* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Fourier transform of e
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Generalized linear model wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical optimization wikipedia , lookup
Routhian mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Corecursion wikipedia , lookup
Time value of money wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Hilbert transform wikipedia , lookup
Laplace transform wikipedia , lookup
The Fourier transform of e−ax 2 R∞ 2 We will also need the value of the integral I = −∞ e−x dx to which end we consider Z ∞ Z ∞ Z ∞Z ∞ 2 2 2 −x2 −y 2 I = e dx · e dy = e−(x +y ) dy dx −∞ −∞ −∞ Z−∞ Z 2 2 = e−(x +y ) dA. R2 Introduction 2 Let a > 0 be constant. We define a function fa (x) by fa (x) = e−ax and denote by fˆa (w) the Fourier transform of fa (x). We wish to show that fˆa (w) = F (fa )(w) = 2 √1 e−w /(4a) 2a for all w ∈ R. The proof consists of three parts, 1. ancillary results 2. the derivation of an ordinary differential equation for fˆa (w), as well as a suitable initial condition to determine a uniqe solution of the ODE 3. the resolution of the initial value problem (i.e. the ODE and the initial condition) We will only require tools already presented in prior mathematics courses at NTNU. Ancillary results Using the substitution u = −ax2 we get du = −2ax dx and x dx = du/(−2a). Consequently, Z Z −ax2 1 1 u 1 −ax2 xe dx = eu −2a du = − 2a e + C = − 2a e + C. 1 Using polar coordinates x = r cos θ and y = sin θ, the above integral may be rewritten as Z 2π Z ∞ Z ∞ 2 2 −r2 I = e r dr dθ = 2π re−r dr. 0 0 0 Thus 2 ∞ I 2 = 2π · − 21 e−r 0 = π √ and we finally get I = π. A differential equation for fˆa (w) Direct insertion into the definition of the Fourier transform yields Z ∞ 1 2 ˆ √ fa (w) = e−ax e−iwx dx. 2π −∞ We note in particular that Z ∞ 1 2 fˆa (0) = √ e−ax dx. 2π −∞ √ √ Using the substitution u = a x we find du = a dx from which dx = √ du/ a. Consequently, Z ∞ Z ∞ 1 1 2 −u2 √1 ˆ du = √ fa (0) = √ e e−u du a 2π −∞ 2πa −∞ (1) √ 1 1 · π=√ . =√ 2πa 2a 2 We incidentally remark that this result is consistent with the desired end result we wish to prove. Differentiating fˆa (w) with respect to the independent variable w further gives Z ∞ dfˆa d 1 2 √ (w) = e−ax e−iwx dx dw dw 2π −∞ Z ∞ 1 ∂ −ax2 −iwx (2) =√ (e e ) dx ∂w 2π −∞ Z ∞ i 2 = −√ xe−ax e−iwx dx. 2π −∞ Integrating equation (2) by parts now gives Z i dfˆa iw ∞ −ax2 −iwx −ax2 −iwx ∞ 1 e e dx (w) = − √ e ]−∞ − [− e dw {z } 2a −∞ 2π | 2a Z ∞ =0 w 1 w 2 √ =− e−ax e−iwx dx = − fˆa (w), 2a 2π −∞ 2a We determine the value of C by means of the initial value as fˆa (0) = C = √12a . In other words, fˆa (w) = 2 √1 e−w /(4a) 2a as we wanted to prove. Concluding remarks It is particularly noteworthy that the Fourier transform of fa (x) is another function of the same general form as the function itself. That is, 2 fˆa (w) = e−kw in which k is a positive constant. This is highly remarkable and does not hold in the general case. On the other hand, other functions do exist for which the Fourier transform is of the same form as the original function, meaning that fa (x) is not entirely exceptional in this respect. the latter equality following from the definition of the Fourier transform of fa (x). Resolution of the initial value problem for fˆa (w) Combining this with the result (1) we find dfˆa w = − fˆa , dw 2a √ fˆa (0) = 1/ 2a. This is a linear, first order separable ordinary differential equation and initial value to determine fˆa . The process of separation then gives dfˆa w = − dw ˆ 2a fa 2 from which anti-differentiation yields ln fˆa (w) = − w4a + K. Here, K is an arbitrary constant of integration. Consequently 2 fˆa (w) = C e−w /(4a) , 3 C = eK . 4