Download Difference between acute and chronic pain Difference between

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Dental emergency wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Definition
Division of TMD and Orofacial Pain
Pain (from ancient greek ποινή - poine) is
defined by the International Association for
the Study of Pain (IASP) as “an unpleasant
sensory and emotional experience
associated with actual or potential tissue
damage, or described in terms of such
damage”.
Sources of pain
Definition: chronic pain
Chronic Pain
Mike T. John
Pain may originate from four sources:
1. stimulation of a pain nerve sensor at the
end of a nerve,
2. actual damage to a pain nerve,
3. damage in the brain where the nerve
travels,
4. and/or psychogenic causes that originate
in the brain but the mechanism is not
understood.
• Chronic pain was originally defined as
pain that has lasted 6 months or longer.
More recently it has been defined as pain
that persists longer than the temporal course
of natural healing, associated with a
particular type of injury or disease process.
Difference between acute and
chronic pain
Difference between acute and
chronic pain
Time
Acute and chronic pain are often separated by the
artificial time limit of 3 months. In reality, they are part
of a continuum.
Chronic pain is better defined as pain from continuing
disease or pain that continues beyond the time expected
for normal healing. Other characteristics such as pain
intensity, pain quality etc. don’t differ substantially.
(David A Conn: Assessment of acute and
chronic pain. Anaesthesia & intensive care medicine.
2005 )
• Some definitions: longer than 3 months
Dimensionality
Acute pain is usually short-lived and of known origin.
Chronic pain is often of longer duration, of unknown origin and has
been difficult to treat effectively. In many cases, accurate
information has been lacking and the patient and family will be
fearful of the cause, prognosis, treatments and the effect on work,
family life and earning capacity.
Therefore, psychological factors can play a larger part in the
presentation.
Severe distress rather that severe pain is a common reason for
referral to a specialist. For these reasons, multidimensional
assessment tools are more commonly used in the chronic setting than
in the acute. (David A Conn: Assessment of acute and chronic pain.
Anaesthesia & intensive care medicine. 2005 )
1
Case No 1
TMJ/TMD PATIENT HISTORY CASE STUDY
HISTORY OF A TYPICAL TMD PATIENT
TM is a 44-year-old white female with a history of having been in an automobile accident
in which her car with hit from behind. She did not lose consciousness, but was
experiencing immediate left jaw pain, left joint pain and clicking, both of which had
not been present before the accident. She was taken to a local hospital where a cranial
nerve screening exam was performed, neck X-ray were taken, Advil prescribed and
then she was discharged.
Following the accident, TM saw her primary care physician who examined her without
findings, except new onset jaw pain and TM joint pain and clicking. She was referred
to her family dentist who did not treat TMD and referred her to an experienced TMD
expert.
The TMD expert diagnosed TM with left TM joint synovitis, left TM joint anterior disc
displacement with reduction, myofascial pain localized in the muscles of mastication
most severely in the left masseter muscle. A TMD appliance to be worn day and night
was made and 60% pain relief was achieved within 3 weeks. TM was then referred to
physical therapy for myofascial release and the dentist performed two trigger point
injections in the masseter muscle. Within 6 more weeks the pain was 90% alleviated
with occasional exacerbations, a determination was made that TM achieved a medical
endpoint, and the TMD appliance was used as at night only. Although there was 90%
pain relief, TM was satisfied with treatment and had no trouble adjusting to minor
intermittent pain. (http://www.tmj-dentist-boston.com/tmjtmd_casestudy.html)
TJ's pain persisted and once again intensified after surgery and PT, trigger point injections were
ordered but without effect. A year after surgery with the pain as bad as even the Valium was
increased to 5mg four times a day. She is also prescribed Vicodin but only 2 tablets a day,
which had no effect.
Now TJ consults with a new TMD dentist who prescribes Elavil 25 mg at bedtime and Percocet
four times per day. The Valium is decreased and a new appliance is made with poor results.
TJ's mood swings increase and she is becoming less productive. She cries every day and her
pain medications are increased to help control her pain.
TJ now has a limited TJ joint and cervical range of motion and requests repeated trigger point
injections for temporary partial relief.
New imaging is ordered and the left TJ joint shows degenerative changes. There is now is
experiencing right joint pain and her jaw deflects to the left. Her left posterior teeth hit slightly
prematurely. An equilibration is done but the patient's symptoms worsen. A left joint injection
with a steroid does not relieve the pain. Now Neurontin and Baclofen are prescribed, the
Percocet is changed to morphine, and the dose of Elavil is increased with only partial benefit.
TJ's confusion is increasing but the medications are necessary to minimize her pain. Everyone is
frustrated with TJ. A psychiatric consultation follows and TJ recounts her entire history and
admits severe depression. The psychiatrist acknowledges that TJ has depression but feels the
intense pain is valid and must be addressed. The psychiatrist also consults with TJ's husband
who wants to explain the effect of TJ's pain on him. He states that he is tired of coming home
and having to cook, clean and feed the children, that he has no social life or sex life. Because
the psychiatrist states the pain is real further treatment is a total joint replacement is
recommended. The total joint replacement fails to alleviate the pain and finally TJ is referred
to a chronic pain program learn to live with pain.
Case No 2
TJ is 33-year-old white female hit in left posterior jaw by a baseball while watching her son pitching in
a little league baseball game. Within 24 hours, she experienced an increasing headache with
pounding pain from the back of the neck to behind the eyes. She felt intense ear pain, jaw pain,
difficulty opening the jaw as well as nausea and vomiting. She was taken to a local emergency
room where a neurological exam was performed along with neck X-rays, and an MRI of the brain.
The preliminary diagnosis by the emergency room physician was migraine and whiplash and
possibly TMD. She was discharged wearing a neck collar and a prescription for naprosyn and
advice to see her primary care physician and her dentist.
Because of the severity of the jaw pain TJ consulted first with her dentist who then referred her to an
oral surgeon. Her chief complaint when presenting to the surgeon was severe jaw pain, headache,
neckache and limited ability to open the jaw. Because of a clinical impression of a left disc
displacement, the surgeon ordered an arthrotomogram that confirmed the disc displacement. The
surgeon then ordered an appliance, physical therapy, and gave her a prescription for Valium.
However, these treatments made her worse.
Because after 4 months of conservative treatment TJ was becoming impatient and irritable a new
repositioning appliance was made, but this too made her worse. Then, once again, in response to
TJ's desperation an arthroscopy which caused a major intensification of pain. At this point TJ's
spouse called the surgeon to say that TJ was becoming less able to care for their children and was
very depressed so as a last resort open joint surgery was performed.
Biopsychosocial model of disease
J. Okeson:
Bell’s Orofacial
Pain – The
clinical
management of
orofacial pain.
6th edition 2005.
P.521
2
Types of chronic pain:
Dental and non-dental origins
Conceptual model
Disease
Impairment/degenerative joint disease
Discomfort/Pain
Functional Limitation
Disability
Handicap
Locker, 1988 – adaptation of WHO model of
impairment, disability, and handicap
Health-related Quality of Life
Quality of life
Extrinsic factors
- Environment
- Society…
It is defined as an individual's perception of their
position in life in the context of the culture and value
Quality of Life
Intrinsic factors
- Personality
- Behavior …
systems in which they live and in relation to their goals,
expectations, standards and concerns.
It is a broad ranging concept affected in a complex way
by the person's physical health, psychological state,
level of independence, social relationships, and their
relationships to salient features of their environment."
Health-related QoL
Oral Health-related QoL
1.
Have you had trouble
pronouncing any words because
of problems with your teeth,
mouth or dentures?
VERY
OFTEN
FAIRLY
OFTEN
OCCASIONALLY
HARDLY
EVER
NEVER
DON’T
KNOW
2.
Have you felt that your sense of
taste has worsened because of
problems with your teeth, mouth
or dentures?
VERY
OFTEN
FAIRLY
OFTEN
OCCASIONALLY
HARDLY
EVER
NEVER
DON’T
KNOW
3.
Have you had painful aching in
your mouth?
VERY
OFTEN
FAIRLY
OFTEN
OCCASIONALLY
HARDLY
EVER
NEVER
DON’T
KNOW
4.
Have you found it uncomfortable
to eat any foods because of
problems with your teeth, mouth
or dentures?
VERY
OFTEN
FAIRLY
OFTEN
OCCASIONALLY
HARDLY
EVER
NEVER
DON’T
KNOW
5.
Have you been self conscious
because of your teeth, mouth or
dentures?
VERY
OFTEN
FAIRLY
OFTEN
OCCASIONALLY
HARDLY
EVER
NEVER
DON’T
KNOW
6.
Have you felt tense because of
problems with your teeth, mouth
or dentures?
VERY
OFTEN
FAIRLY
OFTEN
OCCASIONALLY
HARDLY
EVER
NEVER
DON’T
KNOW
7.
Has your diet been unsatisfactory
because of problems with your
teeth, mouth or dentures?
VERY
OFTEN
FAIRLY
OFTEN
OCCASIONALLY
HARDLY
EVER
NEVER
DON’T
KNOW
8.
Have you had to interrupt meals
because of problems with your
teeth, mouth or dentures?
VERY
OFTEN
FAIRLY
OFTEN
OCCASIONALLY
HARDLY
EVER
NEVER
DON’T
KNOW
9.
Have you found it difficult to relax
because of problems with your
teeth, mouth or dentures?
VERY
OFTEN
FAIRLY
OFTEN
OCCASIONALLY
HARDLY
EVER
NEVER
DON’T
KNOW
Have you been a bit embarrassed
because of problems with your
teeth, mouth or dentures?
VERY
OFTEN
FAIRLY
OFTEN
OCCASIONALLY
HARDLY
EVER
NEVER
DON’T
KNOW
10.
Oral Health Impact Profile
(WHOQOL 1993)
Examination of the
Chronic Pain Patient
Diagnosis and classification of the patient in
two dimensions
1. Physical findings
2. Psychosocial findings (assessment of
TMD-pain and related parafunctional
behaviors, psychological distress and
psychosocial dysfunction)
3
Dimensions of TMD assessment –
interplay between structure and pain
Example: Temporomandibular Disorders
Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular
Disorders
Axis II:
Pain-Related
Disability and
Psychological
Status
The RDC/TMD clinical examination involves clinical
assessment of the following TMD signs and symptoms:
• Pain site
• Mandibular range of motion and associated pain
• TMJ sounds during all jaw excursions
• TMJ imaging as required
Axis I: Clinical TMD Conditions
(physical diagnoses)
Clinical findings from this examination yield algorithm
diagnoses of the most common forms of TMD, including
multiple diagnoses, which are allowed.
Axis I assessment
Current TMD classification using Research
Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular
Disorders (Dworkin and LeResche, 1992)
Axis I: Clinical TMD
Conditions (physical
diagnoses)
Structural diagnoses
Disc
displacement
Osteoarthrosis
Pain diagnoses
Muscle
pain
Axis II: Pain-Related
Disability and
Psychological Status
Depression
Somatization
Joint
pain
Jaw disability
http://symptomre
search.nih.gov/ch
apter_22/sec7/csd
s7pg4.htm
Graded
Chronic Pain
Axis I assessment
Axis I assessment
Pan
4
Axis I assessment
Pan - Arthritis
Axis I assessment
Tomography - Arthritis
Axis I assessment
MRI
Axis I assessment
Example: Temporomandibular Disorders
The RDC/TMD system groups the most common forms of TMD into
three diagnostic categories and allows multiple diagnoses to be made for a
given patient. The RDC/TMD diagnostic groups are:
Group I. Muscle Disorders
• Myofascial pain
• Myofascial pain with limited opening
Group II. Disc Displacements
• Disc Displacement with reduction
• Disc Displacement without reduction, with limited opening
• Disc Displacement without reduction, without limited opening.
Group III. Arthralgia, Arthritis, Arthrosis
• Arthralgia
• Osteoarthritis of the TMJ
• Osteoarthrosis of the TMJ
Orofacial Pain
classification:
J. Okeson: Bell’s
Orofacial Pain –
The clinical
management of
orofacial pain. 6th
edition 2005.
P.133
5
Current TMD classification using Research
Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular
Disorders (Dworkin and LeResche, 1992)
Axis I: Clinical TMD
Conditions (physical
diagnoses)
Structural diagnoses
Disc
displacement
Osteoarthrosis
Pain diagnoses
Muscle
pain
Axis II: Pain-Related
Disability and
Psychological Status
Depression
Jaw disability
Graded
Chronic Pain
Axis II assessment
Graded Chronic Pain Status
Axis II assessment
Jaw disability
• Demographics
• Self-reported pain characteristics
• Parafunctional jaw behaviors (i.e. maladaptive use of jaw
muscles such as clenching or grinding the teeth)
• Psychological status, including depression and
somatization
Somatization
Joint
pain
RDC/TMD Axis II Assessment
(Psychosocial Assessment)
• Psychosocial functioning reflecting the severity and impact
of TMD on interference with usual functioning at home,
work, or school and incorporating disability days (loss of
work days) due to TMD pain, assessed through the Graded
Chronic Pain Scale.
Axis II assessment
Graded Chronic Pain Status
Axis II assessment
Assessment of depression
6
Treatment of Common Chronic Pain
Disorders
J. Okeson: Bell’s
Orofacial Pain –
The clinical
management of
orofacial pain. 6th
edition 2005.
P.534s
• Medication
• Physical therapy + splint treatment (for
TMD)
• Psychosocial intervention & behavioral
therapy
Stabilization splint
Stabilization splint
Stabilization splint
Stabilization splint
7
Systematic review: Stabilization splints
Kreiner et al.: Occlusal stabilization appliances.
Evidence of their efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc.
132:770-7 (2001).
Aim: Whether the evidence is sufficient to judge
occlusal appliances as being efficacious for the
management of localized masticatory myalgia,
arthralgia or both.
Methods: 4 placebo-controlled studies, several
randomized wait-list controlled studies and several
random-assignment treatment-comparison studies.
Conclusion: Considering all of the available data (pro
and con), the authors conclude that the use of
occlusal appliances in managing localized
masticatory myalgia, arthralgia or both is sufficiently
supported by evidence in the literature.
Review: Physical therapy
Feine et al: Physical therapy: a critique. Oral Surg Oral Med
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:123-7.
Some forms of physical therapy are used relatively frequently
in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain
conditions, including the temporomandibular disorders.
We found evidence that ...most patients being treated for
most chronic musculoskeletal pain seem to do better with
most forms of therapy. However, ...there is little evidence
that these methods of management cause long-lasting
reductions in signs and symptoms ...although evidence is
beginning to accumulate that exercise programs designed
to improve physical fitness have beneficial effects on
chronic pain and disability of the musculoskeletal system.
Systematic review: Pharmacologic interventions
List et al: Pharmacologic interventions in the treatment of temporomandibular
disorders, atypical facial pain, and burning mouth syndrome. A qualitative
systematic review. J Orofac Pain 17:301-10 (2003)
(David A Conn: Assessment of acute and
chronic pain. Anaesthesia & intensive care medicine. 2005 )
Psychological and behavioral
interventions
Dworkin et al: A randomized clinical trial of a tailored comprehensive
care treatment program for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac
Pain. 2002;16:259-76.
Dworkin et al: A randomized clinical trial using research diagnostic
criteria for temporomandibular disorders-axis II to target clinic cases
for a tailored self-care TMD treatment program. J Orofac Pain.
2002;16:48-63.
Turk et al: Dysfunctional patients with temporomandibular disorders:
evaluating the efficacy of a tailored treatment protocol. J Consult Clin
Psychol. 1996;64:139-46.
Rudy et al: Differential treatment responses of TMD patients as a function
of psychological characteristics. Pain. 1995;61:103-12.
Turk et al: Effects of intraoral appliance and biofeedback/stress
management alone and in combination in treating pain and depression
in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent.
199370:158-64.
AIMS: SR to assess the pain-relieving effect and safety of
pharmacologic interventions in the treatment of chronic TMD,
including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as well as atypical facial pain
(AFP), and BMS.
METHODS: RCTs
RESULTS: 11 studies: amitriptyline was effective in 1 study and
benzodiazepine in 2 studies; the effect in 1 of the benzodiazepine
studies was improved when ibuprofen was also given. One study
showed that intra-articular injection with glucocorticoidrelieved the
pain of RA of the TMJ. In 1 study, a combination of paracetamol,
codeine, and doxylamine was effective in reducing TMD pain. No
effective pharmacologic treatment was found for BMS. Only minor
adverse effects werereported in the studies.
CONCLUSION: The common use of analgesics in TMD, AFP, and
BMS is not supported by scientific evidence.
Take home message for pain assessment
Axis II:
Pain-Related
Disability and
Psychological
Status
Axis I: Clinical Conditions
(physical diagnoses)
8