Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Social Bonding and Nurture Kinship wikipedia , lookup
Sociobiology wikipedia , lookup
Darwinian literary studies wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive evolution in the human genome wikipedia , lookup
Evolutionary origin of religions wikipedia , lookup
Origins of society wikipedia , lookup
Dynamics and adaptation in human cumulative culture Developing a scientific understanding for the origin and dynamics of cultural diversity requires integrating insights from both the natural and social sciences. Hence, CULTAPTATION, a scientific project funded by the EC (European Commission) 6th Framework Programme (New and Emerging Sciences & Technologies-PATH-043434), brought together biologists, economists, archaeologists, anthropologists, historians, psychologists and mathematicians from four universities in Sweden, Italy and the U.K. to work in collaboration towards generating a scientific foundation of this issue. The work has been theoretical and mathematical as well as empirical and experimental, and has included the staging of a major international multi-disciplinary tournament on the evolution of culture. Some of the findings are described below. The seemingly unique cumulative nature of human culture has been the focus of the work. This ability brings an extraordinary potential to our species to improve its life conditions. However, human cultures also contain many elements that are neutral or even counterproductive with respect to survival and reproduction. Such observations invite a number of questions that CULTAPTATION was set up to address: How can maladaptive cultural practices evolve? How do biological and cultural evolutionary processes interact to generate adaptation? What evolutionary mechanisms underlie the cumulative nature of cultural change? Can the tools, models and terminology of biological evolution be adopted to shed light on cultural phenomena? We have concluded that the evolution of cognitive abilities to discard maladaptive traits has been crucial to the origin of human culture. This finding also has important implications for the field of mathematical modeling, since many commonly considered social learning strategies do not facilitate cumulative change. The relationship between population dynamics and culture has also been studied; demonstrating that under certain conditions cumulative, cultural evolution and population size will mutually reinforce each other while under other conditions culture can affect population size negatively. The study of the spread and accumulation of adaptive and maladaptive traits when individuals repeatedly learn from each other has highlighted important differences between biological and cultural evolution: cultural evolution cannot as easily be predicted as biological evolution, and the same variant may not be favoured in these two processes. In cultural evolution at least two factors determine the “success” of variants: their ability to diffuse and their utility to the individual. For instance, a maladaptive variant may quickly spread but later decrease in popularity. A number of analytical results describe the rate of cultural evolution and the nature of cultural equilibria as a function of population size, social learning abilities and creativity. An important contribution of the project is a general theoretical/mathematical The cumulative nature of human culture led to the evolution of agriculture framework for exploring almost any kind of cumulative process, allowing us to model human cultural evolution in a way that can account for many aspects of the complexity that arise when culture is accumulated. By considering systems of culture, rather than single cultural elements, we have taken a step towards developing more realistic models. The key mechanism here is the dependency of cultural traits on another one: the likelihood that a cultural trait will be invented depends on what other traits are present. © European Union, 2011. This document should not be considered as representative of the Commission’s official position. Social learning is a capacity of humans that make cumulative culture possible. We have shown that individuals must possess several cultural parents in order for culture to be maintained and grown. We have also found that the conditions under which cumulative culture can evolve are far more stringent than the corresponding conditions for simple culture, because in cumulative culture it is more difficult to limit the spread of maladaptive traits. We have also investigated how imitation of others can shape the collective behaviour of groups. Models of decision-making originally developed in economics were extended to include the effects of social interactions, assuming that individuals tend to agree with those that are perceived as similar to themselves. Novel mathematical techniques have been developed to fit these models to data. A major international tournament that investigated the most effective means of learning from others has been completed. The tournament provided new insights into why social learning is widespread in nature, and why humans happen to be so good at it. An experimental economics laboratory was established to gain insight into how humans use and integrate information obtained from others and from their own experiences, and to explore the evolution of adaptive and maladaptive social contracts and to clarify various issues of the role of individuals in cultural accumulation. We found that people seem to be biased against conformity and for individual exploration, both of which will work in favour of accumulation of culture. In other experiments we showed that if groups develop institutions to assist within-group cooperation, then more effective institutions evolve in those groups that are more cooperative from the outset, thus creating a spiral that helps explain the cultural evolution of very complex institutions among humans. Further, experimental studies of cumulative cultural learning in nonhuman primates have been carried out, supporting the hypothesis that the relevant cognitive deficit inhibiting nonhuman primates to exhibit cumulative culture is the absence of imitation and teaching. Cultural evolution of foraging and law codes, respectively, has been studied empirically. Cumulative evolution was detected in food culture in Neolithic and Iron Age populations as well as in food preparation during the last 600 years (as revealed by recipes). A general classification system of Law Codes from the Middle East, China and Europe has been developed, revealing cumulative processes also in the cultural evolution of law. In short, the CULTAPTATION project has been very productive and all objectives have been met. The original plan was to publish 29 scientific papers in international peer-reviewed journals. Instead, over 100 manuscripts have been prepared and already 64 of these are published. In spite of their different backgrounds, the investigators have worked together closely, with great enthusiasm and productivity. The result is a rich theoretical framework that both scientists and social scientists admire. Contract CULTAPTATION Coordinator Stockholms universitet (SU), Sweden Many examples of human culture are difficult to understand in purely functional terms MU - Mälardalen University, Sweden Partners USTAN - The University Court of the University of St Andrews, United Kingdom UNIBO - University of Bologna, Italy EC-contribution 1.961.592,07 € Full partner and project information available on http://cordis.europa.eu/fp6/projects.htm The coordinator provided text and pictures for the factsheet and his copyright is acknowledged http://ec.europa.eu/research