One of Three Pillars
of the ECT
• Effectiveness of the Investment Clauses
↑
Investor vs. Host State Arbitration
2
What is the IIA ?
• Three Elements of Investment Chapter
(1) Investment Protection (投資保護) e.g. Appropriate
Compensation against Expropriation
(2) Treatment of Local Subsidies and Branches of Investors
(待遇) e.g. National Treatment of post investment phase
(3) Liberalization (自由化)
(4) Dispute Settlement: State vs. State, Investor vs. State
Awards (Decisions) are Binding.
• The ECT contains three Elements and (1) and
(2) are important for Investors
3
Effects of Arbitration Awards
• Awards (Decisions) are Binding under
International Law, and Enforceable under
Domestic Laws just as Awards of
International Commercial Arbitrations.
• The Proportion of Voluntary Compliance is
very high.
• One Condition for Loans by the World
Bank is Compliance of IIAs’ Awards.
4
The Number of Arbitration Cases
60
300
50
250
40
200
30
150
20
100
10
50
0
0
1987
1988
1989 1990 1991 1992
ICSID
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
NonICSID
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
2007
All cases
5
Increase of Number of IIAs
6
Nature of the ECT’s
Investment Chapter
• Only One of Universal Multilateral IIAs
(47 members and One International Org.)
Other IIAs are Bilateral or Regional.
• Japan is Party to 21 IIAs (only signed 2
IIAs). → ECT is Very Valuable for Japan.
• The Investment Chapter of the ECT only
Covers Energy Field.
• How shall we Assess such Coverage?
7
When can the IIAs Exercise their
Power?
• In General: The Moment when the Host State
does not Comply with the Obligations arising
from IIA
(Very complicated interpretations are required.)
• Towards Developed States: Few Problems
• Towards Developing States:(1)As an ”Exit” of
Investment (2)Large Amount of InvestmentVery Effective as an exit of Energy sectors as
well as Infrastructure sectors
• The ECT is More Important to Investors than might
be considered at first Sight.
8
Cases concerning ETC’s
Investment Chapter
1. AES Summit Generation Ltd. (UK subsidiary of US-based AES Corporation) v. Hungary
2. Nykomb Synergetics Technology Holding AB (Sweden) v. Latvia
3. Plama Consortium Ltd. (Cyprus) v. Bulgaria
4. Petrobart Ltd. (Gibraltar) v. Kyrgyzstan
5. Alstom Power Italia SpA, Alstom SpA (Italy) v. Mongolia
6. Yukos Universal Ltd. (UK – Isle of Man) v. Russian Federation
7. Hulley Enterprises Ltd. (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation
8. Veteran Petroleum Trust (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation
9. Ioannis Kardassopoulos (Greece) v. Georgia
10. Amto (Latvia) v. Ukraine
11.Hrvatska Elektropriveda d.d. (HEP) (Croatia) v. Republic of Slovenia
12.Libananco Holdings Co. Limited (Cyprus) v. Republic of Turkey
13.Azpetrol International Holdings B.V., Azpetrol Group B.V. and Azpetrol Oil Services Group B.V. (the
Netherlands) v. Azerbaijan
14.Cementownia "Nowa Huta" S.A. (Poland) v. Republic of Turkey
15.Europe Cement Investment and Trade S.A. (Poland) v. Republic of Turkey
16.Liman Caspian Oil B.V. (the Netherlands) and NCL Dutch Investment B.V. (the Netherlands) v.
Republic of Kazakhstan
17.Electrabel S.A. v. Republic of Hungary
18.AES Summit Generation Limited and AES-Tisza Erőmű Kft. v. Republic of Hungary
19.Mercuria Energy Group Ltd. v. Republic of Poland
20.Alapli Elektrik B.V. v. Republic of Turkey
9
Conclusion
• The Investment Chapter of the ECT
should be an Important Moment Before
and After the Investment in the Energy
Sector.
• Before Investment: Risk Hedge Function
(No Premium)
• After Investment: Dispute Resolution
Mechanism, including in the Negotiation
Phase
10
Supplement: on Host State Side
• To Produce (1) Incentive to Invite
Foreign Investments by Improving
Investment Climate
(2)Good Governance of Host States
E.g. Increase of Transparency
11