Download Heart Transplantation and Exercise, in Adults

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup

Heart failure wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
CLINICAL
REVIEW
Heart Transplantation and Exercise, in Adults
Indexing Metadata/Description
› Title/condition: Heart Transplantation and Exercise in Adults
› Synonyms: Transplantation, heart and exercise, in adults; exercise and heart
transplantation, in adults; heart transplantation and cardiac rehabilitation, in adults;
cardiac rehabilitation and heart transplantation, in adults
› Anatomical location/body part affected: Heart/cardiovascular system
› Area(s) of specialty: Acute care, cardiovascular rehabilitation
› Description: Heart transplantation (HTx) is the surgical option for end-stage heart
disease/failure. Life expectancy increases in successful cases
• In adults, HTx is most often performed for advanced dilated cardiomyopathy, ischemic
heart failure, valvular disease, or a failed primary transplant
• Candidates are commonly classified New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV:
symptoms of cardiac insufficiency at rest, unable to carry out any physical activity
without discomfort, and very poor cardiorespiratory fitness as measured by peak oxygen
uptake (VO2peak) on exercise testing(1)
• Although HTx does reduce symptoms and improve functional capacity, recipients
continue to have lower VO2peak than healthy people their age(2)
• The continuing relatively poor physical capacity after HTx likely results in large part
from muscular disuse and aerobic deconditioning associated with prolonged illness and
physical inactivity(3)
• In addition, autonomic denervation of the donor heart diminishes cardiac reserve
because sympathetic neural stimulation is lost.(2,3,4,5,6,7,8) The blunted sympathetic
drive impairs chronotropic and ionotropic responses to exercise. In addition, underlying
muscle weakness after HTx contributes to poor exercise capacity. Recipients typically
have low VO2peak before physical training compared to age- and gender-matched
Authors
Michael Granado, PT, MPT, ATC, CSCS
Cinahl Information Systems, Glendale, CA
Abigail Grover Snook, PT, MS, MEd
Cinahl Information Systems, Glendale, CA
Reviewers
Diane Matlick, PT
Cinahl Information Systems, Glendale, CA
Rehabilitation Operations Council
Glendale Adventist Medical Center,
Glendale, CA
Editor
Sharon Richman, MSPT
Cinahl Information Systems, Glendale, CA
January 1, 2017
healthy individuals(4,5,6,7,8,9,10)
• Transplant recipients are thus commonly referred to exercise rehabilitation for
improving VO2peak, as well as for reducing coronary risk factors, either preexisting or
related to immunosuppressive drug therapy, which is known to promote hyperlipidemia,
hypertension, diabetes, and obesity(9)
• Supervised exercise training post HTx reliably increases VO2peak, lean tissue mass, and
muscle strength, even though ventricular function of the grafted heart usually does not
improve(4,5,6)
• Home-based exercise under strict supervision after HTx might also improve functional
capacity and quality of life in stable recipients(11)
• This review discusses the altered cardiac responses to exercise after HTx and the role of
exercise training in restoring physical work capacity
› ICD-9 codes
• V42.1 organ or tissue replaced by transplant, heart
• V58.44 aftercare following organ transplant
› ICD-10 codes
• Z94.1 heart transplant status
Published by Cinahl Information Systems, a division of EBSCO Information Services. Copyright©2016, Cinahl Information Systems. All rights
reserved. No part of this may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by
any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Cinahl Information Systems accepts no liability for advice
or information given herein or errors/omissions in the text. It is merely intended as a general informational overview of the subject for the healthcare
professional. Cinahl Information Systems, 1509 Wilson Terrace, Glendale, CA 91206
• Z48.21 encounter for aftercare following heart transplant
› (ICD codes are provided for the reader’s reference, not for billing purposes)
› G-Codes
• Mobility G-code set
–G8978, Mobility: walking & moving around functional limitation, current status, at therapy episode outset and at
reporting intervals
–G8979, Mobility: walking & moving around functional limitation; projected goal status, at therapy episode outset, at
reporting intervals, and at discharge or to end reporting
–G8980, Mobility: walking & moving around functional limitation, discharge status, at discharge from therapy or to end
reporting
• Changing & Maintaining Body Position G-code set
–G8981, Changing & maintaining body position functional limitation, current status, at therapy episode outset and at
reporting intervals
–G8982, Changing & maintaining body position functional limitation, projected goal status, at therapy episode outset, at
reporting intervals, and at discharge or to end reporting
–G8983, Changing & maintaining body position functional limitation, discharge status, at discharge from therapy or to end
reporting
• Carrying, Moving & Handling Objects G-code set
–G8984, Carrying, moving & handling objects functional limitation, current status, at therapy episode outset and at
reporting intervals
–G8985, Carrying, moving & handling objects functional limitation, projected goal status, at therapy episode outset, at
reporting intervals, and at discharge or to end reporting
–G8986, Carrying, moving & handling objects functional limitation, discharge status, at discharge from therapy or to end
reporting
• Self Care G-code set
–G8987, Self care functional limitation, current status, at therapy episode outset and at reporting intervals
–G8988, Self care functional limitation, projected goal status, at therapy episode outset, at reporting intervals, and at
discharge or to end reporting
–G8989, Self care functional limitation, discharge status, at discharge from therapy or to end reporting
• Other PT/OT Primary G-code set
–G8990, Other physical or occupational primary functional limitation, current status, at therapy episode outset and at
reporting intervals
–G8991, Other physical or occupational primary functional limitation, projected goal status, at therapy episode outset, at
reporting intervals, and at discharge or to end reporting
–G8992, Other physical or occupational primary functional limitation, discharge status, at discharge from therapy or to end
reporting
• Other PT/OT Subsequent G-code set
–G8993, Other physical or occupational subsequent functional limitation, current status, at therapy episode outset and at
reporting intervals
–G8994, Other physical or occupational subsequent functional limitation, projected goal status, at therapy episode outset,
at reporting intervals, and at discharge or to end reporting
–G8995, Other physical or occupational subsequent functional limitation, discharge status, at discharge from therapy or to
end reporting
›.
G-code Modifier
Impairment Limitation Restriction
CH
0 percent impaired, limited or restricted
CI
At least 1 percent but less than 20 percent impaired, limited or restricted
CJ
At least 20 percent but less than 40 percent impaired, limited or restricted
Source: https://www.cms.gov/
G-code Modifier
Impairment Limitation Restriction
CK
At least 40 percent but less than 60 percent impaired, limited or restricted
CL
At least 60 percent but less than 80 percent impaired, limited or restricted
CM
At least 80 percent but less than 100 percent impaired, limited or restricted
CN
100 percent impaired, limited or restricted
Source: https://www.cms.gov/
.
› Reimbursement
• Reimbursement for therapy will depend on insurance contract coverage; no specific special agencies are applicable for this
condition
• Phase III and IV (long-term maintenance phase) of cardiac rehabilitation might not be reimbursed by some insurance
providers;(12) clinicians/patients should clarify this information with insurance provider prior to beginning services
• For Medicare recipients, please see https://www.medicare.gov/coverage/cardiac-rehab-programs.html
› Presentation/signs and symptoms
• Presentation specifically for cardiac rehabilitation exercise training
• Reduced daily physical activity
• Poor age-related functional exercise capacity
• Sternotomy scar characteristic of open-heart surgery
• Resting heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) might be somewhat elevated(3,8)
• Electrocardiogram (ECG) might show two separate P-waves(3)
• Possible adverse signs/symptoms of immunosuppressive therapy
–Muscle weakness
–Fatigue
–Increased hair growth
–Bruising
–Hypertension
Causes, Pathophysiology, & Risk Factors
› Causes
• Potential causes of reduced functional capacity after HTx:
–Although cardiac function improves significantly, peak exercise capacity remains below predicted for gender and
age.(2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10) Contributing factors include:
- Prolonged illness and extended physical inactivity leading to
- muscle weakness
- cardiovascular deconditioning
- Orthotopic autonomic denervation
- Complications of immunosuppressive therapy, such as corticosteroid-inducedmyopathy, might reduce muscle function
and bone density
- Chronic graft rejection
- Transplant vasculopathy
› Pathophysiology (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)
• Impaired muscle function is associated with atrophy, reduced strength, and insufficient peripheral O2 utilization during
fatigue-limited exercise
• Cardiovascular deconditioning is associated with reduced cardiac output and low aerobic capacity compared to the age/
gender norm. In one study, VO2peak averaged only 16.7 mL.kg-1min-1 before hospital-based exercise training(6)
• Sympathetic denervation of the donor heart blunts the recipient’s chronotropic response (i.e., the increase in HR at the onset
of exercise, as well as the HR achieved during submaximal and maximal-effort exercise)
–This “chronotropic incompetence” is a major factor limiting submaximal or peak HR and exercise performance after
HTx(7)
– Maximal aerobic power was 19 O2/kg x min, only about 60% of healthy age-matched sedentary controls. Peak HR was
140 beats/min(9)
–Achieving 80% or more of the age-predicted maximum HR might indicate a maximum effort for patients after HTx(13)
• HR response to exercise is an important determinant of functional aerobic capacity after HTx.(10,14) The percentage of
predicted peak HR achieved on cardiopulmonary exercise testing is strongly correlated with the percentage of predicted
VO2peak achieved(10)
• Compared to normal controls matched for age to the donor, patients recovering from HTx have lower cardiac preload
reserve (i.e., end-diastolic volume), HR reserve, and vascular reserve during submaximal exercise(7,8,9,10)
• Cardiac reactivity (i.e., the HR response) can increase as functional capacity improves with cardiac rehabilitation(6)
• As in healthy individuals, circulating catecholamines released from the adrenal glands elevate and maintain HR and BP
during and after vigorous exercise
› Risk factors
• Risk factors for poor functional capacity after HTx
–Poor adherence to therapeutic regimen
–Smoking
–Physical inactivity
–Dietary habits that might promote obesity, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia
–Abuse of alcohol, drugs, or illegal substances
–Complications of immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., obesity and corticosteroid-induced myopathy)
Overall Contraindications/Precautions
› Immunosuppressive medications help block rejection of the transplanted heart; however, they increase susceptibility to
infection and various types of cancer. Clinicians should remain alert for new infections and postpone exercise during active
infection
› Metabolic complications of immunosuppressive therapy include arterial hypertension, chronic renal insufficiency,
hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and osteoporosis
› Notify physician immediately if a patient presents with recent onset of signs and symptoms of acute illness, including
• unusual fatigue
• fever
• malaise
• flu-like symptoms (e.g., chills, headache, dizziness, muscle aches)
• pulmonary crackles/rales
• nausea
• diarrhea
› Postpone physical activity/exercise therapy and notify physician in case of(3)
• resting systolic BP over 200 mmHg
• resting diastolic BP over 110 mmHg
• symptoms such as severe headache, dizziness, or lightheadedness during exercise
• fatigue resolves very slowly after exercise
› After HTx, recipients are also at risk for neurologic complications that include diseases of the peripheral nerves and
muscles(15)
› Lower-extremity weakness and cramps might restrict exercise capacity before cardiac responses become limiting
› See specific Contraindications/precautions to examination and Contraindications/precautions under Assessment/
Plan of Care
Examination
› Contraindications/precautions to examination
• Stop the exam and notify physician if patient reports unexpected symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath,
dizziness, etc.
• Chronotropic incompetence is common after HTx.(13) The actual peak HR achieved during standard exercise testing should
be documented rather than estimated from age
• In the absence of exertion-related symptom limitations, exercise testing on a treadmill or cycle ergometer should be
terminated at voluntary fatigue or at other predetermined endpoints specific for the patient(3,7,13)
› History
• History of present injury or etiology of illness
–Document date and stage of heart disease at surgery. How long was patient on waiting list? Any recent changes in weight,
physical activity, diet, smoking, or use of caffeine or alcohol?
–Course of treatment
- Medical management: Is the patient being treated for complications of HTx (e.g., arterial hypertension, chronic renal
insufficiency, hyperlipidemia, neurological disease, diabetes, or osteoporosis)?
- Medications for current illness/injury: Determine what medications have been prescribed. Confirm that they are
being taken. Daily and lifelong immunosuppressive medication is required to prevent organ rejection. Most patients
are treated with a triple-drug immunosuppressive regimen: i.e., a combination of calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine
A or tacrolimus), antimetabolite agent (azathioprine [Imuran] or mycophenolatemofetil), and corticosteroid. Other
immunosuppression treatments include radiation and plasmapheresis. Patients might also receive treatment for
coexisting morbidities such as hypertension or diabetes
- Diagnostic tests completed
- The workup might include:
- ECG
- urinalysis
- blood glucose
- serum potassium, creatinine, and calcium
- hematocrit
- lipid profile – HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides
- optional – urinary albumin/creatinine ratio or urinary albumin excretion
- cardiopulmonary exercise stress test before and/or after treatment
- Home remedies/alternative therapies: Document use of herbal, behavioral, or other alternative therapies for health,
and whether or not they help
- Previous therapy: Document whether patient has received post-HTx physical therapy and what specific treatments
were helpful or not helpful
–Aggravating/easing factors (and length of time each item is performed before the symptoms come on or are eased)
–Body chart: Use body chart to document location and nature of symptoms
–Nature of symptoms: Document reported symptoms
–Rating of symptoms: Use a visual analog scale (VAS) or 0-10 scale to assess symptoms at their best, at their worst, and
at the moment. The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scale can be used
–Pattern of symptoms: Document changes in symptoms throughout the day and night, if any (A.M., mid-day, P.M.,
night); also document changes in symptoms due to weather or other external variables
–Sleep disturbance: If present, document number of wakings/night
–Other symptoms: Document other symptoms patient might be experiencing that could worsen ability to exercise and/or
symptoms that might indicate referral to physician (e.g., dizziness, bowel/bladder/sexual dysfunction, saddle anesthesia)
–Respiratory status: Note any history of use or need for supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilator, asthma inhaler, etc.
–Barriers to learning
- Are there any barriers to learning? Yes __ No __
- If Yes, describe _________________________
–Medical history
- Past medical history
- Previous history of same/similar diagnosis: Any prior exercise therapy for chronic conditions?
- Comorbid diagnoses: Any history of stroke, kidney disease, diabetes, or renovascular disease?
- Medications previously prescribed: Obtain a comprehensive list of all prescribed and over-the-counter medications,
herbal remedies, and use of illegal street drugs
- Other symptoms: Ask patient about other symptoms he or she might be experiencing
–Social/occupational history
- Patient’s goals: Document what the patient hopes to accomplish with therapy (patient-oriented outcomes)
- Vocation/avocation and associated repetitive behaviors, if any: Does the patient want to participate in recreational
sports? Did the patient work previously? If so, does he or she plan to return to work? What duties does the job entail?
- Functional limitations/assistance with ADLs/adaptive equipment: Inquire about ADL status and functional
limitations. Is the patient using any adaptive equipment?
- Living environment: Ask about family situation and with whom patient lives, caregivers, etc. Identify if there are
barriers to independence in the home; any modifications necessary; how many stairs, numbers of floors in home
› Relevant tests and measures: (While tests and measures are listed in alphabetical order, sequencing should be appropriate
to patient medical condition, functional status, and setting)
• Anthropometric characteristics: Determine body mass index (BMI)
• Assistive and adaptive devices: Assess fit and use of prescribed assistive devices, if applicable
• Balance
–Assure that static and dynamic balance reactions are adequate for use of exercise equipment such as treadmill or elliptical
trainer
–Berg Balance Scale (BBS)(16)
- An outcome measure designed to measure static balance and fall risk in an adult population during 14 different activities
- Grading is based on a 0 to 4 scale in which all of the points are tallied together for a final score
• Cardiorespiratory function and endurance
–Assess HR, BP, and respiratory rate during quiet rest and with activity
–The 6-minute walk test for distance, administered in a hospital setting, was found to be a safe and practical submaximal
measure of functional exercise capacity in heart transplantation.(17) This is a submaximal aerobic/endurance test, in which
clinicians measure the distance walked by patients over the span of 6 minutes. The average distance walked by chronic
heart failure patients is between 310 and 427 meters, depending upon the severity of the condition(18)
• Circulation: Assure that peripheral pulses are present in all limbs
• Functional mobility: Assure normalcy in gross movement during transfers and functional tasks using the upper
extremities (e.g., reaching, pulling, pushing, holding, etc.) and lower extremities (e.g., steps, squatting, kneeling, kicking).
The FIM or Timed Up and Go (TUG) test can be used for objective measurement
• Gait/locomotion: Prior to prescribing a walking exercise program, assure that ambulatory function is normal, including
synchrony of limb movements and gait speed, as well as posture in walking
• Joint integrity and mobility: Assess passive accessory movement if there is a history of joint pain
• Muscle strength: Manually scan strength in functional tasks (e.g., handgrip, pushing, pulling, sit-up, squatting). Assess
strength using manual muscle testing (MMT), dynamometry, or weights in muscle groups targeted for exercise training to
calculate 1-repetition maximum (1-RM)
• Observation/inspection/palpation: Assure that no physical deformities are present that might prevent patient from
participating in the prescribed exercise program. Assess for general pain and fatigue during exercise testing. The Borg RPE
Scale can be used
• Range of motion: Assure that normal functional ROM and flexibility are present in all extremities
• Reflex testing: Assure that deep tendon reflexes are normal
• Sensory testing: Scan dermatomes for normal sensation
• Special test specific to diagnosis
–In compliance with medical guidelines, assess HR, BP, adverse signs/symptoms, and perceived exertion responses during
graded exercise testing on a cycle ergometer or treadmill(3)
–Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36): a general health outcome measure that can be completed in
10 minutes. The questionnaire involves 35 questions in 8 different domains and 1 general health question, with scores
between 0 (worst possible health, most disabled) and 100 (best possible health, no disability)(19)
Assessment/Plan of Care
› Contraindications/precautions
• Only those contraindications/precautions applicable to this diagnosis are mentioned below, including with regard
to modalities. Rehabilitation professionals should always use their professional judgment in their assessment and
treatment decisions
• Patients with this diagnosis might be at risk for falls; follow facility protocols for fall prevention and post fall
prevention instructions at bedside, if inpatient. Ensure that patient and family/caregivers are aware of the potential
for falls and educated about fall prevention strategies. Discharge criteria should include independence with fall
prevention strategies
• Clinicians should follow the guidelines of their clinic/hospital and what is ordered by the patient’s physician. The summary
below is meant to serve as a guide, not to replace orders from a physician or a clinic’s specific protocols
• Tailor the exercise prescription to fit each patient’s measured functional ability, symptoms, and cardiorespiratory responses
to exercise testing(3)
• Monitor BP on a regular basis during exercise. According to standard exercise guidelines,(3) exercise testing or exercise
training should be terminated if
–systolic BP exceeds 260 mmHg or diastolic BP exceeds 115 mmHg
–systolic BP fails to rise more than 20 mmHg
–systolic BP falls more than 10 mmHg
–exertional symptoms, such as chest discomfort (uncommon because of denervation), arrhythmia, lightheadedness, or
dyspnea, suggest insufficiency
• BP higher than 180/110 mmHg is an absolute contraindication and BP higher than 160/100 mmHg is a relative
contraindication to resistance exercise(20)
• To prevent an exaggerated BP response to exercise, provide the patient with a thorough orientation to using the prescribed
exercise equipment and adequate warm-uptime
• Research on the safety and appropriateness of resistance exercise (weight lifting) after HTx is limited, and thus general
guidelines for including weight lifting in the training program are not available
• In addition to monitoring HR and BP, use the patient’s perceived exertion and any other symptoms to manage exercise
intensity for either aerobic or resistance training
• Extend the cooling-down period and avoid having the patient stop suddenly after exercise because this might cause a
precipitous drop in systolic BP (orthostatic hypotension and possibly syncope) due to venous pooling
• Contraindications/precautions to use of modalities
–Electrotherapy contraindications/precautions(21)
- Do not place electrodes near:
- Carotid bodies, cardiac pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators, phrenic nerve or urinary bladder
stimulators, phrenic nerve, eyes, gonads
–Osteomyelitis
–Hemorrhage
–Impaired sensation, mental status, communication
–Cardiovascular disease
–Malignancy
–Dermatological conditions
–Proximity of electromagnetic radiation
–In pregnant women, near the pelvis, lumbar spine, hips, abdomen
–In patients with stroke or seizures, near the neck
–History of spontaneous abortion in pregnant women
› Diagnosis/need for treatment: Status post HTx/physical inactivity contributes to reduced functional capacity and increases
risk for comorbidities. For example, poor adherence to prescribed exercise is associated with obesity, dyslipidemia, and
hypertension(22)
› Rule out: N/A
› Prognosis: Lack of improvement in exercise capacity (assessed as percentage of predicted VO2peak achieved on exercise
testing) after supervised exercise training is a strong predictor of adverse cardiac events, independent of classical prognostic
factors (e.g., left ventricular ejection fraction or NYHA class) in chronic heart failure.(23) This exercise prognostic factor has
not been tested in patients with HTx, but it should be considered a red flag
› Referral to other disciplines
• Physician for management of symptoms related to immunosuppression
• Clinical exercise testing laboratory for measurement of VO2peak
• Nutritionist for dietary management and advice on weight control
• Occupational therapist for limitations in ADLs
• Psychiatrist/psychologist for stress/anxiety disorder
• Smoking cessation programs
› Other considerations
• VO2peak is widely used to assess aerobic work capacity in patients who have undergone HTx because it reflects the
integrated function of the heart, lungs, and blood vessels to deliver oxygen and the working muscles to utilize it
• Deficits in both central factors and peripheral factors contribute to the observed lower VO2peak in heart transplant
recipients(2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,11,13)
• VO2peak can be measured directly in a cardiopulmonary exercise testing laboratory or estimated from standard testing
protocols(3)
–Based on a study in Switzerland, incremental stepwise (30-60 W per 3 min) or continuous ramping (10-20 W/min)
workloads on a bicycle ergometer were found equally effective for achieving VO2peak, provided the total exercise time to
peak exertion was 8 to 12 minutes(24)
• Based on a systematic review of 3 studies, there is insufficient evidence to support exercise as an intervention to decrease
psychological distress in patients who have undergone a heart transplantation(31)
• Patients who have undergone a heart transplantation are at greater risk for increases in body mass index (BMI), body fat
percentage, and waist circumference when admission to a cardiac rehabilitation program is delayed(32)
–Based on retrospective Canadian research study of 43 heart transplant patients
› Treatment summary
• General considerations
–Following HTx, patients might begin to participate in an aerobic exercise program as early as 1 month postoperatively(25)
pending physician approval
–Resistance training might be initiated 6 to 8 weeks after HTx(25) pending physician approval
–High-intensity interval training might be safe for patients who have undergone a heart transplantation more than 1 year
prior to the initiation of the program(30)
- Based on a randomized controlled crossover trial in Denmark; 16 subjects completed the study and were included in
data analysis
• Aerobic exercise training after HTx
–Type of activity: Rhythmic movement with the legs (e.g., walking, jogging, or cycling), arms (e.g., upper-body cycle
ergometer), or both legs and arms (e.g., elliptical trainer with arm levers)
–Intensity: “Moderate” exertion, equaling 11 to 13 on the Borg RPE Scale(3) or HR equal to 60-80% of VO2peak
–Duration: Continuous or discontinuous exercise totaling 30-45 min of physical activity per day. Five hours or more per
week for promoting weight loss, as advised
–Frequency: 3 alternating days per week, to as many as 5 times per week(26)
• Resistance exercise training after HTx
–Although exercise therapy should target muscle weakness, the intensity of strengthening exercise that is generally safe
and effective post HTx is unclear
–The cardiac responses of 23 recipients to single leg-press exercise (28 repetitions over 2 min 20 sec) at “moderate”
intensity (50% of 1-RM) were considered within safe and acceptable physiological limits, according to a study in
Canada.(27) At peak exercise, systolic BP averaged 179 mmHg, pulmonary artery BP did not exceed 30 mmHg, and
pulmonary wedge pressure did not exceed 15 mmHg
–The cardiovascular responses of 18 recipients to a 3-minute set of whole-bodyisometric exercise at 50% of maximal
voluntary contraction were blunted compared to healthy controls. Static exercise was reported to be well-tolerated,
according to a study in Israel(28)
–Resistance training at 40-60% of 1-RM is considered safe and effective in persons with cardiovascular diseases(20)
- Type of activity: weight-lifting exercises on machines or using free-weights (e.g., leg press, chest press, leg extension,
lat pull-down,leg curls, shoulder press, biceps curl, triceps press)
- Intensity: 40-60% of 1-RM for each exercise
- Duration: 1-3 sets of 10 repetitions per exercise, taking about 30 min to complete the exercise session
- Frequency: 2-3 nonconsecutive days per week
–Authors of a U.S. study concluded resistance training for 6 months was effective in reversing skeletal muscle myopathy in
HTx recipients.(29) The program involved
- 8 exercises (chest press, knee extension, latissimus dorsi pull-down,seated leg curl, overhead shoulder press, seated
triceps dip, biceps curl, and lumbar extension)
- 1 set of 10-15 repetitions per exercise
- intensity at 50% of 1-RM
- 2 days per week
• Combined aerobic and resistance exercise training after HTx
–Findings of a Canadian randomized controlled trial involving 43 participants (mean age 57 years, mean 5 years post HTx)
who underwent 12 weeks of supervised aerobic and strength training(4)
- Aerobic program
- For the first 8 weeks, treadmill and cycle exercise 5 days/week at HR equal to 60-80% of VO2peak, for 30-45 min
- For the final 4 weeks, continuous aerobic training was performed 3 days/week at HR equal to 80% of VO2peak, for 45
min
- In addition, during the final 4 weeks interval cycle training was performed 2 days/week at 90-100% of peak power for
30 sec followed by 30 sec rest, for 10 to 25 repetitions, as tolerated
- Strength program
- 1-2 sets of 10-15 reps, at 50% of 1-RM, 2 days/week
- 3 upper extremity exercises (chest press, latissimus dorsi pulldown, biceps curl)
- 1 lower extremity exercise (leg press)
- No adverse events were associated with the 12-week training program
- Compared to no exercise training group (n = 21), the supervised aerobic and strength training group had significant
increases in:
- VO2peak
- Leg and total lean tissue mass
- Muscle strength (chest press and leg press)
- Training did not change left ventricular function
• Patients with existing osteoporosis
–Avoid high-intensity exercise training and trunk flexion because of the increased risk of fractures
.
Problem
Goal
Reduced strength,
aerobic endurance, and
functional exercise
capacity
Improvement of
strength, aerobic
endurance, and
functional exercise
capacity to age-norm or
better
.
Intervention
Exercise therapy
_
See review in
Treatment summary
_
_
Monitor vitals
_
_
Expected Progression
Home Program
Gradually progress the
intensity and duration
of exercises to the
maintenance phase
Provide the patient with
an independent home
program at discharge
from supervised
exercise. Physical
fitness can continue
to improve with an
ongoing progressive
exercise program after
HTx(11)
Desired Outcomes/Outcome Measures
› Desired outcomes and outcome measures
• Improved strength
• Improved aerobic endurance
• Improved functional exercise capacity
› Outcome measures
• Strength assessed by MMT, with machines, or using free weights to calculate 1-RM
• VO2peak
• Aerobic endurance assessed by graded exercise testing(3)
• Functional aerobic capacity assessed by 6-minute walk distance(17) or graded exercise test(3)
Maintenance or Prevention
› Continue prescribed exercise training through independent home program
› Weight reduction and control, as indicated
› Dietary program, as prescribed
Patient Education
› See “Patient’s Guide to Heart Transplant Surgery” from the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine at
http://www.cts.usc.edu/ht-patientguide.html
Note
› Recent review of the literature has found no updated research evidence on this topic since previous publication on November
14, 2014
Coding Matrix
References are rated using the following codes, listed in order of strength:
M Published meta-analysis
SR Published systematic or integrative literature review
RCT Published research (randomized controlled trial)
R Published research (not randomized controlled trial)
RV Published review of the literature
RU Published research utilization report
QI Published quality improvement report
L Legislation
C Case histories, case studies
PGR Published government report
G Published guidelines
PFR Published funded report
PP Policies, procedures, protocols
X Practice exemplars, stories, opinions
GI General or background information/texts/reports
U Unpublished research, reviews, poster presentations or
other such materials
CP Conference proceedings, abstracts, presentation
References
1. Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association. In: Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Little,
Brown & Co; 1994:253-256. (GI)
2. Braith RW, Edwards DG. Exercise following heart transplantation. Sports Med. 2000;30(3):171-192. (RV)
3. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. (GI)
4. Haykowsky M, Taylor D, Kim D, Tymchak W. Exercise training improves aerobic capacity and skeletal muscle function in heart transplant recipients. Am J Transplant.
2009;9(4):734-739. (RCT)
5. Kobashigawa JA, Leaf DA, Lee N. A controlled trial of exercise rehabilitation after heart transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(4):272-277. (RCT)
6. Karapolat H, Eyigor S, Zoghi M. Effect of cardiac rehabilitation program on exercise capacity and chronotropic variables in patients with orthotopic heart transplant. Clin Res
Cardiol. 2008;97(7):449-456. (RCT)
7. Marconi C, Marzorati M. Exercise after heart transplantation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;90(3-4):250-259. (RV)
8. Scott JM, Esch BT, Haykowsky MJ. Cardiovascular responses to incremental and sustained submaximal exercise in heart transplant recipients. Am J Physiol Heart Circ
Physiol. 2009;296(2):H350-H358. (R)
9. Marconi C. Pathophysiology of cardiac transplantation and the challenge of exercise. Int J Sports Med. 2000;21(Suppl 2):S106-S108. (RV)
10. Carter R, Al-Rawas OA, Stevenson A, Mcdonagh T, Stevenson RD. Exercise responses following heart transplantation: 5 year follow-up. Scot Med J. 2006;51(3):6-14. (R)
11. Karapolat H, Eyigör S, Zoghi M, Yagdi T, Nalbangil S, Durmaz B. Comparison of hospital-supervised exercise versus home-based exercise in patients after orthotopic heart
transplantation: effects on functional capacity, quality of life, and psychological symptoms. Transplant Proc. 2007;39(5):1586-1588. (RCT)
12. Cardiac rehabilitation. Genesis Heart Institute Web site. http://www.genesishealth.com/ghi/conditions-services/services/cardiac_rehabilitation/. Accessed May 15, 2016. (GI)
13. Carvalho VO, Pascoalino LN, Bocchi EA, Ferreira SA, Guimarães GV. Heart rate dynamics in heart transplantation patients during a treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise test: a
pilot study. Cardiol J. 2009;16(3):254-258. (R)
14. Käser A, Martinelli M, Feller M, Carrel T, Mohacsi P, Hullin R. Heart rate response determines long term exercise capacity after heart transplantation. Swiss Med Wkly.
2009;139(21-22):308-312. (R)
15. Mateen FJ, de Beek D, Kremers WK. Neuromuscular diseases after cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28(3):226-230. (R)
16. La Porta F, Caselli S, Susassi S, Cavallini P, Tennant A, Franceschini M. Is the Berg Balance Scale an internally valid and reliable measure of balance across different
etiologies in neurorehabilitation? A revisited Rasch analysis study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(7):1209-1216. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.020. (R)
17. Doutreleau S, Di Marco P, Talha S, Charloux A, Piquard F, Geny B. Can the six-minute walk test predict peak oxygen uptake in men with heart transplant?. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil. 2009;90(1:51-57). (R)
18. Rasekaba T, Lee AL, Naughton MT, Williams TJ, Holland AE. The six-minute walk test: a useful metric for the cardiopulmonary patient. Intern Med J. 2009;39(8):495-501.
doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01880.x. (R)
19. Failde I, Ramos I. Validity and reliability of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in patients with coronary artery disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(4):359-365. (R)
20. Williams MA, Haskell WL, Ades PA, et al; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and
Metabolism. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on
Clinical Cardiology and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation. 2007;116(5):572-584. (PP)
21. Michlovitz SL, Bellew JW, Nolan TP Jr, eds. Modalities for Therapeutic Intervention. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Co; 2012. (GI)
22. Flattery MP, Salyer J, Maltby MC, Joyner PL, Elswick RK. Lifestyle and health status differ over time in long-term heart transplant recipients. Prog Transplant.
2006;16(3):232-238. (RCT)
23. Tabet JY, Meurin P, Beauvais F. Absence of exercise capacity improvement after exercise training: a strong prognostic factor in patients with chronic heart failure. Circ Heart
Fail. 2008;1(4):220-226. (R)
24. Schmid JP, Gaillet R, Noveanu M, Mohacsi P, Saner H, Hullin R. Influence of the exercise protocol on peak VO2 in patients after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung
Transplant. 2005;24(11):1751-1756. (R)
25. Young MA, Stiens SA, O'Young BJ, Mayer RS. Transplantation of organs: rehabilitation to maximize outcomes. In: Braddom RL, ed. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 4th
ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2011:1443-1447. (GI)
26. Evans J, Tsekouras C, Johnson K, Marx M. Effect of early mobilization efforts on postoperative length of stay after cardiac transplant and left ventricular assist device surgery.
Crit Care Nurse. 2011;31(2):e50-e51. (R)
27. Oliver D, Pflugfelder PW, McCartney N, McKelvie RS, Suskin N, Kostuk WJ. Acute cardiovascular responses to leg-press resistance exercise in heart transplant recipients. Int J
Cardiol. 2001;81(1):61-74. (R)
28. Auerbach I, Tenenbaum A, Motro M, Stroh CI, Har-Zahav Y, Fisman EZ. Blunted responses of Doppler-derived aortic flow parameters during whole-body heavy isometric
exercise in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000;19(11):1063-1070. (R)
29. Braith RW, Magyari PM, Pierce GL, et al. Effect of resistance exercise on skeletal muscle myopathy in heart transplant recipients. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(10):1192-1198. (R)
30. Dall CH, Snoer M, Christensen S, et al. Effect of high-intensity training versus moderate training on peak oxygen uptake and chronotropic response in heart transplant
recipients: A randomized crossover trial. American Journal of Transplantation: Official Journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of
Transplant Surgeons. Advance online publication. 2014. doi:10.111/ajt.12873. (R)
31. Conway A, Schadewaldt V, Clark R, et al. The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in improving psychological outcomes for heart transplant recipients: a
systematic review. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2014;13(2):108-115. doi:10.1177/1474515113519519. (SR)
32. Marzolini S, Grace SL, Brooks D, et al. Time-to-referral, use, and efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation after heart transplantation. Transplantation. Advance online publication. 2014.
(R)